Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
WCMICS MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM MEETING AUDIT Background In February-March 2009, the Western and Central Melbourne Integrated Cancer Service (WCMICS) undertook an audit of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings (MDMs) as part of the ‘Strengthening Multidisciplinary Meetings’ Program. This audit aims to: Identify areas that require further improvement work Benchmark each MDM against all other MDMs in the WCMICS The results of this audit are presented in this report. Methodology Multidisciplinary meetings were identifying from information given by each site’s Tumour Group lead. A snapshot audit was conducted using the same audit tool developed for previous 2007 audit, which was adapted from the DHS Multidisciplinary Toolkit Audit Tool (3). The WCMICS Project Officer observed one meeting at each site, and met with the Tumour Group lead from each site to clarify questions that were not able to be answered by observation alone. Results The audit results for all WCMICS meetings are presented in the following pages. 35 meetings were audited across all organisations and Tumour Streams. Next Steps Sharing of information Aggregated audit results will be available from the WCMICS website (no sites/Tumour Groups will be identifiable). Information from this audit (de-identified) will also be shared with the WCMICS Tumour Groups, Clinical Management Advisory Committee, Supportive Care Advisory Committee and each hospital’s Quality Department. Future Audits This audit will be repeated on a regular basis to assess further improvements to the meetings. In addition, in order to assess progress against milestones in Victoria’s Cancer Action Plan, the DHS have instructed each ICS to audit whether the multidisciplinary team treatment plan is documented in patient’s medical records. Improvement Work Where there are Tumour Group-wide areas requiring improvement, it has been recommended that the Tumour Group look to take improvement work forward to address these issues. Where there are systemic issues, such as attendance and supportive care, it is recommended that the WCMICS Governance Committee agree on how the WCMICS can support their organisations in the delivery of the MDM measures set out in Victoria’s Cancer Action Plan (7). April 2009 OBJECTIVE 1: A REGULAR MULTIDISCIPLINARY MEETING IS HELD TO DISCUSS TREATMENT PLANNING Frequency of Meetings Recommendation: MDT meetings should be held on a regular basis (1). New Patients Discussed at the Meeting Recommendation: All patients with a newly diagnosed cancer should be considered for discussion by the multidisciplinary team (1). Victoria’s Cancer Action Plan aims to increase the number of newly diagnosed patients with a documented multidisciplinary care treatment plan to 80% by 2012 (7). April 2009 Number of Patients Discussed per Meeting Links with Other Teams Collaborative links should be formed with smaller and larger referring centres to facilitate care coordination and enable consideration of the full therapeutic range (8). Conduct of the Meeting Where it is not possible for all core team members to be present at one site, this may be overcome by tele- or video-conferencing (1). April 2009 Room Set-up Recommendation: Venues for the MDT meetings should be set-up in a round-table configuration so that participants can face each other (1). April 2009 OBJECTIVE 2: ALL CORE DISCIPLINES REGULARLY ATTEND MULTIDISCIPLINARY MEETINGS AND PROVIDE INPUT TO THE TREATMENT PLAN WHERE RELEVANT Attendance of Core Disciplines Recommendation: A core group of specialists should be present at the meeting (3). These are set out in the Department of Human Service’s Patient Management Frameworks. Which team members routinely attend meetings? All WCMICS Surgical Oncologist 93 Medical Oncologist 86 Radiation Oncologist 85 Pathology 77 Radiology 83 GP 0 Haematologist 100 Neurologist 0 Respiratory Physician 100 Endoscopist 100 Gynaecologist 100 Dermatologist 100 Reconstructive Surgeon 100 Nurse 82 Social Work 28 Dietetics 50 Speech Pathology 100 Pharmacist 0 Palliative Care 0 Participation of Core Disciplines April 2009 OBJECTIVE 3: MEETING PROTOCOLS AND/OR TERMS OF REFERENCE ARE DEVELOPED Development of Team Protocols (e.g. Terms of Reference, Criteria for Discussion) Recommendation: Written