Download C07-Wireless_LANs_f

Document related concepts

Wake-on-LAN wikipedia , lookup

Network tap wikipedia , lookup

Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup

Multiprotocol Label Switching wikipedia , lookup

Wireless USB wikipedia , lookup

Deep packet inspection wikipedia , lookup

CAN bus wikipedia , lookup

Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup

Wireless security wikipedia , lookup

Cracking of wireless networks wikipedia , lookup

Piggybacking (Internet access) wikipedia , lookup

IEEE 1355 wikipedia , lookup

Asynchronous Transfer Mode wikipedia , lookup

IEEE 802.11 wikipedia , lookup

UniPro protocol stack wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Mobile Communications
Chapter 7: Wireless LANs
Characteristics
 IEEE 802.11


PHY
 MAC
 Roaming
 .11a, b, g, h, i …
S. K. Nayak
HIPERLAN
 Bluetooth / IEEE 802.15.x
 IEEE 802.16/.20/.21/.22
 RFID
 Comparison

PEEC 5409
7.1
Mobile Communication Technology according to IEEE
Local wireless networks
WLAN 802.11
WiFi
802.11a
802.11b
802.11h
802.11i/e/…/w
802.11g
ZigBee
802.15.4
Personal wireless nw
WPAN 802.15
802.15.1
802.15.2
802.15.4a/b
802.15.5
802.15.3
802.15.3a/b
Bluetooth
Wireless distribution networks
WMAN 802.16 (Broadband Wireless Access)
WiMAX
+ Mobility
802.20 (Mobile Broadband Wireless Access)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.2
Characteristics of wireless LANs
Advantages

very flexible within the reception area
 Ad-hoc networks without previous planning possible
 (almost) no wiring difficulties (e.g. historic buildings, firewalls)
 more robust against disasters like, e.g., earthquakes, fire - or users pulling
a plug...
Disadvantages

typically very low bandwidth compared to wired networks
(1-10 Mbit/s) due to shared medium
 many proprietary solutions, especially for higher bit-rates, standards take
their time (e.g. IEEE 802.11)
 products have to follow many national restrictions if working wireless, it
takes a vary long time to establish global solutions like, e.g., IMT-2000
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.3
Design goals for wireless LANs









global, seamless operation
low power for battery use
no special permissions or licenses needed to use the LAN
robust transmission technology
simplified spontaneous cooperation at meetings
easy to use for everyone, simple management
protection of investment in wired networks
security (no one should be able to read my data), privacy (no one should
be able to collect user profiles), safety (low radiation)
transparency concerning applications and higher layer protocols, but also
location awareness if necessary
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.4
Comparison: infrared vs. radio transmission
Infrared

uses IR diodes, diffuse light,
multiple reflections (walls,
furniture etc.)
Advantages

simple, cheap, available in
many mobile devices
 no licenses needed
 simple shielding possible
Disadvantages

interference by sunlight, heat
sources etc.
 many things shield or absorb IR
light
 low bandwidth
Example

S. K. Nayak
IrDA (Infrared Data Association)
interface available everywhere
Radio

typically using the license free
ISM band at 2.4 GHz
Advantages

experience from wireless WAN
and mobile phones can be used
 coverage of larger areas
possible (radio can penetrate
walls, furniture etc.)
Disadvantages

very limited license free
frequency bands
 shielding more difficult,
interference with other electrical
devices
Example

Many different products
PEEC 5409
7.5
Comparison: infrastructure vs. ad-hoc networks
infrastructure
network
AP
AP
wired network
AP: Access Point
AP
ad-hoc network
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.6
802.11 - Architecture of an infrastructure network
Station (STA)
802.11 LAN
STA1
802.x LAN

Basic Service Set (BSS)
BSS1
Portal
Access
Point
Access
Point
ESS


station integrated into the wireless
LAN and the distribution system
Portal

BSS2
bridge to other (wired) networks
Distribution System

S. K. Nayak
group of stations using the same
radio frequency
Access Point
Distribution System
STA2
terminal with access mechanisms
to the wireless medium and radio
contact to the access point
802.11 LAN
STA3
interconnection network to form
one logical network (EES:
Extended Service Set) based
on several BSS
PEEC 5409
7.7
802.11 - Architecture of an ad-hoc network
Direct communication within a limited
range
802.11 LAN

Station (STA):
terminal with access mechanisms to
the wireless medium
 Independent Basic Service Set
(IBSS):
group of stations using the same
radio frequency
STA1
STA3
IBSS1
STA2
IBSS2
STA5
STA4
S. K. Nayak
802.11 LAN
PEEC 5409
7.8
IEEE standard 802.11
fixed
terminal
mobile terminal
infrastructure
network
access point
application
application
TCP
TCP
IP
IP
LLC
LLC
LLC
802.11 MAC
802.11 MAC
802.3 MAC
802.3 MAC
802.11 PHY
802.11 PHY
802.3 PHY
802.3 PHY
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.9
802.11 - Layers and functions
MAC

PLCP Physical Layer Convergence Protocol
MAC Management


access mechanisms, fragmentation,
encryption
clear channel assessment signal
CCA (carrier sense)CS
PMD Physical Medium Dependent
synchronization, roaming, MIB,
power management

modulation, coding
PHY Management

channel selection, MIB
Station Management
S. K. Nayak
LLC
MAC
MAC Management
PLCP
PHY Management
PMD
coordination of all management
functions
Station Management
PHY
DLC

PEEC 5409
7.10
802.11 - Physical layer (classical)
3 versions: 2 radio (typ. 2.4 GHz), 1 IR

data rates 1 or 2 Mbit/s
FHSS (Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum)

spreading, despreading, signal strength, typ. 1 Mbit/s
 min. 2.5 frequency hops/s (USA), two-level GFSK modulation
DSSS (Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum)

DBPSK modulation for 1 Mbit/s (Differential Binary Phase Shift Keying),
DQPSK for 2 Mbit/s (Differential Quadrature PSK)
 preamble and header of a frame is always transmitted with 1 Mbit/s, rest
of transmission 1 or 2 Mbit/s
 chipping sequence: +1, -1, +1, +1, -1, +1, +1, +1, -1, -1, -1 (Barker code)
 max. radiated power 1 W (USA), 100 mW (EU), min. 1mW
Infrared

850-950 nm, diffuse light, typ. 10 m range
 carrier detection, energy detection, synchronization
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.11
FHSS PHY packet format
Synchronization

synch with 010101... pattern
SFD (Start Frame Delimiter)

0000110010111101 start pattern
PLW (PLCP_PDU Length Word)

length of payload incl. 32 bit CRC of payload, PLW < 4096
PSF (PLCP Signaling Field)

data of payload (1 or 2 Mbit/s)
HEC (Header Error Check)

CRC with x16+x12+x5+1
80
synchronization
16
12
4
16
variable
SFD
PLW
PSF
HEC
payload
PLCP preamble
S. K. Nayak
bits
PLCP header
PEEC 5409
7.12
DSSS PHY packet format
Synchronization

synch., gain setting, energy detection, frequency offset compensation
SFD (Start Frame Delimiter)

1111001110100000
Signal

data rate of the payload (0A: 1 Mbit/s DBPSK; 14: 2 Mbit/s DQPSK)
Service

Length
future use, 00: 802.11 compliant

length of the payload
HEC (Header Error Check)

protection of signal, service and length, x16+x12+x5+1
128
synchronization
16
SFD
PLCP preamble
S. K. Nayak
8
8
16
16
signal service length HEC
variable
payload
PLCP header
PEEC 5409
7.13
bits
802.11 - MAC layer I - DFWMAC
Traffic services

Asynchronous Data Service (mandatory)
exchange of data packets based on “best-effort”
 support of broadcast and multicast


Time-Bounded Service (optional)

implemented using PCF (Point Coordination Function)
Access methods

DFWMAC-DCF CSMA/CA (mandatory)
collision avoidance via randomized „back-off“ mechanism
 minimum distance between consecutive packets
 ACK packet for acknowledgements (not for broadcasts)


DFWMAC-DCF w/ RTS/CTS (optional)

Distributed Foundation Wireless MAC
 avoids hidden terminal problem

DFWMAC- PCF (optional)

S. K. Nayak
access point polls terminals according to a list
PEEC 5409
7.14
802.11 - MAC layer II
Priorities

defined through different inter frame spaces
 no guaranteed, hard priorities
 SIFS (Short Inter Frame Spacing)


