Download Uremic autonomic neuropathy studied by spectral analysis of heart

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Kidney International, Vol. 56 (1999), pp. 232–237
CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY – EPIDEMIOLOGY – CLINICAL TRIALS
Uremic autonomic neuropathy studied by spectral analysis
of heart rate
GIUSEPPE VITA, GUIDO BELLINGHIERI, ANTONELLA TRUSSO, GIUSEPPE COSTANTINO,
DOMENICO SANTORO, FRANCESCO MONTELEONE, CORRADO MESSINA, and VINCENZO SAVICA
Institute of Neurological and Neurosurgical Sciences and Division of Nephrology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Uremic autonomic neuropathy studied by spectral analysis of
heart rate.
Background. There is good evidence that power spectral
analysis (PSA) of heart rate variability may provide an insight
into the understanding of autonomic disorders.
Methods. We investigated 30 chronic uremic patients who were
on periodic bicarbonate hemodialysis by a battery of six cardiovascular autonomic tests (beat-to-beat variations during quiet
breathing and deep breathing, heart rate responses to the Valsalva maneuver and standing, blood pressure responses to standing and sustained handgrip) and PSA of heart rate variations.
Results. Eleven patients (37%) had an abnormal response
to only one parasympathetic test. Twelve patients (40%) had
a definite parasympathetic damage, as indicated by at least two
abnormal heart rate tests, whereas four (13%) had combined
parasympathetic and sympathetic damage. Multivariate analysis of the cardiovascular tests revealed that 19 patients (63%)
had moderate-to-severe autonomic neuropathy (AN), and 11
patients exhibited normal autonomic function. Among the symptoms suggestive of autonomic dysfunction, only impotence in
males was significantly associated with test-proven AN. The
PSA of the heart rate variability demonstrated a good discrimination of low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) bands
(LF, 0.03 to 0.15 Hz; HF, 0.15 to 0.33 Hz) among controls,
uremic patients without test-proven AN, and uremic patients
with test-proven AN. A significant reduction of the LF value
on supine uremic patients without AN suggests that an early
sympathetic involvement exists that traditional autonomic tests
were unable to detect.
Conclusions. Our study indicates that the current opinion
of a major parasympathetic damage in chronic uremic patients
on hemodialysis has to be modified in favor of a more widespread autonomic dysfunction involving both the sympathetic
and parasympathetic pathways.
quelae, but the pathogenesis is unknown [1–3]. It has
been demonstrated that parasympathetic neuropathy,
caused mostly by afferent lesions, appears more frequently than sympathetic damage, being isolated in 14
to 34% of patients and combined with a damage of blood
pressure control in 18 to 24% of subjects [3–6]. The
presence and severity of autonomic neuropathy (AN)
do not seem to be related with either the duration of
renal failure or with the duration of dialysis. In recent
years, there has been an increased interest in the literature about autonomic nervous system function in chronic
uremia, especially in the pathogenic investigations of
two important complications: hypertension and sudden
cardiac death [7, 8].
The few longitudinal studies that exist failed to show
that long-term dialysis has a beneficial effect on AN
[9–11], which led us to speculate that uremic autonomic
damage is somewhat irreversible. However, when the
effects of kidney transplantation were investigated, the
results were contradictory. Agarwal et al have reported
a slight improvement of some autonomic indices six
months following renal transplantation [10]. In diabetic
nephropathy, AN has been found to be unchanged up
to four years after simultaneous transplantation of kidney and pancreas [12, 13]. It is noteworthy that the Swedish Huddinge group, despite a clear improvement of
somatic polyneuropathy, found no significant change of
AN at 6 and 12 months after renal transplantation, as
well as 6, 12, and 24 months after combined kidneypancreas transplantation [14, 15]. However, they documented a slight improvement of parasympathetic function 48 months either following kidney graft or after
combined transplantation [16]. The latter findings suggested that uremic AN needs a long time to be repaired
in transplanted patients. A recent study from our group
was in good accordance with recent transplantation investigations, showing that AN can recover after longterm (8 years) bicarbonate dialysis [17].
Laboratory investigation of AN is commonly performed by a battery of cardiovascular reflex tests of pre-
Involvement of the autonomic nervous system may occur in patients with chronic renal failure who are on periodic hemodialysis. It may have a number of clinical seKey words: uremia, hemodialysis, cardiovascular tests, autonomic neuropathy, power spectral analysis.
