Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones 321 21 Cardiovascular Hormones Willis K. Samson, PhD and Meghan M. Taylor, PhD CONTENTS VASOCATIVE HORMONE FAMILIES NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE FAMILY ENDDOTHELINS AM GENE PRODUCTS CARDIOVASCULAR HORMONES AS DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TOOLS 1. VASOACTIVE HORMONE FAMILIES 1.1. The Heart as an Endocrine Organ acterized, their hallmark effects are to unload the vascular tree via a combination of CNS, pituitary, adrenal, vascular, and renal actions (Fig. 1). This results in decreased venous return to the pump as a consequence of increased renal excretion of water and solute, vasorelaxation in certain vascular beds, increased capillary permeability, and decreased cardiac output. The third member of this family of hormones, although exerting many of the same actions as ANP and BNP, is unique in that it is predominantly produced in the vascular endothelium, not in the heart, and is thought to act more in a paracrine or an autocrine fashion, regulating primarily vascular tone and growth. Additionally, this hormone, designated C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), exerts several CNS actions that oppose those of ANP and BNP. For years the central focus of vascular endocrinology was the renin–angiotensin system (see Chapter 23); however, with the discovery of the cardiac hormones and the realization that at least some of their actions were expressed by a functional antagonism of the actions of angiotensin, a broader view of the importance of circulating hormones controlling vascular and renal function took shape. Then this doctrine of endocrine regulation of cardiovascular and renal function From: Endocrinology: Basic and Clinical Principles, Second Edition was challenged and expanded by the realization that (S. Melmed and P. M. Conn, eds.) © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 321 Although the heart had long been considered merely a muscular pump that performed the physical labor of the circulation, it has been recognized for more than six decades that in addition to the contractile ultrastructure, a secretory function was evidenced by densecore granules in the myocytes. Over the past two decades, the endocrine nature of the heart has been established, and the physiology and pathophysiology of the cardiac hormones have been extensively characterized. In both a constitutive and regulated fashion, myocytes produce two members of a family of hormones designated natriuretic peptides based on their abilities to stimulate salt and water excretion by direct renal actions and by actions in other tissues, including endocrine organs, responsible for the control of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. Two members of the natriuretic peptide family, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP, actually a misnomer since very little if any of this peptide is produced in the central nervous system) are produced in the heart and released in response to a variety of cues, many typical of plasma volume overload or hyperosmolality. Although numerous biologic actions have been char- 322 Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary Fig. 1. Summary of biologic actions of ANP and CNP. AVP = vasopressin; ACTH = adrenocorticotropin; GnRH = gonadotropinreleasing hormone; CRH = corticotropin-releasing hormone; CO = cardiac output; UV = urine volume; UNaV = urinary sodium excretion; NO = nitric oxide; ET = endothelin; T3/T4 = thyroid hormones. perhaps the largest endocrine organ in the body, by virtue of its enormous surface area and ubiquitous presence, was the vasculature itself, mainly the endothelium. Not only was one member of the natriuretic peptide family produced in and released from this tissue, but it became apparent that numerous peptidergic, as well as nonpeptidergic, factors originating in the endothelium controlled vascular tone and proliferation. 1.2. Hormones of the Endothelium The vascular endothelium controls access of bloodborne factors not only to the interstitium, but also to the contractile and proliferative elements of the vascular tree, the vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Additionally, the endothelial cells are positioned optimally to respond themselves to circulating factors and to transduce those messages to the VSMCs. Many hormonal messages are in fact delivered to the contractile ele- ments via factors produced in the endothelium. Much attention has been focused on the ability of the endothelium to cause vasorelaxation via the generation of a soluble gas, nitric oxide (NO); however, peptidergic factors originating in the endothelial cells control VSMC function as well. Here the role of CNP as a paracrine factor has been established, and the endothelial cell– VSMC interface was the setting for the discovery and characterization of two additional, potent vasoactive hormones, endothelin (ET) and adrenomedullin (AM). The ETs are potent hypertensive agents that exert their effects directly on the VSMCs. AM, on the other hand, is a potent hypotensive agent, acting in a paracrine or an autocrine fashion in the vasculature. Thus, both circulating and locally produced vasoactive hormones can control regional blood flow, and this cellular interface has provided a model for the paracrine and autocrine effects of these peptides in other tissues as well. Agonists and antagonists selective for these peptides have Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones been successfully tested in models of cardiovascular disease and some have even been approved for clinical use in humans. 2. NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE FAMILY 2.1. Gene Structure and Regulation The members of the natriuretic peptide family share structural homology but are products of unique genes. Expression of separate genes and posttranslational processing of the nascent hormones is very similar. The genes for ANP and BNP have been localized to the same chromosome, whereas that for CNP resides on a separate chromosome, further suggesting the similar actions of ANP and BNP and disparate effects of CNP. Cloning of the cDNA complementarity to ANP mRNA revealed the presence of three exons in the ANP gene and the transcription of a prepro-ANP mRNA that encoded a 151- to 152-amino-acid preprohormone, depending on species. Removal of the N-terminal signal peptide results in a prohormone of 126 amino acids, which demonstrates extensive homology across species. This 126amino-acid prohormone is the major form of the peptide stored in secretory granules in the heart. Stored proANP is processed at secretion to a variety of smaller, biologically active forms, primarily the mature 28amino-acid, C-terminal fragment. In brain, on the other hand, the prohormone is further processed to the mature peptide before packaging in secretory granules. An additional form of ANP is produced in kidney, this form being 33 amino acids of the C-terminus by posttranslational processing that includes four more amino acids on the N-terminus. This isoform, designated urodilatin, is thought to act as a paracrine regulator of tubular function. Expression of the BNP gene differs in that the resultant mRNA is less stable and the final posttranslational product is 32 amino acids long. Finally, CNP processing is quite similar to