Download On compactness with respect to semi

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

3-manifold wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental group wikipedia , lookup

Grothendieck topology wikipedia , lookup

Covering space wikipedia , lookup

General topology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis
Carolinae
Maximilian Ganster; Dragan S. Janković; Ivan L. Reilly
On compactness with respect to semi-open sets
Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, Vol. 31 (1990), No. 1,
37--39
Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/106817
Terms of use:
© Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, 1990
Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy
of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use.
This paper has been digitized, optimized for electronic
delivery and stamped with digital signature within the
project DML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Library
http://project.dml.cz
Comment.Math.Univ.Carolinae 31,1(1990)37-39
37
On compactness with respect to semi-open sets
MAXIMILIAN GANSTER, DRAGAN S.JANKOVIC, IVAN L.REILLY
Dedicated to the memory of Zdenek Frolik
A bstract. This paper shows that semi-compactness of a topological space is equivalent to
hereditary compactness of a larger space, namely the associated space of a-open subsets.
This indicates the strength of the notion of semi-compactness.
Keywords: Compact, semi-open, cr-open, semi-compact, hereditarily compact, semi-Kcompact, semi-Lindelof, nowhere dense, cellular family, Luzin space
Classification: 54D30
1. Introduction.
Recently a strong form of compactness has been defined by requiring each cover
of the topological space in question by semi-open subsets to have a finite subcover,
[1]. A subset of a topological space is semi-open if it is contained in the closure
of its interior. In [6] it was shown that semi-compactness of a topological space is
equivalent to compactness of a much larger space, namely that having the collection
of all semi-open subsets of the given space as a subbase.
Let (X, r) be a topological space. We denote the closure and the interior of a
subset 5 of X by clxS and intxS respectively. A subset S of ( X , r ) is called semiopen [respectively regular closed, a-open] in ( X , r ) if S C clx(intxS) [respectively
S = clx(intxS),S
C intx(clx(intxS))].
Clearly every open set is a-open, and
a-open sets and regular closed sets are semi-open. A subset S of (X, r) is called
nowhere dense, abbreviated nwd., if intx(clxS) = <f>. Njastad [5] has shown that
the collection r a of all a-open sets in ( X , r ) is a topology on X larger than r.
Moreover, V £ r ° if and only if V = U — N where U € r and N is nwd. in (X, r).
Hence nwd. subsets of ( X , r ) are closed and discrete in (X, ra).
Let A and B be famiUes of subsets of X. We say that B refines A if each member
of B is contained in some member of A. Following Hodel [3], we call a pairwise
disjoint collection of non-empty open sets in (X, r) a cellular family. A simple
application of Zorn's lemma yields the foUowing.
Lemma 1.1. Let S be a family of semi-open subsets of X, r. Then there exists a
cellular family Q such that Q refines S and U{G : G € Q] is dense in U{5 : S € S}.
Finally, the cardinaUty of a set X is denoted by |X|. A cardinal number is the
set of all ordinals which precede it. In this paper, K will always denote an infinite
cardinal number.
In this paper we indicate the strength of the semi-compactness property by showing that (X, r) is semi-compact if and only if ( X , r ° ) is hereditarily compact. We
38
M.Gmister, D.S.Jankovic, I.L.Reilly
prefer to present our results for a general cardinal K, rather than for the special case
K = u;, so that we obtain corresponding results for the Lindelof case, for example,
at the same time. An example is provided to show that the role of the topology r a
of a-open subsets is crucial.
2. Semi-K -compact spaces.
Definition 2.1. A space (X, r ) is called /c-compact [respectively semi-/c-compact]
if every open cover [respectively semi-open cover] of (X, r ) admits a subcover of
cardinality < K.
, Hence u;-compact = compact, u>i - compact = Lindelof, semi-u>-compact = semicompact [1] and semi-wi-compact = semi-Lindelof [2], Let us observe that, for
every /c, any set X with the cofinite topology is semi-/c-compact.
The following result is part of our main theorem.
