Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Elder Care in Europe An overview of its history and current trends March 23rd 2011 Социальные услуги ХХI века: пожилых людей Санкт-Петербург Freek Lapré (chair EAHSA) WWW.EAHSA.EU • The European Association of Homes and Services for the Ageing (EAHSA) is affiliated with the International Association of Homes and Services for the Ageing • We have more than 2000 providers in our membership in 15 different European countries from all different industries related to elder care • Based in Brussels • Europe = Greater Europe (> EU) 5 principles of EAHSA • • • • • Preserving dignity Nurturing spirits in life Comforting in partnership Encouraging diversity With a carefree approach EAHSA Network Most relevant contacts: • IAHSA Washington DC (www.iahsa.net) • European Commission Brussels • European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research (affiliated with UN) (www.euro.centre.org) • AGE Platform Europe (www.age-platform.org) • European Housing Forum (www.europeanhousingforum.org) • European Health Management Association (www.ehma.org) • Eden Europe (www.eden-europe.net) • European chapters of the International Society of Gerontechnology (www.gerontechnology.info) Why becoming a member ? Part of European and International Network (EAHSA membership includes IAHSA membership): - Self learning: bi-annual conferences - Exchange of best practices and innovations - Reflection on your own development - Management exchange programmes - Exchange of quality frameworks: IAHSA Quality Movement, Progress indicators Snapshot of last EAHSA conference in Stockholm Sweden (2010) EAHSA strategy towards Eastern Europe • To broaden its geographic base and membership, EAHSA has initiated an EAHSA Eastern European Strategy (EES), within its vision of a broader European community • Key components: – Establish a “network of stakeholders” in Eastern European countries – Develop an EAHSA sponsored EES Forum to share information, identify common issues, difficulties, etc. – Identify ways in which EAHSA could work with organisations, NGOs, , etc. to facilitate progress – Locate sponsors for the Forum (and Strategy) SICUAP, the Silver Time Foundation and EAHSA • We congratulate our colleagues in Russia and welcome you in the EAHSA and IAHSA family • We will build friendships between colleagues with a common aim: improve the quality of life of those who we serve • We hope to learn from you and vice versa History of elder care in Europe • Started with family • Churches and other charities supported this especially when there was no family • Communities took over • Governments came in: – Local – National (moving back to local) • Social care or health care Supply of elder care in Europe: an overview • Different countries, different systems: welfare, social care, health care • Northern European countries: high degree of institutionalization • Southern and Eastern Europe: family care, but growing demand for professional and institutional care • Growing importance of home care Home care vs. institutional care But: USA: mostly private funded Finance of LTC • Mostly tax based systems • Cost-sharing differs between countries: – Cost sharing in institutional care – Cost sharing in home care differs: DNK home care is free • Low private funding: – Coverage by public insurance – High rate of informal care Focus on: • • • • The United Kingdom Romania Italy The Netherlands United Kingdom • Long term care is part of social care • Municipalities contract LTC-organisations • Since 1990: shift from institutional care to domiciliary care • Non- and for-profit organizations • PM David Cameron wants increase home care to shorten length of stay in hospitals • But there is a Chinese wall between social care and NHS Romania • Long waiting lists for residential care • Day care centres, but no respite care • Home care: – Financed by the National Health Insurance Company – Limits until 56 days a year • Personal assistance (paid volunteers): – provided by municipalities for so-called grade one handicap that is entitled by a commission – Client or family needs to find someone who wants to be a personal assistant Italy • From 70’s until ’92 no clear concept about a comprehensive LTC, regional differences • Still emphasis on family support, but family support is decreasing • Therefore strong increase of demand for professional and institutional care • Supply is insufficient • 1992: National Plan for the elderly Netherlands • More then a century tradition of LTC starting from charity • In 70’s financed by government as part of health care • Highly institutionalized and medicalized • Large organisations • Shift towards social care controlled by municipalities • Complex system of financial resources (WMO (municipality), AWBZ (public insurance), Health Insurance (private insurance)) Future challenges LTC in Europe • Labour: keep the sector attractive for professionals • New (or old ?) concepts: de-institutionalisation, integration of informal care • Building appropriate housing for the elderly • Financial sustainability Ratio LTC staff per recipient >65 in facilities in 2007 OECD, 2009 Financial Sustainability of Long Term Care % of GDP 2005 Projected % of GDP in 2050 Increase in % United Kingdom 1.1 % 2.1 - 3.0 % 191 – 273 % Italy 0.6 % 2.8 - 3.5 % 467 – 583 % Germany 1.0 % 2.2 - 2.9 % 220 – 290 % Netherlands 1.7 % 2.9 – 3.7 % 171 – 218 % Japan 0.9 % 2.4 – 3.1 % 267 – 344 % USA 0.9 % 1.8 – 2.7 % 200 – 300 % OECD, 2010 Financial pressure Forecast debt-to-GDP and general government financial balances, 2011 General government balance in percentage of GDP, 2011 -12 IRL GBR -10 USA JPN -8 FRA ESP -6 SVK LUX POL CZE DNK AUT -4 NZL NLD DEU HUN GRC OECD PRT ITA BEL FIN ISL -2 AUS NOR SWE CAN CHE 0 KOR 2 0 50 Source: OECD (2010b). 100 150 200 Gross government debt in percentage of GDP, 2011 250 Current trends in elder care: governments So the challenge for governments: an ageing society and less budget. • Moving from health care to social care • Restoring connection between social care and health care • Public/private collaboration • More individual responsibility: informal care and cost-sharing Current trends in elder care: providers The challenge: less budget and less staff • From large scale institutions to small scale facilities integrated in neighbourhoods • Shift from quality of care to quality of life: more emphasis on sustainable housing and extending range of services at home • Application of technology: – As part of service supply: telehealth and telemonitoring – To increase efficiency: electronic records of clients Some examples Sustainable housing Adapted housing 32 dwellings 24 singles (18 women en 6 men) 8 couples median age: 80 years De Godtschalckwijk 20 dwellings 19 singles (8 men en 11 women) 1 couple median age -70 years : 52 years median age +70 years: 79 years Nursing homes as habitats Telehealth/telemonitoring • Virtual desk • Monitoring system • Tele measuring of bodyfunctions Examples are currently implemented in the Netherlands Virtual desk Courtesy NjbosGroep Monitoring systems Courtesy NjbosGroep Telemeasuring bodyfunctions Innovative: •Plug and play device •Easily integrated in existing callcenters of care service organizations Courtesy VitelNet Hope to see you all at our 2012 conference at: 27-28 september 2012 MALTA Thank you ! With regards to: • Dr. Francesca Colombo, OECD • Ricardo Rodrigues, ECV • Jean-Christophe Vanderhaegen, CBFB • Alzheimer Europe