Download Snow-pack Measurements from Underground

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Snowpack Measurements From Underground
John Wahr and Judah Levine
Department of Physics
University of Colorado
The Experiment
Put a superconducting gravity meter in the mine to
monitor changes in gravity.
Use those changes to monitor changes in the mass of
water and snow up at the surface.
The Instrument
Superconducting gravitymeter, manufactured by GWR
Instruments in San Diego. It measures g.
A superconducting ball is levitated in a magnetic field.
Electrostatic forces are applied to keep the ball
centered when g changes. The meter outputs
voltage.
NOAA is presently operating a meter in Boulder.
Mean value of g = 980 gals
.
All data analyzed by Doug Robertson (NOAA).
Red: gravitational effects of atmosphere (computed using
atmospheric pressure data).
Accuracies at quiet sites are better than 1 µgal for short averaging times.
A change in mass vertically above or below the meter, would cause
a change in gravity.
We will use the gravity data to estimate changes in the mass of
water & snow up at the surface.
We have no vertical resolution: we see the sum of snow mass, soil
moisture, and ground water.
We obtain results averaged over the region above the meter, rather
than at a single point.
Mass sensitivity (assumes flat topography)
Gravity signal at 1500 m depth, from 3 cm of water
spread over a disc.
• So, probably sensitive to mass averaged over a disc of
radius ~5 km; an area of ~80 km2 .
• More sensitive to mass at center of disc than at edges.
• 1 µgal accuracy translates to a water thickness accuracy
of ~3 cm.
Applications
• During the winter, changes in water mass are caused by
changes in snow. We can monitor changes in snowpack,
averaged over our region, on weekly & monthly scales, and
after major storms.
• By monitoring the mass decrease as the snow melts, we can
determine the fraction of snowmelt that soaks into the ground.
This could benefit from independent measurements of snow
mass (from snotel stations, or airborne microwave
scatterometer measurements).
• By watching the mass decrease further after the snow is
gone, and after large summer rainstorms, we can determine
residence times for water in the ground.
Why do this in a mine?
• Gravity measurements at the surface are sensitive
only to local water mass.
• The surface signal depends on how much water has
infiltrated in sideways beneath the building, how
much is on the roof, etc.
Complicating factors
• How noisy is the mine?
• Removal of rock mass will cause a gravity signal. How
well can we model it?
• Vertical displacements of the meter will cause gravity
signals. Can we monitor vertical displacements, or do
we have to live with them?
• The atmosphere causes a gravity signal. We need
barometric pressure data to remove it.
Possible Instrumentation
• Superconducting gravity meter.
Cost: $450,000 new. Or, NOAA instrument might be
available for no cost in short term, though would
eventually require $50,000 to restore computer & data
acquisition system.
• GPS receiver at the surface. Cost: $8000 each.
• Snotel station at the surface, to monitor snowpack at a
single location. Cost: $18,000.
• Barometer(s) at the surface. Cost: ~$4000(?) each.
Summary