Received for publication July 15, 1998
and in revised form February 1, 1999
Accepted for publication February 1, 1999
 1999 by the International Society of Nephrology
232
Vita et al: Spectral analysis of heart rate in uremic patients
dominantly parasympathetic or sympathetic function,
such as active standing, deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver, and sustained handgrip test [18]. A multivariate approach by a pattern recognition analysis has been demonstrated to increase the diagnostic efficiency of the tests
[19, 20]. Although these tests are very helpful in routine
clinical practice and most studies are based on them,
they have been criticized as being of little use in the
investigation of the sympathetic pathway. Several studies
have provided evidence that specific heart rate spectral
components may reflect autonomic cardiovascular influences [21–24]. This report describes the use of spectral
analysis of heart rate variability in the evaluation of
uremic AN.
METHODS
Thirty chronic uremic patients, aged 19 to 85 years
(mean 6 sd, 58 6 14 years; 22 men and 8 women), were
studied. They were on periodic bicarbonate hemodialysis
(4 hr for 3 times per week) for periods ranging from 1
month to 22 years. None of them had heart failure, severe
hypertension, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus,
bronchopneumopathy, or amyloidosis, nor were they
taking medications known to affect the autonomic nervous system. Thirteen patients had mild-to-moderate hypertension and were on therapy with nifedipine, doxazosin, or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Anemia
was treated with folic acid, vitamins, iron, and erythropoietin. After informed consent had been obtained, they
were requested to refrain from smoking and coffee for
at least 12 hours before the investigation, which was
performed at 10:00 a.m. or 4:00 p.m. in a dialysis-free
day of the middle week. They were also asked to have
a light breakfast and lunch.
In the beginning of the examination, a questionnaire
was administered for symptoms suggestive of autonomic
dysfunction. The investigation of autonomic function
was performed in two phases. In the first one, a battery
of cardiovascular autonomic tests was accomplished as
previously described [25]. The four tests of predominantly parasympathetic function were beat-to-beat variations during quiet breathing and deep breathing and
heart rate responses to Valsalva maneuver and to standing. The two tests of predominantly sympathetic function
were blood pressure responses to standing and to sustained handgrip. Finapres (Ohmeda spa, Milan, Italy) was
used for continuous noninvasive blood pressure recordings. A dedicated software program for the automatic
evaluation of the tests (SEDICO-HS srl, Padua, Italy)
was used. Normal, borderline, and abnormal values for
each test have been detailed in earlier studies [11, 25].
The test results were also evaluated by multivariate
analysis, which has been demonstrated to be a valuable
method to investigate uremic AN [11, 17]; the procedure
233
has been detailed elsewhere [19, 20]. Briefly, a normal
model was computed by a pattern-recognition method,
the Bayesian analysis, using seven variables, that is, the
six test results and age, from 85 sex- and age-matched
normal subjects. The distance from the normal model
centroid (Mahalanobis distance) was measured in each
patient. Because of a probability transformation, a confidence level was estimated in the range 0 to 100. A level
of 95 or higher indicated the presence of autonomic
damage.
The second phase of the study included the investigation of power spectral analysis (PSA) of heart rate variations. After each subject had a 10-minute rest, a surface
electrocardiogram from a thoracic lead taken while the
subject was resting in the supine position was obtained
for 10 minutes. The subject was then moved to a standing
position (0 → 858) by a tilting table, and again, after at
least four minutes of stabilization, the heart rate was
measured for another 10-minute period. Twenty normal
subjects aged 22 to 75 years (mean 6 sd, 56 6 15 years;
12 men and 8 women) served as controls. A dedicated
software program (SEDICO-HS srl) recognized the individual electrocardiographic R wave and the corresponding R-R intervals. The PSA of a sequence of 500 R-R
intervals was estimated by the autoregressive modeling
technique, providing a low-frequency (LF) band in the
range of 0.03 to 0.15 Hz, and a high-frequency (HF)
band in the range of 0.15 to 0.33 Hz. LF and HF components are regarded, but not invariably, as specific markers
of sympathetic and parasympathetic activities, respectively [22].
Statistics
The PSA values are expressed as mean 6 sem. Statistical comparisons of results were made using Student’s ttest. Fisher’s test was used to evaluate differences in the
presence of symptoms suggestive of autonomic dysfunction. The relationship between variables was studied using linear regression analysis. A value of P , 0.05 was
considered significant.