that of ANP, with the exception that the final posttranslational product lacks the C-terminal extension distal to the shared (within the natriuretic family) 17-membered disulfide loop, consisting, thus, of only 22 amino acids. In humans, owing to the presence of an arginine in the prohormone at position 73, a second form of CNP is present, which is N-terminally extended, consisting of 53 amino acids. CNP-22 and CNP-53 exert similar actions in many biologic systems. Note that in all three isoforms, the integrity of the internal disulfide loop is necessary for biologic activity. Although little is known about the regulation of CNP gene transcription, mechanisms for activation of ANP and BNP gene transcription have been extensively studied. Gene transcription is induced by glucocorticoids, α-adrenergic agents, growth factors, calcium, and 323 physical factors. There is a regional mismatch in the adult in gene expression of the two peptides, with ANP expressed primarily in the atria and BNP in the ventricles under basal conditions. Physical factors such as cardiac overload induce transcription of both genes, with the appearance of ANP expression in the ventricles as well. Most striking, however, is the level of induction of the BNP gene in the ventricles, resulting in a remarkable increase in circulating hormone levels. At the molecular level, ANP gene transcription is regulated by numerous members of the activating protein1 complex, being induced by c-jun and in most cases suppressed by c-fos. A close relative of c-fos, fra-1, exerts biphasic effects, reducing the magnitude of c-jun activation of ANP gene expression in atriocytes, while amplifying the induction of expression by c-jun in ventriculocytes. Thus, the response of the ANP promotor to these early response elements may vary under unique physiologic conditions, permitting a wider repertoire of control of gene expression. 2.2. Hormone Secretion 2.2.1. PHYSIOLOGIC RELEASE Plasma levels of ANP and BNP are extremely low (5–10 and 0.5–1.0 fmol/mL, respectively) and rise in response to any interventions that increase venous return and, therefore, atrial pressure and stretch. Pressor agents can release ANP in vivo and some even act in isolated tissue in vitro, suggesting direct cellular effects independent from increased venous return. The natriuretic effects of ANP and BNP are mirrored by the ability of hyperosmolality to stimulate directly, and indirectly via volume expansion, hormone secretion. In addition to secretion from the heart, these peptides are produced in and secreted from or into a variety of other tissues where distinct biologic actions have been characterized. The absolute contribution of those release sites to circulating levels of the hormones is in all likelihood minor; however, the potential importance of paracrine effects of the natriuretic peptides in those other tissues makes the study of the regulation of release in noncardiac sites extremely important. Indeed, renal, CNS, gonadal, and thymic production sites suggest a diversity of function for the peptides, and the mechanisms responsible for the regulation of secretion first must be elucidated before the physiologic or pathologic significance of those production sites is fully understood. Within the CNS, some of the same circulating factors that can stimulate ANP release from the myocytes (i.e., vasopressin and ET) similarly stimulate neuronal production and release of the peptide. Endothelial cell production of CNP has been clearly established and the control of peptide secretion partially 324 Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary characterized. A variety of cytokines and growth factors (including interleukin-1α [IL-α] and IL-β, tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], and transforming growth factor [TGF-β], as well as ANP and BNP) can stimulate CNP release from endothelial cells. Shear stress and hypoxia stimulate CNP release in the vasculature, as they do for ANP and BNP in the heart. Thus, the endothelial cell can, via CNP secretion, both transduce the antimitogenic effects of circulating ANP and BNP and buffer the proliferative effects of circulating cytokines and growth factors. 2.2.2. STATE OF HYPERSECRETION Elevations in circulating natriuretic peptides have been reported in a variety of pathophysiologic states. CNP is remarkably elevated in septic shock, but not in hypertension or congestive heart failure (CHF). This again points to the more likely paracrine actions of CNP within the endothelial cell interface with VSMCs. CHF, myocardial ischemia, and hypertension all result in increased ANP and BNP secretion, reflecting possible compensatory mechanisms called into play during those conditions. Plasma BNP levels in cardiac overload states exceed those of ANP and are used clinically as diagnostic and prognostic tools to assess the progression and degree of heart failure. Although elevated during those overload states, the bioactivity of ANP and BNP appears to be reduced owing to a possible combination of effects, including reduced renal perfusion, receptor downregulation, or the counterregulatory effects of simultaneous activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Of these three possible explanations, the best case can be made for the latter. The increased circulating levels of ANP in critically ill trauma patients is thought to be a potential cause of suppressed adrenocorticotropic hormone levels frequently observed, because ANP can act at both the hypothalamic and pituitary levels to inhibit corticotropin release. 2.3. Sites of Action Three natriuretic peptide receptor subtypes have been identified (Fig. 2). Two of these proteins contain intracellular kinase homology domains (adenosine triphosphate binding sites) and C-terminal guanylyl cyclase (GC) domains. Activation of these receptors results, therefore, in elevated cellular cyclic guanosine 5´-monophosphate (cGMP) levels. Their extracellular domains share 44% homology, whereas the intracellular domains share 63% homology in the kinase homology domain and 88% homology in the GC domains. These two receptors have been designated the GC-A and GC-B receptors and are alternatively called natri- uretic peptide receptor-A (NPR-A) and NPR-B. A third receptor subtype, called the clearance receptor or NPRC, shares approx 30% homology with NPR-A and NPRB in the extracellular ligand-binding domain; however, this receptor lacks the intracellular C-terminal extension (i.e., it is missing the kinase and GC domains). This receptor was originally thought to have no biologic activity other than to sequester or clear natriuretic peptides from the extracellular fluid; however, it is now recognized that NPR-C plays important biologic roles and signals via a reduction in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels and possibly a stimulation of polyinositol phosphate turnover (increased phospholipase C [PLC] activity). This receptor appears to mediate the antimitogenic actions of the natriuretic peptides in the CNS. A distinct hierarchy of binding affinities characterizes these receptors with all three forms of natriuretic peptides binding with equal affinity to NPRC. NPR-A prefers ANP as a ligand (ANP > BNP >> CNP), whereas NPR-B recognizes more readily CNP (CNP >> ANP = BNP). Thus, the sites of action of the natriuretic peptides are determined by