Download MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING
FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION ON
ROUTING PROTOCOL ANALYSIS FOR SCALABLE VIDEO CODING TRANSMISSION
OVER MOBILE AD-HOC NETWORKS
PRAJWAL S SANKET
1000980854
MANET PROTOCOLS
Routing
Protocols
Reactive
DSR
Proactive
AODV
OLSR
Hybrid
DSDV
Figure 1: MANET PROTOCOLS[8]
TORA
ACRONYMS
• AODMV: ad-hoc on demand multipath distance vector routing.
• CH: Cluster head
• CGS: Coarse grain quality scalability
• DSR: Dynamic source routing
• DSDV: Destination Sequenced DV
• GOP: group of pictures
• IP: Internet Protocol
• JVT: Joint Video Team
• ISP: Intelligent signal Processing
ACRONYMS
• LAR: location aided routing
• LAN: Local Area Network
• MANET: Mobile Ad-hoc network
• MPEG: Moving Pictures Expert group.
• MGS: Medium-Grain quality scalability
• MAC: Media Access Control Layer
ACRONYMS
• NAL: Network Abstraction Layer
• OLSR: Optimized link state routing
• PDR: Packet delivery ratio
• QOS: Quality of service
• RREQ: Route request Message
• RREP: Route replay
• SVC: scalable video coding
• SVEF: scalable video evaluation Framework.
ACRONYMS
• SNR: Signal to noise Ratio
• TCP: transmission control Protocol
• TORA: Temporally ordered routing algorithm
• TDMA: Time Division Multiple Access
• UDP: User datagram protocol
• VCL: Video Coding Layer
• WLAN: Wireless Local Area Network
PROTOCOLS OVERVIEW
• DSDV: Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing protocol(DSDV).
Every mobile node in the network maintains a routing table in which all of
the possible destinations within the network and the number of hops to
each destination is recorded.
• AODV: Ad-hoc on demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV). This is a on
demand routing protocol. The source node does not maintain a routing
table. It initiates “path discovery” by sending RREQ packets.
• DSR: The DSR is on-demand routing protocol, where route is calculated
only when it is required. It is designed to use in multi-hop ad-hoc networks
• AOMDV: AOMDV had many characteristics like AODV. The main difference
lies in the number of routes found in each route discovery
PROJECT OVERVIEW
• STEP 1: Encode the Raw YUV video( 352 x 288 ) using JSVM [13]
Encoder.
STEP 2: NALU TRACE FILE
STEP 3:USE SVEF TO GENERATE F-N STAMP
STEP 4: PREPARE TCL SCRIPT FOR NETWORK
SIMULATION
STEP 7:SIMULATE TCL SCRIPT
STEP 8 : RECEIVE A TRACE FILE FROM
NETWORK SIMULATOR
RESULTS
PACKET END TOEND DELAY FOR IEEE 802.11
RESULTS
PACKET END TOEND DELAY FOR IEEE 802.11E
PSNR PLOT FOR DSDV
PSNR PLOT FOR AOMDV
COMPARISON OF PSNR VALUES
PROTOCOL
IEEE 802.11 PSNR (dB)
IEEE 802.11E PSNR (dB)
DSDV
18.37
32.74
AODV
21.08
30.15
DSR
19.25
31.23
AODMV
16.96
33.35
IEEE 802.11E PSNR COMPARISON
IEEE 802.11E PSNR (dB)
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
DSDV
AODV
DSR
AODMV
IEEE 802.11 PSNR COMPARISON
IEEE 802.11 PSNR (dB)
25
20
15
10
5
0
DSDV
AODV
DSR
AODMV
COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE BETWEEN
THE NETWORKS
IEEE 802.11
51.44%
IEEE 802.11e
9.22%
FRAME #143
FRAME #144
FRAME #145
FUTURE WORK
• This project can be implemented on HEVC standard and different
physical IEEE specifications.
REFERENCES
• [1]X. Lu, G.R. Martin, and X. Jin, "Performance comparison of the SVC,WSVC, and Motion JPEG 2000 Advanced Scalable Video
coding schemes," in intelligent signal processing conference (ISP 2013), vol. 8, London, pp. 1-6,Dec 2013
• [2]Wireless Networking. Study of IEEE 802.11 Specification. [Online].
http://www30.homepage.villanova.edu/phani.neelakantham/Comm%20Nets/Wireless%20Networking%20802.11.htm
• [3]Difference between Ad-hoc and infrastructure modes. [Online]. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-adhoc-and-infrastructure-modes.htm
• [4]C.H. Ke, "myEvalSVC: An Integrated simulation Framework for Evaluation of H.264/svc Transmission," in KSII Transactions on
Internet and information systems, vol. 6, NO.1, pp. 379-394,Jan 2012.