PIFS (PCF IFS)


highest priority, for ACK, CTS, polling response
medium priority, for time-bounded service using PCF
DIFS (DCF, Distributed Coordination Function IFS)

lowest priority, for asynchronous data service
DIFS
DIFS
medium busy
PIFS
SIFS
contention
next frame
t
direct access if
medium is free  DIFS
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.15
802.11 - CSMA/CA access method I
DIFS
contention window
(randomized back-off
mechanism)
DIFS
medium busy
direct access if
medium is free  DIFS
next frame
t
slot time

station ready to send starts sensing the medium (Carrier Sense
based on CCA, Clear Channel Assessment)
 if the medium is free for the duration of an Inter-Frame Space (IFS),
the station can start sending (IFS depends on service type)
 if the medium is busy, the station has to wait for a free IFS, then the
station must additionally wait a random back-off time (collision
avoidance, multiple of slot-time)
 if another station occupies the medium during the back-off time of
the station, the back-off timer stops (fairness)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.16
802.11 - competing stations - simple version
DIFS
DIFS
station1
station2
DIFS
boe
bor
boe
busy
DIFS
boe bor
boe
busy
boe busy
boe bor
boe
boe
busy
station3
station4
boe bor
station5
busy
bor
t
busy
S. K. Nayak
medium not idle (frame, ack etc.)
boe elapsed backoff time
packet arrival at MAC
bor residual backoff time
PEEC 5409
7.17
802.11 - CSMA/CA access method II
Sending unicast packets

station has to wait for DIFS before sending data
 receivers acknowledge at once (after waiting for SIFS) if the packet was
received correctly (CRC)
 automatic retransmission of data packets in case of transmission errors
DIFS
sender
data
SIFS
receiver
ACK
DIFS
other
stations
waiting time
S. K. Nayak
data
t
contention
PEEC 5409
7.18
802.11 - DFWMAC
Sending unicast packets

station can send RTS with reservation parameter after waiting for DIFS
(reservation determines amount of time the data packet needs the medium)
 acknowledgement via CTS after SIFS by receiver (if ready to receive)
 sender can now send data at once, acknowledgement via ACK
 other stations store medium reservations distributed via RTS and CTS
DIFS
sender
RTS
data
SIFS
receiver
other
stations
CTS SIFS
SIFS
NAV (RTS)
NAV (CTS)
defer access
S. K. Nayak
ACK
DIFS
data
t
contention
PEEC 5409
7.19
Fragmentation
DIFS
sender
RTS
frag1
SIFS
receiver
CTS SIFS
frag2
SIFS
ACK1 SIFS
SIFS
ACK2
NAV (RTS)
NAV (CTS)
other
stations
DIFS
NAV (frag1)
NAV (ACK1)
contention
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.20
data
t
DFWMAC-PCF I
t0 t1
medium busy PIFS
point
coordinator
wireless
stations
stations‘
NAV
S. K. Nayak
SuperFrame
SIFS
D1
SIFS
SIFS
D2
SIFS
U1
U2
NAV
PEEC 5409
7.21
DFWMAC-PCF II
t2
point
coordinator
wireless
stations
stations‘
NAV
S. K. Nayak
D3
PIFS
SIFS
D4
t3
t4
CFend
SIFS
U4
NAV
contention free period
contention
period
PEEC 5409
7.22
t
802.11 - Frame format
Types

control frames, management frames, data frames
Sequence numbers

important against duplicated frames due to lost ACKs
Addresses

receiver, transmitter (physical), BSS identifier, sender (logical)
Miscellaneous

sending time, checksum, frame control, data
bytes
2
2
6
6
6
2
6
Frame Duration/ Address Address Address Sequence Address
Control
ID
1
2
3
Control
4
bits
2
2
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0-2312
4
Data
CRC
1
Protocol
To From More
Power More
Type Subtype
Retry
WEP Order
version
DS DS Frag
Mgmt Data
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.23
MAC address format
scenario
ad-hoc network
infrastructure
network, from AP
infrastructure
network, to AP
infrastructure
network, within DS
to DS from
DS
0
0
0
1
address 1 address 2 address 3 address 4
DA
DA
SA
BSSID
BSSID
SA
-
1
0
BSSID
SA
DA
-
1
1
RA
TA
DA
SA
DS: Distribution System
AP: Access Point
DA: Destination Address
SA: Source Address
BSSID: Basic Service Set Identifier
RA: Receiver Address
TA: Transmitter Address
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.24
Special Frames: ACK, RTS, CTS
Acknowledgement
bytes
ACK
2
2
6
Frame
Receiver
Duration
Control
Address
4
CRC
Request To Send
bytes
RTS
2
2
6
6
Frame
Receiver Transmitter
Duration
Control
Address Address
Clear To Send
bytes
CTS
S. K. Nayak
2
2
6
Frame
Receiver
Duration
Control
Address
PEEC 5409
4
CRC
7.25
4
CRC
802.11 - MAC management
Synchronization

try to find a LAN, try to stay within a LAN
 timer etc.
Power management

sleep-mode without missing a message
 periodic sleep, frame buffering, traffic measurements
Association/Reassociation



integration into a LAN
roaming, i.e. change networks by changing access points
scanning, i.e. active search for a network
MIB - Management Information Base

S. K. Nayak
managing, read, write
PEEC 5409
7.26
Synchronization using a Beacon (infrastructure)
beacon interval
access
point
medium
B
B
busy
busy
B
busy
B
busy
t
value of the timestamp
S. K. Nayak
B
beacon frame
PEEC 5409
7.27
Synchronization using a Beacon (ad-hoc)
beacon interval
station1
B1
B1
B2
station2
medium
busy
busy
B2
busy
busy
t
value of the timestamp
S. K. Nayak
B
beacon frame
PEEC 5409
random delay
7.28
Power management
Idea: switch the transceiver off if not needed
States of a station: sleep and awake
Timing Synchronization Function (TSF)

stations wake up at the same time
Infrastructure

Traffic Indication Map (TIM)


list of unicast receivers transmitted by AP
Delivery Traffic Indication Map (DTIM)

list of broadcast/multicast receivers transmitted by AP
Ad-hoc

Ad-hoc Traffic Indication Map (ATIM)

announcement of receivers by stations buffering frames
 more complicated - no central AP
 collision of ATIMs possible (scalability?)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.29
Power saving with wake-up patterns (infrastructure)
TIM interval
access
point
DTIM interval
D B
T
busy
medium
busy
T
d
D B
busy
busy
p
station
d
t
S. K. Nayak
T
TIM
D
B
broadcast/multicast
DTIM
awake
p PS poll
d data transmission
to/from the station
PEEC 5409
7.30
Power saving with wake-up patterns (ad-hoc)
ATIM
window
station1
beacon interval
B1
station2
A
B2
B2
D
a
B1
d
t
B
beacon frame
awake
S. K. Nayak
random delay
a acknowledge ATIM
A transmit ATIM
D transmit data
d acknowledge data
PEEC 5409
7.31
802.11 - Roaming
No or bad connection? Then perform:
Scanning

scan the environment, i.e., listen into the medium for beacon signals or
send probes into the medium and wait for an answer
Reassociation Request

station sends a request to one or several AP(s)
Reassociation Response

success: AP has answered, station can now participate
 failure: continue scanning
AP accepts Reassociation Request

signal the new station to the distribution system
 the distribution system updates its data base (i.e., location information)
 typically, the distribution system now informs the old AP so it can release
resources
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.32
WLAN: IEEE 802.11b
Data rate

1, 2, 5.5, 11 Mbit/s, depending on
SNR
 User data rate max. approx. 6
Mbit/s
Transmission range

300m outdoor, 30m indoor
 Max. data rate ~10m indoor
Frequency

Free 2.4 GHz ISM-band
Security

Limited, WEP insecure, SSID
Availability

Many products, many vendors
S. K. Nayak
Connection set-up time

Connectionless/always on
Quality of Service

Typ. Best effort, no guarantees
(unless polling is used, limited
support in products)
Manageability

Limited (no automated key
distribution, sym. Encryption)
Special Advantages/Disadvantages

Advantage: many installed systems,
lot of experience, available
worldwide, free ISM-band, many
vendors, integrated in laptops,
simple system
 Disadvantage: heavy interference
on ISM-band, no service
guarantees, slow relative speed
only
PEEC 5409
7.33
IEEE 802.11b – PHY frame formats
Long PLCP PPDU format
128
16
synchronization
SFD
8
8
16
16
signal service length HEC
PLCP preamble
bits
variable
payload
PLCP header
192 µs at 1 Mbit/s DBPSK
1, 2, 5.5 or 11 Mbit/s
Short PLCP PPDU format (optional)
56
short synch.
16
SFD
8
16
16
bits
variable
signal service length HEC
PLCP preamble
(1 Mbit/s, DBPSK)
payload
PLCP header
(2 Mbit/s, DQPSK)
96 µs
S. K. Nayak
8
2, 5.5 or 11 Mbit/s
PEEC 5409
7.34
Channel selection (non-overlapping)
Europe (ETSI)
channel 1
2400
2412
channel 7
channel 13
2442
2472
22 MHz
2483.5
[MHz]
US (FCC)/Canada (IC)
channel 1
2400
2412
channel 6
channel 11
2437
2462
22 MHz
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
2483.5
[MHz]
7.35
WLAN: IEEE 802.11a
Data rate



Connection set-up time
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 Mbit/s,
depending on SNR
User throughput (1500 byte packets): 5.3
(6), 18 (24), 24 (36), 32 (54)
6, 12, 24 Mbit/s mandatory
Transmission range

100m outdoor, 10m indoor

E.g., 54 Mbit/s up to 5 m, 48 up to 12 m,
36 up to 25 m, 24 up to 30m, 18 up to 40
m, 12 up to 60 m
Frequency


