Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
bs_bs_banner Pain Medicine 2012; 13: 948–956 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Regional Anesthesia as Compared with General Anesthesia for Surgery in Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: Does It Decrease Morbidity, Mortality, and Health Care Costs? Results of a Single-Centered Study pme_1402 948..956 Linda Le-Wendling, MD,* Azra Bihorac, MD,† Tezcan Ozrazgat Baslanti, PhD,* Stephen Lucas, MD,* Kalia Sadasivan, MD,‡ Adam Wendling, MD,* H. James Heyman, MD,* and Andre Boezaart, MD, PhD§ Departments of *Anesthesiology, † Anesthesiology, Surgery, and Medicine, ‡ Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation and § Anesthesiology and Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA Reprint requests to: Linda Le-Wendling, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL 32610-0254, USA. Tel: 352-294-5076; Fax: 352-265-8013; E-mail: [email protected]. Disclosure: All authors have read and approved the manuscript. Dr. Boezaart is a consultant for Teleflex Medical and receives royalties for Arrow International for his invention of the “stimulating catheter.” Azra Bihorac (AB) was supported by Award Number K23GM087709 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. to July 2007) on morbidity, mortality and hospitalization costs. Methods. This retrospective cohort study involved data collection from electronic and paper charts of 308 patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture from September 2006 to December 2008. Data on postoperative morbidity, in-patient mortality, and cost of hospitalization (as estimated from data on hospital charges) were collected and analyzed. Seventy-three patients received regional anesthesia and 235 patients received general anesthesia. During July 2007, approximately halfway through the study period, a regional anesthesia and analgesia program was introduced. Results. The average cost of hospitalization in patients who received surgery for hip fracture was no different between patients who receive regional or general anesthesia ($16,789 + 631 vs $16,815 + 643, respectively, P = 0.9557). Delay in surgery and intensive care unit (ICU) admission resulted in significantly higher hospitalization costs. Age, male gender, African American race and ICU admission were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality and rates of readmission are not statistically different between the two anesthesia groups. Conclusions. There is no difference in postoperative morbidity, rates of rehospitalization, in-patient mortality or hospitalization costs in geriatric patients undergoing regional or general anesthesia for repair of hip fracture. Delay in surgery beyond 3 days and ICU admission both increase cost of hospitalization. Abstract Introduction. Hip fracture in geriatric patients has a substantial economic impact and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. At our institution, a regional anesthesia program was instituted for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. This retrospective cohort review examines the effects of regional anesthesia (from mainly after July 2007) vs general anesthesia (mainly prior 948 Key Words. Acute Pain; Aged; Analgesic; Anesthesiology; Elderly Introduction Hip fracture is a common, potentially devastating event for geriatric patients with approximately 1.6 million hip fractures occurring annually worldwide [1] and a projected 6.2 Regional Anesthesia for Geriatric Patients million hip fractures annually by the year 2050 [1]. In 2004 in the US alone, an estimated 387,000 patients older than 65 were hospitalized due to falls and about 37% of these patients sustained hip fractures [2]. The mean cost of hospitalization for patients with hip fractures was $18,638 with an average length of hospital stay of 7 days [2]. Hip fracture has consistently been found to be associated with a high morbidity and mortality [3–5] with reported mortality remaining stable in the last 40 years [6]. A higher mortality has been associated with increasing age and male gender [7,8]. At the University of Florida and Shands Hospital (UF&Shands), we have performed an increasing number of surgeries for geriatric patients with fragility hip fractures since the opening of our level I trauma center in 2005. Prior to July 2007, most surgeries for hip fractures were performed using general anesthesia. A shift in the involvement of the Acute Pain Medicine Service in July 2007 resulted in a change in intraoperative anesthetic management of geriatric, debilitated patients, which