Download Stool Softeners for the Prevention and Management of

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Health equity wikipedia , lookup

Patient safety wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Rhetoric of health and medicine wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
July 2014
Stool Softeners for the Prevention and Management of Constipation:
A Review
Context
Methods
Although definitions of constipation vary, it is often
described as a reduced frequency of bowel
movements to fewer than three times per week or by
symptoms that include difficulty passing stools, hard
stools, abdominal cramping, and incomplete stool
passage. Constipation may be idiopathic, with no
known cause, or it can be caused by diet, medication,
or medical conditions. An estimated 2% to 27% of the
general population is affected by constipation, and
chronic constipation is much more common in the
elderly and in patients taking opioids.
A limited literature search was conducted of key
resources, and titles and abstracts of the retrieved
publications were reviewed. Full-text publications
were evaluated for final article selection according to
predetermined selection criteria (population,
intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study
designs).
Technology
Current treatment options for constipation include
dietary or bulking agents (i.e., psyllium seed husk),
osmotic laxatives (i.e., lactulose, sorbitol,
polyethylene glycol [PEG]), stimulant laxatives (i.e.,
sennosides, bisacodyl, sodium picosulfate), and stool
softeners (i.e., docusate sodium or docusate calcium).
In North America, a stool softener and a stimulant
laxative are commonly used in bowel treatment
protocols for institutionalized elderly and oncology
patients.
Issue
Given how frequently stool softeners are prescribed
in everyday clinical practice and despite the low cost
of these medications, a review of the clinical
effectiveness of docusate will help to inform decisions
about the prevention and management of
constipation.
Key Messages
For the prevention and management of
constipation:
 There is little evidence to support the use of
docusate in hospitalized patients or long-term
care residents.
 Docusate does not increase stool frequency or
soften stools compared with placebo.
 Docusate does not improve the symptoms of
constipation.
 Docusate does not improve the difficulties or
completeness of stool evacuation in patients
taking opioids.
Results
The literature search identified 367 citations, 15 of
which were deemed potentially relevant. An
additional 3 articles were retrieved from other
sources. Of these 18 studies, 5 met the criteria
for inclusion in this review: 2 systematic reviews,
1 randomized controlled trial, and 2 non-randomized
studies.
DISCLAIMER: The information in this Report in Brief is intended to help health care decision-makers, patients, health care professionals, health
systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. The information in
this Report in Brief should not be used as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or
other professional judgment in any decision-making process nor is it intended to replace professional medical advice. While CADTH has taken
care in the preparation of the Report in Brief to ensure that its contents are accurate, complete, and up-to-date, CADTH does not make any
guarantee to that effect. CADTH is not responsible for any errors or omissions or injury, loss, or damage arising from or as a result of the use (or
misuse) of any information contained in or implied by the information in this Report in Brief.
CADTH takes sole responsibility for the final form and content of this Report in Brief. The statements, conclusions, and views expressed herein do
not necessarily represent the view of Health Canada or any provincial or territorial government. Production of this Report in Brief is made
possible through a financial contribution from Health Canada.
RC0561