Typ. best effort, no guarantees (same as
all 802.11 products)
Manageability

Limited (no automated key distribution,
sym. Encryption)
Special Advantages/Disadvantages


Limited, WEP insecure, SSID
Connectionless/always on
Quality of Service
Free 5.15-5.25, 5.25-5.35, 5.725-5.825
GHz ISM-band
Security


Advantage: fits into 802.x standards, free
ISM-band, available, simple system,
uses less crowded 5 GHz band
Disadvantage: stronger shading due to
higher frequency, no QoS
Availability

Some products, some vendors
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.36
IEEE 802.11a – PHY frame format
4
1
12
1
rate reserved length parity
6
16
tail service
variable
6
variable
payload
tail
pad
bits
PLCP header
PLCP preamble
12
signal
1
6 Mbit/s
S. K. Nayak
data
variable
symbols
6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 54 Mbit/s
PEEC 5409
7.37
Operating channels for 802.11a / US U-NII
36
5150
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320
channel
5350 [MHz]
16.6 MHz
149
153
157
161
channel
center frequency =
5000 + 5*channel number [MHz]
5725 5745 5765 5785 5805 5825 [MHz]
16.6 MHz
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.38
OFDM in IEEE 802.11a (and HiperLAN2)
OFDM with 52 used subcarriers (64 in total)
 48 data + 4 pilot
 (plus 12 virtual subcarriers)
 312.5 kHz spacing
312.5 kHz
pilot
-26 -21
-7 -1 1
7
21 26
channel center frequency
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
subcarrier
number
7.39
WLAN: IEEE 802.11 – future developments (03/2005)
802.11c: Bridge Support

Definition of MAC procedures to support bridges as extension to 802.1D
802.11d: Regulatory Domain Update

Support of additional regulations related to channel selection, hopping sequences
802.11e: MAC Enhancements – QoS

Enhance the current 802.11 MAC to expand support for applications with Quality of
Service requirements, and in the capabilities and efficiency of the protocol
 Definition of a data flow (“connection”) with parameters like rate, burst, period…
 Additional energy saving mechanisms and more efficient retransmission
802.11f: Inter-Access Point Protocol

Establish an Inter-Access Point Protocol for data exchange via the distribution
system
 Currently unclear to which extend manufacturers will follow this suggestion
802.11g: Data Rates > 20 Mbit/s at 2.4 GHz; 54 Mbit/s, OFDM

Successful successor of 802.11b, performance loss during mixed operation with 11b
802.11h: Spectrum Managed 802.11a

Extension for operation of 802.11a in Europe by mechanisms like channel
measurement for dynamic channel selection (DFS, Dynamic Frequency Selection)
and power control (TPC, Transmit Power Control)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.40
WLAN: IEEE 802.11– future developments (03/2005)
802.11i: Enhanced Security Mechanisms



Enhance the current 802.11 MAC to provide improvements in security.
TKIP enhances the insecure WEP, but remains compatible to older WEP systems
AES provides a secure encryption method and is based on new hardware
802.11j: Extensions for operations in Japan

Changes of 802.11a for operation at 5GHz in Japan using only half the channel
width at larger range
802.11k: Methods for channel measurements

Devices and access points should be able to estimate channel quality in order to be
able to choose a better access point of channel
802.11m: Updates of the 802.11 standards
802.11n: Higher data rates above 100Mbit/s


Changes of PHY and MAC with the goal of 100Mbit/s at MAC SAP
MIMO antennas (Multiple Input Multiple Output), up to 600Mbit/s are currently
feasible
 However, still a large overhead due to protocol headers and inefficient mechanisms
802.11p: Inter car communications



Communication between cars/road side and cars/cars
Planned for relative speeds of min. 200km/h and ranges over 1000m
Usage of 5.850-5.925GHz band in North America
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.41
WLAN: IEEE 802.11– future developments (03/2005)
802.11r: Faster Handover between BSS



Secure, fast handover of a station from one AP to another within an ESS
Current mechanisms (even newer standards like 802.11i) plus incompatible devices from
different vendors are massive problems for the use of, e.g., VoIP in WLANs
Handover should be feasible within 50ms in order to support multimedia applications efficiently
802.11s: Mesh Networking


Design of a self-configuring Wireless Distribution System (WDS) based on 802.11
Support of point-to-point and broadcast communication across several hops
802.11t: Performance evaluation of 802.11 networks

Standardization of performance measurement schemes
802.11u: Interworking with additional external networks
802.11v: Network management


Extensions of current management functions, channel measurements
Definition of a unified interface
802.11w: Securing of network control

Classical standards like 802.11, but also 802.11i protect only data frames, not the control frames.
Thus, this standard should extend 802.11i in a way that, e.g., no control frames can be forged.
Note: Not all “standards” will end in products, many ideas get stuck at working group level
Info: www.ieee802.org/11/, 802wirelessworld.com, standards.ieee.org/getieee802/
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.42
ETSI – HIPERLAN (historical)
ETSI standard

European standard, cf. GSM, DECT, ...
 Enhancement of local Networks and interworking with fixed networks
 integration of time-sensitive services from the early beginning
HIPERLAN family

one standard cannot satisfy all requirements

range, bandwidth, QoS support
 commercial constraints

HIPERLAN 1 standardized since 1996 – no products!
higher layers
medium access
control layer
channel access
control layer
physical layer
HIPERLAN layers
S. K. Nayak
logical link
control layer
medium access
control layer
network layer
data link layer
physical layer
OSI layers
physical layer
IEEE 802.x layers
PEEC 5409
7.43
Overview: original HIPERLAN protocol family
Application
Frequency
Topology
Antenna
Range
QoS
Mobility
Interface
Data rate
Power
conservation
HIPERLAN 1
wireless LAN
HIPERLAN 2
access to ATM
fixed networks
HIPERLAN 3
wireless local
loop
HIPERLAN 4
point-to-point
wireless ATM
connections
17.2-17.3GHz
point-to-point
5.1-5.3GHz
decentralized adcellular,
point-tohoc/infrastructure
centralized
multipoint
omni-directional
directional
50 m
50-100 m
5000 m
150 m
statistical
ATM traffic classes (VBR, CBR, ABR, UBR)
<10m/s
stationary
conventional LAN
ATM networks
23.5 Mbit/s
>20 Mbit/s
yes
155 Mbit/s
not necessary
HIPERLAN 1 never reached product status,
the other standards have been renamed/modfied !
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.44
HIPERLAN 1 - Characteristics
Data transmission

point-to-point, point-to-multipoint, connectionless
 23.5 Mbit/s, 1 W power, 2383 byte max. packet size
Services

asynchronous and time-bounded services with hierarchical priorities
 compatible with ISO MAC
Topology

infrastructure or ad-hoc networks
 transmission range can be larger then coverage of a single node
(„forwarding“ integrated in mobile terminals)
Further mechanisms

power saving, encryption, checksums
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.45
HIPERLAN 1 - Physical layer
Scope

modulation, demodulation, bit and frame synchronization
 forward error correction mechanisms
 measurements of signal strength
 channel sensing
Channels

3 mandatory and 2 optional channels (with their carrier frequencies)
 mandatory

channel 0: 5.1764680 GHz
 channel 1: 5.1999974 GHz
 channel 2: 5.2235268 GHz

optional

channel 3: 5.2470562 GHz
 channel 4: 5.2705856 GHz
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.46
HIPERLAN 1 - Physical layer frames
Maintaining a high data-rate (23.5 Mbit/s) is power consuming problematic for mobile terminals

packet header with low bit-rate comprising receiver information
 only receiver(s) address by a packet continue receiving
Frame structure

LBR (Low Bit-Rate) header with 1.4 Mbit/s
 450 bit synchronization
 minimum 1, maximum 47 frames with 496 bit each
 for higher velocities of the mobile terminal (> 1.4 m/s) the maximum
number of frames has to be reduced
HBR
LBR
synchronization
data0
data1
...
datam-1
PEEC 5409
7.47
Modulation

GMSK for high bit-rate, FSK for LBR header
S. K. Nayak
HIPERLAN 1 - CAC sublayer
Channel Access Control (CAC)

assure that terminal does not access forbidden channels
 priority scheme, access with EY-NPMA
Priorities

5 priority levels for QoS support
 QoS is mapped onto a priority level with the help of the packet
lifetime (set by an application)





S. K. Nayak
if packet lifetime = 0 it makes no sense to forward the packet to the
receiver any longer
standard start value 500ms, maximum 16000ms
if a terminal cannot send the packet due to its current priority, waiting
time is permanently subtracted from lifetime
based on packet lifetime, waiting time in a sender and number of hops to
the receiver, the packet is assigned to one out of five priorities
the priority of waiting packets, therefore, rises automatically
PEEC 5409
7.48
HIPERLAN 1 - EY-NPMA I
EY-NPMA (Elimination Yield Non-preemptive Priority Multiple Access)

