Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
EECS 40 Fall 2002 Copyright Regents of University of California S. Ross and W. G. Oldham LECTURE 14 Today: • Summary of Linear and Nonlinear Rules • Load-line graphical method for circuits with nonlinear elements • Three terminal devices, solution methods and power • Unsolicited Advice: Make learning your priority 1 EECS 40 Fall 2002 Copyright Regents of University of California S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Art, Michelle and Rob (Be Like Michelle) Reduce or eliminate: • Over-focusing on policy and grades – Better off devoting energy towards understanding • Perfectionism – Don’t expect perfection of yourself or your instructors • Competition – Cooperation, helping others benefits you too Big don’ts for success at school and at work 2 EECS 40 Fall 2002 S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Copyright Regents of University of California Circuit Laws and Tricks Linear Circuits: Nonlinear Circuits: • KCL, KVL • KCL, KVL • Nodal Analysis • Nodal Analysis • Thévenin and Norton equivalents Special Graphical Technique for Circuits containing linear and nonlinear elements (Load-line Method): • Combine all linear parts into a simple Thévenin equivalent Circuit attached to the nonlinear element. • Plot the I-V Characteristics of NLE and Thévenin circuit on same axes, recognizing the intersection as the solution. 3 EECS 40 Fall 2002 S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Copyright Regents of University of California Example of Load-Line Method We have a circuit containing a two-terminal non-linear element “NLE”, and some linear components. First replace the entire linear part of the circuit by its Thevenin equivalent. Then define I and V at the NLE terminals (typically associated signs) D Nonlinear 9mA element S D 250K 1M + - 1V N L E ID + VDS + 200K 2V S - 4 EECS 40 Fall 2002 S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Copyright Regents of University of California Example of Load-Line method (con’t) Given the graphical properties of two terminal non-linear circuit (i.e. the graph of a two terminal device) And have this connected to a linear (Thévenin) circuit D N L E Whose I-V can also be graphed on the same axes (“load line”) + VDS + 200K 2V S - Application of KCL, KVL gives circuit solution ID (mA) D ID N L E 10 The solution ! 200K S ID + - 2V 1 2 VDS (V) 5 EECS 40 Fall 2002 S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Copyright Regents of University of California Load-Line method The method is graphical, and therefore approximate But if we use equations instead of graphs, it could be accurate It can also be use to find solutions to circuits with three terminal nonlinear devices (like transistors) Application of KCL, KVL gives circuit solution ID (mA) D ID 10 The solution ! 200K S + - 2V 1 2 VDS (V) 6 EECS 40 Fall 2002 Copyright Regents of University of California S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Three-Terminal Devices ID G 3-Terminal Device D S With three terminals we have four independent variables (two voltages and two currents) We can set one variable at each terminal and the I-V behavior of the device will determine the value of the two unknowns. For example apply a VGS and VDS, then measure IG and ID. Similarly we could apply a fixed VGS and IG and plot the two-terminal characteristic ID versus VDS. 7 EECS 40 Fall 2002 S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Copyright Regents of University of California Three-Terminal Parametric Graphs ID 3-Terminal Device G VGS ID (mA) D 10 + - VGS = 3 VGS = 2 VGS = 1 S Concept of 3-Terminal Parametric Graphs: 1 2 VDS (V) We set a voltage (or current) at one set of terminals (here we will apply a fixed VGS, IG=0) and conceptually draw a box around the device with only two terminals emerging so we can again plot the two-terminal characteristic (here ID versus VDS). But we can do this for a variety of values of VGS with the result that we get a family of curves. 8 EECS 40 Fall 2002 S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Copyright Regents of University of California Graphical Solutions for 3-Terminal Devices ID G V S + - + - ID (mA) D 200K 10 VGS = 3 2V VGS = 2 VGS = 1 We can only find a solution for one input (VGS) at at time: First select VGS (e.g. 2V) and draw ID vs VDS for the 3-Terminal device. Now draw ID vs VDS for the 2V 200KW Thevenin source. ID (mA) 1 10 VDS (V) 2 The solution ! The only point on the I vs V plane which obeys KCL and KVL is ID = 5mA at VDS = 1V. 1 2 VDS (V) 9 EECS 40 Fall 2002 Copyright Regents of University of California S. Ross and W. G. Oldham Three-Terminal Devices – Power Flow IG G ID 3-Terminal Device D S With three terminals we have two independent measures of power (e.g. one at GS and one at DS). We can set any two variables and the I-V behavior of the device will determine the value of the other two. Defining all currents as inward, the power dissipated is simply the algebraic sum of VGS IG and VDS ID, i. e., P (in) = VGS IG + VDS ID . See the textbook, p. 117 for more generality. 10