Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
International Relations, 1919-1939 ‘Revision’ Treaty of Versailles - Aims Everything is a mess in Europe Clemenceau wants revenge Wilson wants peace and his 14 points, including LoN Lloyd George wants decent compromise to avoid war, but British people want vengeance! (we lost a lot of men) Case for treating harshly strengthened by how Germany treated Russia in Treaty of Brest-Litovsk – stripped Russia of land and 25% population. Disagreements and Compromises Wilson has to give way to Clemenceau on issues of Rhineland and coalfields in the Saar. Lloyd George ok with treating Germany leniantly – but does not want Germany to have any navy or colonies Point 2 of 14 points gives access to all seas – this angers DLG – Britain rules the waves! The Treaty itself War Guilt Reparations – £6,600 million German Territories and Colonies stripped Armed forces – army of 100,000. No conscription. No armoured vehicles, planes or submarines. Only six battleships. Rhineland demilitarised. German reaction to the Treaty Lost 10 percent of land, all overseas colonies, 12.5% population and 16% coalfields, with over half of iron and steel industry. Outrage over War Guilt – did not feel they had started the war! Did not understand the defeat – had been kept in dark about how bad things were. Also – treatment not consistent with 14 points, which gave self-determination to many countries – ToV actually put German-speakers in other countries… Impact on Germany: Ebert’s Government fragile – tips into chaos when sign in 1919. Kapp Putsch – attempt to take over. Put down by Berlin workers’ strike. 1923 – French troops occupy Rhineland, forcibly taking the reparations – kill 100 people, eject 100,000 protesters. Government prints more money – leads to Hyperinflation – very bad. Germans blamed the Treaty. Reactions Clemenceau – not harsh enough. Lost election in 1920 Lloyd George – hero’s welcome in Britain, but worried too harsh Wilson – v. disappointed. American Congress refuses to sign. LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES – Leads to the Rise of the Nazis, and to WWII Historians kinder now – best job in circumstances? The Other Treaties Germany’s allies have to pay reparations Treaties make Eastern Europe a patchwork of new states. BATH – Bulgaria, Austria, Turkey, Hungary Treaty of St. Germain 1919 (Austria) Austria separated from Hungary. Austria no longer a leading power. Bohenmia and Moravia go to Czechs Bosnia-Herzegovina go into Yugoslavia w/Serbia. Army of 30,000 men, forbidden to unite with Germany again. More about sorting out Eastern European mess than about harming Austria. Italy thoguht should have had more land, but many Eastern Europeans happy – self detirmination. Austria’s economy bad – industry now in Czechoslovakia! Former Austrians annoyed, though – Austria loses its markets – formerly all in one Empire, preferential trading. No more. Treaty of Neuilly, 1919 (Bulgaria) Bulgaria did well compared to Germany, Austria and Hungary. Lost lands to Greece, Romania and Yugoslavia, and lost access to Mediterranean. Limit armed forces to 20,000, had to pay 100 million in reparations. Many Bulgarians governed by foreign powers in 1920… though treaty less harsh. Treaty of Trianon, 1920 (Hungary) Similar to St. Germain – involves transfer of territories Transylvania goes to Romania Slovakia and Ruthenia to Czechs Slovenia and Croatia to Yugoslavia. Hungary lost lots of territory and 3 million people. Industries suffer – no population and no raw materials. Never paid reparations – no economy! Treaty of Sèvres, 1920 (Turkey) Turkey important – strategic position, and size of Empire. Smyrna to Greece Syria = Mandate (LoN under French control. Lost control of Straits into Black Sea Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco get independence or controlled by Brits/French Not successful – Turks outraged, Turkish nationalists challenged the terms of the treaty – drove Greeks out of Smyrna. Treaty of Lausanne (1923) returned to Turkey. Suspect motives – France and Britian taking the land! Arabs who helped Brits in war gain little – Palestine controversial, nothing settled (still not settled today) The League of Nations Wilson wanted a world parliament where leaders meet regularly Britain thought could just get together in