3 phases: priority resolution, contention resolution, transmission
 finding the highest priority

transmission
S. K. Nayak
prioritization
contention
user data
yield listening
elimination survival
verification
elimination burst
priority assertion
priority detection
synchronization
every priority corresponds to a time-slot to send in the first phase, the
higher the priority the earlier the time-slot to send
 higher priorities can not be preempted
 if an earlier time-slot for a higher priority remains empty, stations with the
next lower priority might send
 after this first phase the highest current priority has been determined
IPS
IPA
IES IESV IYS
transmission
PEEC 5409
t
7.49
HIPERLAN 1 - EY-NPMA II
Several terminals can now have the same priority and wish to send

contention phase

Elimination Burst: all remaining terminals send a burst to eliminate
contenders (11111010100010011100000110010110, high bit- rate)
 Elimination Survival Verification: contenders now sense the channel, if the
channel is free they can continue, otherwise they have been eliminated
 Yield Listening: contenders again listen in slots with a nonzero probability,
if the terminal senses its slot idle it is free to transmit at the end of the
contention phase
 the important part is now to set the parameters for burst duration and
channel sensing (slot-based, exponentially distributed)

data transmission

the winner can now send its data (however, a small chance of collision
remains)
 if the channel was idle for a longer time (min. for a duration of 1700 bit) a
terminal can send at once without using EY-NPMA

S. K. Nayak
synchronization using the last data transmission
PEEC 5409
7.50
HIPERLAN 1 - DT-HCPDU/AK-HCPDU
LBR
LBR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 HI
HDA
bit
bit
HBR
HID
DA
SA
UD
PAD
CS
Data HCPDU
S. K. Nayak
bit
Acknowledgement HCPDU
HDA
HDACS
BLIR = n
BLIRCS 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
TI
BLI = n
PLI = m
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 HI
AID
AID
AIDCS
byte
1
2
3-6
7 - 12
13 - 18
19 - (52n-m-4)
(52n-m-3) - (52n-4)
(52n-3) - 52n
HI: HBR-part Indicator
HDA: Hashed Destination HCSAP Address
HDACS: HDA CheckSum
BLIR: Block Length Indicator
BLIRCS: BLIR CheckSum
TI: Type Indicator
BLI: Block Length Indicator
HID: HIPERLAN IDentifier
DA: Destination Address
SA: Source Address
UD: User Data (1-2422 byte)
PAD: PADding
CS: CheckSum
AID: Acknowledgement IDentifier
AIDS: AID CheckSum
PEEC 5409
7.51
HIPERLAN 1 - MAC layer
Compatible to ISO MAC
Supports time-bounded services via a priority scheme
Packet forwarding


support of directed (point-to-point) forwarding and broadcast forwarding (if
no path information is available)
support of QoS while forwarding
Encryption mechanisms

mechanisms integrated, but without key management
Power conservation mechanisms

mobile terminals can agree upon awake patterns (e.g., periodic wake-ups
to receive data)
 additionally, some nodes in the networks must be able to buffer data for
sleeping terminals and to forward them at the right time (so called stores)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.52
HIPERLAN 1 - DT-HMPDU
bit
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
LI = n
TI = 1
RL
byte
1-2
3
4-5
PSN
DA
SA
ADA
ASA
ML
ML
6-7
8 - 13
14 - 19
20 - 25
26 - 31
32
33
UP
KID
IV
IV
UD
SC
Data HMPDU
S. K. Nayak
34
35 - 37
38 - (n-2)
(n-1) - n
n= 40–2422
LI: Length Indicator
TI: Type Indicator
RL: Residual Lifetime
PSN: Sequence Number
DA: Destination Address
SA: Source Address
ADA: Alias Destination Address
ASA: Alias Source Address
UP: User Priority
ML: MSDU Lifetime
KID: Key Identifier
IV: Initialization Vector
UD: User Data, 1–2383 byte
SC: Sanity Check (for the
unencrypted PDU)
PEEC 5409
7.53
Information bases
Route Information Base (RIB) - how to reach a destination

[destination, next hop, distance]
Neighbor Information Base (NIB) - status of direct neighbors

[neighbor, status]
Hello Information Base (HIB) - status of destination (via next hop)

[destination, status, next hop]
Alias Information Base (AIB) - address of nodes outside the net

[original MSAP address, alias MSAP address]
Source Multipoint Relay Information Base (SMRIB) - current MP status

[local multipoint forwarder, multipoint relay set]
Topology Information Base (TIB) - current HIPERLAN topology

[destination, forwarder, sequence]
Duplicate Detection Information Base (DDIB) - remove duplicates

[source, sequence]
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.54
Ad-hoc networks using HIPERLAN 1
1
RIB
NIB
HIB
AIB
SMRIB
TIB
DDIB
RIB
NIB
HIB
AIB
DDIB
2
Forwarder
4
Information Bases (IB):
RIB: Route
NIB: Neighbor
HIB: Hello
AIB: Alias
SMRIB: Source Multipoint Relay
TIB: Topology
DDIB: Duplicate Detection
3
Forwarder
RIB
NIB
HIB
AIB
DDIB
5
RIB
NIB
HIB
AIB
DDIB
neighborhood
(i.e., within radio range)
S. K. Nayak
RIB
NIB
HIB
AIB
SMRIB
TIB
DDIB
RIB
NIB
HIB
AIB
SMRIB
TIB
DDIB
PEEC 5409
6
Forwarder
7.55
Some history: Why wireless ATM?







seamless connection to wired ATM, a integrated services highperformance network supporting different types a traffic streams
ATM networks scale well: private and corporate LANs, WAN
B-ISDN uses ATM as backbone infrastructure and integrates several
different services in one universal system
mobile phones and mobile communications have an ever increasing
importance in everyday life
current wireless LANs do not offer adequate support for multimedia
data streams
merging mobile communication and ATM leads to wireless ATM from a
telecommunication provider point of view
goal: seamless integration of mobility into B-ISDN
Problem: very high complexity of the system – never reached products
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.56
ATM - basic principle

favored by the telecommunication industry for advanced high-performance
networks, e.g., B-ISDN, as transport mechanism
 statistical (asynchronous, on demand) TDM (ATDM, STDM)
 cell header determines the connection the user data belongs to
 mixing of different cell-rates is possible


different bit-rates, constant or variable, feasible
interesting for data sources with varying bit-rate:

e.g., guaranteed minimum bit-rate
 additionally bursty traffic if allowed by the network
ATM cell:
5
48
[byte]
cell header
user data
connection identifier, checksum etc.
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.57
Cell-based transmission






asynchronous, cell-based transmission as basis for ATM
continuous cell-stream
additional cells necessary for operation and maintenance of the network
(OAM cells; Operation and Maintenance)
OAM cells can be inserted after fixed intervals to create a logical frame
structure
if a station has no data to send it automatically inserts idle cells that can be
discarded at every intermediate system without further notice
if no synchronous frame is available for the transport of cells (e.g., SDH or
Sonet) cell boundaries have to be detected separately (e.g., via the
checksum in the cell header)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.58
B-ISDN protocol reference model
3 dimensional reference model

three vertical planes (columns)




user plane
control plane
management plane
three hierarchical layers

Out-of-Band-Signaling: user data is
transmitted separately from control
information
control
user
plane
plane
higher
higher
layers
layers
layer management

physical layer
ATM layer
ATM adaptation layer
ATM adaptation layer
ATM layer
layers
physical layer
planes
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.59
plane management

management plane
ATM layers
Physical layer, consisting of two sub-layers

physical medium dependent sub-layer

coding
 bit timing
 transmission

transmission convergence sub-layer

HEC (Header Error Correction) sequence generation and verification
 transmission frame adaptation, generation, and recovery
 cell delineation, cell rate decoupling
ATM layer

cell multiplexing/demultiplexing
 VPI/VCI translation
 cell header generation and verification
 GFC (Generic Flow Control)
ATM adaptation layer (AAL)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.60
ATM adaptation layer (AAL)
Provides different service classes on top of ATM based on:

bit rate:

constant bit rate: e.g. traditional telephone line
 variable bit rate: e.g. data communication, compressed video

time constraints between sender and receiver:

with time constraints: e.g. real-time applications, interactive voice and video
 without time constraints: e.g. mail, file transfer

mode of connection:

connection oriented or connectionless
AAL consists of two sub-layers:

Convergence Sublayer (CS): service dependent adaptation

Common Part Convergence Sublayer (CPCS)
 Service Specific Convergence Sublayer (SSCS)

Segmentation and Reassembly Sublayer (SAR)
 sub-layers can be empty
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.61
ATM and AAL connections
end-system A
AAL
ATM
end-system B
service dependent
AAL connections
service independent
ATM connections
physical
layer

ATM layer:
AAL
ATM
physical
layer
ATM network

service independent transport of ATM cells
 multiplex and demultiplex functionality

application
AAL layer: support of different services
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.62
ATM Forum Wireless ATM Working Group





ATM Forum founded the Wireless ATM Working Group June 1996
Task: development of specifications to enable the use of ATM
technology also for wireless networks with a large coverage of
current network scenarios (private and public, local and global)
compatibility to existing ATM Forum standards important
it should be possible to easily upgrade existing ATM networks with
mobility functions and radio access
two sub-groups of work items
Radio Access Layer (RAL) Protocols