the relative distributions of the three receptors, with NPR-B predominating in the brain (e.g., the hypothalamo-hypophyseal system) and muscular component of the vasculature, whereas NPR-A is more abundant in the kidney, adrenal gland, and endothelium. The clearance (NPR-C) receptor is present throughout the body. 2.4. Biologic Actions Originally CNP was thought to act only in a paracrine fashion to regulate vascular tone and growth; however, CNP can also exert cardiovascular, renal, and adrenal actions when infused intravenously. This may simply be a reflection of the fact that CNP is produced in a variety of tissues, and, therefore, multiple paracrine actions may occur. CNP levels are elevated in chronic renal failure, and the peptide is produced in kidney, where it exerts diuretic and natriuretic effects. One can recognize the sites of action of the natriuretic peptides by locating receptors, but the assignment of biologic activity is not as simple. Two reagents that have clarified the receptor subtype responsible for a variety of natriuretic peptide actions are the clearance receptor ligand C-ANF4–23, which binds preferentially to NPRC, and the GC antagonist HS-142-1, which blocks the ability of the natriuretic peptides to signal via activation of GC. By using a combination of methodologic approaches, it has been realized that although the NPRC controls the antimitogenic effects of the natriuretic peptides centrally, NPR-B performs a similar function in the vascular compartment. Within the kidney, multiple receptors are found, explaining the ability of both Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones 325 Fig. 2. Three members of the natriuretic peptide family, ANP, BNP, and CNP, share 65% homology (indicated by shaded circles) in the biologically active ring structure formed by the disulfide links and vary in amino acid composition and lengths of their N- and C-terminal extensions. All three peptides are recognized by the natriuretic peptide C (clearance) receptor (NPR-C); however, the A receptor (NPR-A) prefers ANP and BNP. The B receptor (NPR-B) recognizes with relative preference CNP. Activation of the three receptors has been reported to generate the indicated changes in intracellular levels of cGMP or cAMP and/or phosphoinositol (PI) turnover. ANP and CNP to act as diuretic and natriuretic agents. The multiple peripheral effects of the natriuretic peptides are summarized in Fig. 1. Although not all of these actions seem related to fluid and electrolyte homeostasis, some may instead be related to the antiproliferative effects of the peptides. Within the CNS, similar and diverging actions of ANP and CNP have been described. In most species, more CNP is produced within the brain than ANP or BNP and, for the most part, NPR-B and NPR-C predominate within the brain interstitium. It should be recognized that ANP may therefore exert its biologic actions in the brain by displacing CNP from NPR-C (clearance receptor). This has been demonstrated to be the case in the neuroendocrine hypothalamus. There are other examples where interactive effects via the shared NPR-C cannot underlie the effects observed. Thus, the ability of ANP to inhibit the behavioral (water drinking) and endocrine (prolactin [PRL] secretion) aspects of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis is opposed by the stimulatory effects of CNP. Certainly in these cases, activation of NPR-A must underlie the effects of ANP, whereas NPR-B must be responsible for the stimulatory effects of CNP. In the absence of antagonists that can distinguish between these two GC receptor subtypes, other methodologies had to be created to make these distinctions. One such approach is receptor-specific cytotoxin cell targeting using the plant lectin ricin. With this approach, evidence for the involvement of the NPRA in the physiologic regulation of salt appetite has been 326 obtained, and the importance of NPR-B in the hypothalamic mechanisms controlling neuroendocrine function has been established. Which of the pharmacologic actions of the natriuretic peptides are physiologically relevant? A combination of experimental approaches has provided evidence for the role of the peptides in a variety of tissues. Use of the selective clearance receptor ligand C-ANF4–23 established the importance of ligand binding to the NPR-C on astrocyte proliferation (i.e., antimitogenic effects). The GC receptor antagonist HS-142-1 was employed to demonstrate that the natriuretic peptides play important roles in the maintenance of glomerular filtration and sodium excretion under basal conditions. Ricin cytotoxin adminstration studies demonstrated the role of endogenous brain-derived CNP in the neuroendocrine regulation of PRL and luteinizing hormone secretion, and the importance of central ANP to the control of sodium homeostasis (i.e., appetite). Passive immunoneutralization was employed to demonstrate the physiologic relevance of the action of ANP to inhibit thirst. Recently two molecular techniques have provided additional insight into the physiology of the natriuretic peptides. Transgenic mouse models of overexpression of natriuretic peptide have been created. In the case of the ANP transgene, homozygotes displayed significantly lower blood pressure under basal conditions than nontransgenic littermates; however, sodium excretion was not different. Transgene-induced overexpression of BNP led to increased endochondral ossification and bony overgrowth. These studies uncovered an action of BNP that was not revealed in pharmacologic studies, probably due to the chronic effect of BNP overexpression, something not possible to accomplish in classic pharmacologic application studies. Transgene-induced overexpression of CNP or BNP improved postischemic insult neovascularization by stimulating reendothelialization and suppressing neointimal formation. These studies strongly suggest a therapeutic option for the natriuretic peptides in patients with tissue ischemia. The second molecular approach to the study of the physiologic relevance of the pharmacologic effects of the natriuretic peptides is the generation of null mutations (knockouts), which results in the absence of a given peptide. ANP-null mice are more susceptible to the hypertensive consequences of high salt ingestion. This model reveals two important things. First, ANP is not essential for normal embryonic and postnatal development. Second, endogenous ANP must play some role in the physiologic mechanisms that protect against the development of high blood pressure. CNP knockouts are dwarfs, displaying impaired endochondral ossifica- Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary tion, but the condition can be rescued by simultaneous targeted overexpression of a CNP transgene. These data complement the results (just discussed) in the CNP overexpression system alone and further support a significant role of CNP in normal bone development and turnover. The CNP knockout animals display early mortality; thus, other important roles of CNP must be present and are certainly awaiting discovery. 