Download Breaking Down the Sensor Signal Path

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Breaking Down the Sensor Signal Path
By understanding the stages of an analog signal path, digital developers can more accurately
capture sensor data for a wide variety of applications
By: Aaron GL Podbelski, senior product marketing engineer, Cypress Semiconductor Corp.
Embedded systems are using sensors with increasing frequency. While industrial products have always used them for
manufacturing control systems, consumer devices are starting to employ them more often, as well. Sensors are being
integrated into consumer products to create better user experiences — ranging from adding accelerometers in mobile phones
to adding water vapor sensors in microwaves.
System designers, who previously worked only in the digital domain, are now finding themselves having to interface with
analog sensors. A sensor's analog signal needs to be digitized to be used by the system, and the signal path goes through
several stages: amplification, filtering and digitization (see Figure 1, below). Once the signal has been digitized, the user can
pass it to a control system on the microcontroller or can massage the data and pass it to a host processor via a
communication protocol. The sensor data can be utilized as required.
Each stage usually involves a component which must have passives around it to perform properly for the given application.
Figure 1: A sensor
The Sensor
Every sensor has a different output signal and range. The output signal can be voltage-, current-, resistive-, capacitive- or
frequency-based, but few standards exist, and they are only used in specific industrial systems. Even similar sensors from the
same manufacturer can have different outputs, and these differences can create problems for systems designers. A designer
must select a sensor that meets the requirements for the system, but if the requirements change during the design, a sensor
change may also be in order. In addition, a new sensor with a slightly different output would necessitate altering the
amplification and filtering stages. Since a majority of sensors output a low-level current or voltage-based signal, this article will
assume this type of sensor is being used and that any current-based signal has been adapted into a voltage via a simple
resistive network. Note: This article simplifies some concepts and the component selection process for efficiency sake.
The output of a sensor can be as small as several millivolts or as large as several volts. In order for the signal to be properly
digitized, it needs to be large enough for the analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to effectively read the signal. In most cases, the
sensor signal will need to be amplified. For example, a typical type-K thermocouple outputs 41 µV/°C, which needs to be
greatly amplified if the user would like to read 1C granularity. Thus, designers must take ADC resolution into account to ensure
that signal is amplified enough to obtain the desired granularity.
Amplitude
The selection of an amplifier is based mainly on the type needed — instrumentation amplifier, differential amplifier, OpAmp or
Programmable Gain Array, as well as the amount of gain. The gain of an amplifier is set by a resistive network around the
amplifier with feedback. The maximum gain for standard amplifiers is ideally limitless. The gain for a PGA is usually set by a
Breaking Down the Sensor Signal Path
Published in Design News (http://www.designnews.com/article/232816-Breaking_Down_the_Sensor_Signal_Path.php)
Page 1 of 4
May 2009
[+] Feedback
digital signal to the device which alters an internal resistive network. The maximum possible gain for a PGA is more limited
than a tradition amplifier, somewhere in the order of 0.5x to several 1,000x, but, in most cases, this range is more than
acceptable.
With amplifiers, another key specification needs to be taken into account — offset voltage (VOS). VOS is the amount of
voltage a signal that is passed through the amplifier will be altered. For example, if a 500-mV signal is input into an amplifier
with unity gain (1x) and a VOS of 10 mV, the resulting output would be 510 mV. If the output range of the sensor is 0-900mV,
and the system does not need a very granular reading of the sensor, this offset may be negligible. If the range of the sensor is
450-550 mV, this offset is probably unacceptable. When selecting an amplifier, the smaller the VOS, the more costly it is.
Since all amplifiers have an offset, what matters is whether the system can tolerate it. The VOS can also be reduced or
eliminated using correlated double sampling.
In all systems, some noise will be imparted on the sensor's signal. Noise arises from a number of sources, including board
layout, radios, thermal noise and even the sensor itself. Not only does signal noise cause inaccurate and unstable readings by
the ADC, the level of noise has been increased through the amplification stage, which exaggerates the error in the signal.
Signal noise can be qualified as low frequency, high frequency or a specific known frequency. Most often, high-frequency
noise is the issue that needs to be dealt with.
Noise can be filtered via several methods, including passive analog filters, filter ICs and digital filtering. The most common
method, passive filtering, involves creating a passive network of resistors, capacitors and inductors. The issue with passive
filters is they need to be designed and are not easily altered. As filter design can be as cumbersome as the order of filter
needed — a first-order Chebyshev filter will take much less effort to design compared to an eighth-order Bessel filter —
designers should determine the order of the filter needed before selecting the method of filtering to be employed.
Filtering ICs, which allows the designer to digitally program the type of filter needed, exist. These ICs use different types of
analog circuitry internally to create the filter and may have offset voltages associated with them. They also allow designers to
move the filter process until after quantification with the ADC. Digital filter design can be complex, but many tools exist that
allow for the easy design of high-order filters. Digital filtering can be an ideal means of removing noise; however, it often
requires a healthy number of CPU cycles which also increase power consumption.
Digital Conversion
In order to use the sensor's filtered signal, it is necessary to quantify the analog signal into the digital domain using an ADC.
Selection of an ADC mainly concerns the system's requirements for sampling speed and resolution. The sampling speed
required is related to the sensor's bandwidth or how often the system needs to be updated. Resolution is dependent on the
granularity needed to react to the sensor's information.
