Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Duration of Combined Orthodontic‐Orthognathic Treatment A. C. Dunbar, G. T. McIntyre, S. Laverick. Dundee Dental Hospital and Ninewells Hospital, Dundee Background •Date of start of Orthodontic treatment (T0) •Last appliance activation prior to surgery (T1) •Date of surgery (T2) •Start of post-surgical orthodontic treatment (T3) •Removal of the appliance (T4) Patients requiring orthognathic surgery (Fig.1) combined with orthodontics represent a significant portion (7%) of the cases treated by Consultant Orthodontists in the UK1. A number of studies have shown that patients value thorough communication and information about treatment prior to commencing orthodontic-orthognathic treatment2-4. If this is not done adequately patient satisfaction can be reduced, patients can feel depressed and consent may not be valid5. •A Wilcoxon two sample test found that the total treatment time for patients presenting with a class II malocclusion was statistically significantly longer than that for patients presenting with a class III malocclusion (P<0.05). Discussion •All patients have an appointment on the multidisciplinary clinic to determine their readiness for surgery. It may be more appropriate to schedule this earlier. This may help reduce the delay (2.5 months on average) from the end of pre-surgical orthodontic treatment to the surgery itself. •Results show that class II patients ’ total treatment duration is statistically significantly longer than class III patients. This reflects the longer treatment time required to decompensate class II patients. •Although not statistically significant; the mean duration for extraction cases was less than non-extraction cases. It was anticipated that extraction cases take longer due to the need for space closure; however decompensation may be easier if extractions are carried out. These data were entered into Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, California) and the mean durations of the different treatment stages were calculated. This was done with the assumption that each month has 30 days. Results •Age: mean age at beginning of treatment was 23.0; 24.9 at surgery •Gender: 32 male; 66 female Figures 2 and 3 illustrate malocclusions and procedures Malocclusions I II III 8% 37% 55% Fig. 1 Aims To investigate: yPre-surgical treatment time yTime from end of pre-surgical orthodontics to surgery yTime from surgery to beginning of post-surgical orthodontics yPost-surgical orthodontic treatment time yTotal treatment time Fig. 2 Surgical Procedures Maxillary Bimaxillary 22% 54% 24% Conclusion •The mean duration of orthodonticorthognathic treatment in NHS Tayside is Fig. 3 •41% of patients completed treatment currently 34 months and only 41% of patients currently complete treatment within 30 months within 30 months. •Mean treatment duration 34.1 months •Patients presenting with a Class II Figure 4 shows the mean duration of malocclusion take longer to complete treatment than those presenting with a treatment stages Class III malocclusion. Treatment Stage Durations 40 •Patients are therefore not receiving appropriate information regarding the 34.1 35 likely duration of orthodontic-orthognathic treatment completion. 30 Duration (Months) Standard 90% of patients should have their entire combined orthodontic-surgical treatment completed within 30 months Process This retrospective audit assessed all 98 patients undergoing orthodonticorthognathic treatment at Dundee Dental Hospital and Perth Royal Infirmary where surgery was carried out at Ninewells Hospital (Dundee) between 1January 2006 to 31December 2010. The following information was gathered from casenotes: •Age at beginning of treatment and at surgery •Gender •Malocclusion •Surgical procedure •Extraction/non-extraction Mandibular Changes to Clinical Practice Patients should be booked on the multidisciplinary planning clinic 1 year after the start of pre-surgical orthodontic treatment for an anticipated surgical date to be determined. 25 References 24.5 1. 20 2. 15 10 7.6 5 4. 2.5 0.4 0 Start→Last Pre-surgery Duration (Months) 3. 24.5 Last Presurgery→ Surgery 2.5 Surgery→ Post-surgery Post-surgery Ortho→ End Ortho 0.4 7.6 Total treatment 34.1 Treatment Stage Fig. 4 5. Russel JI, Pearson AI, Bowden DEJ, Write J, O’Brien KDO. The consultant orthodontic service 1996 survey. Br Dent J 1999; 187:49–53. Kiyak HA, West RA, Hohl T, McNeill RW. The psychological impact of orthognathic surgery: A 9month follow-up. Am J Orthod 1982; 81: 404-412. Flanary CM, Barnwell Jr GM, Alexander JM. Patients perception of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 137–145. Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP, Feinmann C. Perceptions of outcome following orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34: 210–213. Jones JW. A medico-legal review of some current UK guidelines in orthodontics: a personal view. Br J Orthod 1999; 26: 307–324.