2.5. Potential Therapeutic Uses Although the action of the natriuretic peptides appears to be blunted in edematous states, such as CHF, cirrhosis, and the nephrotic syndrome, therapeutic use of the peptides in these states may prove at least acutely advantageous. Certainly, if the mechanism by which the biologic activity of the peptides has been reduced in these states can be elucidated, strategies might be employed that overcome those deficits. In particular, it has already been demonstrated that in CHF, administration of high doses of ANP and urodilatin can lower preload and increase diuresis and natriuresis, providing significant benefit in this life-threatening situation. Even though plasma ANP levels are elevated in CHF, further elevation by exogenous administration has provided salutary therapy. Like conventional diuretics, ANP increases urine volume and urinary sodium excretion, at least in part by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the collecting duct by an action on the sodium/chloride transporter. However, unlike current diuretic agents, ANP inhibits the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by directly inhibiting renin secretion and thereby lowering aldosterone levels in plasma. In addition, administration of ANP lowers sympathetic tone, and the combined reduction in plasma renin activity and sympathetic tone effectively lowers sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule. ANP also inhibits tubuloglomerular feedback, and the maintenance of glomerular filtration even in the face of decreased renal blood flow may be an important reason for the peptide’s protective effect on renal function even in low perfusion states such as heart failure. Finally, ANP not only inhibits arginine vasopressin (AVP) release, but it blocks AVP’s ability to stimulate water reabsorption in the collecting duct. ANP therapy in acute heart failure was approved in Japan almost 10 yr ago, and recently a synthetic BNP, nesiritide, was approved for use in the United States. Because a role of endogenous ANP in the phenomenon has been suggested, perhaps a similar strategy can be used to induce mineralocorticoid escape. Interest in the postoperative use of ANP and urodilatin to prevent acute renal failure has been stimulated by early studies demonstrating the ability of high pharmacologic doses Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones 327 Fig. 3. Three members of the mammalian ET peptide family have been identified, each sharing remarkable homology in amino acid composition. Shaded circles indicate differing amino acids. Three receptor subtypes have been characterized. The ET-A receptor binds ET with a relative preference indicated by the thickness of the arrows (ET-1 ⱖ ET-2 > ET-3). The ET-B receptor recognizes equally all three forms of ET. The third receptor, ET-C, found thus far only in nonmammals, prefers ET-3. Sites of receptor expression are indicated. of the peptide to reduce the need for hemodialysis/ hemofiltration in these patients. Most promising in a therapeutic sense is the potential use of the natriuretic peptides as antiproliferative agents. In a rabbit model of vascular lesions caused by balloon catheter injury, administration of CNP significantly lowered the resultant intima-to-media ratios, providing direct evidence for a paracrine action of the peptide to suppress intimal thickening. Furthermore, local CNP antagonizes the growth-promoting effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) and the vascular consequences of cyclosporine A induction of ET release and subsequent mitogenesis, again predicting a significant avenue for the prevention of vascular lesions. 3. ENDOTHELINS 3.1. Gene Structure In addition to the production of endothelial-derived relaxing factors in the vasculature, it had been known for some time that the cells lining the blood vessels produce potent vasoconstrictive substances as well. In 1988, the sequence of a powerful, endogenous vasoconstrictor substance produced by endothelial cells was identified. This 21-amino-acid peptide was named ET. It is now recognized that there are at least three forms of the ETs (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3), all 21 amino acid peptides differing by only 2–5 amino acids in the 15membered ring structure formed by two internal disulfide bonds (Fig. 3). Each are products of unique genes and are first processed similarly into a prohormone form of 203 amino acids, in the case of ET-1, and then posttranslationally modified into the 39-amino-acid prohormone intermediate, big ET. In states of hypersecretion, the prohormone forms appears in plasma; however, under normal conditions, the mature 21amino-acid form is the major secretory product. The final cleavage of the prohormone is thought to occur at secretion and to be catalyzed by a phosphoramidonsensitive metalloproteinase designated ET-converting enzyme (EC 3.4.24.11). Knowledge of this important conversion enzyme’s presence has led to potential therapeutic intervention strategies for interruption of ET action in states of hypersecretion, because the prohormone big ET has limited biologic activity. The human ET-1 gene has five exons and four introns, with the peptide coded in the second exon. The gene is transcriptionally regulated via cis elements, including a GATA-2 protein-binding site and an AP-1 site that is activated by thrombin, angiotensin II, epidermal growth factor (EGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), 328 Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary insulin-like growth factor, and TGF-β. Other transcriptional regulators include vasopressin, the ILs, TNF-α, and NO, which apparently mediates the ability of heparin to stimulate ET production. Physical factors also activate transcription, including pressure and anoxia. Translational regulation is exerted by a variety of factors that also regulate secretion, since little hormone is stored intracellularly. High-density lipoproteins stimulate production and secretion, whereas insulin not only stimulates production and secretion, but also augments ET binding and action. Negative regulation of production and secretion is exerted at the transcriptional level by NO, and at the translational event by prostaglandins, prostacyclin, AM, and ANP. 3.2. Hormone Secretion Fortunately, the majority of the ET produced is secreted abluminally, away from the vessel lumen, to act in a paracrine or autocrine fashion. Although levels of the hormone do rise in certain pathologic conditions, in general, reflecting tissue damage in most cases, this peptide should be kept out of the circulation because of its potent vasoconstrictive properties and because in experimental animals, elevation in circulating ET results in respiratory failure and/or cerebral vasospasms and aneurysms. Again, knowledge of the production sites predicts biologic activities. The major site of ET-1 production is the endothelium, where on release it causes vasoconstriction. Additional production sites include the brain, uterus, kidney mesangial cells, Sertoli cells, and breast epithelial cells. ET-3 production occurs mainly within the CNS, where a role for the peptide in neuronal and astroglial development and proliferation has been suggested. What little ET-2 is produced in the body is found in kidney, intestine (hence, the alternative name vasoactive intestinal constrictor), myocardium, and uterus. The ETs have a relatively short half-life in plasma, about 4–7 min, and are released primarily in response to hypoxia, ischemia, and shear stress. 