involved placement of single injection spinals, continuous spinal catheters, or epidural catheters for intraoperative anesthesia and femoral nerve blocks or lumbar paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia. We also introduced a specialized team of medical personnel dedicated to postoperative analgesia. Subsequently, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine patient characteristics, cost of hospitalization (estimated from charges of hospitalization), readmission rates, and in-hospital mortality for these patients. Our hypothesis was that the use of regional anesthesia would reduce pulmonary morbidity, and therefore reduce the need for critical care intervention postoperatively, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization. Methods Data Source Investigators received institutional review board approval and a waiver of informed consent prior to gathering and analyzing data. Patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures (percutaneous pinning, open reduction internal fixation, or bipolar arthroplasty) from September 2006 to December 2008 were identified using current procedure terminology codes. We arbitrarily chose this period of time for the equal number of months before and after institution of regional anesthesia for hip fracture repair, and to allow for up to at least 1 year follow-up after the last discharge date to assess 1 year mortality. The hospital’s decision support services analyst provided the authors with demographic data, charges for surgery and hospitalization, hospital characteristics, outcomes (e.g., in-hospital mortality, length of stay, number of intensive care unit (ICU) days, ICU charge, and discharge facility), and insurance status. Hospital charge data included physician fees, procedural charges, and equipment charges. Cost of hospitalization was estimated by applying the ratio of cost-to-charge for urban hospitals in the South Atlantic division (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2008 National Statistics) [9] to the amount charged for hospitalization. International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition (ICD-9) codes for up to 15 diagnoses and procedures are listed for each admission. We reviewed the perioperative anesthesia records and recorded type of intraoperative anesthesia (general vs regional) and postoperative analgesia (systemic opioids vs peripheral or neuraxial continuous nerve block). General anesthesia included the use of inhalational with or without intravenous agents for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. Regional anesthesia included the use of a neuraxial technique (single injection spinal, continuous spinal, or continuous epidural anesthesia) with or without the use of a continuous peripheral nerve block. Of note, patients with failed neuraxial blockade who subsequently underwent surgery using general anesthesia were included in the general anesthesia (GA) group for analysis. Patient Population All surgeries were performed at a single hospital in an academic setting. Patients were included in the retrospective review if their age was greater than or equal to 65 and if they sustained a low-impact hip fracture requiring surgical stabilization. We identified 319 patients who underwent a total of 324 surgeries for fragility hip fracture at UF&Shands between September 2006 and December 2008. Patients who subsequently had a second low-impact hip fracture requiring stabilization during the time period of the study who may or may not have the same type of intraoperative anesthetic (N = 5) were not included in the analysis. Patients with preexistent end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (N = 6) were not included in the analysis. Of the 308 patients included in the statistical analysis, 73 received regional anesthesia and 235 received general anesthesia intraoperatively. Outcomes We reviewed admission and discharge summaries from the hospital’s electronic records to acquire information about hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge and reason for readmission. Information regarding number of days of hospitalization, days from admission to surgical stabilization, ICU length of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, in-patient mortality, ICD-9 codes for admission diagnoses, condition and disposition at discharge, and discharge facility were provided by the hospital’s decision support services analyst. Statistical Analysis The primary outcomes of interest in this study were in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications, hospital length of