RESULTS
The questionnaire revealed that all patients referred
to at least one of the symptoms suggestive of AN. The
most frequent findings were impotence in males (73%),
bowel dysfunction with diarrhea and/or constipation
(63%), bladder problems (63%), and gastroparesis
(60%; Table 1). Pseudomotor problems and orthostatic
intolerance were less frequent (43 and 37%, respectively). Furthermore, 12 patients (40%) suffered from
hemodialysis-induced hypotension.
Three patients (10%) had normal responses to all cardiovascular autonomic tests. Eleven patients (37%) had
an abnormal response to only one parasympathetic test;
234
Vita et al: Spectral analysis of heart rate in uremic patients
Table 1. Symptoms of autonomic dysfunction in 30 chronic uremic patients
Number of patients
Impotence
Bowel dysfunction
Bladder problems
Gastric fullness or delay in emptying
Sudomotor problems
Orthostatic intolerance
Hemodialysis-induced hypotension
Total (%)
without AN
with AN
Significance
16/22M (73)
19 (63)
19 (63)
18 (60)
13 (43)
11 (37)
12 (40)
3
9
5
7
7
4
5
13
10
14
11
6
7
7
P , 0.05
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Abbreviations are: AN, autonomic neuropathy; NS, not significant.
12 patients (40%) showed a definite parasympathetic
damage, as indicated by at least two abnormal heart rate
tests, whereas 4 (13%) had combined parasympathetic
and sympathetic damage.
Multivariate analysis of the six cardiovascular autonomic tests revealed that 19 patients (63%) had moderate-to-severe AN [confidence interval (CI) ranging from
97 to 100], and 11 patients exhibited normal autonomic
function (CI 35 to 87). The CI as an index of autonomic
status was not correlated with either age or the duration
of dialysis. Among symptoms of autonomic dysfunction,
only impotence resulted as being significantly (P , 0.05)
associated with test-proven AN (Table 1). Moreover,
autonomic dysfunction was unrelated to the presence of
hypertension or hemodialysis-induced hypotension.
The LF mean power value in chronic uremics who
were supine was 152 6 34, which was significantly lower
from that of control subjects (415 6 82, P , 0.0002; Fig.
1A). The HF mean power value result was not significantly different between uremic patients (100 6 21) and
controls (165 6 4).
While standing, the LF mean power value in chronic
uremic patients was 141 6 39, which was significantly
lower from that of control subjects (316 6 132, P , 0.02;
Fig. 1B). Again, the HF mean power value was not different between uremics (34 6 5) and controls (56 6 47).
The LF/HF ratio values resulted on lying 6.5 6 3.4 in
controls and 5.5 6 1.6 in uremics and on standing 9.9 6
2.6 in controls and 19.9 6 6.8 in uremics, with no significant differences (Fig. 1C). PSA values did not vary as
function of uremic patients’ age or duration of dialysis,
except for the LF mean power value on standing, which
correlated with age (r 5 20.502, P , 0.01).
When the group of uremics were divided into two
subgroups according to the results of traditional cardiovascular tests, the LF mean power value in 11 uremics
without AN who were supine was 202 6 66, which was
significantly lower from that of the control subjects (P ,
0.04; Fig. 2A). The results obtained in 19 uremic patients
with AN were 123 6 37, a value not different from
that of the uremic patients without AN, but significantly
different from that of controls (P , 0.0003). The HF
mean power values obtained during the time they were
supine were not significantly different among controls,
uremic patients without AN (90 6 27), and uremic patients with AN (106 6 29).
While standing, the LF mean power value in uremic
subjects without AN was 231 6 90, which was not different from that of the control subjects (Fig. 2B). The value
obtained in uremic patients with AN (89 6 29) was
significantly lower from that of controls (P , 0.003). The
HF mean power values during standing were 61 6 20 in
uremic patients without AN (no difference with controls)
and 19 6 11 in uremic patients with AN, a value that
was significantly lower from controls (P , 0.02) and
from that of uremic patients without AN (P , 0.05).
The LF/HF ratio value results were 5.0 6 1.7 in uremic
patients without AN and 5.8 6 2.3 in uremic patients with
AN when they were supine (Fig. 2C). While standing, the
corresponding values were 14.4 6 9 and 23 6 9.7. There
were no significant differences among controls and both
subgroups of uremic patients.
The total variance and spectral components normalized by total variance are shown in Table 2. The total
variance was significantly lower in uremic patients than
controls, without any difference between the two subgroups of patients. Only the LF power value during
standing resulted in significantly lower values in the total
uremic patients’ group and in uremic patients with AN
group than in normal controls.
