Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The use of inhaler devices in children د هالة الرفاعي • INTRODUCTION • The pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) has been a mainstay in the • treatment of respiratory diseases, especially asthma, since its introduction in 1956. It is the most • commonly prescribed delivery system for administering inhaled bronchodilators and antiinflammatory • agents worldwide • Spacer devices, when used properly, substantially improve the delivery of • pMDIgenerated • aerosols to the distal airways. The pMDI, used alone or in combination with a spacer or • valvedholding • chamber, is the most convenient and costeffective • way to administer aerosolized • medications for most patients. • Dry powder inhalers (DPI) are a separate group of medication aerosolizing devices widely used in the • management of adult and pediatric pulmonary disease. These devices eliminate the need for propellants, • and are less dependent upon coordination of inhalation and device actuation. Shortand • longacting • beta • agonists and inhaled glucocorticoids are available for administration via DPIs. • The effectiveness of both delivery systems is dependent upon several factors, including the properties of • the agent administered, design, temperature, humidity, and patient technique • Device technique • should be assessed during every encounter to ensure optimal use and drug delivery to the lungs • Propellants — Up to 80 percent of the aerosol generated by a pMDI is propellant, historically a • chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) such as freon. The cold blast resulting from the impact of particles in the • pharynx (the coldfreon • effect) when pMDIs containing CFC were actuated directly into the mouth • The international ban on CFCs (the Montreal Protocol) and the disadvantages described above prompted • the development of other propellants, such as hydrofluoroalkanes (HFA), for use with pMDIs. In some • cases (such as with HFA beclomethasone ), the use of HFA improves the delivery of drug to the lower • airways and decreases deposition in the oropharynx • Similarly, the output of respirable particles • from an HFAalbuterol • pMDI is superior to that from a pMDI containing CFCalbuterol • when both are • administered using a spacer device • Improved delivery to peripheral airways may necessitate the • reduction of drug dose, particularly when using an inhaled glucocorticoid • Plastic spacers have electrostatic charges within the chamber that attract particles and significantly • reduce drug delivery to the lungs • This effect may be particularly important when starting • bronchodilator therapy in acute asthma. One option is to use a nonelectrostatic metal spacer, where • available • Alternatively, the electrostatic charge within the plastic spacer can be reduced by • washing the spacer in a dilute solution • Valvedholding • chambers — The valvedholding • chamber is a specialized spacer that incorporates a • oneway • valve that permits aerosol removal from the chamber during inhalation and holds particles in the • chamber during exhalation • These devices can be fitted with a mouthpiece or a sizeappropriate • facemask, making them suitable for use in infants and young children. When using a facemask, it is • important that it is well sealed and that dead space volume is minimized to assure optimal drug delivery • There is no evidence that adding a spacer improves drug delivery or efficacy as compared with a • correctly used pMDI alone • but the addition of a spacer does correct for poor pMDI technique in • most patients and allows faster resolution of symptoms in children with acute asthma • In • addition, using a spacer markedly decreases oropharyngeal drug deposition and may reduce both oral and • systemic side effects, especially when used with inhaled glucocorticoids • The use of a spacer or valved holding chamber is recommended for all children in whom proper breath • Pressurized MDI or nebulizer? — Many clinical trials and metaanalyses • indicate that the administration • of beta agonists via pMDI with spacer is at least as effective as, and possibly superior to, delivery of • medication by jet nebulizer in reversing acute bronchospasm in infants and children • In • addition, patients using a pMDI with spacer may experience fewer side effects (vomiting, tremors, • hypoxemia, tachycardia) as compared with those using a jet nebulizer • Pressurized MDIs were equal or superior to nebulizers in studies of small infants with bronchopulmonary • Dysplasia • wheezy infants between 4 and 12 months of age and young children with • moderate to severe asthma • indicating the appropriateness of bronchodilator therapy via a pMDI • and valvedholding • chamber in all age groups. In young children with moderate to severe acute asthma, • the pMDI with valved holding chamber produced a greater reduction in wheezing and significantly • decreased the need for admission (33 percent versus 60 percent) as compared with the jet nebulizer • Data suggest that four to six puffs of albuterol by pMDI and valvedholding • chamber are therapeutically • equivalent to 2.5 mg by jet nebulizer • In addition, the dose of drug delivered via pMDI with • valvedholding • chamber can be readily titrated to clinical effect, which may decrease side effects and • reduce cost • These data have led some authors to suggest that the pMDI with valvedholding • chamber should be the preferred method for administering bronchodilators to infants and children with • acute asthma at home, as well as in the emergency department and hospital Spacer technique • In one study, almost half of parents received • inadequate instruction in spacer use for infants and young children • Although most of the parents • thought the procedure was easy to understand, errors that affected the efficiency of medication • administration were common DRY POWDER INHALERS • A dry powder inhaler (DPI) is a breathactuated • device containing • micronized drug particles with a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of less than 5 μm that are • usually aggregated with carrier particles (such as lactose or glucose) of greater diameter • Drug is • delivered to the airways by the inhalation of air over a punctured drugcontaining • capsule or blister • DPIs have several advantages compared with pMDI that are reviewed in the table • The clinical effects of drugs administered by DPI are similar to those administered by pMDI. • This is true even when beta agonists are administered in the treatment of acute asthma • There is • evidence that at least some of these breathactuated, • drypowder • devices (eg, Turbuhaler) actually • enhance pulmonary deposition of inhaled glucocorticoids and provide equal improvement in lung • function at a lower dose compared with meterdose • InhalersIn addition, oropharyngeal side effects • appear to be less common when glucocorticoids are delivered by DPI • Device selection — Shor t and • Long acting • beta agonists and inhaled glucocorticoids are available for • administration via DPIs. A number of different types of DPIs are commercially available • Several factors may influence the efficiency of drug delivery by DPIs. The age of the child and presence • of asthma symptoms affect peak inspiratory flow • In addition, the design of the device affects • the resistance to inspiration and the inspiratory flow required to aerosolize the medication • For instance, • the Diskus is reliable at both low and high flow rates • and may be suitable for use in children as • young as four years of age and patients with severely impaired lung function (FEV1 less than 30 percent • predicted) • In contrast, highresistance • devices, such as the Turbuhaler, require greater inspiratory • flow to efficiently aerosolize a high percentage of the nominal dose, and are not as reliable at lower • inspiratory flow rates or in patients with severe airway obstruction SUMMARY • The two main types of inhaler devices used to administer aerosolized medications are the • pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and the dry powder inhaler (DPI). The effectiveness of • both delivery systems is dependent upon several factors, including the properties of the agent • administered, design, temperature, humidity, and patient technique. Device technique should be • assessed during every encounter to ensure optimal use and drug delivery to the lungs • Many clinical trials and metaanalyses • indicate that the administration of beta agonists via pMDI • with spacer is at least as effective as, and possibly superior to, delivery of medication by jet • nebulizer in reversing acute bronchospasm in infants and children. In addition, patients using a • pMDI with spacer may experience fewer side effects compared with those using a jet nebulizer • A dry powder inhaler (DPI) is a breathactuated • device containing micronized drug • These devices eliminate the need for propellants, and are less dependent on • coordination of inhalation and device actuation • However, relatively high inspiratory • flow rates are required to deaggregate and aerosolize the drug • A dry powder inhaler (DPI) is a breathactuated • device containing micronized drug • These devices eliminate the need for propellants, and are less dependent on • coordination of inhalation and device actuation • However, relatively high inspiratory • flow rates are required to deaggregate and aerosolize the drug. شكرا الصغائكم •