stay, and total costs (as estimated from hospital charges). All categorical outcomes were adjusted using multiple logistic regression models that included age, race, gender, anesthesia type, day of admission (weekend 949 Le-Wendling et al. vs weekday), admitting service, surgery delay, length of stay, ICU admission, presence of cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, diabetes, and dementia. For continuous outcomes, we used linear regression models adjusted for the same factors as above. In addition, because this was an observational study, to adjust for the lack of randomization that could result in large differences on the observed and unobserved patient characteristics between the general anesthesia and regional anesthesia groups, we used a propensity scoring method to create an analysis that resembled what would occur if the anesthesia had been randomly assigned. This method allowed us to reduce the bias that would result due to the lack of randomization of subjects into anesthesia groups to properly estimate the effect of anesthesia type on length of stay and hospital charges. A propensity score, which is the probability of the patient being assigned to general anesthesia rather than regional anesthesia conditional on the patient’s demographic characteristics and comorbidities, was calculated for each patient using the logistic regression. The propensity score weights, which are the inverse of the propensity scores, were calculated and used in the analyses as weight [10]. Propensity score-weighted linear regression models were fitted to compare the effect of anesthesia type on the cost of hospitalization and length of stay. Least squares means were compared for the propensity score adjusted and the unadjusted multiple regression models. Linear regressions were performed using untransformed Table 1 groups costs because mean estimates obtained were similar to those of alternative approaches that better account for skewed data. The coefficient of determination, R2, was calculated as an indicator of the proportion of variability explained by each model. Length of stay and hospital charges were compared among subgroups with analysis of variance and Kruskal–Wallis test, then modeled in linear regressions. For univariate analysis of categorical variables, we used Pearson c2 analyses or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. The goodness of fit of the logistic regression models was assessed with the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and c-statistics evaluated the discriminatory capability of the models. All significance tests were two-sided, with an a of 0.05, which we considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS (v.9.2, Cary, NC). Results We enrolled a total of 323 patients who underwent hip fracture surgery for fragility hip fracture of whom 308 were eventually submitted to the analysis. Univariate analysis comparing patient characteristics between the GA and regional anesthesia (RA) group are presented in Table 1. Proportions of in-hospital mortality, nursing home discharge, and rehospitalization and median length of stay, and estimated cost of hospitalization among subgroups that are determined by baseline demographics and clinical Comparison of demographics and comorbidities of patients in general and regional anesthesia No. (%) of Patients Overall Age (years) (ⱖ80) Male gender African American race Weekend admission Medicine admitting service Cardiovascular disease Diabetes Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Cancer Dementia Chronic renal disease Postoperative ICU Postoperative mechanical ventilation Postoperative regional analgesia Surgery day delay (days) 0–1 2–3 >3 ICU = intensive care unit. 950 Overall General Anesthesia (N = 235) Regional Anesthesia (N = 73) 308 186 79 22 83 88 151 66 85 20 36 53 64 18 128 132 64 18 74 68 119 57 66 13 30 40 53 17 64 54 15 4 9 20 32 9 19 7 6 13 11 1 64 236 55 17 175 (75%) 46 (20%) 14 (6%) (56%) (27%) (8%) (31%) (29%) (51%) (24%) (28%) (6%) (13%) (17%) (23%) (6%) (27%) (74%) (21%) (5%) (12%) (27%) (44%) (12%) (26%) (10%) (8%) (18%) (15%) (1%) (88%) 61 (85%) 9 (12%) 3 (4%) P Value 0.0066 0.2532 0.5275 0.0013 0.7993 0.3098 0.0301 0.7312 0.2742 0.2909 0.8763 0.1686 0.0841 <0.0001 0.2748 Regional Anesthesia for Geriatric Patients Table 2 Measures of health care use related to hip stabilization surgery, patients aged 65 or older No. (%) of Patients Overall Age (years) 65–79 ⱖ80 Gender Female Male Race African American Other Anesthesia type General anesthesia Regional anesthesia Admission day of week Weekend Weekday Admitting service