The system's usage model defines this speed and resolution requirement. For example, a generic gyroscope measures 360
degrees of rotation at 0.67 mV per degree, resulting in an output range of 241 mV. A hobby helicopter might need information
from the gyroscope at a granularity of 1 degree, but with a high throughput of 10Ksps to keep the helicopter upright. This
requirement would necessitate a 10-bit ADC which would provide 0.35°/bit (note that the signal will still have noise on it and ±1
bit is considered acceptable). Conversely, a digital camera with image stabilization might require a granularity of 0.02 degrees
but with a lower throughput of 5Ksps in order to adjust the image sensor as a camera shakes. This requirement would
necessitate a 16-bit ADC which would provide 0.005°/bit.
The accuracy of an ADC is rated in terms of integral non-linearity (INL), differential non-linearity (DNL), offset error, gain error
and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). When these terms are combined they offer an understanding of the ADC's total error. Figure
2, page S10, shows each of the errors individually and then combined. For a majority of applications, looking into these ADC
specifications is not needed, but a thorough engineer should have an understanding of these values for the ADC being used.
When selecting an ADC, the user has the choice of using an external ADC or a microcontroller with an integrated ADC.
External ADCs tend to be higher performance, both in speed and resolution, as well as accuracy specifications. But the
majority of sensor application requirements are well-aligned with integrated microcontroller ADCs.
Breaking Down the Sensor Signal Path
Published in Design News (http://www.designnews.com/article/232816-Breaking_Down_the_Sensor_Signal_Path.php)
Page 2 of 4
May 2009
[+] Feedback
Figure 2: Combining integral non-linearity, differential non-linearity, offset error, gain error and signal-to-noise ratio
provides an understanding of the ADC
Figure 3: Developers can implement the amplification and filtering stages, integrating the entire analog signal chain
onto a single device
Another option, configurable ADCs, are comprised of programmable logic blocks available within a microcontroller. Integrated
digital and analog programmable blocks allow for the dynamic definition of configurable peripherals optimized for a particular
sensor application, including: counters, PWMs, UART, SPI, amplifiers, filters, ADCs and DACs. Developers can also
implement the amplification and filtering stages, integrating the entire analog signal chain onto a single device (see Figure 3,
above).
Breaking Down the Sensor Signal Path
Published in Design News (http://www.designnews.com/article/232816-Breaking_Down_the_Sensor_Signal_Path.php)
Page 3 of 4
May 2009
[+] Feedback
Configurable ADCs can result in much cleaner designs compared to using passive components. In addition, given that these
blocks can also be dynamically reconfigured, developers have the option of reusing these system resources for other
functions.
Sensors continue to penetrate a wide range of markets, bringing more control and greater flexibility to developers. Sensors
increase reliability through management of the environment (i.e., temperature monitoring), improved performance through
feedback mechanisms and enables new types of user interfaces, just to name a few applications. For many of these designs,
the integrated ADCs on microcontrollers provide sufficient granularity and accuracy. Developers not familiar with analog
design may encounter pitfalls along the analog signal chain between the sensor and the MCU.
Implementing the multiple stages of the analog signal path can appear convoluted, especially to engineers accustomed to
designing primarily in the digital domain. However, by breaking down the analog signal path into the various amplification,
filtering and ADC stages, digital developers can more easily and accurately capture sensor data for a wide variety of industrial
and consumer applications. In addition, readily available ICs, configurable ADCs and filter design tools can greatly simplify
sensor design.
Cypress Semiconductor
198 Champion Court
San Jose, CA 95134-1709
Phone: 408-943-2600
Fax: 408-943-4730
http://www.cypress.com
© Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, 2007. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation assumes no responsibility for the
use of any circuitry other than circuitry embodied in a Cypress product. Nor does it convey or imply any license under patent or other rights. Cypress products are not warranted nor intended
to be used for medical, life support, life saving, critical control or safety applications, unless pursuant to an express written agreement with Cypress. Furthermore, Cypress does not authorize
its products for use as critical components in life-support systems where a malfunction or failure may reasonably be expected to result in significant injury to the user. The inclusion of
Cypress products in life-support systems application implies that the manufacturer assumes all risk of such use and in doing so indemnifies Cypress against all charges.
PSoC Designer™, Programmable System-on-Chip™, and PSoC Express™ are trademarks and PSoC® is a registered trademark of Cypress Semiconductor Corp. All other trademarks or
registered trademarks referenced herein are property of the respective corporations.
This Source Code (software and/or firmware) is owned by Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (Cypress) and is protected by and subject to worldwide patent protection (United States and
foreign), United States copyright laws and international treaty provisions. Cypress hereby grants to licensee a personal, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to copy, use, modify, create
derivative works of, and compile the Cypress Source Code and derivative works for the sole purpose of creating custom software and or firmware in support of licensee product to be used
only in conjunction with a Cypress integrated circuit as specified in the applicable agreement. Any reproduction, modification, translation, compilation, or representation of this Source Code
except as specified above is prohibited without the express written permission of Cypress.
Disclaimer: CYPRESS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH REGARD TO THIS MATERIAL, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Cypress reserves the right to make changes without further notice to the materials described
herein. Cypress does not assume any liability arising out of the application or use of any product or circuit described herein. Cypress does not authorize its products for use as critical
components in life-support systems where a malfunction or failure may reasonably be expected to result in significant injury to the user. The inclusion of Cypress’ product in a life-support
systems application implies that the manufacturer assumes all risk of such use and in doing so indemnifies Cypress against all charges.
Use may be limited by and subject to the applicable Cypress software license agreement.
Breaking Down the Sensor Signal Path
Published in Design News (http://www.designnews.com/article/232816-Breaking_Down_the_Sensor_Signal_Path.php)
Page 4 of 4
May 2009
[+] Feedback