emergencies – similar organisation already called Conference of Ambassadors France wants strong league with its own army. Countries doubt people will behave as Wilson thinks, but willing to give it a try – had enough of war. America does not join, because: Trade could be suspended due to LoN sanctions – also America has to solve international problems no matter what the cost… Many German-Americans hated the ToV Distrust of British/French Empires – why should America get dragged in to protect Britain’s Empire and Colonies? Do not want to lose any more American boys in other peoples’ wars. The Democrats had been in power for ages – the Republicans wanted a chance to defeat them. Candidate campaigned on ‘Return to Normalcy’ i.e. return to life before war: ISOLATIONISM. Aims of the League Discourage Aggression from any nation Encourage countries to co-operate, especially in business or trade Encourage nations to Disarm Improve living/working conditions worldwide. Membership USA not in. Britain and France most important countries. YET: B & F weakened by WW1, and don’t have resources to replace USA. Germany not in until 1926, leaves in 1933. Japan leaves in 1933 Italy leaves in 1937 Structure – Issues with Assembly – only met once a year, all decisions had to be unanimous The Council – meets more regularly. Smaller group inc. Britain, France, Italy, Japan. Each of these permanent members has a veto. There are no armed forces – reliant on members Various Commissions and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) – see your diagrams Remember: League can do three things Moral Condemnation – decide which country is an aggressor and tell them to stop! Economic and financial sanctions – refuse to trade with aggressor Military force – use armed forces of member countries to stop aggressor. How successful was the League in the 1920s? Successes: Upper Silesia & Aaland Islands, 1921 Bulgaria 1925 Mixed fortunes: Corfu. Failures: Vilna, Geneva Protocol. Social Work: Refugees helped, PoWs sent home. Working conditions improved. Health Committee beats malaria by killing mozzies Transport – produced international highway code Social prolems – fought drugs trade, slave labour and forced labour. Also combatted prostitution. Agreements Locarno Agreements – 1925: Germany agrees border with France is settled – last dispute over ToV – Germany joins LoN in 1926 Kellog-Briand Pact – Everyone agreed not to settle arguments by force. 1929 Young Plan – Reduced Germany’s reparations payments to manageable size. Was the world safer at end of 1920s? Yes – lots of agreements to disarm, LoN has had some successes No – None of it is really effective, nothing is really agreed. LoN has fatal weaknesses. Why was LoN Successful in 1920s? No-one wants another war – too many dead. Economic recovery – American loans finance Europe’s recovery. More work, more money, more exports, more pay, happier people, no wars. Why did it all go wrong in the 1930s? IMPORTANT Wall Street Crash leads to Depression Depression leads to the rise of the FASCISTS. Fascists are angry people who are aggressive to other countries. This makes wars more likely. Depression Britain has high unemployment and broken economy. Unwilling to get involved USA won’t help economic sanctions if own trading economy in mess Mussolini wants overseas Empire to distract his people from rubbishness of economy Hitler elected in Germany to sort out depression, basically. Japan invades Manchuria for more money. France concerned about Hitler, starts building forts on border. DEPRESSION THEREFORE HIGHLY IMPORTANT. Two types 10 mk Question on League Biggest problem with the League Answer by going through the League’s issues (what’s wrong with it) and showing how they made it impossible to deal with Manchuria & Abyssinia Each weakness in turn, with examples from the Crises Biggest problem for the League Show how the Abyssinian Crisis and Manchurian Crisis showed up the weaknesses with the League, leading to its downfall. Tackle each crisis in turn, with examples of League’s failings. Manchuria. Delay – had to send someone to other side world to look. Full year before present report. (Organisation/Decisiveness) Japan Vetoes resolution against itself, then leaves. Powerless – economic sanctions pointless without USA (membership) Britain and France not going to risk war