Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
In-stent restenosis: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic principles Prof Vicente Andrés Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Prof Rainer Wessely Ev. Klinikum Duisburg Last updated on 15 January 2009 Introduction Since its introduction in 1977 by Andreas Grüntzig, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become a popular procedure used to dilate atherosclerotic vessels to alleviate angina pectoris, eventually preventing myocardial infarction, or to revascularize the infarcted myocardium. The major limitation of the long-term success of PTCA is restenosis, a pathological process provoking recurrent arterial narrowing at the site of the intervention. Restenotic lesions typically lack lipid deposits and grow during 4-6 months post-PTCA, unlike native atheromas, which normally accumulate high content of lipids and develop over longer time periods, typically years or decades. Excessive restenosis leads to hemodynamically relevant vessel obstruction and eventually recurrence of clinical symptoms thus forcing target-vessel revascularization. Restenosis after conventional PTCA, which is mainly due to negative arterial remodelling, affects 25-50% of patients. Currently, more than 90% of the percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are performed using metallic prostheses named stents, which increase the safety of interventional revascularization and, by preventing negative arterial remodelling, reduce the rates of restenosis to 15-30%. In-stent restenosis (ISR) is further reduced using drug-eluting stents (DES, see below). It is noteworthy that ISR has a significant economic impact, with estimated annual costs exceeding US$ 1 billion in the western world. Molecular mechanisms of ISR Neointimal hyperplasia is regarded as the main cause of ISR . This proliferative process can be considered as the arterial wall's healing response to the acute mechanical injury provoked by stent deployment (e.g., injury of the endothelial cell lining, denudation, disruption of the lamina elastica, etc). The acute early phase of ISR is characterized by the activation of platelets and ensuing thrombosis accompanied by the recruitment into the intimal area of blood-borne monocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes. These cells engage in the production of a plethora of mitogenic and chemotactic factors which trigger a chronic inflammatory response leading to the activation of the smooth muscle cells (SMCs) residing in the tunica media, which then undergo aberrant cell proliferation and migration toward the growing neointimal lesion. Moreover, activated SMCs exhibt a less (un)differentiated, so called synthetic phenotype featuring broader and flatter shape, expression of embryonic isoforms of contractile proteins, and abundant synthesis of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, unlike medial SMCs in normal adult arteries, which are fusiform and exhibit a differentiated, contractile phenotype characterized by the expression of contractile proteins and reduced proliferative and migratory activity. Although it is becoming increasingly evident that recruitment of bone marrow-derived and adventitial SMC progenitors and adventitial myofibroblasts also contribute to the accumulation of neointimal SMCs, their relative contribution to restenosis remains undefined. Putative regulators of neointimal hyperplasia include thrombogenic factors (e.g., thrombin receptor, tissue factor), cell adhesion molecules (e.g., VCAM, ICAM, LFA-1, Mac-1), transcription factors (e.g., NF-kB, E2F, p53, AP-1, c-myc, c-myb, YY1, Gax, IRF-1), signal transduction molecules (e.g., MEK/ERK, PI 3-kinase/Akt), inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNFa), chemotactic factors (e.g., CCR2, MCP-1), growth factors (e.g., PDGF-BB, TGFb, FGF, IGF, EGF, VEGF), cell cycle regulators (e.g., CDK2, CDC2, cyclin B1, PCNA, p21, p27, pRb), and metalloproteases (e.g., MMP-2, MMP-9). At later stages post-PCI characterized by the resolution of inflammation and wound healing, neointimal SMCs return to a contractile phenotype characterized by low proliferative and migratory activity and production of ECM components to more closely resemble the undamaged arterial wall. Drug eluting stents In spite of encouraging results in animal models, countless systemic therapeutic approaches against restenosis have failed in clinical trials. However, after shifting the paradigm to local, stent-based therapy, the introduction of DES at the beginning of this millennium has revolutionized interventional cardiology owing to a robust decrease of restenosis of up to 80% compared to bare-metal stents (BMS). The therapeutic principle is derived from the pathophysiological evidence that ISR can be viewed as a proliferative disorder, mainly involving proliferation and migration of SMCs to form the pathoanatomical correlate of restenosis, the neointimal lesion. Lipophilic drugs that target the eukaryotic cell cycle, such as the G1-phase inhibitors sirolimus (also named rapamycin). Everolimus and Biolimus, or the S-phase inhibitor paclitaxel (also named taxol), are locally delivered at high local dosages via the stent surface into the adjacent vascular wall, thus attenuating cell proliferation and consequently ISR. To modulate release kinetics of the drug, the vast majority of clinically available DES utilize a polymeric coating. Due to nonspecific anti-proliferative drug effects that also prevent endothelial proliferation, the healing process can be considered prolonged subsequent to placement of a DES compared to a BMS. To prevent life-threatening stent thrombosis, the healing phase has to be bridged by a longer-lasting dual antiplatelet therapy, commonly with aspirin and an ADP-dependent platelet antagonist such as Clopidogrel. The majority of therapeutic developments are based on the principle of local stent or device-based therapy and focus on coatings with less interference or even improvements of the healing process while maintaining anti-restenotic efficacy, or they concentrate on biodegradable stent platforms as drug carriers that dissolve over time. Additional goals for further optimization comprise the development of tailored DESs adjusted to the unique needs of special lesion or patient subsets such as diabetics or patients suffering from an acute myocardial infarction. Diagnostic of ISR Coronary angiography is the diagnostic gold standard for ISR. Although much effort is being devoted for the development of non-invasive diagnostic tools, including novel direct imaging techniques such as coronary CT (computerized tomography), lower sensitivity and specificity is still limiting their use in the clinical setting. Functional assessment of ischemic myocardium can be undertaken by stress cardiac MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), Sestamibi-SPECT (single positron emitting computed tomography) or stress echocardiography. As indicated above, the prolonged healing phase that is apparent in DES possibly owing to incomplete reendothelialization has to be bridged by a longer-lasting dual antiplatelet therapy to avoid late-stent thrombosis that is associated with a high mortality rate. Moreover, DES are 2-3 times more expensive that BMS. Therefore, developing diagnostic kits to predict the risk of ISR would be a valuable tool for improved stratification of patients to individually tailored treatment (e.g. prescribe BMS and DES to patients at lowmoderate and high risk of restenosis, respectively). Known predictors of ISR are limited to certain clinical scenarios, such as diabetes mellitus or previous ISR, as well as the number of stents per lesion, stent length, lesion length and complexity, residual diameter stenosis, and small vessel diameter (≤2.75mm). Assuming that the risk of developing restenosis may have a genetic component, pilot genotype-phenotype studies have been conducted in small cohorts which identified the association between the risk of restenosis and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)/haplotypes in several genes considered involved in the disease (e.g., TLR-2, ADRB2, CD14, CSF2, CCL11, p22-PHOX, PON1, FABP2, THBD). Validation of these preliminary results in larger cohorts, together with high-throughput screening for additional SNPs the human genome contains millions of SNPs - may help identify useful markers for improved stratification of patients to individually tailored treatment for ISR.