3.3. Site and Mechanisms of Action Two mammalian ET receptor subtypes have been cloned, and they are members of the G protein–linked, seven-transmembrane-spanning domain superfamily of biologic receptors (Fig. 3). The ET-A receptor displays a rank order of binding affinity with ET-1 being the preferred ligand (ET-1 ⱖ ET-2 >> ET-3). This receptor predominates in VSMCs and cardiac myocytes. Activation of the receptor results, depending on tissue site, in the activation of a variety of signaling cascades, including in the lung the production of prostanoids via stimulation of PLD and PLA2 activities resulting in bronchoconstriction and in the scenario of hypersecretion, pulmonary hypertension (Fig. 4). In VSMCs, ET stimulates contraction and mitogenesis via multiple signaling pathways, including activation of PLC with the resultant formation of diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP 3). The DAG formed activates the kinase cascade via protein kinase C (PKC), and IP3 mobilizes intracellular calcium, initiating the contractile event. ET-A receptor activation also in these cells has been reported to open potassium channels and to activate adenylyl cyclase. In the myocardium, the ET-A receptor is thought to be activated by endogenous ET released in response to ischemia following myocardial infarction. The resultant opening of potassium channels causes a decrease in the electrical activity of the myocyte and closes the chloride channel, resulting in a suppression of catecholamine activation of contractile function. The ET-B receptor predominates in the endothelium itself and in the CNS. This receptor binds all three isoforms equally and is responsible for the activity of circulating ET to stimulate a transient vasodilatory response in the periphery, via acute release of vasodilators such as NO and CNP. The signaling cascade that follows activation of the ET-B receptor is multifaceted. G protein–coupled activation of PLC results in PKC activation and mobilization of intracellular calcium. NO synthase activity is stimulated with the resultant production of the potent vasodilator NO, which can act within the endothelial cell to activate GC or diffuse across to the smooth muscle cells to perform the same function. Additionally, ET-B activation results in opening of the sodium-hydrogen antiporter and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. The mitogenic effects of ET are thought to be transduced via PKC activation and tyrosine phosporylation–intiated activation of the mitogenactivated protein kinase (MAPK) system. In mesangial cells, the mitogenic effect of ET is mediated via transcriptional activation of immediate early genes. Activation of Ras proteins and downstream induction of the kinase activity of Raf-1 result in transcriptional induction of the c-fos serum response element, perhaps providing a mechanism for the mitogenic effect of ET. One hallmark characteristic of the biologic effects of the ETs is their profound tachyphylaxis. Although some data indicate this to be the result of chronic membrane effects or overloading of the cytosolic calcium pool, evidence also exists for rapid internalization of the ligand-receptor complex and continued signaling from the internalized aggregate. 3.4. Biologic Actions Although multiple pharmacologic effects of the ETs have been reported, there is a need to establish which of Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones 329 Fig. 4. Summary of biologic actions of ETs. those have biologic significance and physiologic relevance. In this case, multiple pharmacologic tools are available, such that selective antagonism of the ET-A receptor is possible and isoform-specific activation of the ET-B receptor can now be accomplished. Also available are antagonists that affect both the ET-A and ETB receptor, and a new generation of relatively specific ET-B antagonists. Much interest continues regarding the possible existence of a unique, ET-3-selective ET-C receptor in mammals similar to that found in frog melanophores, and it is hoped that eventual cloning of that protein will permit generation of similarly selective antagonists. Surprising results from molecular approaches have provided new insight into the biology of the ETs. As discussed below, it was anticipated that these potent vasoconstrictive peptides would be found to play an important role in the development of hypertension; however, gene knockout homozygotes have, if anything, slightly elevated blood pressure, not the expected hypotension. Unexpected results accrued from these null mutation strategies. Mice lacking expression of the normal ET-1 gene are born with severe craniofacial malformations, suggesting a developmental role of the peptide in pharyngeal arch structures. Additionally, these animals succumb to respiratory failure, suggesting an important embryonic role of the peptide in the preparation of respiratory structures for postnatal life. Knockouts of the genes encoding the ET-B receptor or ET-3 itself result in a postnatal phenotype similar to that observed in Hirschsprung disease (congenital megacolon), suggesting the importance of ET in the development of the intrinsic nervous system of the gut and the regulation of gastrointestinal smooth muscle function. Multiple CNS actions of the ETs have been reported, ranging from mitogenic effects on astrocytes mediated via the ET-B receptor to effects on descending sympathetic activity. The presence of the ET peptide and ET receptors during fetal development indicates a potential embryonic role in CNS structures, 330 Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary which may mirror the situation uncovered by the ET-3 and ET-B receptor knockouts in the intrinsic nervous system of the gut. Loss of the neurotropic effects of the ETs may be responsible in part for the respiratory failure seen in the immediate postpartum interval. Regarding neuromodulatory effects of the ETs, antagonist studies have revealed the physiologic relevance of the antidipsogenic effects of ET; however, the day-to-day significance of the neuroendocrine actions of the peptide (including activation of the hypothalamic mechanisms controlling anterior pituitary function and vasopressin secretion) and the effects of the peptides on sympathetic function have yet to be established. A final CNS consequence of the administration of ET is potentially disastrous. In some species, ET infusion results in rupture of the basal artery on the ventral surface of the Pons, and a role for endogenous ET in vasospasm subsequent to subarachinoid hemorrhage has been established by the observation that pretreatment with an ET antagonist can prevent this event. This has led to the hypothesis that ET antagonists may prove therapeutically advantageous to prevent or lessen ischemic damage downstream from damaged, hypoxic endothelium of the cerebral vessels after thrombosis or infarct. 