Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ebola Virus Ethics Forum Ebola Virus—a highly contagious RNA virus that has around a 50-90% fatality rate. Symptoms typically start a week after infection. Tranmission Human-to-human transmission of the virus is only possible with direct contanct with bodily fluids. Needles, syringes, containmated surfaces, fecal matter, and embaling fluids used on infected individuals all pose a risk of infection. The semen of infected males can transmit the virus for up to 3 months after the initial infection. Why does the virus spread? Lack of personal protective equipment Reusing needles Inherent sanitation issues like disposing of fecal matter Traditional embalming and burial rituals Lax protocol for “universal precautions” in hospitals Limited access to running water Eating bush meat—the fruit bat is considered a natural host Treatment Oral rehydration therapy, pain management, fever reducers, and nausea medication ZMapp—human monoclonal antibodies against the Ebola virus made in using a tobacco mosaic virus TKM-Ebola—RNA interference drug that binds and inhibits proteins important to Ebola replication. Researchers are working on a vaccine, but have been unsuccessful so far 2014 Outbreak The first case was reported in March of 2014. Guinea, Seirra Leone, and Liberia are the most heavily affected countries and there have been some cases in Senegal and Nigeria. These are some of the poorest countries in the world. So far, out of around a 3,000 infected individuals there have been about 1,500 deaths. Ethical Considerations The use of “unregistered interventions” ZMapp and TKM-Ebola are treatment options that have not undergone human clinical trials and have not received FDA approval. However, ZMapp does seem to have saved the lives of several infected individuals, including two Americans. o Is it justifiable to use these drugs on people during an epidemic? o By using experimental drugs are we turning people into experiments during desperate times? o If a vaccine or robust drug treatment becomes available, who receives treatment first? o Is this a case of the Western experimentation narrative like the Tuskegee Syphilis Trials? “In the particular circumstances of this outbreak, and provided certain conditions are met, the panel reached consensus that it is ethical to offer unproven interventions with as yet unknown efficacy and adverse effects, as potential treatment or prevention.” –The World Health Organization (WHO) August 11, 2014 Distribution of limited treatment options The majority of infected West Africans did not receive the experimental drugs, however, two Americans and a Spanish priest received ZMapp. o Do you think it is justifiable to give treatments to individuals because of their citizenship or status? o Why did predominantly Caucasian people receive treatment instead of the native population? The other group that received ZMapp were Liberian health workers. o During an epidemic, who should be given treatment priority, doctors or patients? Foreign Aid o Is this a global problem or a West African problem? o Should wealthier countries be giving monetary contributions? o What do you think about President Obama sending troops to Africa to help with the crisis? Research Dollars o Do you think more treatments are not available because pharmaceutical companies are not willing to make drugs for people who cannot afford them? Larger Social Issues o Does the Ebola outbreak reflect the need for better social understanding in Africa if people do not trust their healthcare workers? For example, in parts of West Africa people hide from health workers, do not trust their physicians, and have been exposed to coercive quarantine measures. o Would the circumstances of the epidemic have been the same if it had occurred in richer countries? o Would the global public health response have been different if Ebola emerged in the Western world? Healthcare worker issues o Should healthcare workers be forced to work in an environment that is potentially dangerous to their own health? o How do you compensate for these risks? Hazard pay? Should it be your moral duty or professional obligation? o Some healthcare workers are not being paid. Would that stop you from working? Sources: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/us-troops-heading-africa-ebola-fight-25624075 http://theconversation.com/epidemic-ethics-four-lessons-from-the-current-ebola-outbreak30534 http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebola_virus_disease http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/ http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2014/ebola-ethical-review-summary/en/ http://www.bioethicsinstitute.org/announcements/untested-interventions-and-the-ebolaoutbreak