S. K. Nayak
radio access layer
wireless media access control
wireless data link control
radio resource control
handover issues
Mobile ATM Protocol Extensions





handover signaling
location management
mobile routing
traffic and QoS Control
network management
PEEC 5409
7.63
WATM services
Office environment

multimedia conferencing, online multimedia database access
Universities, schools, training centers

distance learning, teaching
Industry

database connection, surveillance, real-time factory management
Hospitals

reliable, high-bandwidth network, medical images, remote monitoring
Home

high-bandwidth interconnect of devices (TV, CD, PC, ...)
Networked vehicles

S. K. Nayak
trucks, aircraft etc. interconnect, platooning, intelligent roads
PEEC 5409
7.64
WATM components
WMT (Wireless Mobile ATM Terminal)
RAS (Radio Access System)
EMAS-E (End-user Mobility-supporting ATM Switch - Edge)
EMAS-N (End-user Mobility-supporting ATM Switch - Network)
M-NNI (Network-to-Network Interface with Mobility support)
LS (Location Server)
AUS (Authentication Server)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.65
Reference model
EMAS-N
WMT
RAS
EMAS-E
M-NNI
WMT
RAS
EMAS-N
LS
AUS
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.66
User plane protocol layers
fixed network segment
radio segment
MATM
terminal
WATM
terminal
adapter
RAS
EMAS
-E
EMAS
-N
fixed
end
system
ATMSwitch
user process
user
process
AAL
AAL
ATM
S. K. Nayak
ATMCL
ATMCL
RAL
RAL
ATM
ATM
ATM
ATM
ATM
PHY
PHY PHY
PHY PHY
PHY PHY
PHY
PEEC 5409
7.67
Control plane protocol layers
fixed network segment
radio segment
MATM
terminal
WATM
terminal
adapter
EMAS
-E
EMAS
-N
ATMSwitch
fixed
end
system
SIG,
M-UNI
SIG,
M-UNI,
M-PNNI
SIG,
M-PNNI
SIG,
PNNI,
UNI
SIG,
UNI
SAAL
SAAL
SAAL
SAAL
SAAL
ATM
ATM
ATM
ATM
PHY PHY
PHY
RAS
M-ATM
S. K. Nayak
ATMCL
ATMCL
RAL
RAL
ATM
PHY
PHY PHY PHY PHY
PEEC 5409
7.68
Reference model with further access scenarios I
1: wireless ad-hoc ATM network
2: wireless mobile ATM terminals
3: mobile ATM terminals
4: mobile ATM switches
5: fixed ATM terminals
6: fixed wireless ATM terminals
WMT: wireless mobile terminal
WT: wireless terminal
MT: mobile terminal
T: terminal
AP: access point
EMAS: end-user mobility supporting ATM switch (-E: edge, -N: network)
NMAS: network mobility supporting ATM switch
MS: mobile ATM switch
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.69
Reference model with further access scenarios II
WMT
1
RAS
2
EMAS
-E
RAS
WMT
ACT
WMT
EMAS
-N
EMAS
-E
MT
5
T
6
RAS
3
WT
NMAS
MS
RAS
RAS
T
S. K. Nayak
4
PEEC 5409
7.70
BRAN – Broadband Radio Access Networks
Motivation

deregulation, privatization, new companies, new services
 How to reach the customer?

alternatives: xDSL, cable, satellite, radio
Radio access

flexible (supports traffic mix, multiplexing for higher efficiency, can be
asymmetrical)
 quick installation
 economic (incremental growth possible)
Market

private customers (Internet access, tele-xy...)
 small and medium sized business (Internet, MM conferencing, VPN)
Scope of standardization

access networks, indoor/campus mobility, 25-155 Mbit/s, 50 m-5 km
 coordination with ATM Forum, IETF, ETSI, IEEE, ....
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.71
Broadband network types
Common characteristics

ATM QoS (CBR, VBR, UBR, ABR)
HIPERLAN/2


short range (< 200 m), indoor/campus, 25 Mbit/s user data rate
access to telecommunication systems, multimedia applications, mobility
(<10 m/s)
HIPERACCESS

wider range (< 5 km), outdoor, 25 Mbit/s user data rate
 fixed radio links to customers (“last mile”), alternative to xDSL or cable
modem, quick installation
 Several (proprietary) products exist with 155 Mbit/s plus QoS
HIPERLINK – currently no activities

intermediate link, 155 Mbit/s
 connection of HIPERLAN access points or connection between
HIPERACCESS nodes
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.72
BRAN and legacy networks
Independence

BRAN as access network independent from the fixed network
 Interworking of TCP/IP and ATM under study
Layered model

Network Convergence Sub-layer as superset of all requirements for IP and
ATM
Coordination
core network
ATM
core network
IP
network convergence sublayer
BRAN data link control
BRAN PHY-1
S. K. Nayak
BRAN PHY-2

IETF (TCP/IP)
 ATM forum (ATM)
 ETSI (UMTS)
 CEPT, ITU-R, ...
(radio frequencies)
...
PEEC 5409
7.73
HiperLAN2 (historical)
Official name: BRAN HIPERLAN Type 2

H/2, HIPERLAN/2 also used
High data rates for users

More efficient than 802.11a
Connection oriented
QoS support
Dynamic frequency selection
Security support

Strong encryption/authentication
Mobility support
Network and application independent

convergence layers for Ethernet, IEEE 1394, ATM, 3G
Power save modes
Plug and Play
S. K. Nayak
No products – but several mechanisms have been
Adopted by other standards (e.g. 802.11a)
PEEC 5409
7.74
HiperLAN2 architecture and handover scenarios
AP
MT1
1
APT
APC
MT2
3
MT3
APT
APC
2
MT4
S. K. Nayak
AP
Core
Network
(Ethernet,
Firewire,
ATM,
UMTS)
APT
PEEC 5409
7.75
Centralized vs. direct mode
AP
AP/CC
control
control
control
data
MT1
MT2
Centralized
S. K. Nayak
MT1
data
MT2
MT1
data
control
Direct
PEEC 5409
7.76
MT2 +CC
HiperLAN2 protocol stack
Higher layers
DLC control
SAP
Radio link control sublayer
Radio
resource
control
DLC user
SAP
Convergence layer
DLC
conn.
control
Assoc.
control
Data link control basic data
transport function
Error
control
Radio link control
Scope of
HiperLAN2
standards
Medium access control
Physical layer
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.77
Physical layer reference configuration
PDU train from DLC
(PSDU)
mapping
S. K. Nayak
scrambling
FEC coding
interleaving
OFDM
PHY bursts
(PPDU)
radio
transmitter
PEEC 5409
7.78
Operating channels of HiperLAN2 in Europe
36
5150
40
44
48
52
56
60
64
channel
5180 5200 5220 5240 5260 5280 5300 5320
5350 [MHz]
16.6 MHz
100
5470
140
channel
5500 5520 5540 5560 5580 5600 5620 5640 5660 5680 5700
5725
[MHz]
16.6 MHz
S. K. Nayak
104
108
112
116
120
124
128
132
136
center frequency =
5000 + 5*channel number [MHz]
PEEC 5409
7.79
Basic structure of HiperLAN2 MAC frames
2 ms
2 ms
MAC frame
2 ms
MAC frame
broadcast phase
MAC frame
downlink phase
variable
2 ms
MAC frame
random
access phase
uplink phase
variable
...
TDD,
500 OFDM
symbols
per frame
variable
2
406
24
LCH PDU type
payload
CRC
2
10
396
24
LCH PDU type
sequence
number
payload
CRC
bit
LCH transfer syntax
bit
UDCH transfer syntax
(long PDU)
54 byte
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.80
Valid configurations of HiperLAN2 MAC frames
2 ms
2 ms
MAC frame
MAC frame
broadcast
2 ms
MAC frame
downlink
2 ms
MAC frame
uplink
random
access
BCH
FCH
ACH
DL phase DiL phase UL phase
RCHs
BCH
FCH
ACH
DiL phase UL phase
RCHs
BCH
FCH
ACH
UL phase
RCHs
BCH
FCH
ACH
UL phase
RCHs
BCH
FCH
ACH
DL phase DiL phase
RCHs
BCH
FCH
ACH
DiL phase
RCHs
BCH
FCH
ACH
BCH
FCH
ACH
S. K. Nayak
DL phase
...
DL phase
Valid
combinations
of MAC frames
for a single
sector AP
RCHs
RCHs
PEEC 5409
7.81
Mapping of logical and transport channels
BCCH
FCCH
RFCH
LCCH
RBCH
DCCH
UDCH
UBCH
UMCH
downlink
BCH
FCH
ACH
UDCH
DCCH
LCCH
LCH
SCH
RCH
uplink
S. K. Nayak
SCH
ASCH
UDCH
LCH
UBCH
UMCH
DCCH RBCH
LCH
SCH
direct link
PEEC 5409
7.82
LCCH
Bluetooth
Idea





