Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IMPACT OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRISIS ON THE KINGDOM OF SWAZILAND 1. Introduction Since independence in 1968, but especially in the 1980s and early 1990s the Kingdom of Swaziland witnessed good economic performance. This was partly due to political stability, peace and security and strong adherence to a firm macro-economic framework. This was helped in no small measure by its membership of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) and its Common Monetary Area (CMA) with its currency, the “Lilangeni” is pegged to the South African Rand. The latter helped ensure the discipline necessary for its sound monetary and fiscal policies; which together with its low integration into the global financial system has to some extent insulated it from the first order contagion effect of the global financial crisis. In the past the war in Mozambique and sanctions against apartheid South Africa served to attract foreign direct investment (FDI) especially in the manufacturing sector . Although Swaziland has a viable agricultural sector dominated by sugar, timber, livestock etc, it has done extremely well in years when the manufacturing sector has performed well. This is also partly because the agricultural sector is weakened by recurrent drought, which coupled by limited access of the poor to productive assets such as arable land and water, has often led to poor harvest, severe food shortages and dependency on food aid. The WFP which had closed its offices in Swaziland has had to reopen. Swaziland’s performance has worsened by the “triple threat” of poverty and food insecurity, HIV&AIDS and the ensuing weakened governance capacity for efficient service delivery. Key factors in this regard include: 1.1. The end of the civil war in Mozambique and attainment of majority rule in South Africa diverted FDI to these countries at the expense of Swaziland. Even established firms including in the textiles subsector shifted to South Africa. 1.2. The country is severely plagued by HIV&AIDS with the highest prevalence incidences in the world (with prevalence rates of about 26% and 42% for 15-49 and 25-29 age groups) which has reduced GDP growth by about 2% and threatened the social fabric of society. 1.3. Swaziland’s MIC status has not allowed her easy access to concessional loans or grants; a situation worsened by little donor assistance partly because of perceived poor governance. Thus although Swaziland is a MIC, its human development situation, exemplified by its human development indicators is quite akin to an LDC. Although Swaziland has a relatively high per capita income of about USD2, 450.00; about 69% of its population lives on less than USD1 per day. Its global HDI ranking at 142/177 is very much below where it was in 1990; its HDI has declined from 0.633 in 1990 to 0.547 in 2005. It is in these dire circumstances that the global economic and financial crisis with its effects on amongst others, demand for, and prices of, commodities, has found the Kingdom. Given that it is landlocked, and has a sizeable manufacturing and services sectors, it is very vulnerability to external shocks. 1 2. The Global Economic and Financial Crisis and its effects In the past two years or so, Swaziland experienced the food and energy crises, with their prices especially fuel reaching an unprecedented peak of USD145 per barrel in July 2008. The recent lowering of prices of fuel, food and interest rates that has led to reduced inflation, has been followed by the financial crisis and economic meltdown. The crisis that began as an insignificant sub-prime mortgage problem, initially limited to the American financial markets, blossomed and its spillover effects now impacts negatively on Swaziland and its major trading partners. This has far reaching effects on the economic wellbeing, political and social stability of the Kingdom. 2.1 Effects on Swaziland’s Real GDP Growth Partly because of poor performance in export commodities, a decline in the contribution of the construction sector to growth and a decline in the South African economy, to which Swaziland is linked, real GDP growth fell by 2.6% in the past year. 2.2 Spill-0ver Effects of Recession in South Africa Swaziland’s economy is very much integrated with that of South Africa, with which it shares 75% of its border; and from which it gets 80-90% of its imports and directs 60% of its exports. It relies almost 100% on South African energy and petroleum imports; and is its main “gateway” to the outside world. Most Swazi firms in all sectors of the economy are subsidiaries of South African companies. South Africa is the economic power house of (Southern) Africa. With South Africa in a recession, and its economic growth rate projected to decline from 3.1% in 2008 to 1.2% in 2009, the consequences for Swaziland are severe. 2.3 Decline in Revenues from SACU Over 60% and 70% of Swaziland’s Budget and total revenues respectively are from the SACU. Swaziland and Lesotho are the major beneficiaries as their share of the revenue pool is slightly enhanced by an adjustment factor that rewards these two land-locked countries more (30% of the revenues are set aside for the two within the five-nation customs union). Revenues from SACU are projected to fall by 9% in 2008/09 as a result of global/regional trade liberalization. The volume of imports e.g. motor vehicles, are declining as are exports. Thus it is estimated that Swaziland’s share of SACU revenues will decline by 6.4% in 2009/10 and by 12.5% in 2010/11. They will now fall even more as a result of the fall in the levels of trade related to the economic slowdown in South Africa. Partly because of forecasted decline in SACU revenues, Swaziland’s budget deficit is projected at of 8% of GDP in instead of the 1% estimated earlier. 2.4 Declining Levels of Remittances Swaziland receives substantial amounts of remittances from thousands of Swazis working in South Africa especially in the mines; but also elsewhere in the world. The former is historical legacy of migrant labour for the mines, the latter is brain drain especially of engineers, doctors, nurses, teachers, etc who have migrated to greener pastures in South Africa, UK, Australia,etc. If they manage to keep their jobs (IMF has estimated South African mining job 2 losses to be about 250,000) their take home pay might be much lower in which case remittances will go down. If they loose their jobs, this could further fuel unemployment in Swaziland now estimated at 28%. However, for skilled and semi-skilled labour such as doctors and nurses, their return home would while minimizing remittances, provide person-power for hard pressed sectors. To meet the teachers demand for the free education programme Swaziland badly needs teachers and it would be better to have their own rather than expatriate personnel. 2.5 Declining ODA and FDI Swaziland’s ODA is as low as 1% of the budget; while FDI is also low. As already noted the Kingdom’s MIC status and its political governance record has put off donors. It is however trying to diversify – including in particular opening up to the rich Sheikhdoms of the Middle East. It has also received loans from the regional banks and other financial institutions such as the AfDB and BADEA as well as the Kuwait Fund. 2.6 Loss of Trade Opportunities Swaziland partly because of its limited domestic market and the structure of its economy - the manufacturing sector accounts for 35% of GDP (and is composed of a narrow range of commodities: sugar, pulp wood, textiles, beef, canned fruit, soft drinks concentrates) and has an upcoming services sector, is dependent on regional and international trade. Since the advent of the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA) it has benefited from the USA market for its textiles exports. Given weakened demand in the USA, benefits from AGOA are likely to go down and textiles factories are threatening to close down with attendant loss of thousands of jobs and income. In addition as demand for paper and pulp products has dwindled, the largest timber company in the country-SAPPI has served notice to close with a loss of over 600 jobs. Its recent signing of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with the EU will reduce benefits from its hitherto very preferential access to EU markets for sugar. However, Government hopes that within the context of the Aid for Trade initiative, it may receive grants and concessional loans. 3. Concluding Remarks The global economic meltdown will have dire consequences for Swaziland. Reduced revenues from development partners including possibly the UN, and reduced SACU revenues will widen the budget deficit (now at 8.2% of GDP) with adverse consequences for macro-economic stability, which is important for ensuring a stable exchange rate and the Lilangeni /Rand parity. Widening the budget deficit has the danger of depletion of the foreign reserves ( now at a comfortable level of five months of imports). Reduced revenues will constrain the ability of government to efficiently offer better and expanded services including free basic education (now a constitutional requirement), and address HIV and AIDS which together with a number of other basic services are key to the attainment of the MDGs . 3