DISCUSSION
Although traditional autonomic tests still remain the
cornerstone in the clinical approach to patients with autonomic dysfunction, the PSA of heart rate variability
may add useful information to the natural history of AN
in a number of conditions, providing a more accurate
evaluation of cardiovascular autonomic activity [23, 24].
As an example, traditional autonomic tests led to the
erroneous interpretation that diabetic AN began with
an early parasympathetic failure that was only later followed by sympathetic impairment. On the basis of PSA,
that opinion has been totally revised in favor of a more
Vita et al: Spectral analysis of heart rate in uremic patients
235
Fig. 2. Low- and high-frequency power spectrum density components
(respectively, LF and HF) during supine (A) and standing (B) positions
in 20 control subjects (h), 11 uremic patients without test-proven AN
( ), and 19 uremic patients with test-proven AN (j). The LF/HF ratio
is illustrated in (C). The results are expressed as mean 6 sem; the
statistical significance of differences is listed above the bars.
Fig. 1. Low- and high-frequency power spectrum density components
(respectively, LF and HF) during lying (A) and standing (B) in 20 control
subjects (h) and 30 uremic patients (j) on periodic hemodialysis. The
LF/HF ratio is illustrated in (C). The results are expressed as mean 6
sem; *P , 0.0002; **P , 0.02.
widespread autonomic failure that simultaneously involves both the sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways [22]. Therefore, spectral analysis of heart rate variations may permit unexpected insight into understanding
the diseases of the autonomic nervous system.
Only a very few studies have investigated the spectral
analysis of heart rate variability in small numbers of
patients with chronic renal failure, with no or little comparison with the traditional autonomic tests. Axelrod et
al have studied 8 patients treated by hemodialysis, 7 on
intermittent peritoneal dialysis, and 10 on conservative
treatment [26]. The largest decrease in power from control to uremics, as a whole group, was observed in the mid
(0.1 to 0.2 Hz) and respiratory (0.2 to 0.3 Hz) frequency
ranges, indicating a preeminent vagal depression or most
236
Vita et al: Spectral analysis of heart rate in uremic patients
Table 2. Total variance and spectral components normalized by total variance in 30 chronic uremic patients
Controls
(a)
Total uremics
(b)
Uremics
without AN (c)
Uremics
with AN (d)
1808 6 270
563 6 123
588 6 151
549 6 177
LF during lying (nu)
HF during lying (nu)
LF during standing (nu)
54 6 6
236 4
726 4
44 6 5
266 4
526 6
53 6 8
286 7
566 10
39 6 7
256 5
506 8
HF during standing (nu)
15 6 2
16 6 3
17 6 6
16 6 3
Total variance ms
2
Significance
a vs. b, P , 0.00003
a vs. c, P , 0.004
a vs. d, P , 0.0005
c vs. d, NS
NS
NS
a vs. b, P , 0.03
a vs. c, NS
a vs. d, P , 0.02
c vs. d, NS
NS
Values are expressed as the mean 6 SEM. Abbreviations are: AN, autonomic neuropathy; LF, low-frequency band; HF, high-frequency band; nu, normalized
units; NS, not significant.
likely a dysfunction in both sympathetic and parasympathetic tone. Particularly, a similar depression in autonomic control was demonstrated in hemodialysis and
peritoneal dialysis patients, whereas patients who as yet
were not undergoing dialysis showed a lesser degree
of depression. In another study, six uremic patients on
chronic intermittent hemodialysis exhibited reduced
blood pressure and heart rate short-term variabilities,
with a dramatic reduction in the amplitude of the 0.1
Hz component of systolic and diastolic blood pressure
spectra, reflecting a sympathetic neuropathy [27]. Dialysis did not produce any consistent immediate improvement in the amplitudes. The findings reported by Munakata et al suggested that the decreased mid-frequency
band of blood pressure could be attributed to low sensitivity of the vasculature to sympathetic stimuli, and that
the autonomic modulation of linear blood pressure/R-R
interval relationships is frequency dependent [28]. Very
recently, in an investigation of 278 patients with endstage renal disease of different causes and on different
types of treatment, who were awaiting kidney transplantation, frequency domain measurements performed in 21
patients more sensitively identified those with autonomic
dysregulation than the traditional autonomic tests [8].
