Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Service Quality Toronto Dominion 1 An Illustration P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 2 Federal Express • How do you create dissatisfaction? Consider Fedex – calls • abandonment (1) – pick-up • miss package (10) – transport and delivery • lost (10), damaged (10), etc. – invoice • adjustment (1) – customer service • complaint reopened (5) P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 3 Federal Express (contd.) Pickup Calls •Abandoned calls (1) •Missed pick-up (10) Transport & Delivery Calls •Lost (10) •Adjustment (1) •Damaged (10) •Wrong late (5) •Overgoods (lost & found) (5) •Right day late (1) •Missing proof of delivery (1) •International (composite index) Calls •Complaint reopened (5) •Traces (not answered) (1) (occurence s x weighti ng factor) Service Quality Index 12 P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 4 Operational Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 5 Service Quality • Service Quality – expectation (expected service) – performance (perceived service) • SERVQUAL – Dimensions: • Tangibles, • Reliability, • Responsiveness, • Assurance, and, • Empathy. P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 6 A Conceptual Model of Service Quality P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 7 Consumer Expectations Revisited • Almost all the SERVQUAL type instruments focus on consumer’s making a point estimate of quality, satisfaction, etc., • What if – consumer has a prior distribution about the average quality of a brand? – consumer care not just about the outcome (on average), but also about the distribution of possible outcomes? – consumer updates beliefs over time? • Implications – It is not necessary to exceed expectations (reducing variance in quality alone can raise future preference) – If customer expects bad quality and receives it, he/she will not reduce preference for that brand (matching expectations reduces risk!) – Given two equally priced options, customers will not necessarily choose the one with the higher expected quality P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 8 Commerce Bank: Service Quality Does Not Mean Automation P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 9 Service Quality & Organizational Performance • An Application of Service Quality Methodology – Gerrad & Cunningham, “Bank Service Quality: A Comparison between a Publicly Quoted and Govt. Bank in Singapore,” Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2001. • Oliva & Sterman, “Cutting Corners and Working Overtime,” Management Science, 2001. – Characteristics of service = inseparability, intangibility and labor intensity – Rising Financial Pressures on Performance implies Focus on Driving Productivity – Consequence = Employees Drop Time Spent on Consumers at Expense of Service Quality – Result = Rework, Reduced Loyalty, High Turnover – Data: NatWest Bank, U.K. P4 Sept/Oct -2003 Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan 10