Proposition 2.2. I e t ( X , r ) be semi-K-compact. Then
i) every nwd. subset of (X,T) has cardinality < K.
ii) every cellular family in (X, r) has cardinality < K.
PROOF : Let N be nwd. in (X, r ) . Then N is closed and discrete in (X, r ° ) . Since
( X , r a ) is clearly /c-compact we have \N\< K.
Now let Q = {Gi: i € I} be a cellular family in (X, r ) and suppose that |I| = K.
Then we may write I = \J{Ip : 0 < K} where |I^| = K for each f$ < K and
Ip fl I7 = ^ whenever 0^7Let G = U{G» : i € I} and for each 0 < K let
Vfi = U{Gi : i 6 I^}. If A = clxG - G then A is nwd. and consequently | A | < K.
Let A* = {x € A : 30 < K such that x € clxV$x }• For each x 6 A* pick 0X < K
such that x € clxVpx. Since |A*| < K there exists 7 € K - {ftx : x € A*} and thus
we have cixG = clx(U{Gi : i g I7) U F 7 . Now, {X - clxG} U {c/ x (U{Gi : i f|
I-r})} u {^i : i € I7} is a semi-open cover of (X, r ) having no subcover of cardinality
< K. Hence ii) is proved.
•
T h e o r e m 2.3. For a space (X, r) the following are equivalent:
1) (X,T) is semi-K-compact
2) Every nwd. subset of (X, r) has cardinality < K and every cellular family in
( X , r ) has cardinality < K.
3) (X, Ttt) is hereditarily K-compact.
PROOF:
1) -=> 2): This is Proposition 2.2.
2) => 3): By an analogous result to Theorem 1 of [7], we have to show that
each W € Ta is a K-compact subset of (X, r ° ) . So let W be an a-open
cover of W € r a . By Lemma 1.1 there exists a cellular family Q in ( X , r )
which refines W and whose union is dense in W. By assumption, \Q\ < K.
If A = W - U{0 : < ? € ( ? } then 4 is nwd. in ( X , r ) and hence | A | < K. For
each (? € Q pick Vb € W such that G C VG. Then W = U{VG : G € Q} U 4
proving that W is K-compact in ( X , r t t ) .
3) •=» 1): Since (X, r ° ) is /c-compact, every nwd. subset of (X, r ) has cardinality
< K. Let {Si :€ I} be a semi-open cover of (X, r ) . For each i € I there exists
On compactness with respect to semi-open sets
39
Vt € r such that Vt C 5, C clx(Vi). I f V = U{Vt : t € I} then V is dense
and open in (K, T) and thus \X — V\ < K. By assumption there exists Io C I
whit |Io| < K and V = U{Vt : i € Io}. Hence X = U{St : i € Io} U (X - V)
showing that (K, r) is semi-K-compact.
Corollary 2.4. A space (Xr) is semi-compact if and only if(X,Ta)
compact.
is hereditarily
Corollary 2.5. (see also [2]). For a space ( K , r ) the following are equivalent:
1) ( K , r ) is semi-Lindelof
2) ( K , r a ) is hereditarily Lindelof
3) ( K , r ) satisfies the countable chain condition and every nwd. subset of(X, r )
is at most countable.
Hence, if (K, r ) is an uncountable Hausdorff space then (X, r ) is semi-Lindelof if
and only if (X, r ) is a Luzin space in the sense of Kunen [4].
3. A n example.
In this example we point out that in our Theorem 2.3 the condition u(X,Ta)
is hereditarily ^-compact" is essential In particular ( X , r a ) cannot be replaced by
(X,r). We show that for each K there exists a hereditarily /c-compact T\ space
(X, r) which is not semi-Ac-compact.
Let X be a set with \X\ = K and let X = Xx U X2 with IX-J = |X 2 | = « and
X\ f)X2 = <f>. Define a topology r on X in the following way: a basic neighbourhood
V of x € Xi is of the form V = Ux U £/2 where for i = 1,2,17, C X t , |X t - /J t | < K
and x € Cli. A basic neighbourhood V of a: G X2 is a subset of X 2 containing x
such that |Ki
-V2\<K.
Then ( K , r ) is a hereditarily ^-compact T\ space. Since X\ is nwd. ( X , r ) and
IKi | = «, (X, r) fails to be semi-«-compact.
REFERENCES
[l] C.Dorsett, Semi compactness, semi separation axioms, and product spaces, Bull. Malaysian
Math.Soc. 4 (2) (1981), 21-28.
[2] M.Ganster, On covering properties and generalized open sets in topological spaces, to appear.
[3] R.Hodel, Cardinal functions I, in Handbook of set-theoretic Topology, North Holland (1987).
[4] K.Kunen, Luxin spaces, Topology Proc. 1 (1976), 191-199.
[5] O.Njastad, On some classes of nearly open sets, Pacific J.Math 15 (1965), 961-970.
[6] I.L.Reilly, M.K.Vamanamurthy, On semi compact spaces, Bull. Malaysian Math.Soc. 7 (2)
(1984), 61-67.
[7] A.H.Stone, Hereditarily compact spaces, Amer. J.Math. 82 (1960), 900-916.
Department of Mathematics, Graz University of Technology, A-8010 Graz, Austria
Department of Mathematics, East Central University, Ada, Oklahoma, U.S.A 74820
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
(Received October 17,1989)