In the current study, we investigated 30 uremic patients on chronic hemodialysis and found that, in accordance with previous reports [3], 53% of the patients had
a definite parasympathetic dysfunction that was isolated
in 40% and combined with a sympathetic damage in
13%, and 37% had a borderline parasympathetic damage. Nobody presented an isolated dysfunction of the
sympathetic nervous system. When multivariate analysis
was applied, 19 patients (63%) were identified as having
a moderate-to-severe AN and the rest being with a normal autonomic nervous system function. Among the
symptoms suggestive of autonomic dysfunction, only impotence in males was significantly associated with testproven AN.
The results of the heart rate PSA have demonstrated
a good assessment of sympathetic-parasympathetic cardiovascular modulation between controls and the two
subgroups of uremic patients. More interestingly, the
significant reduction of LF value in the supine uremic
AN group compared with normal controls suggests the
presence of an early sympathetic involvement that traditional autonomic tests were unable to detect.
However, it has been reported that atropine in humans
reduces both 0.3 and 0.1 Hz spectral heart rate components [29, 30], which indicates that parasympathetic modulation is involved in the generation of both these spectral powers and that, at least in a number of conditions,
the 0.1 Hz component does not specifically reflect the
sympathetic cardiac drive. In light of such evidence, the
current opinion of an early and more frequent parasympathetic damage in chronic uremic patients on hemodialysis has to be modified in favor of a more widespread
autonomic dysfunction involving both the sympathetic
and parasympathetic pathways.
At rest, the HF component, that is, the spectral index
of vagal activity, was similar in normal controls and uremic patients, suggesting an unchanged sympathovagal
balance in baseline conditions. However, the response
to standing was significantly altered in uremic patients,
with a clear difference between the two subgroups of
patients. Moreover, the LF/HF ratio, considered a good
indicator of sympathovagal balance [21], did not significantly change in our patients in either the supine or
standing position.
In conclusion, our findings support the ability of the
PSA of heart rate variability to evidence the occurrence
of alterations in cardiovascular autonomic activity in
chronic uremics. The PSA technique may represent a
complementary approach to traditional autonomic tests,
providing a more accurate investigation of natural history of the disease and, most likely, response to therapeutic strategies. The possible clinical usefulness of PSA of
heart rate variability as a tool for the early detection of
Vita et al: Spectral analysis of heart rate in uremic patients
subjects at increased risk of relevant autonomic failure
needs further study.
Reprint requests to Giuseppe Vita, M.D., Clinica Neurologica 2,
Policlinico Universitario, 98125 Messina, Italy.
E-mail: [email protected]
REFERENCES
1. Campese VM, Romoff MS, Levitan D, Lane K, Massry SG: Mechanisms of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in uremia. Kidney
Int 20:246–253, 1981
2. Heidbreder E, Schafferhans K, Heidland A: Autonomic neuropathy in chronic renal insufficiency: Comparative analysis of
diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Nephron 41:50–56, 1985
3. Vita G, Messina C, Savica V, Bellinghieri G: Uraemic autonomic neuropathy. J Auton Nerv Syst 30(Suppl):179–184, 1990
4. Zoccali C, Ciccarelli M, Mallamaci F, Maggiore Q: Effect of
naloxone on the defective autonomic control of heart rate in uraemic patients. Clin Sci 69:81–86, 1985
5. Malik S, Winney RJ, Ewing DJ: Chronic renal failure and cardiovascular autonomic function. Nephron 43:191–195, 1986
6. Vita G, Dattola R, Calabrò R, Manna L, Venuto C, Toscano
A, Savica V, Bellinghieri G: Comparative analysis of autonomic
and somatic dysfunction in chronic uraemia. Eur Neurol 28:335–
340, 1988
7. Converse RL, Jacobsen TN, Toto RD, Jost CMT, Cosentino F,
Fouad-Tarazi F, Victor RG: Sympathetic overactivity in patients
with chronic renal failure. N Engl J Med 327:1912–1918, 1992
8. Hathaway DK, Cashion AK, Milstead EJ, Winsett RP, Cowan
PA, Wicks MN, Gaber AO: Autonomic dysregulation in patients