3.5. Pathophysiology of the ETs Because of the multiple pharmacologic activities of the ETs, their involvement in numerous pathologic states has been hypothesized. These hypotheses were based largely on elevated circulating ET levels or responses seen in these conditions and, under many circumstances, it remains unclear whether the associations are causal or coincidental. The most predicted role for the ETs in pathophysiology was that in hypertensive states. Indeed, plasma levels are not consistently found to correlate with blood pressure, and although they may be elevated in some animal models of hypertension, null mutant mice actually have elevated blood pressures. Similarly controversial is the potential role for ET in reperfusion injury; one group using an isolated perfused rat heart model argued against a causative role and another utilizing isolated ventricular myocytes argued in favor. In vivo evidence favoring a role for endogenous ET in reperfusion injury comes from studies in pig in which both myocardial ischemia and infarction resulted in significantly elevated ET production and release. In rats receiving infusion of an antiserum directed against ET-1 prior to coronary artery ligation, damage distal to the ligation was markedly reduced. Similar results were obtained with an ET-A receptor antagonist in a canine myocardial infarction model. These data provide the best evidence for a role for ET in reperfusion injury and ischemia. ET antagonists improve renal function in a genetic model of hypertension, the spontaneously hypertensive rat, and ET has been invoked in the pathogenesis of acute renal failure (postischemia renal failure). Cyclosporine A–induced nephrotoxicity has been identified to be owing at least in part to ET-induced vasoconstriction of the afferent arteriole, since the renal toxicity of immunosuppressant therapy was blocked by ET antagonist pretreatment. The mitogenic actions of ET are thought to underlie the development of graft arteriosclerosis in cardiac allografts, the establishment of atherosclerotic plaques, and the development of diabetes-related vascular lesions. Its role in vasospasm secondary to subarachnoid hemorrhage has been established in animal models. Within the lung, roles for ET in asthma and pulmonary hypertension have been proposed. The current literature favors the therapeutic use of ET antagonists in a variety of pathologic situations. However, clinical trials have not always been successful in establishing their clinical value. Several patient trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of ET antagonists in the setting of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The rational for these trials was that lung levels of ET mRNA are increased in PAH, and a positive correlation between serum ET levels and measured pulmonary vascular resistance had been described. Although the nonselective ET antagonist, bosentan, was effective in reducing pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance in one study when administered with another agent (a prostaglandin included to increase pulmonary blood flow), deaths occurred in the treatment group. In another trial, bosentan did improve exercise tolerance in patients with severe PAH. This led to the approval by the Food and Drug Administration of the use of low-dose bosentan in PAH; however, liver function tests were abnormal in a significant portion of the treatment group, and, thus, the possible negative side effect of hepatotoxicity must be weighed against the benefit obtained. Hepatotoxicity was also a problem in trials employing the selective ETA antagonist sitaxsentan. Again in human trials, this time in the setting of CHF, bosentan treatment resulted in a significant incidence of liver abnormalities. On the other hand, tezosentan, a nonselective ET antagonist, showed some benefit in acute heart failure patients in one trial but failed to provide protection in others. The selective ET-A antagonist darusentan improved cardiac index in patients with New York Heart Association stage III heart failure, but there were more adverse events in the treatment group than in placebo control subjects. Thus, in heart failure trials, ET antagonists have not been proven to be safe alternatives to conventional therapies. The same can be said of trials Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones 331 Fig. 5. Posttranslational processing of the preproadrenomedullin protein results in the formation of two biologically active peptides, AM and PAMP. examining the efficacy of the ET antagonist in essential hypertension. Only recent, preliminary trials in patients with coronary artery disease are promising. Because ET is a vasoconstrictor and stimulates smooth muscle proliferation, neutrophil adhesion, and platelet aggregation, it was hypothesized that ET antagonists would be effective in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Indeed, ET antagonists increased coronary artery diameter and prevented vasoconstriction after percutaneous coronary angiography. However, these trials need to be repeated and extended with a careful examination of liver function in patients before any conclusions can be made. 4. ADRENOMEDULLIN GENE PRODUCTS 4.1. Gene Structure and Regulation Utilizing a bioassay system that monitored accumulation of cAMP in platelets, Japanese investigators identified in 1993 a novel vasoactive hormone in extracts of a human pheochromocytoma. The peptide (Fig. 5) is produced in normal chromaffin cells of the adrenal gland, as well as a variety of other tissues, including brain, kidney, endothelial cells, and VSMCs. Posttranslational processing of the 185-amino-acid prohormone results in the production and secretion of the mature 52-amino-acid form, designated AM, and a 20-amino-acid fragment from the N-terminus designated proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP), a peptide that shares some, but not all, of the biologic activities of AM. Although activation of adenylyl cyclase was used as a screening bioassay in the initial phases of discovery, the hallmark bioassay for AM is the potent hypotensive action when infused intravenously (Fig. 6). AM production in VSMCs and endothelial cells is regulated at the transcriptional level by a variety of cytokines, including IL-1α, IL-1β, TNF-α, and TNF-β. Production of AM in these cells is also stimulated by thrombin, aldosterone, cortisol, retinoic acid, and thyroid hormones. To a lesser degree, stimulation of production in VSMCs was reported also in response to Ang II, epinephrine, platelet-derived growth factor, EGF, and FGF. TGF-β and cAMP inhibit production. 332 Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary Fig. 6. Summary of biologic actions of AM. CRH = corticotropin-releasing hormone; ACTH = adrenocorticotropin; AVP = vasopressin; OT = oxytocin; CO = cardiac output; HR = heart rate; ANP = atrial natriuretic peptide; UV = urine volume; UNaV = urinary sodium excretion; ET = endothelin. 4.2. Hormone Secretion Many of the factors that stimulate hormone production also stimulate secretion in isolated cell systems, leading to the hypothesis that AM may be responsible for the hypotension of inflammation, septic shock, and atherosclerosis. Circulating levels in humans are similar to those of other vasoactive hormones (about 3 fmol/ mL of plasma), suggesting that like other vasoactive substances, the actions of AM may be predominantly autocrine or paracrine in nature. One group failed to observe elevations in plasma AM concentrations during hypertensive attacks in patients with pheochromocytomas; however, cosecretion of AM and catecholamines has been observed from cultured, bovine adrenal medullary cells. In fact, the cosecretion of PAMP and catecholamines from these cells is calcium dependent and induced by carbachol activation of nicotinic receptors. Those studies also pointed to an autocrine or paracrine action of the peptide, since PAMP acted as an anticholinergic inhibiting sodium influx and reducing the magnitude of catecholamine response to carbachol. 