Universal radio interface for ad-hoc wireless connectivity
Interconnecting computer and peripherals, handheld devices, PDAs, cell
phones – replacement of IrDA
Embedded in other devices, goal: 5€/device (2005: 40€/USB bluetooth)
Short range (10 m), low power consumption, license-free 2.45 GHz ISM
Voice and data transmission, approx. 1 Mbit/s gross data rate
One of the first modules (Ericsson).
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.83
Bluetooth
History






1994: Ericsson (Mattison/Haartsen), “MC-link” project
Renaming of the project: Bluetooth according to Harald “Blåtand” Gormsen
[son of Gorm], King of Denmark in the 10th century
(was:
)
1998: foundation of Bluetooth SIG, www.bluetooth.org
1999: erection of a rune stone at Ercisson/Lund ;-)
2001: first consumer products for mass market, spec. version 1.1 released
2005: 5 million chips/week
Special Interest Group

Original founding members: Ericsson, Intel, IBM, Nokia, Toshiba
 Added promoters: 3Com, Agere (was: Lucent), Microsoft, Motorola
 > 2500 members
 Common specification and certification of products
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.84
History and hi-tech…
1999:
Ericsson mobile
communications AB
reste denna sten till
minne av Harald
Blåtand, som fick ge
sitt namn åt en ny
teknologi för trådlös,
mobil kommunikation.
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.85
…and the real rune stone
Located in Jelling, Denmark,
erected by King Harald “Blåtand”
in memory of his parents.
The stone has three sides – one side
showing a picture of Christ.
Inscription:
"Harald king executes these sepulchral
monuments after Gorm, his father and
Thyra, his mother. The Harald who won the
whole of Denmark and Norway and turned
the Danes to Christianity."
Btw: Blåtand means “of dark complexion”
(not having a blue tooth…)
S. K. Nayak
This could be the “original” colors
of the stone.
Inscription:
“auk tani karthi kristna” (and
made the Danes Christians)
PEEC 5409
7.86
Characteristics
2.4 GHz ISM band, 79 (23) RF channels, 1 MHz carrier spacing
Channel 0: 2402 MHz … channel 78: 2480 MHz
 G-FSK modulation, 1-100 mW transmit power

FHSS and TDD

Frequency hopping with 1600 hops/s
 Hopping sequence in a pseudo random fashion, determined by a master
 Time division duplex for send/receive separation
Voice link – SCO (Synchronous Connection Oriented)

FEC (forward error correction), no retransmission, 64 kbit/s duplex, pointto-point, circuit switched
Data link – ACL (Asynchronous ConnectionLess)

Asynchronous, fast acknowledge, point-to-multipoint, up to 433.9 kbit/s
symmetric or 723.2/57.6 kbit/s asymmetric, packet switched
Topology

Overlapping piconets (stars) forming a scatternet
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.87
Piconet
Collection of devices connected in an ad hoc
fashion
P
One unit acts as master and the others as slaves
for the lifetime of the piconet
S
S
M
Master determines hopping pattern, slaves have
to synchronize
SB
S
P
Each piconet has a unique hopping pattern
Participation in a piconet = synchronization to
hopping sequence
P
M=Master
S=Slave
SB
P=Parked
SB=Standby
Each piconet has one master and up to 7
simultaneous slaves (> 200 could be parked)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.88
Forming a piconet
All devices in a piconet hop together

Master gives slaves its clock and device ID

Hopping pattern: determined by device ID (48 bit, unique worldwide)
 Phase in hopping pattern determined by clock
Addressing

Active Member Address (AMA, 3 bit)
 Parked Member Address (PMA, 8 bit)
SB
SB
S. K. Nayak
SB 
SB
SB
SB
SB
SB 
SB
P 
S
S
SB
M
P
S
P 
SB
PEEC 5409
7.89
Scatternet
Linking of multiple co-located piconets through the sharing of common
master or slave devices

Devices can be slave in one piconet and master of another
Communication between piconets

Devices jumping back and forth between the piconets
P
S
S
S
P
P
M
Piconets
(each with a
capacity of
720 kbit/s)
M
SB
M=Master
S=Slave
P=Parked
SB=Standby
S. K. Nayak
S
P
SB
SB
S
PEEC 5409
7.90
Bluetooth protocol stack
audio apps.
NW apps.
vCal/vCard
TCP/UDP
OBEX
telephony apps.
AT modem
commands
IP
mgmnt. apps.
TCS BIN
SDP
BNEP PPP
Control
RFCOMM (serial line interface)
Audio
Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol (L2CAP)
Link Manager
Baseband
Radio
AT: attention sequence
OBEX: object exchange
TCS BIN: telephony control protocol specification – binary
BNEP: Bluetooth network encapsulation protocol
S. K. Nayak
SDP: service discovery protocol
RFCOMM: radio frequency comm.
PEEC 5409
7.91
Host
Controller
Interface
Frequency selection during data transmission
625 µs
fk
M
fk+1
fk+2
fk+3
fk+4
fk+5
fk+6
S
M
S
M
S
M
t
fk
fk+3
fk+4
fk+5
fk+6
M
S
M
S
M
t
fk
fk+1
M
S
fk+6
M
t
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.92
Baseband
Piconet/channel definition
Low-level packet definition

Access code


Channel, device access, e.g., derived from master
Packet header

1/3-FEC, active member address (broadcast + 7 slaves), link type, alternating
bit ARQ/SEQ, checksum
68(72)
54
0-2745
access code packet header
4
preamble
S. K. Nayak
64
sync.
(4)
3
(trailer) AM address
bits
payload
4
1
1
1
8
type
flow
ARQN
SEQN
HEC
PEEC 5409
7.93
bits
SCO payload types
payload (30)
HV1
audio (10)
HV2
audio (20)
HV3
DV
FEC (20)
FEC (10)
audio (30)
audio (10)
header (1)
payload (0-9)
2/3 FEC
CRC (2)
(bytes)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.94
ACL Payload types
payload (0-343)
header (1/2)
DM1 header (1)
DH1 header (1)
DM3
header (2)
DH3
header (2)
DM5
header (2)
DH5
header (2)
AUX1 header (1)
S. K. Nayak
payload (0-339)
payload (0-17)
2/3 FEC
payload (0-27)
payload (0-121)
CRC (2)
CRC (2)
(bytes)
CRC (2)
2/3 FEC
CRC (2)
payload (0-183)
CRC (2)
payload (0-224)
2/3 FEC
payload (0-339)
CRC (2)
CRC (2)
payload (0-29)
PEEC 5409
7.95
Baseband data rates
ACL
1 slot
3 slot
5 slot
SCO
Type
Payload User
Header Payload
[byte]
[byte]
FEC
CRC
Symmetric Asymmetric
max. Rate max. Rate [kbit/s]
[kbit/s]
Forward
Reverse
DM1
1
0-17
2/3
yes
108.8
108.8
108.8
DH1
1
0-27
no
yes
172.8
172.8
172.8
DM3
2
0-121
2/3
yes
258.1
387.2
54.4
DH3
2
0-183
no
yes
390.4
585.6
86.4
DM5
2
0-224
2/3
yes
286.7
477.8
36.3
DH5
2
0-339
no
yes
433.9
723.2
57.6
AUX1
1
0-29
no
no
185.6
185.6
185.6
HV1
na
10
1/3
no
64.0
HV2
na
20
2/3
no
64.0
HV3
na
30
no
no
64.0
DV
1D
10+(0-9) D 2/3 D yes D
64.0+57.6 D
Data Medium/High rate, High-quality Voice, Data and Voice
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.96
Baseband link types
Polling-based TDD packet transmission

625µs slots, master polls slaves
SCO (Synchronous Connection Oriented) – Voice

Periodic single slot packet assignment, 64 kbit/s full-duplex, point-to-point
ACL (Asynchronous ConnectionLess) – Data

Variable packet size (1,3,5 slots), asymmetric bandwidth, point-to-multipoint
MASTER
SLAVE 1
SLAVE 2
S. K. Nayak
SCO
f0
ACL
f4
SCO
f6
f1
ACL
f8
f7
SCO
f12
f9
ACL
f14
SCO
f18
f13
ACL
f20
f19
f17
f5
PEEC 5409
f21
7.97
Robustness
Slow frequency hopping with hopping patterns determined by a master

Protection from interference on certain frequencies
 Separation from other piconets (FH-CDMA)
Retransmission