type Medicine Surgery Cardiovascular disease Yes No Diabetes Yes No COPD Yes No Cancer Yes No Dementia Yes No CKD Yes No ICU Yes No Surgery day delay (days) 0–1 2–3 >3 Median (Q1, Q3) Overall In-hospital Mortality Nursing Home Discharges (N = 297) Rehospitalization (N = 297) 308 11 (3.57) 173 (58.25) 59 (19.87) 5 (4, 7) 14,689 (11,823, 18,697) 122 186 2 (1.64) 9 (4.84) 55 (45.83)* 118 (66.67) 23 (19.17) 36 (20.34) 6 (4, 8) 5 (4, 7) 15,163 (12,378, 20,095) 14,161 (11,677, 17,923) 229 79 4 (1.75)* 7 (8.86) 126 (56.00) 47 (65.28) 44 (19.56) 15 (20.83) 5 (4, 7) 6(4, 8) 13,958 (11,731, 17,764)* 16,039 (12,948, 21,133) 22 286 3 (13.64)* 8 (2.80) 11 (57.89) 162 (58.27) 2 (10.53) 57 (20.50) 6 (4, 8) 5 (4, 7) 16,780 (13,571, 20,067) 14,601 (11,731, 18,642) 235 73 9 (3.83) 2 (2.74) 125 (55.31) 48 (67.61) 42 (18.58) 17 (23.94) 5 (4, 7) 5 (4, 7) 14,724 (11,731, 18,866) 13,812 (12,151, 18,480) 83 225 4 (4.82) 7 (3.11) 40 (50.63) 133 (61.01) 19 (24.05) 40 (18.35) 5 (4, 8) 6 (4, 7) 14,333 (10,884, 19,511) 14,718 (12,246, 18,646) 88 220 7 (7.95)* 4 (1.82) 51 (62.96) 122 (56.48) 21 (25.93) 38 (17.59) 7 (5, 10)* 5 (4, 6.5) 17,017 (14,106, 21,492)* 13,681 (11,463, 16,551) 151 157 8 (5.30) 3 (1.91) 91 (63.64) 82 (53.25) 32 (22.38) 27 (17.53) 6 (4, 9)* 5 (4, 7) 16,039 (13,299, 21,133)* 13,085 (10,921, 16,312) 66 242 0 (0) 11 (4.55) 41 (62.12) 132 (57.14) 20 (30.30)* 39 (16.88) 6 (4, 10)* 5 (4, 7) 15,371 (12,929, 21,331) 14,537 (11,710, 18,365) 85 223 3 (3.53) 8 (3.59) 50 (60.98) 123 (57.21) 23 (28.05)* 36 (16.74) 5 (4, 7) 5 (4, 8) 14,902 (12,286, 19,174) 14,623 (11,677, 18,646) 20 288 0 (0) 11 (3.82) 10 (50.00) 163 (58.84) 1 (5.00) 58 (20.94) 7.5 (5, 14)* 5 (4, 7) 19,923 (14,127, 24,423)* 14,459 (11,766, 18,082) 36 272 1 (2.78) 10 (3.68) 26 (74.29) 147 (56.11) 9 (25.71) 50 (19.08) 5 (4, 7) 5 (4, 7) 15,119 (11,776, 18,973) 14,647 (11,823, 18,697) 53 255 2 (3.77) 9 (3.53) 32 (62.75) 141 (57.32) 13 (25.49) 46 (18.70) 6 (4, 9)* 5 (4, 7) 15,306 (12,659, 20,646) 14,553 (11,710, 18,286) 64 244 8 (12.5)* 3 (1.23) 35 (62.50) 138 (57.26) 17 (30.36)* 42 (17.43) 9 (6, 13.5)* 5 (4, 7) 22,025 (17,539, 30,807)* 13,594 (11,398, 16,375) 236 55 17 5 (2.12)* 3 (5.45) 3 (17.65) 135 (58.44) 31 (59.62) 7 (50.00) 43 (18.61) 52 (25.00) 3 (21.43) Length of Stay (days) 5 (4, 7)* 7 (6, 10) 12 (9, 13) Hospital Cost ($) 13,767 (11,398, 16,509)* 17,287 (13,795, 21,902) 22,868 (20,095, 25,488) * Significant differences among subgroups, P value < 0.05. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD = chronic kidney disease; ICU = intensive care unit. characteristics are presented in Table 2. Of the 308 patients, 73 received regional anesthesia and 235 received general anesthesia. Frequency and type of regional anesthesia and analgesia as well as surgical procedure is presented in Tables 3 and 4. The majority of RA patients (96%) received continuous spinal anesthesia. There were predominantly more females (N = 229) than males (N = 79), and 188 patients were older than 80 years of age. The odds ratios (ORs) for in-hospital mortality, nursing home discharge, and rehospitalization rates obtained by multiple logistic regression (c-statistic = 0.949) are reported in Table 5. A higher in-hospital mortality was Table 3 Frequency of anesthesia Frequency (%) Type of Anesthesia General anesthesia Failed regional anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia Continuous spinal catheter Local with sedation Single injection spinal Combined spinal/epidural 222 (72%) 13 (4%) 70 1 1 1 (23%) (0.3%) (0.3%) (0.3%) 951 Le-Wendling et al. Table 4 Propensity score-weighted linear regression models on hospital cost and length of stay R 2 = 75.4% Hospital Cost ($) R 2 = 33.18% Length of Stay (days) Predictors Estimate (SE) P Value Estimate (SE) P Value Age (years) Male gender (vs female) African American race (vs other) General anesthesia (vs regional) Weekend admission (vs weekday) Medicine admitting service (vs surgery) Cardiovascular disease (yes vs no) COPD (yes vs no) Dementia (yes vs no) Cancer (yes vs no) Diabetes (yes vs no) ICU (yes vs no) In-hospital mortality (yes vs no) Surgery day delay (hours) (2–3 vs 0–1) (>3 vs 0–1) Length of stay (day) 65 460 28 25 429 -1,128 410 921 645 2,290 -563 4,389 2,873 NA NA 1,360 0.2140 0.3947 0.9759 0.9557 0.4159 0.0407* 0.4161 0.0850 0.3630 0.0358* 0.3339 <0.0001* 0.0365* NA NA <0.0001* 0.05 0.93 -1.10 0.19 -1.27 0.36 0.75 -0.72 -0.88 2.46 0.85 2.95 -0.32 6.87 1.52 NA 0.3190 0.0562 0.1860 0.6438 0.0075* 0.5205 0.0974 0.1231 0.1710 0.0116* 0.1036 <0.0001* 0.7947 <0.0001* 0.0168* NA (52) (539) (925) (457) (527) (549) (504) (521) (708) (1,086) (582) (655) (1,368) (61) (0.05) (0.49) (0.83) (0.41) (0.47) (0.56) (0.45) (0.47) (0.64) (0.97) (0.52) (0.56) (1.23) (1.04) (0.63) * Significant differences among subgroups, P value < 0.05. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU = intensive care unit; NA = not applicable; SE = standard error. Table 5 Regression on overall complications, pulmonary complications, and cardio complications c-statistic Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test 0.7290 0.8592 0.7730 0.4780 0.8210 0.9513 Complications Pulmonary Complications Cardio Complications Predictors OR (CI for OR) P Value OR (CI for OR) P Value OR (CI for OR) P Value Age (years) Male gender (vs female) African American race (vs other) General anesthesia (vs regional) Weekday admission (vs weekend) Surgery admitting service (vs medicine) Cardiovascular disease (yes vs no) COPD (yes vs no) Dementia (yes vs no) Cancer (yes vs no) Diabetes (yes vs no) Surgery day delay (hours) (2–3 vs 0–1) (>3 vs 0–1) 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 1.8 (0.9, 3.6) 0.7 (0.2, 2.6) 0.5822 0.0972 0.5462 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 2.3 (1.0, 5.2) 1.5 (0.4, 6.2) 0.9472 0.0520 0.5752 1.0 (0.8, 1.1) 1.7 (0.6, 4.8) 0.4 (0.0, 3.9) 0.4485 0.2799 0.4409 1.7 (0.7, 4.1) 0.2056 2.2 (0.7, 7.2) 0.1751 1.7 (0.4, 6.3) 0.4534 2.1 (0.9, 4.8) 0.0712 1.9 (0.7, 5.1) 0.2287 1.8 (0.6, 5.7) 0.3069 1.4 (0.7, 3.2) 0.3730 2.0 (0.7, 5.3) 0.1758 2.4 (0.7, 8.0) 0.1427 3.1 (1.5, 6.4) 0.0019* 5.1 (1.9, 13.7) 0.001* 8.1 (2.2, 30.4) 0.0019* 1.5 2.1 1.1 0.8 1.2 0.2609 0.1165 0.9153 0.5211 0.6670 1.2 1.9 2.4 0.7 1.2 0.7336 0.2811 0.2152 0.5180 0.8012 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.0883 0.3465 0.6577 0.8728 0.6801 0.0387* 2.4 (0.5, 10.8) 0.2419 6.4 (1.5, 28.5) (0.8, (0.8, (0.3, (0.3, (0.5, 3.0) 5.2) 3.9) 1.7) 3.0) 3.6 (1.1, 12.2) (0.5, (0.6, (0.6, (0.3, (0.4, 2.8) 5.8) 9.6) 1.9) 3.4) * Significant differences among subgroups, P value < 0.05. CI = confidence interval; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR = odds ratio. 952 (0.9, (0.5, (0.3, (0.4, (0.2, 6.1) 7.0) 8.1) 3.3) 3.1) 0.0143* Regional Anesthesia for Geriatric Patients Table 6 Propensity score-weighted linear regression models on hospital cost and length of stay R 2 = 75.4% Hospital Cost ($) R 2 = 33.18% Length of Stay (days) Predictors Estimate (SE) P Value Estimate (SE) P Value Age (years) Male gender (vs female) African American race (vs other) General anesthesia (vs regional) Weekend admission (vs weekday) Medicine admitting service (vs surgery) Cardiovascular disease (yes vs no) COPD (yes vs no) Dementia (yes vs no) Cancer (yes vs no) Diabetes (yes vs no) ICU (yes vs no) In-hospital mortality (yes vs no) Surgery day delay (hours) (2–3 vs 0–1) (>3 vs 0–1) Length of stay (day) 65 460 28 25 429 -1,128 410 921 645 2,290 -563 4,389 2,873 NA NA 1,360 0.2140 0.3947 0.9759 0.9557 0.4159 0.0407* 0.4161 0.0850 0.3630 0.0358* 0.3339 <0.0001* 0.0365* NA NA <0.0001* 0.05 0.93 -1.10 0.19 -1.27 0.36 0.75 -0.72 -0.88 2.46 0.85 2.95 -0.32 6.87 1.52 NA 0.3190 0.0562 0.1860 0.6438 0.0075* 0.5205 0.0974 0.1231 0.1710 0.0116* 0.1036 <0.0001* 0.7947 <0.0001* 0.0168* NA (52) (539) (925) (457) (527) (549) (504) (521) (708) (1086) (582) (655) (1,368) (61) (0.05) (0.49) (0.83) (0.41) (0.47) (0.56) (0.45) (0.47) (0.64) (0.97) (0.52) (0.56) (1.23) (1.04) (0.63) * Significant differences among subgroups, P value < 0.05. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU = intensive care unit; NA = not applicable; SE = standard error. associated with increasing age (OR, 1.6), male gender (OR, 8.1), African American race (OR, 16.1), and ICU admission (OR, 24.2). Anesthesia type was not found to be significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. The OR of nursing home discharge was significantly higher for patients with dementia (OR, 2.6), whereas the OR of rehospitalization was significantly higher for patients with COPD (OR, 2.3) or diabetes (2.5). Cardiovascular disease was associated with a higher overall complication rate and higher cardiovascular and pulmonary complication rate. Delay in surgery beyond 3 days was associated with higher overall complication rate and a higher cardiovascular complication rate (Table 5). Table 6 shows the propensity score-weighted regression analysis results for estimated hospital cost and length of stay. Although the median estimated cost of hospitalization was higher for patients admitted to the medicine service (as compared with surgical admitting service), admission by the department of internal medicine Table 7 resulted in a lower cost of hospitalization after