awaiting kidney transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 32:221–229, 1998
9. Solders G, Persson A, Gutierrez A: Autonomic dysfunction
in non-diabetic terminal uraemia. Acta Neurol Scand 71:321–327,
1985
10. Agarwal A, Anand IS, Sakhuja V, Chugh KS: Effect of dialysis
and renal transplantation on autonomic dysfunction in chronic
renal failure. Kidney Int 40:489– 495, 1991
11. Vita G, Savica V, Puglisi RM, Marabello L, Bellinghieri G,
Messina C: The course of autonomic neural function in chronic
uraemic patients during haemodialysis treatment. Nephrol Dial
Transplant 7:1022–1025, 1992
12. Heidbreder E, Schafferhans K, Götz R, Heidland A: Autonomic neuropathy in diabetic nephropathy: Effect of regular dialysis treatment and simultaneous transplantation of kidney and
pancreas. Contrib Nephrol 73:112–126, 1989
13. Boucek P, Bartos V, Vanek I, Hyza Z, Skibova J: Diabetic autonomic neuropathy after pancreas and kidney transplantation. Diabetologia 34(Suppl 1):121–124, 1991
14. Solders G, Persson A, Wilczek H: Autonomic system dysfunction and polyneuropathy in nondiabetic uremia: A one-year followup study after renal transplantation. Transplantation 41:616–619,
1986
237
15. Solders G, Wilczek H, Gunnarsson R, Tyden G, Persson A,
Groth CG: Effects of combined pancreatic and renal transplantation on diabetic neuropathy: A two-year follow-up study. Lancet
2:1232–1234, 1987
16. Solders G, Tyden G, Persson A, Groth CG: Improvement of
nerve conduction in diabetic neuropathy: A follow-up study 4
yr after combined pancreatic and renal transplantation. Diabetes
41:946–951, 1992
17. Vita G, Savica V, Milone S, Trusso A, Bellinghieri G, Messina
C: Uremic autonomic neuropathy: Recovery following bicarbonate
hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 45:56–60, 1996
18. Bannister R, Mathias CJ: Autonomic Failure: A Textbook of
Clinical Disorders of the Autonomic Nervous System (3rd ed).
Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992
19. Vita G, Princi P, Messina C: Multivariate analysis of cardiovascular reflexes applied to the diagnosis of autonomic neuropathy.
J Neurol 238:251–255, 1991
20. Vita G, Princi P, Savica V, Bellinghieri G, Puglisi RM, Marabello L, Messina C: Uremic autonomic dysfunction evaluated by
pattern recognition analysis. Clin Nephrol 36:290–293, 1991
21. Pagani M, Malfatto G, Pierini S, Casati R, Masu AM, Poli M,
Guzzetti S, Lombardi F, Cerutti S, Malliani A: Spectral analysis
of heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic diabetic
neuropathy. J Auton Nerv Syst 23:143–153, 1988
22. Bellavere F, Balzani I, De Masi G, Carraro M, Carenza P,
Cobelli C, Thomaseth K: Power spectral analysis of heart-rate
variations improves assessment of diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes 41:633–640, 1992
23. van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA, Kollée LAA, Hopman JCW, Stoelinga GBA, van Geijn HP: Heart rate variability. Ann Intern Med
118:436– 447, 1993
24. Omboni S, Parati G, Di Rienzo M, Wieling W, Mancia G: Blood
pressure and heart rate variability in autonomic disorders: A critical
review. Clin Auton Res 6:171–182, 1996
25. Vita G, Princi P, Calabrò R, Toscano A, Manna L, Messina
C: Cardiovascular reflex tests: Assessment of age-adjusted normal
range. J Neurol Sci 75:263–274, 1986
26. Axelrod S, Lishner M, Oz O, Bernheim J, Ravid M: Spectral
analysis of fluctuations in heart rate: An objective evaluation of
autonomic nervous control in chronic renal failure. Nephron
45:202–206, 1987
27. Cloarec-Blanchard L, Girard A, Houhou S, Grünfeld JP, Elghozi JL: Spectral analysis of short-term blood pressure and heart
rate variability in uremic patients. Kidney Int 41(Suppl 37):S14–
S18, 1992
28. Munakata M, Imai Y, Sekino H, Abe K: Rhythmic oscillations
of blood pressure and R-R interval in patients with chronic renal
failure. Med Biol Eng Comput 31(Suppl):S115–S122, 1993
29. Saul JP, Berger RD, Chen MH, Cohen RJ: Transfer function
analysis of autonomic regulation. II. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia.
Am J Physiol 256:H153–H161, 1989
30. Saul JP, Berger RD, Albrecht P, Stein SP, Chen MH, Cohen
RJ: Transfer function analysis of the circulation: Unique insights
into cardiovascular regulation. Am J Physiol 261:H1231–H1245,
1991