protocols should be established to describe the organisation and content of the meeting (3). Role Designation Recommendation: Team purpose, membership, and roles should be documented (5). April 2009 April 2009 OBJECTIVE 4: ALL PATIENTS ARE PROVIDED WITH INFORMATION ABOUT MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE Provision of Information about Multidisciplinary Care to the Patient Recommendation: All patients should be provided with written information about multidisciplinary care (1) Patient’s Consent sought before Discussion Recommendation: The patient’s consent should be sought before their case is presented at the MDT meeting (3). April 2009 OBJECTIVE 5: SUPPORTIVE CARE ISSUES ARE CONSIDERED FOR ALL PATIENTS WHEN DEVELOPING THE TREATMENT PLAN Consideration of Supportive Care Issues Recommendation: Psychosocial status and support needs should be considered at the meeting (1). Input from Relevant Staff when Supportive Care Issues are Discussed Recommendations: All core disciplines, including supportive care, should provide input into the meeting (1). April 2009 OBJECTIVE 6: THE TREATMENT PLAN IS DOCUMENTED AND PLACED IN THE MEDICAL RECORD SO THAT IT ACCESSIBLE TO ALL TEAM MEMBERS Data Currently Collected at Meetings Recommendation: The meeting recommendations, lead clinician, attendance, and follow-up plan should be recorded as a minimum (1, 3). Verbal Summary of Treatment Plan Recommendation: The Meeting Chair should summarise the discussion before moving on to the next case (1). April 2009 Recording of Meeting Recommendations Recommendation: The recommendations from the meeting should be documented using a standardised treatment plan (1,3). Victoria’s Cancer Action Plan aims to increase the number of newly diagnosed patients with a documented multidisciplinary care treatment plan to 80% by 2012 (7). OBJECTIVE 7: OUTCOMES OF THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY MEETING ARE COMMUNICATED TO THE PATIENT’S GP IN A TIMELY MANNER Input from the Patient’s GP Recommendation: The patient’s GP is a core team member and effective processes for communication between the GP and the Treating Clinician should be implemented (4). The patient’s GP does not provide input into any of the meetings audited. April 2009 Communication of Meeting Outcomes to the GP Recommendation: The patient’s GP should be informed of the meeting outcome as soon as practicable after the meeting (3). OBJECTIVE 8: PATIENTS ARE INFORMED OF THE PROPOSED TREATMENT PLAN AND GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE INPUT Communication of Meeting Recommendations to the Patient Recommendation: The MDT meeting outcomes should be communicated with the patient (1,3) via whatever method is preferable to them (3). All sites communicate the Treatment Plan to the patient verbally only. April 2009 REFERENCES 1. National Breast Cancer Centre. Multidisciplinary meetings for cancer care: a guide for health service providers. 2005 National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown, NSW 2. Department of Health and Ageing. Medicare Benefits Schedule. 2007 http://www9.health.gov.au/mbs/fullDisplay.cfm?type=note&qt=NoteID&q=A.50, Accessed 13/12/07 3. Cancer Coordination Unit. Multidisciplinary Meeting Toolkit. 2006 Victorian Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria 4. Ministerial Taskforce for Cancer, Patient Management Framework – Central Nervous System Tumour Stream: Malignant Glioma. 2006 Victorian Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria 5. Evans A, Zorbas HM, Keaney MA, Sidhom MA, Goodwin HE, Peterson JC. Medicolegal implications of a multidisciplinary approach to cancer care: Consensus recommendations from a national workshop. 2008 Medical Journal of Australia 188(7): 401-404 6. Butow P, Harrison JD, Choy ET, Young JM, Spillane A, Evans A. Health Professional and Consumer Views on Involving Breast Cancer Patients in the Multidisciplinary Discussion of Their Disease and Treatment Plan. 2007 Cancer 100(9): 1937-1944 7. Victorian Government Department of Human Services, Victoria’s Cancer Action Plan. 2008 Victorian Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria 8. Department of Human Services, Achieving best practice cancer care: A guide for implementing multidisciplinary care. 2007 Victorian Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria April 2009