Error in payload
(not header!)
ACL only, very fast
Forward Error Correction

NAK
SCO and ACL
MASTER
SLAVE 1
SLAVE 2
S. K. Nayak
A
C
B
C
D
F
ACK
H
E
G
PEEC 5409
G
7.98
Baseband states of a Bluetooth device
unconnected
standby
detach
inquiry
transmit
AMA
park
PMA
connected
AMA
hold
AMA
Standby: do nothing
Inquire: search for other devices
Page: connect to a specific device
Connected: participate in a piconet
S. K. Nayak
page
sniff
AMA
connecting
active
low power
Park: release AMA, get PMA
Sniff: listen periodically, not each slot
Hold: stop ACL, SCO still possible, possibly
participate in another piconet
PEEC 5409
7.99
Example: Power consumption/CSR BlueCore2
Typical Average Current Consumption (1)
VDD=1.8V Temperature = 20°C
Mode
SCO connection HV3 (1s interval Sniff Mode) (Slave)
SCO connection HV3 (1s interval Sniff Mode) (Master)
SCO connection HV1 (Slave)
SCO connection HV1 (Master)
ACL data transfer 115.2kbps UART (Master)
ACL data transfer 720kbps USB (Slave)
ACL data transfer 720kbps USB (Master)
ACL connection, Sniff Mode 40ms interval, 38.4kbps UART
ACL connection, Sniff Mode 1.28s interval, 38.4kbps UART
Parked Slave, 1.28s beacon interval, 38.4kbps UART
Standby Mode (Connected to host, no RF activity)
Deep Sleep Mode(2)
Notes:
(1) Current consumption is the sum of both BC212015A and the flash.
(2) Current consumption is for the BC212015A device only.
(More: www.csr.com )
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
26.0 mA
26.0 mA
53.0 mA
53.0 mA
15.5 mA
53.0 mA
53.0 mA
4.0 mA
0.5 mA
0.6 mA
47.0 µA
20.0 µA
7.100
Example: Bluetooth/USB adapter (2002: 50€)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.101
L2CAP - Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol
Simple data link protocol on top of baseband
Connection oriented, connectionless, and signalling channels
Protocol multiplexing

RFCOMM, SDP, telephony control
Segmentation & reassembly

Up to 64kbyte user data, 16 bit CRC used from baseband
QoS flow specification per channel

Follows RFC 1363, specifies delay, jitter, bursts, bandwidth
Group abstraction

Create/close group, add/remove member
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.102
L2CAP logical channels
Master
Slave
L2CAP
L2CAP
2
d
signalling
L2CAP
1
1 d d d d 1
baseband
S. K. Nayak
Slave
baseband
ACL
1
baseband
connectionless
connection-oriented
PEEC 5409
7.103
d
d
2
L2CAP packet formats
Connectionless PDU
2
2
2
0-65533
length
CID=2
PSM
payload
bytes
Connection-oriented PDU
2
2
0-65535
length
CID
payload
bytes
Signalling command PDU
2
2
length
CID=1
S. K. Nayak
bytes
One or more commands
1
1
2
0
code
ID
length
data
PEEC 5409
7.104
Security
User input (initialization)
PIN (1-16 byte)
Pairing
PIN (1-16 byte)
E2
Authentication key generation
(possibly permanent storage)
E2
link key (128 bit)
Authentication
link key (128 bit)
E3
Encryption key generation
(temporary storage)
E3
encryption key (128 bit)
Encryption
encryption key (128 bit)
Keystream generator
Keystream generator
payload key
Ciphering
payload key
Cipher data
Data
Data
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.105
SDP – Service Discovery Protocol
Inquiry/response protocol for discovering services






Searching for and browsing services in radio proximity
Adapted to the highly dynamic environment
Can be complemented by others like SLP, Jini, Salutation, …
Defines discovery only, not the usage of services
Caching of discovered services
Gradual discovery
Service record format

Information about services provided by attributes
 Attributes are composed of an 16 bit ID (name) and a value
 values may be derived from 128 bit Universally Unique Identifiers (UUID)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.106
Additional protocols to support legacy protocols/apps.
RFCOMM

Emulation of a serial port (supports a large base of legacy applications)
 Allows multiple ports over a single physical channel
Telephony Control Protocol Specification (TCS)

Call control (setup, release)
 Group management
OBEX

Exchange of objects, IrDA replacement
WAP

Interacting with applications on cellular phones
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.107
Profiles
Represent default solutions for a certain usage model
Applications
Vertical slice through the protocol stack
 Basis for interoperability
Protocols

Generic Access Profile
Service Discovery Application Profile
Cordless Telephony Profile
Intercom Profile
Serial Port Profile
Additional Profiles
Headset Profile
Advanced Audio Distribution
Dial-up Networking Profile
PAN
Fax Profile
Audio Video Remote Control
LAN Access Profile
Basic Printing
Generic Object Exchange Profile
Basic Imaging
Object Push Profile
Extended Service Discovery
File Transfer Profile
Generic Audio Video Distribution
Synchronization Profile
Hands Free
Hardcopy Cable Replacement
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.108
Profiles
WPAN: IEEE 802.15-1 – Bluetooth
Data rate
Connection set-up time

Synchronous, connection-oriented:
64 kbit/s
 Asynchronous, connectionless


433.9 kbit/s symmetric
723.2 / 57.6 kbit/s asymmetric
Transmission range


Quality of Service



Free 2.4 GHz ISM-band
Security

Challenge/response (SAFER+),
hopping sequence
Availability

Integrated into many products,
several vendors
S. K. Nayak
Public/private keys needed, key
management not specified, simple
system integration
Special Advantages/Disadvantages
Frequency

Guarantees, ARQ/FEC
Manageability

POS (Personal Operating Space)
up to 10 m
 with special transceivers up to 100
m
Depends on power-mode
Max. 2.56s, avg. 0.64s

Advantage: already integrated into
several products, available worldwide,
free ISM-band, several vendors, simple
system, simple ad-hoc networking, peer
to peer, scatternets
Disadvantage: interference on ISM-band,
limited range, max. 8
devices/network&master, high set-up
latency
PEEC 5409
7.109
WPAN: IEEE 802.15 – future developments 1
802.15-2: Coexistance

Coexistence of Wireless Personal Area Networks (802.15) and Wireless
Local Area Networks (802.11), quantify the mutual interference
802.15-3: High-Rate








Standard for high-rate (20Mbit/s or greater) WPANs, while still lowpower/low-cost
Data Rates: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55 Mbit/s
Quality of Service isochronous protocol
Ad hoc peer-to-peer networking
Security
Low power consumption
Low cost
Designed to meet the demanding requirements of portable consumer
imaging and multimedia applications
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.110
WPAN: IEEE 802.15 – future developments 2
Several working groups extend the 802.15.3 standard
802.15.3a:

Alternative PHY with higher data rate as extension to 802.15.3
 Applications: multimedia, picture transmission
802.15.3b:

Enhanced interoperability of MAC
 Correction of errors and ambiguities in the standard
802.15.3c:

Alternative PHY at 57-64 GHz
 Goal: data rates above 2 Gbit/s
Not all these working groups really create a standard, not all standards
will be found in products later …
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.111
WPAN: IEEE 802.15 – future developments 3
802.15-4: Low-Rate, Very Low-Power












Low data rate solution with multi-month to multi-year battery life and very
low complexity
Potential applications are sensors, interactive toys, smart badges, remote
controls, and home automation
Data rates of 20-250 kbit/s, latency down to 15 ms
Master-Slave or Peer-to-Peer operation
Up to 254 devices or 64516 simpler nodes
Support for critical latency devices, such as joysticks
CSMA/CA channel access (data centric), slotted (beacon) or unslotted
Automatic network establishment by the PAN coordinator
Dynamic device addressing, flexible addressing format
Fully handshaked protocol for transfer reliability
Power management to ensure low power consumption
16 channels in the 2.4 GHz ISM band, 10 channels in the 915 MHz US ISM
band and one channel in the European 868 MHz band
Basis of the ZigBee technology – www.zigbee.org
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.112
ZigBee
Relation to 802.15.4 similar to Bluetooth / 802.15.1
Pushed by Chipcon, ember, freescale (Motorola), Honeywell, Mitsubishi,
Motorola, Philips, Samsung
More than 150 members

Promoter (40000$/Jahr), Participant (9500$/Jahr), Adopter (3500$/Jahr)
No free access to the specifications (only promoters and participants)
ZigBee platforms comprise

IEEE 802.15.4 for layers 1 and 2
 ZigBee protocol stack up to the applications
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.113
WPAN: IEEE 802.15 – future developments 4
Several working groups extend the 802.15.4 standard
802.15.4a:


Alternative PHY with lower data rate as extension to 802.15.4
Properties: precise localization (< 1m precision), extremely low power consumption,
longer range
 Two PHY alternatives


UWB (Ultra Wideband): ultra short pulses, communication and localization
CSS (Chirp Spread Spectrum): communication only
802.15.4b:


Extensions, corrections, and clarifications regarding 802.15.4
Usage of new bands, more flexible security mechanisms
802.15.5: Mesh Networking


Partial meshes, full meshes
Range extension, more robustness, longer battery live
Not all these working groups really create a standard, not all standards will be
found in products later …
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.114
Some more IEEE standards for mobile communications
IEEE 802.16: Broadband Wireless Access / WirelessMAN / WiMax

Wireless distribution system, e.g., for the last mile, alternative to DSL
 75 Mbit/s up to 50 km LOS, up to 10 km NLOS; 2-66 GHz band
 Initial standards without roaming or mobility support
 802.16e adds mobility support, allows for roaming at 150 km/h

Unclear relation to 802.20, 802.16 started as fixed system…
IEEE 802.20: Mobile Broadband Wireless Access (MBWA)

