Download Statistics in Drug Development

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Statistics in Drug Development
Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.*
Division of Biometrics I
Food and Drug Administration
* The views expressed here are those of the author and not
necessarily those of the FDA.
1
Various Indications for Drugs
For example: Headache/Pain medicine, psychiatric drugs,
AIDS treatments, Cancer drugs, etc.
Details about the design and goal of a study depends on the
indication of the drug (how the drug will be used).
2
Goal of New Drug Development
Develop a safe and effective drug.
3
Phases of Drug Development
Pre-clinical - Animal testing
Phase 1 - Dose ranging (toxicity)
Phase 2 - Use of the drug in a small number of studies
(efficacy screening)
Phase 3 - Comparative study with a placebo or an active drug
(usually the standard therapy)
Phase 4 - Post-marketing studies
4
Comparative Phase 3 Trials
Aspects of a quality comparative study
- Randomization (patients are randomly divided into groups)
- Stratification
- Double-Blind (eliminate a placebo-effect and diagnosis bias)
- Control
5
Endpoints (Variables of Interest)
Examples of Oncology Endpoints:
Survival Time
Tumor response (binary or ordinal variable)
Time to tumor progression
Quality of Life
6
Hypotheses
H0: experimental drug and the standard drug (or placebo)
have the same effectiveness
H1: experimental drug and the standard drug (or placebo)
have different effectiveness
Alternative hypotheses are two-sided. Hypotheses are formally
for those patients in the study.
One or more endpoints may tested.
7
Potential Errors
Type I error: Rejecting H0 when H0 is true
(false positive rate)
Type II error: Failing to reject H0 when H1 is true
( or for the drug company the type II error of
interest is failing to conclude the drug is
effective when it is effective)
An overall probability of a type I error is maintained at 0.05
for the primary efficacy analysis. If more than one endpoint is
involved in the primary efficacy analysis, individual type I errors
are adjusted for the total number of comparisons.
8
Sample Size Determination
Aspects considered for the sample size calculation:
- A primary method of analysis is selected.
- Desired Type II error probability at a clinically meaningful
effectiveness alternative.
- Accrual Period
- Follow-up time
- Fraction of dropouts
9
Analysis Populations
Intent-to-treat Population: All patients as randomized
Evaluable Population: All patients who received study
therapy that have measurements for the primary efficacy
endpoint and comply with the protocol.
10
Statistical Conclusions
Patients in the study are volunteers - not randomly
selected from some group. Formally, any conclusions
of statistical significance is good only for that set of
patients in the study.
11
Other Issues
- Formal Definitions of Endpoints
- Missing Data (common in quality of life measurements)
- Crossover to other therapies
- Censoring
- Robustness with respect to the method of analysis chosen
- Interim Efficacy Analyses
12