adjusting for the demographic characteristics and comorbidities than the admitting service of the department of surgery. Patients with a diagnosis of cancer, patients who require an admission to the ICU and patients who died or stayed longer during hospitalization had higher estimated costs of hospitalization. The mean estimated cost of hospitalization ($16,789 vs $16,815) and mean length of stay (6.4 vs 6.6 days) were not significantly different between the patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under regional anesthesia and general anesthesia (Tables 7 and 8). Table 9 summarizes the effect of anesthesia type on complications and health care use; there are no significant differences between the two anesthesia groups. Discussion In this study, we found that there is no added cost to the institution for use of regional anesthesia, predominantly Mean hospital cost ($) by anesthesia type: unadjusted vs propensity score adjusted models Model Anesthesia Type Hospital Cost ($) Propensity score adjusted model Unadjusted model General anesthesia Regional anesthesia General anesthesia Regional anesthesia 16,815 16,789 16,816 16,877 95% Confidence Limits 16,172 16,158 16,246 15,835 17,457 17,420 17,386 17,919 P Value for Difference Difference between Means 95% Confidence Limits for the Difference 0.9557 25 -875 925 0.9209 -61 -1,263 1,142 953 Le-Wendling et al. Table 8 Mean length of stay (days) by anesthesia type: unadjusted vs propensity score adjusted models Model Anesthesia Type Length of Stay (days) Propensity score adjusted model Unadjusted model General anesthesia Regional anesthesia General anesthesia Regional anesthesia 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.8 95% Confidence Limits 6.0 5.8 6.2 6.0 consisting of continuous spinal anesthesia for hip fracture repair. Patients with continuous spinal anesthesia were more likely to receive RA via continuous femoral and lumbar paravertebral blocks, and these continuous blocks remained in situ an average of two postoperative days. Our group considers the use of RA in elderly patients to be opioid sparing and thus desirable, though we did not study this issue [11–13]. The fact that there was no significant increase in morbidity or mortality associated with implementing RA for hip fracture repair [14] makes RA an attractive modality for perioperative pain control, especially important during the preoperative period. Neuraxial anesthesia, especially continuous spinal anesthesia should be considered an option for the geriatric population undergoing hip fracture surgery because of its ease of use and relative safety in addition to the fact that it offers optimal flexibility in the timing and duration of the surgery. The potential to decrease intraoperative hypotension [15] was also subjectively perceived to have been avoided. Fragility hip fractures in the geriatric population can pose an economic burden to the health care system because this patient population is at risk for significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Most published studies investigate perioperative parameters and their effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality with inconsistent results [16]. Table 9 Difference between Means 95% Confidence Limits for the Difference 0.6438 0.2 -0.6 1.0 0.7331 -0.2 -1.2 0.8 Little data exist on the economic impact of the type of anesthesia used for hip surgery in the geriatric population. One study noted a lower cost of intraoperative anesthesia associated with using a single-injection spinal anesthesia for intraoperative management. This study looked at only the intraoperative period, not at cost for the entire hospital stay [17]. Our average estimated cost of hospital stay for hip fracture in the geriatric population is consistent with literature published in the United States and similar to costs published in Europe [2,17,18]. Kates et al. published a lower median cost of hospitalization than the current study ($11,417), but they did not add surgeon and geriatrician costs of care [19]. The current study includes all estimated costs of hospitalization, including labor, procedures, and equipment. Continuous spinal anesthesia was felt to provide good anesthesia with judicious dosing of local anesthetic to allow for improved hemodynamic control and avoidance of an invasive airway [14]. It also provided optimal flexibility in scheduling, as patients with hip fractures are almost always unscheduled and emergency surgery. The timing of the end of surgery is usually not predictable, especially in a large very busy training hospital and continuous