Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
This material is protected by U.S. copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. To purchase quantity reprints, please e-mail [email protected] or to request permission to reproduce multiple copies, please e-mail [email protected]. Downloaded on 05 07 2017. Single-user license only. Copyright 2017 by the Oncology Nursing Society. For permission to post online, reprint, adapt, or reuse, please email [email protected] FEATURE ARTICLE Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Current Treatment and Nursing Management With Economic Considerations Pamela Hallquist Viale, RN, MS, CS, ANP, AOCNP, Anita Fung, PharmD, and Laura Zitella, NP, AOCN ® C olorectal cancer is The introduction of irinoteColorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers common in men and can in 1996, followed by the women. More than first new platinum analog agent, affecting men and women in the United States. In 2005, 56,000 people will die of the oxaliplatin, in 2002, offered 10% of all new cancer cases in men will be colorectal; disease in the United States considerable advances in chefor women, 11% of new cases will be colorectal. The in 2005 (Jemal et al., 2005). motherapy for advanced and Including Europe, the number metastatic colorectal cancer disease is the third most frequent cancer occurring in rises to about 200,000 deaths (Schrag, 2004). An oral fluoboth sexes. Colorectal cancer also is the third most (Midgley & Kerr, 2000b). Early rouracil agent, capecitabine, frequent cause of death for men and women, and more diagnosis with better screening was released in 1998 and has than 56,000 cancer deaths in 2005 will be attributed to has improved overall survival been shown to have activity for patients with colorectal canin colorectal cancer. Two new colorectal cancer. Chemotherapy options for treatment cer. Unfortunately, more than monoclonal antibody agents, beof the disease remained relatively stagnant until the ap50% of new patients present vacizumab and cetuximab, were proval of irinotecan in 1996 followed by capecitabine, with stage III or metastatic disapproved in 2004 for the treatease, and half of all people with oxaliplatin, and the new targeted agents. The new agents ment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are diagnosed colorectal cancer. The agents have improved efficacy of treatment for colorectal cancer with recurrent or metastatic disare different in tumor effects and the lives of patients with advanced disease. With the ease (Xiong & Ajani, 2004). and side-effect profiles and may new options for treatment come increased nursing and Therefore, screening and early diagnosis are crucial in helping patient-teaching responsibilities, as well as increased Submitted October 2004. Acto reduce mortality. costs associated with the newer drugs in the armamencepted for publication April 6, Because more patients with 2005. The primary author speaks tarium of chemotherapy agents. Formulary budgets colorectal cancer present with for Abraxis Oncology; the Instilater-stage disease, effective are seeing dramatic rises in expenditures for the new, tute for Medical Education and treatments are needed. Treattargeted therapy treatments; discussion of the most apResearch; Merck & Co., Inc.; ments usually include systemic Novartis; and Pfizer Inc. and propriate therapies may be considered. This article will chemotherapy. Patients often reserves on the advisory boards discuss epidemiology of colorectal cancer, treatment ceive a combination of surgery, for Amgen Inc., the Institute for chemotherapy, and possibly radioptions in advanced colorectal cancer, and nursing care Medical Education and Research, ation therapy in the treatment of crucial to patients undergoing chemotherapy. Discussion Novartis, and Pfizer Inc. (Mention stage III or advanced colorectal of specific products and opinions of economic impact also will be presented. cancer. Although improvements related to those products do not have been made in surgical and indicate or imply endorsement radiation therapy techniques in the treatment & Kerr, 2000a; Rich, Shepard, & Mosely, by the Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing of advanced colorectal cancer, 5-fluorouracil 2004). Chemotherapy options have changed or the Oncology Nursing Society.) (5-FU) has been the mainstay of chemother- dramatically since 2000 and will be the focus apy for this patient population (Midgley of this article. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING • VOLUME 9, NUMBER 5 • ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER Digital Object Identifier: 10.1188/05.CJON.541-552 541