with ever-more-powerful Japan. (Lack of Muscle) Disarmament Why did it fail in 1930s? Nobody will risk disarming if everyone else has guns! Hitler wants guns back. 1932 Disarmament Conference. Produced resolutions eg. No bombing of civilians, no gas warfare. BUT NO PLAN TO ACHIEVE IT. Hitler Britain also kind of feels that Germany was treated unfairly originally in ToV Hitler promises to disarm if everybody else does. Starts rearming secretly, 1933 Withdrew from Conference and then the League later in 1933. Abyssinia 1935 Britain and France don’t take seriously – want to keep good relations with Mussolini Signed treaty in 1935 with Mussolini vs. Hitler. Silly idea. They then decide to get ‘tough’ as public are annoyed. Much talk of ‘collective security’ in League – nothing done. More weaknesses SANCTIONS WILL NOT WORK. LEAGUE TAKES AGES TO DECIDE TO DO NOTHING. Worried Americans would nor support sanctions. Britain concerned will lose coal exports to Italy. Britain and France own Suez Canal – Mussolini using to supply army. Britain and France could shut it, but won’t risk war. F.A.I.L.U.R.E. French and British self-interest. They looked after their own interests, not the League’s Absent Powers e.g. USA & USSR Ineffective Santions Lack of Armed Forces Unfair Treaty – ToV to be enforced by LoN, but many members thought unfair Reaching decisions too slowly. Squid Leage needs to be: Strong Quick United Interested Decisive League fails because of: Organisation/Membership Lack of Muscle Appeasement Why did the Allies follow the policy of Appeasement? See anyone you recognise? 1933 Hitler elected Chancellor of Germany. Why? The Great Depression – nobody has jobs, everybody angry… ‘Stab in the Back’ – betrayed in WWI by politicians. Treaty of Versailles still humiliating. Hitler offers opportunity to make Germany strong again. What Did Hitler Want? - - Abolish the Treaty of Versailles Hitler believed that the Treaty of Versailles was unjust. Too harsh, a humiliating reminder of WW1 defeat. By time he came to power, some terms had changed – stopped paying reparations. Hitler aims to overturn the remaining points of the Treaty, however. Expand German Territory Treaty of Versailles took territory away from Germany. Hitler wants it back. Wants Germany to unite with Austria Wants German minorities in countries such as Czechoslovakia to rejoin Germany Wants Eastern European Empire for Lebensraum – ‘Living Space’ Defeat Communism. Hitler believes that Bolsheviks (Communists) had helped to bring about Germany’s defeat (with the Jews. He was nuts) He’s a Fascist – a militant, right-wing Nationalist. They like fighting Communists, and really fear the Soviet Union Worried Bolshies will take over Germany. Things Hitler does: Please refer to the Appeasement revision table in your books – this has all the key information. Overleaf you will find a summary of the steps of what Hitler did, and which objectives he was trying to accomplish: 1933 – Takes Germany out of LoN and begins rearming Germany – against the ToV 1935 – Massive rearmament rally in Germany – against ToV 1936 – Troops into Rhineland (against ToV) 1936 – Anti-Comintern Pact (alliance of the Fascist countries, Italy/Germany/Japan, vs. Communists) – (fighting Communists) 1937 – tries out new German military in Spanish Civil War (vs. Communists) 1938: Anschluss with Austria (expand Germany, vs. ToV 1938 – Sudetenland taken (anti-ToV, expanding Germany) (Munich Agreement, 1938) 1939 – Takes rest Czechoslovaia, invades Poland (expanding Germany, vs. ToV) Note: Nazi-Soviet Pact signed by Stalin as scared of Hitler… they divide up Poland and invade together in September 1939. Why Appeasement good idea: Hitler standing up to Communism – should be encouraged Britain’s Empire would not necessarily support war with Germany Too many people died in the last war to risk another Depression – everyone’s too poor for another war Treaty of Versailles IS unfair, so Hitler has a point USA will not support vs. Hitler – isolationist ALLOWED BRITAIN TIME TO REBUILD HER ARMED FORCES, READY FOR WAR AGAINST GERMANY. Why Appeasement’s a bad idea: Encourages Hitler to be aggressive, as he always gets away with it Puts too much trust in Hitler’s promises Allowed Germany to grow too strong It scared the USSR – they see France/Britain not acting, and sign NaziSoviet Pact.