Download Some interesting geometric facts about eclipsing binaries (see if you

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cassiopeia (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Corona Borealis wikipedia , lookup

Ursa Minor wikipedia , lookup

Auriga (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Ursa Major wikipedia , lookup

Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Serpens wikipedia , lookup

IK Pegasi wikipedia , lookup

Star formation wikipedia , lookup

Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Hipparcos wikipedia , lookup

CoRoT wikipedia , lookup

R136a1 wikipedia , lookup

Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Lyra wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Some interesting geometric facts about eclipsing binaries (see if you can prove these):
The probability of a binary being properly oriented in space for us to observe it as an eclipsing system
becomes progressively smaller as the distance between the two stars increases. It turns out that no
visual binary nor astrometric binary has ever been seen to eclipse, that is, all known eclipsing binaries
are composite spectrum binaries. It is also true that the probability that a system will be seen as a
partially eclipsing system rather than a totally eclipsing system is greater if the two stars are about the
same size, rather than of widely different sizes. If two stars are exactly the same size, the probability
that they will be observed as a totally eclipsing system is virtually zero while if one star is much, much
larger than the other star, the probability they will be be seen as a partially eclipsing system rather than
a totally eclipsing system is virtually zero.