Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Daniele Santini Università Campus Bio-Medico Roma Patients With Bone Metastases From Pca Are at High Risk for Developing SREs Any Pathologic fracture Radiation therapy Patients With SRE, % Surgical intervention Spinal cord compression 24 months Saad F, et al. JNCI. 2002;94(19):1458-1468; Saad F, et al. Eur Urol Suppl. 2007;6(11):683-688. Skeletal Complications Reduce Quality of Life in Prostate Cancer Patients Total Change/Standard Deviation 0 Physical P < .05. Emotional -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 a -0.4 -0.5 a a a a a Radiation to bone Pathologic fracture Other SREs -0.6 -0.7 a Functional Change in FACT-G score for patients with an event vs patients without an event Data from Weinfurt KP, et al. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(4):579-584. Probability SREs Are Associated With Lower Survival in Prostate Cancer 360 Days Survival No SRE (n = 355) ≥ 1 SRE (n = 116) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 No SRE: 49.7% ≥ 1 SRE: 28.2% P = .02 Median Survival Times No SRE: 338 days (95% CI = 189, 460) 0 90 180 270 Survival, days 360 Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SRE, skeletal-related event. DePuy V, et al. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:869-876. ≥ 1 SRE: 248 days (95% CI = 181, 296) FISIOPATOLOGIA DELLA METASTASI ADDENSANTE IGF1 TGFb-1 IGF1 TGFb-1 Osteocalcina ALP TGF-b1 ET1 uPA >RANKL/<OPG PTHrP IL-6 OPG Bertoldo F, Santini D Textbook of Osteoncology 2010 Wnt DDK-1 Molecular states and bone targeted therapies Armamentarium Androgen deprivation therapy Bisphosphonates (CITBL, only for BMD) Denosumab (CITBL, also for fracture rate) Nelson PS, J Clin Oncol, feb 2012 Molecular states and bone targeted therapies Armamentarium Castration-resistant patients Docetaxel (only in metastating setting) Cabazitaxel (in docetaxel-progressing patients) AR inhibitors (MDV3100) (in docetaxelprogressing patients, ASCO 2012) Bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid only in bone metastatic setting) Denosumab (both in bone metastasis prevention and in metastatig setting) Abiraterone (only in metastating setting, after docetaxel) Nelson PS, J Clin Oncol, feb 2012 Target therapies and potential applications in prostate cancer CTIBL Bone met prevention in castration resistant prostate cancer patients SREs in castration resistant metastatic disease RANK is expressed by cancer cells both at primary tumor and at bone metastases PRIMITIVI METASTASI (p= .194) a. confronto primitivi-metastasi considerando tutti i campioni Santini D. J Cell Phys, 2010 PRIMITIVI METASTASI (p= .528) b. confronto primitivi-metastasi considerando solo le coppie metastasi-tumore d’origine Prevention of Bone Metastases in PC: Phase III Denosumab Trial (AMG 147) Primary endpoint: Time to development of bone metastasis or death Secondary endpoint: Time to development of bone metastasis (excluding death) N = 1.435 Prostate cancer (non metastatic) Hormone-refractory disease High risk of bone metastases (PSA at least 8 and/or PSA doubling time less than 10 months Adequate organ function R A N D O M I Z A T I O N Denosumab 120 mg SC every 4 weeks Placebo Event-driven study: time to bone metastasis or death Smith MR, et al. Lancet. 2012. Bone metastasis-free survival 1.0 Proportion of patients HR = 0.85 (95% CI 0.73, 0.98) P = 0.028 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Median months Placebo Denosumab 25.2 29.5 Events 370 335 0.0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 Study month Placebo 716 691 569 500 421 375 345 300 259 215 168 137 99 60 36 Denosumab 716 695 605 521 456 400 368 324 279 228 185 153 111 59 35 Smith MR, et al. Lancet. 