Licensed bands < 3.5 GHz, optimized for IP traffic
 Peak rate > 1 Mbit/s per user
 Different mobility classes up to 250 km/h and ranges up to 15 km
IEEE 802.21: Media Independent Handover Interoperability

Standardize handover between different 802.x and/or non 802 networks
IEEE 802.22: Wireless Regional Area Networks (WRAN)

Radio-based PHY/MAC for use by license-exempt devices on a noninterfering basis in spectrum that is allocated to the TV Broadcast Service
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.115
WLAN: Home RF – yet another standard, no success
Data rate

0.8, 1.6, 5, 10 Mbit/s
Transmission range

300m outdoor, 30m indoor
Connection set-up time

Quality of Service

Frequency

2.4 GHz ISM
Security

Strong encryption, no open access
Adapter 130€, base station 230€
Availability

Up to 8 streams A/V, up to 8 voice
streams, priorities, best-effort
Manageability

Like DECT & 802-LANs
Special Advantages/Disadvantages

Cost

10 ms bounded latency
Several products from different
vendors, no more support
S. K. Nayak
Advantage: extended QoS support,
host/client and peer/peer, power
saving, security
 Disadvantage: future uncertain due
to DECT-only devices plus
802.11a/b for data
PEEC 5409
7.116
RF Controllers – ISM bands
Data rate

Typ. up to 115 kbit/s (serial
interface)
Transmission range

5-100 m, depending on power (typ.
10-500 mW)
Frequency

Typ. 27 (EU, US), 315 (US), 418
(EU), 426 (Japan), 433 (EU), 868
(EU), 915 (US) MHz (depending on
regulations)
Security

Some products with added
processors
Cost

Cheap: 10€-50€
Connection set-up time

N/A
Quality of Service

none
Manageability

Very simple, same as serial
interface
Special Advantages/Disadvantages

Advantage: very low cost, large
experience, high volume available
 Disadvantage: no QoS, crowded
ISM bands (particularly 27 and 433
MHz), typ. no Medium Access
Control, 418 MHz experiences
interference with TETRA
Availability

Many products, many vendors
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.117
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (1)
Data rate


Transmission of ID only (e.g., 48 bit,
64kbit, 1 Mbit)
9.6 – 115 kbit/s
Transmission range



Passive: up to 3 m
Active: up to 30-100 m
Simultaneous detection of up to, e.g.,
256 tags, scanning of, e.g., 40 tags/s
Frequency

Connection set-up time

Quality of Service


Cost

Very cheap tags, down to 1€ (passive)
Very simple, same as serial interface
Special Advantages/Disadvantages

125 kHz, 13.56 MHz, 433 MHz, 2.4 GHz,
5.8 GHz and many others
Application dependent, typ. no crypt. on
RFID device
none
Manageability
Security

Depends on product/medium access
scheme (typ. 2 ms per device)

Advantage: extremely low cost, large
experience, high volume available, no
power for passive RFIDs needed, large
variety of products, relative speeds up to
300 km/h, broad temp. range
Disadvantage: no QoS, simple denial of
service, crowded ISM bands, typ. oneway (activation/ transmission of ID)
Availability

Many products, many vendors
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.118
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (2)
Function

Standard: In response to a radio interrogation signal from a reader (base
station) the RFID tags transmit their ID
 Enhanced: additionally data can be sent to the tags, different media access
schemes (collision avoidance)
Features

No line-of sight required (compared to, e.g., laser scanners)
 RFID tags withstand difficult environmental conditions (sunlight, cold, frost,
dirt etc.)
 Products available with read/write memory, smart-card capabilities
Categories

Passive RFID: operating power comes from the reader over the air which is
feasible up to distances of 3 m, low price (1€)
 Active RFID: battery powered, distances up to 100 m
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.119
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (3)
Applications

Total asset visibility: tracking of goods during manufacturing, localization of
pallets, goods etc.
 Loyalty cards: customers use RFID tags for payment at, e.g., gas stations,
collection of buying patterns
 Automated toll collection: RFIDs mounted in windshields allow commuters
to drive through toll plazas without stopping
 Others: access control, animal identification, tracking of hazardous
material, inventory control, warehouse management, ...
Local Positioning Systems

GPS useless indoors or underground, problematic in cities with high
buildings
 RFID tags transmit signals, receivers estimate the tag location by
measuring the signal‘s time of flight
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.120
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (4)
Security

Denial-of-Service attacks are always possible

Interference of the wireless transmission, shielding of transceivers

IDs via manufacturing or one time programming
 Key exchange via, e.g., RSA possible, encryption via, e.g., AES
Future Trends
RTLS: Real-Time Locating System – big efforts to make total asset visibility
come true
 Integration of RFID technology into the manufacturing, distribution and
logistics chain
 Creation of „electronic manifests“ at item or package level (embedded
inexpensive passive RFID tags)
 3D tracking of children, patients

S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.121
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (5)
Devices and Companies










AXCESS Inc., www.axcessinc.com
Checkpoint Systems Group, www.checkpointsystems.com
GEMPLUS, www.gemplus.com/app/smart_tracking
Intermec/Intellitag, www.intermec.com
I-Ray Technologies, www.i-ray.com
RF Code, www.rfcode.com
Texas Instruments, www.ti-rfid.com/id
WhereNet, www.wherenet.com
Wireless Mountain, www.wirelessmountain.com
XCI, www.xci-inc.com
Only a very small selection…
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.122
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (6)
Example Product: Intermec RFID UHF OEM Reader





Read range up to 7m
Anticollision algorithm allows for scanning of 40 tags per second regardless
of the number of tags within the reading zone
US: unlicensed 915 MHz, Frequency Hopping
Read: 8 byte < 32 ms
Write: 1 byte < 100ms
Example Product: Wireless Mountain Spider





Proprietary sparse code anti-collision algorithm
Detection range 15 m indoor, 100 m line-of-sight
> 1 billion distinct codes
Read rate > 75 tags/s
Operates at 308 MHz
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.123
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (7)
Relevant Standards

American National Standards Institute


Automatic Identification and Data Capture Techniques


ISO TC 104 / SC 4, www.autoid.org/tc104_sc4_wg2.htm,
www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/TC104.htm
Road Transport and Traffic Telematics


JTC 1/SC 17, www.sc17.com, www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/sc17.htm,
Identification and communication


ETSI, www.etsi.org, www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/ETSI.htm
Identification Cards and related devices


ERO, www.ero.dk, www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/ERO.htm
European Telecommunications Standards Institute


JTC 1/SC 31, www.uc-council.com/sc31/home.htm,
www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/sc31.htm
European Radiocommunications Office


ANSI, www.ansi.org, www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/ANSIT6.html
CEN TC 278, www.nni.nl, www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/CENTC278.htm
Transport Information and Control Systems

S. K. Nayak
ISO/TC204, www.sae.org/technicalcommittees/gits.htm,
www.aimglobal.org/standards/rfidstds/ISOTC204.htm
PEEC 5409
7.124
RFID – Radio Frequency Identification (8)
ISO Standards

ISO 15418

MH10.8.2 Data Identifiers
 EAN.UCC Application Identifiers

ISO 15434 - Syntax for High Capacity ADC Media
 ISO 15962 - Transfer Syntax
 ISO 18000





Part 2, 125-135 kHz
Part 3, 13.56 MHz
Part 4, 2.45 GHz
Part 5, 5.8 GHz
Part 6, UHF (860-930 MHz, 433 MHz)

ISO 18047 - RFID Device Conformance Test Methods
 ISO 18046 - RF Tag and Interrogator Performance Test Methods
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.125
ISM band interference
OLD
Many sources of interference





Microwave ovens, microwave lightning
802.11, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.15, Home RF
Even analog TV transmission, surveillance
Unlicensed metropolitan area networks
…
NEW
Levels of interference

Physical layer: interference acts like noise

Spread spectrum tries to minimize this
 FEC/interleaving tries to correct

MAC layer: algorithms not harmonized

S. K. Nayak
© Fusion Lighting, Inc.
E.g., Bluetooth might confuse 802.11
PEEC 5409
7.126
802.11 vs.(?) 802.15/Bluetooth
Bluetooth may act like a rogue member of the 802.11 network
DIFS
500 byte
100
byte
802.15.1
79 channels
SIFS
ACK
SIFS
ACK
100
byte
(separated by
installation)
DIFS
SIFS
ACK
DIFS
SIFS
ACK
DIFS
100
byte
SIFS
ACK
DIFS
SIFS
ACK
DIFS
100
byte
500 byte
SIFS
ACK
100
byte
SIFS
ACK
DIFS
500 byte
DIFS
DIFS
DIFS
f [MHz]  Does not know anything about gaps, inter frame spacing etc.
802.11b
2480
3 channels
1000 byte
(separated by
hopping pattern)
2402
t
IEEE 802.15-2 discusses these problems

Proposal: Adaptive Frequency Hopping

a non-collaborative Coexistence Mechanism
Real effects? Many different opinions, publications, tests, formulae, …


Results from complete breakdown to almost no effect
Bluetooth (FHSS) seems more robust than 802.11b (DSSS)
S. K. Nayak
PEEC 5409
7.127