Download Service Quality

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Service Quality
Toronto Dominion
1
An Illustration
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
2
Federal Express
• How do you create dissatisfaction? Consider Fedex
– calls
• abandonment (1)
– pick-up
• miss package (10)
– transport and delivery
• lost (10), damaged (10), etc.
– invoice
• adjustment (1)
– customer service
• complaint reopened (5)
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
3
Federal Express (contd.)
Pickup
Calls
•Abandoned
calls (1)
•Missed
pick-up
(10)
Transport
&
Delivery
Calls
•Lost (10)
•Adjustment (1)
•Damaged (10)
•Wrong late (5)
•Overgoods
(lost & found) (5)
•Right day late (1)
•Missing proof of
delivery (1)
•International
(composite index)
Calls
•Complaint
reopened (5)
•Traces
(not answered)
(1)
 (occurence s x weighti ng factor)  Service Quality Index
12
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
4
Operational Efficiency and Customer Satisfaction
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
5
Service Quality
• Service Quality
– expectation (expected service)
– performance (perceived service)
• SERVQUAL
– Dimensions:
• Tangibles,
• Reliability,
• Responsiveness,
• Assurance, and,
• Empathy.
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
6
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
7
Consumer Expectations Revisited
• Almost all the SERVQUAL type instruments focus on consumer’s making a
point estimate of quality, satisfaction, etc.,
• What if
– consumer has a prior distribution about the average quality of a brand?
– consumer care not just about the outcome (on average), but also about the
distribution of possible outcomes?
– consumer updates beliefs over time?
• Implications
– It is not necessary to exceed expectations (reducing variance in quality
alone can raise future preference)
– If customer expects bad quality and receives it, he/she will not reduce
preference for that brand (matching expectations reduces risk!)
– Given two equally priced options, customers will not necessarily choose the
one with the higher expected quality
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
8
Commerce Bank: Service Quality Does Not Mean
Automation
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
9
Service Quality & Organizational Performance
• An Application of Service Quality Methodology
– Gerrad & Cunningham, “Bank Service Quality: A Comparison
between a Publicly Quoted and Govt. Bank in Singapore,” Journal
of Financial Services Marketing, 2001.
• Oliva & Sterman, “Cutting Corners and Working Overtime,”
Management Science, 2001.
– Characteristics of service = inseparability, intangibility and labor
intensity
– Rising Financial Pressures on Performance implies Focus on
Driving Productivity
– Consequence = Employees Drop Time Spent on Consumers at
Expense of Service Quality
– Result = Rework, Reduced Loyalty, High Turnover
– Data: NatWest Bank, U.K.
P4 Sept/Oct -2003
Services Marketing – Professor V. Padmanabhan
10
Related documents