spinal anesthesia provided optimal timing flexibility and added little, or in the case of this study, no additional risk. Patients Complications and health care use as a function of anesthesia type Hospital cost, adjusted mean (US $) Length of stay, adjusted mean (days) Complications (yes/no) Pulmonary complications (yes/no) Cardio complications (yes/no) In-hospital mortality (yes/no) Nursing home discharges (yes/no) Rehospitalization (yes/no) CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio. 954 7.1 6.9 7.1 7.7 P Value for Difference Regional anesthesia General anesthesia Regional anesthesia General anesthesia General vs regional General vs regional General vs regional Regional vs general Regional vs general Regional vs general Adjusted Mean 95% CI 16,789 16,815 6.38 6.57 (16,158, 17,420) (16,172, 17,457) (5.81, 6.93) (5.99, 7.14) OR 95% CI 1.7 2.2 1.7 1.0 1.7 2.0 (0.7, (0.7, (0.4, (0.1, (0.9, (1.0, 4.1) 7.2) 6.3) 6.7) 3.1) 4.0) Regional Anesthesia for Geriatric Patients undergoing general anesthesia who failed tracheal extubation did so because of hemodynamic instability and poor postoperative ventilation, especially in the presence of preexistent pulmonary comorbidities. This study was thus performed on the premise that the patients who received RA would have lower incidences of postoperative ventilator requirements as they would require less systemic anesthetic and analgesics, and thus have reduced postoperative respiratory depression. Because ventilator dependence would necessitate postoperative ICU admission, avoidance of postoperative respiratory depression was believed to result in decreased cost of hospitalization, and an intuitive notion that these patients would have decreased morbidity and mortality. However, RA did not influence morbidity, in-patient mortality, or the number of patients who required postoperative ventilation via an endotracheal tube, which was low in both the GA and RA group. One patient in the RA group (1%) vs 10 patients in the GA group (4%) required postoperative mechanical ventilation. This makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions about this hypothesis. However, consistent with results from previous publications, this study finds that cost of hospitalization increased with delay in surgery. ICU admission expectedly also increased the cost of hospitalization. This study differs from current literature in several ways. A recent Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials prescribing GA vs RA showed borderline improvement of short-term mortality and decreased postoperative delirium with regional anesthesia, but no long-term differences [20]. Radcliff retrospectively reviewed a large database of Veterans Administration patients with hip fractures and showed increased short-term mortality associated with intraoperative GA (vs RA). However, they did not investigate any role for peripheral nerve blockade for postoperative pain relief [21]. Pedersen assessed the implementation of a pathway, which included early anesthesia evaluation, optimization of fluid and electrolyte balance, nutritional assessment, and a social service consult in addition to postoperative pain management with a peripheral nerve block [22], and demonstrated a reduction in opioid requirements, postoperative complications and mortality. None of the cited studies used continuous intrathecal catheters for intraoperative anesthesia nor did they look at the financial implications of different treatments. A weakness of this study includes its retrospective nature. Furthermore, the authors did not adjust the estimated cost of hospitalization data for inflation, but because the patient cohort was selected over a period of less than 2 years, it was felt that inflation would not alter the data significantly. Hospital charge data were collected instead of cost data, however, because cost-to-charge ratio for hospitals can be inferred using the cost-to-charge ratio from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, this number was felt to adequately reflect cost of hospitalization of these patients. Data collected with regard to complications and comorbid conditions were based on ICD-9 codes, and therefore, the accuracy of the information collected is subject to the accuracy of the actual coding itself. The fact that the type of surgical anesthesia did not alter the patient’s cost of hospitalization or postoperative morbidity and mortality may be a result of the complexity of the patients’ medical history and the number of surgical and medical factors that all can contribute to the outcomes or it may simply