Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Extreme Precipitation in Minnesota 10 – 11 August 2016 Wesley James Motivation • Relate key concepts learned in class to a slow propagating convective line • Discover the synoptic and mesoscale setup which would allow for 175mm of precipitation in 24 hours Methodology • Veering winds removes the downdraft from the updraft • Upper level winds are east-west, same as the initial convection • This spawns convection near the origin of existing convection • Rear flank cold front forcing for new development (Maddox et al. 1979) 35kt @ 850mb 30kt @ 850mb • Rear flank is left exposed to influx of warm moist air Methodology Continued WPC surface analysis 0127 UTC 11 Aug Schumacher and Johnson (2005) NEXRAD-college of DuPage Conclusion • Referencing similar analysis from Maddox et al. (1979) and Schumacher and Johnson (2005) we see a case resembling a perfect scenario for back building precipitation. (Duration) • Upper level Divergence and large instability allotted for intense convection and precipitation (Rate) • P=R*T