4.3. Sites of Action Some of the pharmacologic actions of AM can be blocked by the calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP) receptor blocker CGRP8–37, which is not surprising because AM and CGRP share considerable structural homology. Both activate adenylyl cyclase in a variety of tissues and can displace each other in binding assays. Mesenteric vasodilatory responses to AM are blocked by CGRP8–37 in vitro, but the in vivo vasodilatory responses are not. Additionally, the increase in cAMP levels observed in response to AM in endothelial cells in culture is not blocked byCGRP8–37. Both AM and CGRP bind the calcitonin receptor–like receptor (CRLR), which is a unique G protein–coupled receptor. When Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones CRLR associates with an accessory protein (receptor activity modifying protein-1 [RAMP-1]), it functions as a selective CGRP receptor, one that can be blocked by CGRP8–37. On the other hand, when CRLR associates with the homologous RAMP-2 and RAMP-3, the complex is more selective for AM binding. This may explain the apparent similarity in action of CGRP and AM in some systems. Not all of the biologic activities of AM can be explained by the presence of the CRLR/RAMP2 or RAMP-3 receptor complexes; thus, additional yetto-be described receptors may exist. In bovine aortic endothelial cells, AM binding leads to activation of adenylyl cyclase via a cholera toxin–sensitive G protein mechanism, with concomitant stimulation of PLC activity. As a result, cyctosolic calcium levels increase and NO is generated. In mesangial cells, AM inhibits MAPK, an effect that may underlie the peptide’s antimitogenic actions. In VSMCs, AM activates a proline-rich tyrosine kinase. Very little is understood about the identity of the PAMP receptor. PAMP inhibits catecholamine release induced by periarterial nerve stimulation, possibly by a direct membrane action mediated via a pertussis toxin–sensitive G protein. Pertussis toxin also blocks the ability of PAMP to inhibit opening of voltage-gated (N-type) calcium channels in pheochromocytoma cells (PC-12 cells), a cell line in which PAMP also opens inwardly rectifying potassium channels. A potassium channel also appears to mediate the ability of PAMP to inhibit corticotropin-releasing hormone– stimulated adrenocorticotropin release from cultured anterior pituitary cells in vitro. 4.4. Biologic Actions AM and PAMP exert profound effects on cardiovascular function and fluid and electrolyte homeostasis by actions in a variety of tissues (Fig. 6). The hallmark action of AM is vasodilation by an action on endothelial cells to generate NO and by direct activation of adenylyl cyclase in VSMCs. PAMP, on the other hand, exerts its hypotensive action not by an action on the endothelial cells or VSMCs, but, instead, by presynaptic inhibition of electrical activity in the sympathetic fibers that innervate the blood vessels. These vascular effects appear to be physiologically relevant because heterozygote AM gene knockout mice (missing one copy of the AM gene) display only 50% of the normal circulating levels of AM and are hypertensive compared with wild-type (normal two-gene copy) mice. The vasodilatory effect of AM is even more pronounced in circumstances of high levels of Ang II, such as in preconstricted vessels in vitro or human hypertensives in vivo. This has led to the hypothesis that the physiologic action of AM is to act as a coun- 333 terbalance to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Indeed, this may be the case because both AM and PAMP inhibit Ang II–stimulated aldosterone secretion in vivo and block activation of the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis at the level of the anterior pituitary gland. AM is produced in cardiomyocytes and acts locally to inhibit fibrosis stimulated by increased Ang II and aldosterone levels. It acts to increase coronary blood flow, a function that is thought to have clinical relevance in recovery of the ischemic myocardium following infarction. This is one area where a therapeutic action of AM may hold promise. Additionally, AM exerts positive inotropic and chronotropic actions in the heart, effects that may be beneficial in patients in CHF. Finally, AM upregulates expression of the vasodilatory peptide ANP in the heart, while downregulating ET expression in the vasculature. The AM gene is expressed abundantly in kidney, where the peptide exerts numerous effects. It exerts direct natriuretic and diuretic actions (prostacyclin mediated) in renal tubule and is an important determinant of renal perfusion pressure. Even when administered intravenously, AM maintains renal blood flow in the face of profound decreases in mean arterial pressure. AM accomplishes this paradox by exerting a vasodilatory effect (NO dependent) on the afferent arteriole, thus maintaining glomerular filtration and urine flow. Although in pharmacologic studies the threshold dose in humans for the renal effects exceeded that required to observe the cardiovascular actions, it is unlikely that circulating AM explains the observed in vitro or in vivo actions of AM. Locally produced peptide instead appears to act in an autocrine/paracrine fashion to control sodium and water handling by the tubule and perhaps even glomerular filtration. The same pharmacologic administration of AM in patients displaying already high levels of plasma AM (renal failure) did improve renal function in one study, and it appears that administration of exogenous AM can improve survival in septic crisis (a hypotensive state in which endogenous AM levels are already elevated). The AM gene is highly expressed in the CNS, and significant effects of the peptide in brain have been demonstrated, many related to the regulation of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. The natriuretic and diuretic actions of AM in kidney appear to be mirrored by CNS effects to inhibit thirst and sodium appetite. Both of these CNS actions have been demonstrated to be physiologically relevant. AM also acts in brain to stimulate sympathetic tone and to stimulate the release of vasopressin and oxytocin. Although the actions to elevate peripheral blood pressure and circulating levels of AVP may seem counter to the peptide’s renal and vascular 334 Part IV / Hypothalamic–Pituitary effects (natriurestis, diuresis, and vasodilation), they may reflect brain actions that are cardioprotective in nature, just as those exerted by AM in the heart may have evolved to protect against cardiovascular collapse. Other actions of AM include a stimulatory effect on progesterone secretion and a quiescent effect in uterus. The fact that the knockout of the AM gene resulted in embryonic death at approx d 14 of mouse gestation points to significant effects of the peptide during embryogeneis as well. Indeed, the cause of embryo demise appeared to be a constriction of the umbilical arteries and veins. The knockout also provided insight into the physiologic relevance of another pharmacologic effect of AM. Heterozygote (one gene copy) animals develop a late-onset diabetic phenotype, suggesting that the ability of AM to inhibit insulin secretion has physiologic relevance. 