• [5]C.H. Ke. (2014) How to do H.264 SVC transmission simulations. This website explains the simulation steps for SVEF Evaluation
Frame Work. [Online]. http://csie.nqu.edu.tw/smallko/ns2/svc.htm
• [6]SVEF Framework: scalable video evaluation Framework. SVEF is a mixed online/offline open-source framework devised to
evaluate the performance of H.264 SVC video streaming. It is written in C and Python and released under the GNU General Public
License. [Online]. http://svef.netgroup.uniroma2.it/
• [7]Image Processing SVC Extension of H.264/AVC. This gives overview of different SVC Methods. [Online].
http://www.hhi.fraunhofer.de/de/kompetenzfelder/image-processing/research-groups/image-video-coding/svc-extension-ofh264avc.html
• [8]Tutorial for network simulator. This Explains about working of network simulator. [Online].
http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/tutorial/
REFERENCES
• [9]U. Iraide et al., "A Tutorial on H.264/SVC Scalable Video Coding and its Tradeoff between Quality,
Coding Efficiency and Performance," in Recent Advances in video coding, Javier Del Ser, Ed.: Intech, July
2011, ch. 1, pp. 1-26. [Online]. http://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advances-on-video-coding
• [10]JSVM software. [Online]. https://sites.google.com/site/kalveinrantelobo/csvc/what-is-jsvm-andhow-to-using
• [11]H. Yang and X. Jing, "Adaptive scalable Video coding for Wireless Networks," in IEEE Paper on
Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless communication, vol. 4, Chengdu,
pp. 496-499, Oct 2013.
• [12]E. Toh, C. Keong and M. Rover, "A review of current Routing protocols for Ad-hoc Mobile Wireless
Networks," in IEEE Transaction on Personal communication, vol. 6, California, , pp. 46-55, April 1999.
• [13]Implementation of IEEE 802.11e using NS Simulator.. [Online].
http://www.telematica.polito.it/oldsite/casetti/802.11e/
• [14]O.B Rhaiem and L.C. Fourati, "Routing Protocols Performance analysis for scalable video
coding(SVC) transmission over mobile ad-hoc networks," in IEEE Transaction on signal and image
Processing applications, vol. 3, Melaka, pp. 197-202, Oct 2013.
REFERENCES
• [15]N.I. Sarkar and R. McHaney, "Modulation and simulation of IEEE 802.11WLAN: A case study of A Network Simulator,"
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
in AUT Transactions on Computer and information science, vol. 3, New Zealand, pp. 340-346, September 2005.
[16]JSVM Software Manual. [Online]. ube.ege.edu.tr/~boztok/JSVM/SoftwareManual.pdf
[17]H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, and T. Wiegand, "Overview of the scalable Video Technology," in IEEE Transactions. CSVT,
Special Issue on H.264/AVC , vol. 17, pp. 1103-1120, Sept 2007.
[18]A. Detti et al., "SVEF: an open source Experimental Evaluation Framework for H.264 Scalable Video Streaming," in IEEE
symposium on computers and communications, vol. 5, pp. 36-41, July 2009.
[19]A. Puri, L. Yan, and B.G. Haskell, "Temporal resolution scalable video coding," in IEEE International Conference on
Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 947-951, Nov 1994.
[20]IEEE Wireless Standards Fast Reference. [Online]. http://searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/definition/IEEE-802Wireless-Standards-Fast-Reference
[21]T. Weigand et al, "Overview of H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard," in IEEE Transactions. CSVT, Special Issue on
H.264/AVC, vol. 13, pp. 560-576,July 2003.
[22]M.M. Hannuksela, T. Wiegand and T. Stockhammer, "H.264/AVC in wireless environments," in IEEE Transactions. CSVT,
vol. 13, , pp. 657–673,July 2003.
[23]S. Wenger, "H.264/AVC over IP," in IEEE CSVT, vol. 13, pp. 645–656, July 2003.
[24]I.E. Richardson. H.264 / MPEG-4 Part 10 White Paper. [Online]. www.vcodex.com
Related documents