2012. Bone Metastasis-Free Survival in Patients with PSADT ≤ 6 Months Denosumab 147 Trial Proportion of Patients With Bone Metastasis-Free Survival 1.0 HR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.64, 0.93) P = 0.006 0.8 23% Risk Reduction 0.6 0.4 Median Months 0.2 Placebo Denosumab 0.0 0 6 12 Delay (Months) Events 18.7 25.9 242 197 7.2 18 24 Study Month 30 36 Placebo 427 411 323 274 223 194 176 148 122 99 78 65 47 Denosumab 419 406 345 284 238 207 193 170 145 109 89 67 46 Smith MR, et al. ASCO GU, 2012. Sopravvivenza libera da metastasi ossee in pazienti con PSADT ≤4 mesi F. Saad, ASCO 2012 ZEUS: Zoledronic Acid for Prevention of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Primary endpoint: Time to bone metastases Secondary endpoints: Overall survival, PSA doubling time, substudies on bone markers, adverse events N = 1,433 Prostate cancer, M0 ± previous local curative treatment, ± ADT High-risk PC with ≥ 1 of the following criteria: • Gleason Score 8-10 • pN+ • PSA 20 at diagnosis Zoledronic acid 4 mg q 3 months R No zoledronic acid Treatment duration: 4 years Accrual complete Abbreviations: ADT, androgen-deprivation therapy; PC, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate-specific antigen. Target therapies and potential applications in prostate cancer CTIBL Bone met prevention in castration resistant prostate cancer patients SREs in castration resistant metastatic disease Randomized Trial of Zoledronic Acid Versus Placebo in Patients With Prostate Cancer R A N D O M I Z E D n = 214 Zoledronic acid 4 mg q 3 wk + daily oral vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg n = 208 Placebo q 3 wk + daily oral vitamin D 400 IU and calcium 500 mg 0 1. Saad F, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1458-1468. 2. Saad F, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:879-882. 15 months Core analysis1 24 months Final analysis2 Zoledronic Acid Reduced the Risk of SREs Regardless of Prior SRE History Risk Reduction P Value Before Study Entry 0.670 No Prior SRE 0.603 Prior SRE 33% .027 40% .028 36% .002 0.640 Overall Trial Population 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Risk Ratio (ZOL 4 mg vs Placebo) In favor of ZOL Abbreviations: SRE, skeletal-related event; ZOL, zoledronic acid. In favor of placebo 2 Study Design: International, Randomised, DoubleBlind, Active-Controlled Study N = 950 denosumab 120 mg SC and placebo IV Q4W Key Inclusion Criteria • Castration-resistant prostate cancer and 1 bone metastases Key Exclusion Criteria • Current or prior IV bisphosphonate treatment Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoints Supplemental calcium and vitamin D strongly recommended N = 951 zoledronic acid 4 mg IV* and placebo SC Q4W Time to first on-study skeletal-related event (SRE) (noninferiority) Time to first on-study SRE (superiority) Time to first and subsequent on-study SRE(s) (superiority) Fizazi K, et al. Lancet. 2011;377:813–822. Baseline Characteristics Denosumab (N = 950) Zoledronic Acid (N = 951) 71 (64–77) 71 (66–77) 882 (93) 886 (93) PSA at randomisation 10 g/L, n (%) 805 (85) 806 (85) Recent chemotherapy ( 6 weeks before randomisation), n (%) 132 (14) 132 (14) Previous SRE, n (%) 232 (24) 231 (24) 3.94 (1.22–15.67) 5.19 (1.31–16.10) Characteristic Median age, years (IQR) ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, n (%) Stratification Factors Median time from diagnosis of bone metastasis to randomisation, months (IQR) Fizazi K, et al. Lancet. 2011;377:813–822. Primary Endpoint: Time to First On-Study SRE HR = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71–0.95) P 0.001 (noninferiority) P = 0.008 (superiority) Proportion of Subjects Without SRE 1.00 0.75 0.50 Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Median Months 0.25 20.7 17.1 Denosumab Zoledronic acid 0.00 0 Patients at Risk: Zoledronic acid 951 Denosumab 950 3 6 9 733 758 544 582 407 472 Fizazi K, et al. Lancet. 2011;377:813–822. 15 12 Study Month 299 361 207 259 18 21 24 27 140 168 93 115 64 70 47 39 Cumulative Mean Number of SREs per Patient Secondary Endpoint: Time to First and Subsequent On-Study SRE(s) (Multiple-Event Analysis) 2.0 Rate ratio = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71–0.94) 1.8 P = 0.009 (superiority) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 Events 0.4 494 Denosumab 0.2 584 Zoledronic acid 0.0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Study Month Fizazi K, et al. Lancet. 2011;377:813–822. 