Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Positives Let us begin with Andrew Jacksons positives. The man was a strong proponent of individual rights. Jackson believed in a limited government supported by a strong president at the top; the states were to govern themselves with limited federal interference with the president as a representative of the country’s population. The man was indeed a war hero, and he built much of his image on his participation in the War of 1812. During the nullification crisis, Jackson made clear that the states could not and should not disobey a federal law, shocking considering his championing of state’s rights. One could argue that Jackson knew that with states ignoring federal mandates, there was no reason to call the United States a union at all. All things considered, the positives revolving around Jackson seemingly end here. Lastly, Jackson did indeed pay off the entire national debt, a feat not since repeated. Of course, the panic of 1837 would come at the end of Jackson’s administration, partly due to Jackson’s attacks on the second bank of the United States. Under Jackson’s administration, the United States would also face the possibility of expansion, this expansion would be at the expense of a notable minority, however. Negatives Moving on to the negatives; Andrew Jackson was in no uncertain terms, a tyrant. Specifically to native Americans, but somewhat extending to the African American slave population as well. Under Andrew Jackson’s administration, the policy of Indian Removal saw its greatest enactment. Jackson essentially forced the native Americans off their lands, all the while ignoring supreme court decisions that stated such actions were indeed unconstitutional. Although Jackson was out of office when the Indian Removal act was actually carried out, he had set its path into motion, and shares just as much credit for the act if not more than his presidential and ideological successor, Martin Van Buren. As Jackson saw it, the tribes were not part of the union, but sovereign nations, so why should they have any sort of protection from the federal government? The is the notable minority as stated earlier. Their land, unfortunately according to Jackson, belonged in and to the states they resided in. Jackson was also a strong supporter of slavery, which was an extension of, ironically enough, individual rights. A slave was indeed property in Jackson’s time, and an individual had a right to said property. For all his views on personal freedom, Andrew Jackson was a great enemy of minorities in the antebellum United States of America. Another negative of Andrew Jackson’s administration was a ridiculous obsession with ending the Second Bank of the United States, an obsession which can be seen as directly contributing to the Panic of 1837 and its aftermath, but we get ahead of ourselves. Lastly, it should be noted that Jackson basically ignored the women’s rights movement, although the movement did grow substantially in antebellum America.