* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Business Cycles Analysis: A Model to Study the Fluctuations of
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Jacques Drèze wikipedia , lookup
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Okishio's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Refusal of work wikipedia , lookup
Business Cycles Analysis: A Model to Study the Fluctuations of Output Around the Steady State A simple multiplier-accelerator model Ct a a Y 0 1 t 1 0 a 1 1 (1) It b b Y Y 0 1 t 1 t 2 b 0 1 (2) Yt Ct It Gt PCAt Gt PCAt C 0 (3) Ct is consumption,Yt is output,It is investmentGt is government spending,PCAt is the current account balance. Substituting (1) and (2) in (3) we have Yt a a Y b b Y Y C 0 1 t 1 0 1 t 1 t 2 0 Yt a b a b Y b Y C 0 0 1 1Macroeconomic t 1 1 t 2Theme: 0 11 1 Steady State and Transitional Dynamics In the steady state: Yt Y t 1 a b Y 0 0 1 a 1 Y Y t 2 (4) We need to solve for a complementary (homogenous) solution to find the transitional dynamics Yt K t K t 1 2 Yt a b Y b Y 0 1 t 1 1 t 2 1 K t a b K t 1 b K t 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Iterating forward by two periods and dividing both sides by K1 t 2 a b t 1 b t 0 1 1 1 2 a b b 0 1 1 1 Macroeconomic Theme: 11 2 Solution for the Transition Path Two roots of this equation are: 2 a b a b 4b 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 2 2b 1 Three possible solutions exist for this problem 2 a b 4b 1 1 1 2 a b b. repeated root case if 1 1 4b1 2 a b c. complex root case 1 1 4b1 a. real and distinct root case if Complementary solution Yt K t K t still requires 11 2 2 K and K to make it definite. The initial values of 1 2 Y output to find the definite solution 0 and Y1 . values of Macroeconomic Theme: 11 3 A Numerical Example for Complementary Let a = 1.8 and b =1 Solution 1 1 2 a b a b 4b 1 1 1 1, 2 1 1 2b 1 1.8 1 1.8 1 4 1, 2 2.37,0.42 2 Yt K t K t Y K 2.37 t K 0.42t t 1 1 2 2 1 2 Using two initial conditions 0 0 Y K 2.37 K 0.42 K 2 Y0 K1 0 1 2 Y K 2.37 K 0.42 Y1 K1 2.37 Y0 K1 0.42 1 1 2 Y 0.42Y 1 0 K 1 1.85 Y 0.42Y 1.43Y Y K Y K 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 K 2 Y0 1.85 1.85 Macroeconomic Theme: 11 4 Complete Time Path for Income Complete solution includes both particular and complementary solutions 1.43Y Y Y 0.42Y t t 1 0 0 1 Yt Y 2.37 0.42 1.85 1.85 The first term shows the output in the steady state and the second part shows the transitional dynamics around that steady state. The time path of the variable also depends on the initial values of output. Macroeconomic Theme: 11 5 Real Business Cycle Model Impact of Productivity Shock in Labour Demand, Price and Money Supply Labour Supply a Real wage rate B Labour demand 1 Labour demand 2 Employment A negative productivity shock lowers labour demand from a to b. wage rate as well as labour supply declines. This causes a reduction in output. Prices rise, real money balance decrease. LM 2 LM1 r C d IS-curve FY2 FY2Theme: 11Output Macroeconomic Prices are perfectly flexible and economy is always in full employment. Full employment level of output changes as people keep changing their labour supply in response wage rates and productivity 6 Simple specification of RBC Model 1a A L a Y K Output t with 0 a 1 t t t Capital accumulation Kt 1 Kt (1 d ) It Kt (1 d ) Yt Ct Gt t 1 Wage rate is according to the marginal productivity of labour a K a wt ¶Y 1a Kta At Lt At 1a t At A L ¶L t t K Interest rate is paid according to the marginal product of capitals 1a A L 1 a rt ¶Y aKta 1 At L a t t K ¶K t Macroeconomic Theme: 11 5 7 Shocks to the technology and Government Expenditure ln At A gt t 0 where the term t represents shock to the technology. How is t determined ? It depends on its past values t t 1 vt t is a white noise disturbance mean-zero shock and 0 1 is an autocorrelation term less than one. All these things imply that the effect of technological shock disappears over time. Macroeconomic Theme: 11 8 Shocks to the Government Expenditure Similar to technological shock some RBC models includes shock due the government demand, which depends on exogenous government spendingG0 , growth rate of population (n) and the economy (g). Gt G n g t t 0 where t is a shock to government spending. It is determined by its past values: t t 1 vt Macroeconomic Theme: 11 9 Intertemporal Substitution and Labour-Leisure Choice Max U C1 , l1 , C 2 , l 2 ln C1 ln 1 LS 1 e ln C 2 ln 1 LS 2 C w LS C1 2 w1 LS1 2 2 1 r 1 r C w LS L ln C1 ln 1 LS1 e ln C 2 ln 1 LS 2 C1 2 w1 LS1 2 2 1 r 1 r ¶L w1 or ¶l1 1 LS1 w ¶L e 2 or ¶l 2 1 LS 2 1 r Eliminating w1 1 LS1 e 1 r w2 1 LS 2 1 LS1 w2 term in above equations we get 1 LS w1e 1 r 2 Macroeconomic Theme: 11 10 Procyclical, Anticyclical and Acyclical Variables: Leading and Lagging indicators Procyclical variables move along with the GDP. GDP components move together and Inflation Anticyclical variables move in the opposite direction of the GDP Unemployment rate Acyclical variables does not have any relation with GDP and amount of water under the Humber river. In order to identify which variables are pro, anti or a-cyclical RBC analysts use correlation coefficient between the GDP and concerned variable, X Macroeconomic Theme: 11 11 Use of Correlation Coefficient to determine lagging and leading indicators Y Y X X ; Y Y X X T y,x covYt , X t varYt varX t t t 0 t 2 t 2 t Variable is pro-cyclical if y, x 0 ; counter-cyclical if y , x 0 and acyclical if y , x 0 ; lagging procyclical if y , x leading procyclical if y t t 1 0; t 1 , xt 0 Macroeconomic Theme: 11 12 Reference Bhattarai and Jones (2000) Macroeconomic Fluctuations in the UK Economy”, Hull Economics Working Paper. Burda and Wyplosz (2002) Chapter 14. Barro, R. J. (1976), “Rational Expectations and the Role of Monetary Policy” Journal of Monetary Economics, 2 (January): 1-32 Burns, A and W. Michell, (1946), “Measuring Business Cycles” NBER, New York. Holly, Sean and Martin Weal (2000), (eds), “Econometric Modelling: Techniques and Application Cambridge University Press. Mankiw NG (1989) Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives- 3:3: 19-90. Prescott, E.C. (1986), “Theory Ahead of Business Cycle Measurement,” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review; Fall. Quah, D.T., (1995), “Business Cycle Empirics: Calibration and Estimation,” The Economic Journa 105 (November) 1594-1596 Romer D. (2002) Advanced Macroeconomics McGraw Hill. Macroeconomic Theme: 11 13