reflect the natural coarse of life in this population, which consisted of 188 of 306 patients older than 80 years. Conclusion There is no difference in cost of hospitalization, rehospitalization rates, postoperative morbidity, and in-patient mortality in geriatric patients, the majority being older than 80 years, undergoing regional vs general anesthesia for hip fracture repair. Delay in surgery beyond 3 days and ICU admission both increase the cost of hospitalization in geriatric patients that receive surgery for hip fracture. Acknowledgment A special thanks to Christine Bono, PhD, decision support services analyst for the acquisition of financial data. References 1 Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures: A worldwide problem today and tomorrow. Bone 1993;14(suppl 1):S1–8. Available at: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-andstatistics.html International Osteoporosis Foundation webpage (accessed March 12, 2012). 2 Roudsari BS, Ebel BE, Corso PS, Molinari NA, Koepsell TD. The acute medical care costs of fall related injuries among the U.S. older adults. Injury 2005;36: 1316–22. 3 Forsen L, Meyer HE, Midthjell K, Edna TH. Survival after hip fracture: Short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:73–8. 4 Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: An observational study. Lancet 1999;353:878–82. 5 Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colon-Emeric CS, et al. Meta-analysis: Excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:380–90. 6 Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R, Grice JE, Parker MJ. Mortality following hip fracture: Trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury 2008;39:1157–63. 7 Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. Br Med J 1993;307:1248–50. 955 Le-Wendling et al. 8 Schroder HM, Erlandsen M. Age and sex as determinants of mortality after hip fracture: 3,895 patients followed for 2.5–18.5 years. J Orthop Trauma 1993;7:525–31. 9 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2008 National Statistics. 2008. Available at: www.hcup.ahrq.gov (accessed September 9, 2011). 10 Leslie RS, Ghomrawi H. The use of propensity scores and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment selection bias. SAS Global Forum 2008, Paper 366-2008. Available at: http://www2.sas.com/ proceedings/forum2008/366-2008.pdf (assessed December 19, 2011). 11 Gilbert TM, Hawkes WG, Hebel R, et al. Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for hip fracture repair: A longitudinal observation of 741 elderly patients during 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthop 2000;29:25–35. 12 Catro-Alves LJ, De Azevedo VL, De Freitas Braga TF, Goncalves AC, De Oliveira GS Jr. The effect of neuraxial versus general anesthesia techniques on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2011;113:1480–6. 13 Abbou-Setta AM, Beaupre LA, Rashiq S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of pain management interventions for hip fracture: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:234–45. 14 Foss NB, Kristensen BB, Bundgaard M, et al. Fascia iliaca compartment blockade for acute pain control 956 in hip fracture patients: A randomized, placebocontrolled trial. Anesthesiology 2007;106:773–8. 15 Minville V, Asehnoune K, Delussy A, et al. Hypotension during surgery for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients: Effect of anaesthetic techniques. A retrospective study. Minerva Anestesiol 2008;74:691–6. 16 Luger TJ, Kammerlander C, Gosch M, et al. Neuraxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: Does it matter? Osteoporos Int 2010;21(suppl 4):S555–72. 17 Chakladar A, White SM. Cost estimates of spinal versus general anaesthesia for fractured neck for femur surgery. Anaesthesia 2010;65:810–4. 18 Sahota O, Morgan N, Moran CG. The direct cost of acute hip fracture care in care home residents in the UK. Osteoporos Int 2012;23:917–920. 19 Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: Early results. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25:233–7. 20 Parker MJ, Handoll HH, Griffiths R. Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(4):CD00052. 21 Radcliff TA, Henderson WG, Stoner TJ, et al. Patient risk factors, operative care, and outcomes among older community-dwelling male veterans with hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:34–42. 22 Pedersen SJ, Borgbjerg FM, Schousboe B, et al. Group of Bisperbjerg Hospital. A comprehensive hip fracture program reduces complication rates and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:1831–8.