4.5. Pathophysiology of AM The multiple pharmacologic effects of AM have predicted that the peptide or its analogs would be beneficial in a variety of disease states. The ability of AM to inhibit Ang II–mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibroblast proliferation predicted a role for the peptide in protection against hypertension-induced ventricular hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis of the heart. In addition, AM exerts antimigratory and antiproliferative effects in VSMCs, promising a possible role in the prevention of atherosclerosis and angiogenesis. This is supported by observations in heterozygote knockout animals in which perivascular fibrosis and intimal hyperplasia were exaggerated compared with wild-type controls following salt loading or chronic administration of Ang II. The protective effect of AM is also supported by results from transgenic mice in which overexpression of AM has been engineered. Much less interstitial fibrosis and a milder form of hypertrophy were observed in these animals compared with controls in several models of hypertension. In experimental animals, overexpression of AM reduces the magnitude of arterial thickening and promotes reendothelialization following balloon angioplasty. In one study, administration of AM immediately following myocardial infarction enhanced ejection fraction and improved coronary sinus blood flow. Thus, administration of AM may provide both acute and chronic benefit in this patient population. Plasma AM levels are elevated in CHF. Because of the peptide’s vasodilatory and renotropic effects, it was thought that exogenous administration might provide some benefit in these patients. Initial results were disappointing. Increases in forearm blood flow to iv administration of AM were attenuated in CHF patients compared with control subjects, as were the blood pressure–lowering effects. Later it was determined that the failure of AM in these models was owing to an impairment in NO generation in these patients. However, more promising were the observations that administration of AM decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as well as pulmonary arterial pressure in patients with CHF. Furthermore, AM infusion increased heart rate, stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac index in patients with CHF and in another study increased urine volume and sodium excretion. These were short-term infusion protocols; longer-term clinical studies are needed. However, chronic infusion studies in experimental animals have demonstrated the ability of AM to reduce renin levels in models of renovascular hypertension and to decrease renal injury in hypertensive animals. Similarly, animal models have demonstrated that administration of AM improves blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, exerting a more profound effect in those animals than in their normotensive (Wistar-Kyoto) control counterparts. This should not be surprising because the vasodilatory effect of AM is more pronounced in preconstricted vessels. In one clinical trial in patients with essential hypertension, administration of AM reduced both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and also reduced total peripheral resistance. Therapeutically, AM is already being employed for the treatment of septic crisis. It had been observed that plasma AM levels correlate positively with the severity of sepsis, which initially suggested that AM was the causative agent for the observed hypotension, since proinflammatory cytokines stimulate AM production and release. However, it was subsequently reported that there was also a direct, positive correlation between absolute levels of plasma AM and survival, in that patients with highest AM levels in circulation had a greater chance of surviving the septic event. This was observed to be owing to a preservation of renal function in the high AM group, mirroring the ability of exogenous AM to maintain renal perfusion even in the face of profound hypotension. 5. CARDIOVASCULAR HORMONES AS DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC TOOLS The three families of cardiovascular hormones discussed in this chapter have proven to be potent regulators of cardiovascular and renal function. Acting as either true endocrine or autocrine/paracrine hormones, they exert a wide variety of physiologically and pathologically relevant actions. Although the effects of the ETs are predominantly pathologic in nature, this still provides promise for the use of antagonists to block Chapter 21 / Cardiovascular Hormones those deleterious actions in a variety of disease states characterized by overproduction or secretion of the peptides. Results from the initial trials with these antagonists are discussed above. More promising are the beneficial effects of long-term administration of the natriuretic peptides or AM because their actions in general appear organ specific and protective. In addition, pathologic secretion of these two classes of peptides may reflect the recruitment of compensatory mechanisms within the body that can hallmark the onset of disease and therefore provide diagnostic advantage. Just as important are the basic biomedical lessons learned from the discovery and characterization of the actions of these peptide hormones. Emerging now is an integrated view of how these hormones can coordinate endocrine, cardiovascular, and renal mechanisms that protect against postischemia proliferative disease and tissue damage caused by volume over- or underload. The roles played by these peptides in inflammatory disease are now being recognized and their importance in normal glucose metabolism and bone health is better understood. In summary, the roles played by these potent cardiovascular hormones in the maintenance of cardiovascular function and fluid and electrolyte homeostasis have taught investigators a great deal about integra- 335 tive, systems biology. These peptides promise to open new avenues into cellular and molecular control mechanisms underlying other normal and pathologic systems as well. SELECTED READINGS Ando K, Fujita T. Lessons from the adrenomedullin knockout mouse. Regul Pept 2003;112:185–188. Charles CJ, Lainchbury JG, Nicholls MG, Rademaker MT, Richards AM, Troughton RW. Adrenomedullin and the renin-angiotensinaldosterone system. Regul Pept 2003;112:41–49. Costello-Borrigter LC, Boerrigter G, Burnett JC. Revisting salt and water retention: new diuretics, aquaretics, and natriuretics. Med Clin North Am 2003;87:475–491. Eto T, Kato J, Kitamura K. Regulation of production and secretion of adrenomedullin in the cardiovascular system. Regul Pept 2003;112:61–69. Moreau P, Schiffrin EL. Role of endothelins in animal models of hypertension: focus on cardiovascular protection. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2003;81:511–521. Rich S, McLaughlin VV. Endothelin receptor blockers in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2003;108:2184–2190. Stoupakis G, Klapholz M. Natriuretic peptides: biochemistry, physiology, and therapeutic role in heart failure. Heart Dis 2003;5: 215–223. Taylor MM, Samson WK. Adrenomedullin and the integrative physiology of fluid and electrolyte balance. Microsc Res Tech 2002; 57:105–109. Taylor MM, Shimosawa T, Samson WK. Endocrine and metabolic actions of adrenomedullin. The Endocrinologist 2001;11:171– 177.