Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
REVIEWS Stress, glucocorticoids and memory: implications for treating fear-related disorders Dominique de Quervain1–3, Lars Schwabe4 and Benno Roozendaal5,6 Abstract | Glucocorticoid stress hormones are crucially involved in modulating mnemonic processing of emotionally arousing experiences. They enhance the consolidation of new memories, including those that extinguish older memories, but impair the retrieval of information stored in long-term memory. As strong aversive memories lie at the core of several fear-related disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder and phobias, the memory-modulating properties of glucocorticoids have recently become of considerable translational interest. Clinical trials have provided the first evidence that glucocorticoid-based pharmacotherapies aimed at attenuating aversive memories might be helpful in the treatment of fear-related disorders. Here, we review important advances in the understanding of how glucocorticoids mediate stress effects on memory processes, and discuss the translational potential of these new conceptual insights. Transfaculty Research Platform, University of Basel, CH‑4055, Basel, Switzerland. 2 Division of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, CH‑4055, Basel, Switzerland. 3 University Psychiatric Clinics, University of Basel, CH‑4012, Basel, Switzerland. 4 Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. 5 Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 6 Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 1 Correspondence to D.d.Q. dominique.dequervain@ unibas.ch doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.155 Published online 24 Nov 2016 Stressful encounters lead to orchestrated signalling by various hormones, peptides and neurotransmitters in both the periphery and the brain1. These stress mediators not only prepare an individual for the acute consequences of a dangerous or threatening situation but also induce long-term adaptive responses, including influences on learning and memory 2. Notably, stressful and emotionally arousing events are typically remembered better and more vividly than mundane events3. By contrast, memory retrieval can be hampered by stress4. Animal research into the neurobiological mechanisms underlying these phenomena has revealed that glucocorticoid hormones that are released in response to stressful experiences play a central part in mediating the modulatory effects of stress on both the consolidation and the retrieval of memory 5–7. Furthermore, precisely timed interactions of glucocorticoids with arousal-associated noradrenergic signalling in the brain render emotionally arousing information particularly sensitive to the modulatory effects of glucocorticoids4. Studies in healthy humans have confirmed the importance of glucocorticoids in emotional memory processes4,8,9. The tight regulation of emotional memories is usually considered to be highly adaptive and pivotal for survival3,4. However, the compelling evidence that aberrant processing of emotionally aversive memories lies at the core of several fear-related disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and phobias (BOX 1), has recently stimulated a wealth of clinical investigations specifically aimed at understanding the role of glucocorticoid signalling mechanisms in the pathogenesis, symptomatology and treatment of these disorders. The current treatment options for fear-related disorders mainly consist of psychotherapy and/or anxiety-reducing and antidepressant medications. Psychotherapeutic interventions have had some success, especially in phobias, but not all patients respond adequately to the treatment, and the return of fear in treated patients is a well-known problem10. Pharmacological first-line treatments for phobias usually include drugs with anxiolytic actions (such as benzodiazepines), whereas drugs with antidepressant actions (such as serotonin- or other monoamine-reuptake inhibitors) tend to be used for phobias and PTSD11. However, many patients who are treated with such anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs continue to have symptoms12. Of note, such pharmacotherapies are primarily aimed at alleviating chronic stress and anxiety symptoms13 and fail to tackle the underlying aversive-memory trace14. Therefore, new approaches are urgently needed. In recent years, the idea to target memory processes relevant to fear-related disorders has received lots of attention (BOX 2). This idea is further bolstered by evidence from neuroimaging studies that indicate a large overlap between the neural substrates of fear-related disorders and those of emotional memory processes15. One proposed strategy to target memory processes in order to prevent PTSD is to pharmacologically reduce the initial memory consolidation of aversive events, for example, by using opioids16 or β-adrenergic receptor blockers17. In established NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 7 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS Box 1 | The role of memory in fear-related disorders Memory functions have important roles in the pathogenesis, symptomatology and treatment of fear-related disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and phobias. Pathogenesis After experiencing an aversive event, the formation of an excessively strong aversive-memory trace is an important pathogenic mechanism in the development of fear-related disorders159–163. A central mechanism in the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders is associative learning or conditioning, which can lead to both conscious and unconscious aversive memories164. Animal models and human studies have shown that the amygdala has a central role in the modulation of memory by emotion5,165. More specifically, neuroimaging studies have shown that, compared with controls, patients with PTSD or phobias show