24 27 30 33 36 Exploratory Endpoint: Overall Survival HR = 1.03 (95% CI, 0.91–1.17) P = 0.65 Proportion of Patients Survived 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 Denosumab Zoledronic acid 0.00 0 Patients at Risk: Zoledronic acid 951 Denosumab 950 3 864 872 Fizazi K, et al. Lancet. 2011;377:813–822. 6 9 745 746 635 645 12 15 18 Study Month 519 552 401 427 297 310 21 24 27 30 207 233 143 156 98 99 55 54 Summary of Adverse Events Denosumab (N = 943) n (%) Zoledronic Acid (N = 945) n (%) 402 (43) 375 (40) 79 (8) 168 (18) 139 (15) 153 (16) 22 (2) 12 (1) Year 1 10 (1) 5 (1) Year 2 22 (2) 8 (1) 121 (13) 55 (6) 18 (2) 10 (1) Patient Incidence Infectious AEs Acute phase reactions (first 3 days) Renal AEs Cumulative rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ)‡ Hypocalcaemia New primary malignancy ‡P = 0.09 Fizazi K, et al. Lancet. 2011;377:813–822. Skeletal Complication Risk: Incremental Benefits in Prostate Cancer No bisphosphonate 49% risk at 2 yrs Zoledronic ~ 20% risk reduction Saad F, JNCI, 2004, Fizazi K, Lancet, 2011 Denosumab Additional ~ 12% risk reduction + Denosumab Additional 18% time to first SRE increase Bone targeted therapies nella neoplasia prostatica metastatica - Aggiornamento 2012 L’acido zoledronico si è dimostrato efficace nel ridurre le complicanze scheletriche di pazienti con metastasi ossee da carcinoma prostatico (Livello di evidenza 1++; positiva forte) Il denosumab non è inferiore all’acido zoledronico in termini di tempo al primo SRE (Livello di evidenza 1++; positiva forte) Il denosumab è superiore all’acido zoledronico in termini di tempo al primo SRE e di tempo al primo e ai successivi SRE (Livello di evidenza 1-; positiva debole) Safety: L’incidenza di ONJ durante il trattamento con denosumab è almeno pari a quella riscontratta durante il trattamento con acido zoledronico (Livello di evidenza 1++; positiva forte) Effect of Abiraterone Acetate on Pain Control and Skeletal-Related Events in Patients With Metastatic CastrationResistant Prostate Cancer Post Docetaxel: Results From The COU-AA-301 Phase 3 Study C. Logothetis, J. S. de Bono, A. Molina, E. M. Basch, K. Fizazi, S. North, K. N. Chi, R. J. Jones, O. B. Goodman, P. N. Mainwaring, C. N. Sternberg, D. D. Gagnon, R. Dhawan, M. Rothman, Y. Hao, C. S. Liu, T. S. Kheoh, H. I. Scher, and C. M. Haqq Logothetis et al. JCO 2011; 29 (Suppl): Abst4520 (oral) Meccanismo azione abiraterone • Gli androgeni che stimolano la proliferazione tumorale sono prodotti in tre siti critici: – Testicoli – Ghiandola Deoxysurrenale Corticosterone Progesterone corticosterone – Cellule tumorali prostatiche Cholesterol Desmolase Pregnenolone Aldosterone CYP17 X 17αhydroxylase • Abiraterone inibisce la sintesi degli androgeni in tutti e tre i siti 17α –OHprogesterone 17α-OHpregnenolone X 11-Deoxycortisol Cortisol ACTH Testosteronemia < 1ng/dl CYP17 C17,20-lyase 5α-reductase DHEA Androstenedione Testosterone DHT Abiraterone Yang, Drugs. 2011; Attard, JCO 2008 Overall Study Design Patients (N = 1195) R A N D O M I Z E D Efficacy end points AA 1000 mg daily Prednisone 5 mg BID n = 797 Placebo daily Prednisone 5 mg BID n = 398 Primary end point: • OS Secondary end points: • PSA response • rPFS Tertiary end points: • Pain • SREs BPI questionnaire Baseline, Cycle 1 (Day 15), subsequent treatment cycles (Day 1) de Bono et al. NEJM 2011 Patients experiencing palliation Symptomatic Improvement Pain Intensity Palliation 70% 60% 50% 155/349 P = 0.0002 (44.4%) 44/163 40% (27.0%) 30% 20% 10% 0% AA (n = 797) Placebo (n = 398) Results AA (n = 797) Placebo (n = 398) P Value 14.8 10.9 < 0.0001 Total 38.0% 10.1% < 0.0001 Confirmed 29.1% 5.5% < 0.0001 5.6 3.6 < 0.0001 Overall survival Median, months PSA response rate Radiographic PFS Median, months Time to first SRE (pathologic fracture/spinal cord compression/ palliative radiation/bone surgery) 25th percentile, days Logothetis et al. JCO 2011; 29 (Suppl): Abst4520 (oral) 301.0 150.0 < 0.0001 JS De Bono, ASCO, 2012 JS De Bono, ASCO, 2012 JS De Bono, ASCO, 2012 JS De Bono, ASCO, 2012 Molecular states and bone targeted therapies Armamentarium No standard drugs Src inhibitors (dasatinib, saracatinib)? Endothelin RA inhibitors (atresartan, zibotentan)? Anti-HER2/neu? Inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2 (cabozantinib)? AR inhibitors (MDV3100)? Bisphosphonates (problably) Denosumab (strong biological rational – src in a down stream gene of rank- rank is expressed also in prostate cancer cells) Denosumab works also in patients without NTX suppression during zoledronic acid Nelson PS, J Clin Oncol, feb 2012 Overview: bone health and target molecules • Src inhibitors (Saracatinib, Dasatinib) Evidence for a Role of Src in Bone Metabolism and Metastatic Bone Disease • Src kinase is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, highly expressed in normal osteoclasts1,2 • Src plays an essential role in RANKL-mediated osteoclast activation3 and perhaps survival4 • Src knockout mice are osteopetrotic5 • Src may be critical for tumor cell survival in bone microenvironment6 1. Horne WC, et al. J Cell Biol. 1992;119(4):1003-1013; 2. Tanaka S, et al. FEBS Lett. 1992;313(1):85-89; 3. Boyce BF, et al. J Clin Invest. 1992;90(4):1622-1627; 4. Wong BR, et al. Mol Cell. 1999;4(6):1041-1049; 5. Lowe C, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(10):4485-4489; 6. Zhang XH, et al. Cancer Cell. 2009;16(1):67-78. Role of Src in Prostate Tumor Cell and Osteoclast Activities Tumor cells Systemic factors Src Local factors Osteoclast activity Growth factors Direct bone destruction Src Activated osteoclast Osteolysis Src Bone Bone complications Dasatinib in PC: Inhibition of Tumor Cells and Osteoclast Activity Through Src Tumor cells Src Dasatinib Systemic factors Local factors Osteoclast activity Direct bone destruction Src Growth factors Osteolysis Dasatinib Bone Phase III study: READY (ongoing) (metastatic hormonorefractory prostate cancer patients) Doc + P vs Doc + P + DASATINIB Preliminary results: • 4.8 months OS improvement with the combination • Longer PFS with the combination • Median time to SRE longer (7.5 vs. 6.0 months) Abstract 4513 Cabozantinib (XL184) in chemotherapypretreated metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II nonrandomized expansion cohort (NRE). Autori, Matthew Raymond Smith, Christopher Sweeney, Dana E. Rathkopf, Howard I. Scher, Christopher Logothetis, Daniel J. George, Celestia S. Higano, Evan Y. Yu, Andrea Lynne Harzstark, Eric Jay Small, A. Oliver Sartor, Michael S. Gordon, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, David C. Smith, Maha Hussain, Johann Sebastian De Bono, Naomi B. Haas, Christian Scheffold, Yihua Lee, Paul G. Corn; ASCO 2012 Risposta sulle lesioni ossee (revisione indipendente) Molecular states and bone targeted therapies Armamentarium No standard drugs Src inhibitors (dasatinib, saracatinib)? Endothelin RA inhibitors (atresartan, zibotentan)? Anti-HER2/neu? Octreotide? Pasireotide? TKIs? Inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2 (cabozantinib)? Bisphosphonates (problably) Denosumab (strong biological rational – src in a down stream gene of rank- rank is expressed also in prostate cancer cells) Denosumab works also in patients without NTX suppression during zoledronic acid Nelson PS, J Clin Oncol, feb 2012 …. and how to place radium-223 ? Abstract LBA4512 Updated analysis of the phase III, double-blind, randomized, multinational study of radium-223 chloride in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with bone metastases (ALSYMPCA). Autori, Chris Parker, Sten Nilsson, Daniel Heinrich, Joe M. O'Sullivan, Sophie D. Fossa, Ales Chodacki, Pawel J. Wiechno, John P. Logue, Mihalj Seke, Anders Widmark, Dag Clement Johannessen, Peter Hoskin, David Bottomley, Robert Edward Coleman, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, C. Gillies O'Bryan-Tear, Jose E. GarciaVargas, Minghua Shan, A. Oliver Sartor; TLA C Parker et al, ASCO, 2012 Disegno dello studio A.O. Sartor et al, ASCO GU, 2012 Analisi aggiornata della sopravvivenza globale C Parker et al, ASCO, 2012 Analisi aggiornata del tempo allo sviluppo del primo evento scheletrico C Parker et al, ASCO, 2012 Nuovi farmaci per nuovi e vecchi Target Santini D et al. Cancer Treat Reviews, 2010 Thank you very much for your attention [email protected]