Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Patch Panels in the Sky: A Case for Free-Space Optics in Data Centers Navid Hamed Azimi, Himanshu Gupta Vyas Sekar, Samir Das Datacenter network design is hard! Performance Cost Energy Cabling Expandability Cooling Adaptability 2 Existing Choices Cost Core Top of Rack (ToR) … Over subscribed (tree, leaf spine,…) Performance 3 Existing Choices Cost Core Top of Rack (ToR) … Over provisioned (Fattree, Jellyfish,…) Over subscribed (tree, leaf spine,…) Performance 4 Existing Choices Cost Over provisioned (Fattree, Jellyfish,…) Core Augmented (c-Through , 3D Beam) Top of Rack (ToR) … Over subscribed (tree, leaf spine,…) Performance 5 Existing Choices Cost Over provisioned (Fattree, Jellyfish,…) Augmented (c-Through , 3D Beam) Over subscribed (tree, leaf spine,…) Can we get here? Performance 6 Our Vision • Core Coreless • Wired Wireless • Static Flexible … 7 Potential Benefits of This Vision Coreless Wireless Flexible Performance Cost Cabling Cooling Energy Expandability Adaptability 8 Challenges in Realizing the Vision • Flexible wireless links • Network management 9 Outline • Flexible wireless links • Network management • Feasibility & cost 10 Traditional RF is not Sufficient … • Wide beam High interference 11 Traditional RF is not Sufficient … • Wide beam • Difficult to narrow High interference 12 Solution: Free Space Optical Links (FSOs) … • Easy to narrow beam • No interference • High throughput over long range 13 Concerns with FSOs • • • • Cost : $30K Size : 3 ft³ Power: 60w Flexibility 14 Why Size, Cost, Power Can be Reduced? • Traditional use : outdoor, long haul ‒ High power ‒ Weatherproof • Data centers: indoor, short haul ‒ Low power • Feasible roadmap via commodity fiber optics ‒ E.g. Small form transceivers (Optical SFP) 15 Proof of Concept (1 Gbps) Fiber connected to SFP (TX) Lens Mirror SFP (RX) Lens Mirror SFP : 2x$40 Lens : 2x$30 16 FSO Link Throughput PDF 1 0.8 0.6 Optical fiber FSO 0.4 0.2 0 <924 924- 928 928- 932 >932 Mbps Throughput FSO link is the same as optical cable 17 FSO Link Misalignment Tolerance • Effect of vibrations, etc. Movement tolerance – 0.7mm at destination – 3mm at source 3 mm TX 0.7 mm RX FSO link is stable 18 FSOs (1Gbps) • • • • Cost : $30K Size : 3 ft³ Power: 60w Flexibility • • • • Cost : $140 Size : 1x4 in Power: 0.3w Flexibility 19 Flexibility via Switchable Mirror • Switchable Mirror: glass • Electronic control, low latency mirror Ceiling Mirror SM in “mirror” mode Receiver 1 Reciever2 Sender 20 Flexibility via Switchable Mirror • Switchable Mirror: glass • Electronic control, low latency mirror Ceiling Mirror SM in “mirror” mode Receiver 1 Sender Receiver 1 Reciever2 Reciever2 21 Outline • Flexible wireless links • Network management • Feasibility & cost 22 Management: Pre-Configuration Input: FSO#, SM#,… Output: Candidate links (Alignment of each SM) Receiver 1 Reciever2 Sender 23 Management: Reconfiguration Input: Traffic Output: Run-time topology Receiver 1 Reciever2 Sender 24 Current Solutions: Simple Heuristics • Pre-Configuration : Regular Random Graph • Reconfiguration Only reconfigure for large flows Only delete a link if network remains connected 25 Outline • Flexible laser link • Management • Feasibility & cost 26 Throughput Average Throughput Per Server (Gbps) • 512 racks, 48 server/rack, hotspots traffic, flow level simulations 2 Fattree 2G 3D-Beamforming 1.5 c-through 1 FSO 0.5 0 (4,5) (4,10) (8,5) (12,5) (8,10) (16,5) (12,10) (16,10) (Hot Spots %, Average Load per Hot spot (Gbps)) FSO based 2-4x improvement 27 Cost Comparison Architecture Cost Effective Bisection Bandwidth Fattree 1 Gbps $ 13 M 1 FSO based $ 38 M 8.5 Gbps Fattree 10 Gbps $ 57 M 10 Gbps Gbps FSO based: Near 10G performance with 65% of cost 28 Conclusions • Data center network is challenging • Our vision: Fully flexible, coreless, wireless network • Key enablers : FSO + switchable mirrors • Early promise: ~ 10Gbps performance @ 65% cost • Future work: Improve FSO, better management 29