Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A Before and After Study to evaluate Acute Kidney Injury Outreach – preliminary results and two-year followup of a Complex Multifactorial Intervention Mark Thomas, Cathy Hatton, Carol Willis and Jyoti Baharani. Declaration I have attended unpaid advisory boards and user groups run by Sunquest International. Alert studies OBSERVATIONAL AUDIT 17th Sept to 17th Dec 2008 463 first Alerts in adults in study period 61% 176 Alerts from dialysis patients 52 repeat Alerts for same patient 21 Alerts from patients already on dialysis 23% 7% 3% Thomas, Sitch and Dowswell Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011 15TH BEFORE STUDY OBSERVATIONAL May to 12th June 2009 4 weeks AFTER STUDY – SERVICE EVALUATION 12TH June to 31st July 2009 7 weeks 411 first Alerts in adults in study period 66% 144 Alerts from dialysis patients 20 repeat Alerts for same patient 15 Alerts from patients already on dialysis 23% 3% 2% Small numbers of Alerts with/in: CKD – no clear ACKD; Children under 16 years Alerts with suppressed low Creatinine; Poor data BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY • • • • Alert messaging system set up on ICE Laboratory Information System – Sunquest Information Systems Inc. AKI Alerts – Creatinine rises of ≥ 75% from the last value notified to a messaging inbox Before phase: ‘Usual care’ 158 patients – Alerts collected without intervention – Referrals received as usual After phase: 253 patients – Alerts reviewed early morning and late afternoon, five days a week – A Nephrology nurse or doctor discussed patient with any available primary clinician – Case details and recommendations recorded using standard proforma and faxed (when possible) According to National Research Ethics Service procedures, the project was classified as a service evaluation by the Heart of England NHS Trust Research and Development office and did not require separate ethical approval. After study – service evaluation AFTER STUDY – SERVICE EVALUATION 12TH June to 31st July 2009 262 eligible Alerts Included in service evaluation Results of service evaluation 262 potential calls 253 patients 1st episode of AKI Eligible for survival analysis ≥ 2nd AKI episodes in 9 patients Excluded from survival analysis After study: Outcome of Outreach • Call successful in 89.7% (median 14.6h) – fully successful – partial success – referred and seen as a result of call 235 225 8 2 • No call / call unsuccessful in 10.3% 27 – Patient deceased by time of call – Insufficient time – Could not contact / Call declined 12 8 7 • Median of 3 recommendations (for all 262 Alerts) Non Drug recommendations • ‘Investigational’ recommendations 306 – including urine dipstick, recheck of U&E, other • Volume status related recommendations 151 – including clinical reassessment; catheterisation – including advice on fluid prescription • Care pathway recommendations 45 – medical review, admission, appropriate transfer • General medical recommendations 38 – typically about underlying conditions • Escalation / palliative care recommendations 16 Drug recommendations Drugs stopped as potentially contributing to AKI ACE inhibitor / ARB Aspirin Diuretic (non K sparing) NSAID Other hypotensive K sparing diuretic Aminoglycoside Aciclovir Other (incl. NSAID gel, CNI) Drugs stopped / reduced to avoid adverse events 60 30 21 19 18 13 4 3 7 LMW heparin Metformin Hartmann’s Reduced opiate dose 19 10 2 8 Drugs recommended to be avoided Avoid contrast 6 Avoid NSAID 2 Total of : 222 drug recommendations made In addition to: 64 similar actions taken by primary team before call Conclusions • A modest time input (15-20 hr per week) resulted in large scale changes to care of AKI patients • Consistent 6-8% absolute survival benefit appeared rapidly and was maintained • Further work needed on peak creatinine, dialysis usage, multivariate adjustment of survival analysis • Further studies of the Alert + Outreach approach are clearly warranted Thanks to colleagues Angela Price Carl Richardson Cathy Hatton Harry Nair Joanne Walker Karen Harris Lynette Groombridge Roger Adkins Sharon Deakin Steven Ting Trudy Manji Annette Dodds Carol Willis Clive Allen Indranil Dasgupta Jyoti Baharani Lisa Tebbit Lynn Ivison Sarah Powers Steve Smith Tami Stevenson Vijay Suresh