enhanced amygdala activity in response to aversive stimuli and that this increase in amygdala activity correlates with subsequent recall of aversive memory and symptom severity166–171. Symptomatology Activation of an aversive-memory trace — often induced by a reminder cue — leads to the expression of fear in animal models and in patients172,173. The symptoms of PTSD include aversive-memory retrieval in which components of the event are relived in the form of intrusive daytime recollections, traumatic nightmares and flashbacks122. The symptoms of phobic disorders include fear that is excessive or unreasonable. Treatment Behavioural therapy of fear-related disorders is based on the extinction of fear responses, which in turn depends on the formation of a non-fearful extinction memory174–177. However, patients suffering from chronic fear often show a reduced capacity for proper fear extinction15,18. A different approach to treat fear-related disorders aims at disrupting the aversive-memory trace by interfering (for example, using β-adrenergic receptor blockers) with reconsolidation after memory reactivation15,178. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A disorder that can occur after the exposure to a traumatic event; it includes symptoms of intrusion, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and alterations in arousal and reactivity. Phobias Anxiety disorders that are characterized by intense fear or anxiety that is circumscribed to the presence or anticipation of a particular object or situation. fear-related disorders, a different approach could be to reduce the excessive retrieval of aversive memories, thereby reducing the severity and/or frequency of symptoms such as intrusions and nightmares. A third approach would be to aid the extinction of the traumatic-memory trace (a process that is often impaired in patients with fear-related disorders)18. A promising novel strategy to achieve this is combining drug treatment (for example, the partial glutamate agonist d‑cycloserine19) with exposure therapy in a timed manner to enhance extinction and improve the long-term outcome of exposure therapy. A fourth strategy is the use of pharmacological agents such as β-adrenergic receptor blockers20 at the time of reactivation of the aversive-memory trace to interfere with reconsolidation of the traumatic memory. In this Review, we argue that glucocorticoid-related interventions are of special interest in the clinical context because, unlike most other memory-modifying drugs, they can affect distinct memory processes that can synergistically contribute to a reduction of fear-related symptoms; for example, by both reducing aversive-memory retrieval and enhancing fear extinction (BOX 2). The current Review includes an integrative discussion of important recent advances in the understanding of stress and glucocorticoid effects on memory, including the involvement of endocannabinoid signalling, the role of multiple memory systems, and epigenetic and genetic findings, and discusses the translational implications of these new conceptual insights, in particular for the treatment of fear-related disorders. Stress, glucocorticoids and memory Stress activates the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, which leads to the release of glucocorticoid hormones (mainly cortisol in humans and corticosterone in rodents) from the adrenal cortex. These hormones can access the brain easily and, once there, bind to mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs) and glucocorticoid receptors (GRs)5,21,22 to exert both rapid, non-genomic and slow, genomic actions on physiology and behaviour 23. GRs are highly ubiquitous and expressed in most brain regions, whereas MRs are predominantly expressed in limbic regions such as the hippocampus and central amygdala24. GR activation has been linked to adaptive processes such as memory consolidation, whereas MR‑mediated effects have been associated with the appraisal and responsiveness to stressful experiences and with the negative feedback control of the HPA axis24. Early reports that acute stress or glucocorticoids can have both deleterious and enhancing effects on memory have indicated that these hormones have complex effects on cognitive functions. Two decades of research have identified that these stress hormones can have opposite effects on different memory processes, including consolidation, retrieval, extinction and reconsolidation4,8 (BOX 2). Most of these specific stress-hormone effects have been investigated in conditions with acute elevations of glucocorticoid levels. Although chronic stress differs in many aspects from acute stress (for example, unlike acute stress, chronic stress induces dendritic remodelling at the cellular level21), acute administration of glucocorticoids can have similar effects on memory processes in both acute and chronic stress conditions. For example, comparable to the memory effects in acute conditions, glucocorticoid administration reduces recall of trauma-related memory in PTSD and enhances fear extinction in people with PTSD and phobias (which are chronic stress conditions)4. Furthermore, the effects of acute glucocorticoid administration on memory retrieval are also observed in patients who have chronically elevated glucocorticoid levels as a result of medication25. In this section, we discuss acute glucocorticoid effects on different memory processes, the importance of timing of glucocorticoid administration, and the impact of stress and glucocorticoids on multiple, often competing, memory systems. Consolidation. Memory consolidation refers to a molecular process by which a short-term memory trace is transferred into stable long-term memory26. From looking back into one’s own past, it quickly becomes clear that not all information is equally well transferred into long-term memory. In particular, emotionally arousing (pleasant or unpleasant) life events are remembered better than neutral events, even after a long period of time3. Animal model and human studies provide compelling evidence that glucocorticoids are important in regulating the consolidation of memory processes27 (FIG. 1). Administration of the glucocorticoid-synthesis inhibitor metyrapone to rats or humans prevents the enhancing effects of stress and emotional arousal on memory consolidation28,29. By contrast, glucocorticoids or synthetic GR ligands such as dexamethasone30,31 administered 8 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 18 www.nature.com/nrn . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS Box 2 | Glucocorticoid effects on memory processes Memory involves several distinct processes that can be differentially affected by a specific intervention. Here, we elaborate on the memory processes that are most relevant for fear-related disorders — consolidation, retrieval, extinction and reconsolidation — and explain how these processes are affected by glucocorticoids. Consolidation Consolidation is a protein synthesis-dependent molecular process by which a short-term memory trace is transferred into stable long-term memory26,179. Depending on the form of memory (for example, episodic memory or habitual memory), memory consolidation takes place in partly different brain regions180. Consolidation plays an important part in the pathogenesis of fear-related disorders by stabilizing aversive memories after an aversive event159–163. Glucocorticoids enhance memory consolidation for emotionally arousing information in a dose-dependent manner27,33, and this effect depends on the concomitant activation of the noradrenergic system2. High doses of glucocorticoids without noradrenergic activation can impair memory32. Retrieval Retrieval is the process of recollecting previously stored information. Depending on the form of memory (for example, episodic memory or habitual memory), different brain regions can be involved in this process180. Retrieval of aversive memories can lead to experiencing fear, which is the core symptom of fear-related disorders. Elevated glucocorticoid levels impair memory retrieval4,7 and can thereby contribute, for example, to the well-known phenomenon of impaired memory recall in stressful situations4. In addition, the effect of glucocorticoids on retrieval depends on the concomitant activation of the noradrenergic system4,9. Extinction Extinction is the process during which conditioned responses to a stimulus that was previously paired with an aversive event diminish if the stimulus is presented repeatedly without the aversive event63,181. After successful extinction, the newly formed extinction memory competes against, but does not erase, the original memory of the aversive event. Spontaneous recovery (that is, the reappearance of a previously extinguished conditioned response after a delay) is often observed after extinction. Extinction is the process underlying exposure-based psychotherapy of fear-related disorders174–177. Newly formed extinction memories undergo consolidation, which is facilitated by glucocorticoids65–68. Reconsolidation Reconsolidation is the process during which memories that have been rendered labile after memory reactivation are stabilized anew71. The molecular mechanisms of reconsolidation and initial consolidation seem to be at least partly distinct74. A blockade of reconsolidation leads to an erasure of the original memory; spontaneous recovery is not observed71. Reconsolidation may be a process vulnerable to interference in order to alter aversive memories in fear-related disorders73. Reconsolidation depends on intact glucocorticoid signalling; the administration of glucocorticoid receptor antagonists after reactivation disrupts reconsolidation78,79. either shortly before or immediately after training in emotionally arousing learning tasks enhance long-term memory consolidation in rats and humans (reviewed in REFS 4,9). Importantly, the memory-enhancing effects of pharmacologically administered glucocorticoids or GR agonists follow an inverted U‑shaped dose–response relationship. Moderate doses enhance memory, whereas lower or higher doses are typically less effective or impair memory consolidation32,33. Furthermore, several studies have found that stress effects on memory consolidation are more pronounced in men than in women33–35. Some studies have proposed that there might be an interaction between stress effects and sex hormones; in particular, oral contraceptives can lead to a blunted HPA-axis response to stress and thereby reduce stress effects on memory 34,35. In line with this idea, no sex differences in memory effects were reported among people acutely dosed with exogenous cortisol36. The enhancing effects of glucocorticoids on memory consolidation are dependent on the arousal-induced activation of noradrenergic transmission in the amygdala, particularly the basolateral amygdala, as well as on interactions of the amygdala with other regions, including the hippocampus and cortex 2. For example, animal model studies have shown that a β-adrenergic receptor antagonist administered systemically or directly into the basolateral amygdala blocks glucocorticoid effects on memory consolidation for an emotionally arousing training experience6,37. Further, post-training glucocorticoid administration does not enhance retention of training experiences (for example, object recognition) that induce relatively low emotional arousal. However, with such low-arousing conditions, administration of yohimbine, a drug that stimulates noradrenaline release, enables glucocorticoid-induced memory enhancement 37. In line with this, studies in humans showed that administered glucocorticoids require emotional arousal and noradrenergic activation (measured via salivary α‑amylase) at encoding to enhance long-term memory for emotional material38,39. By contrast, glucocorticoids impair or have little effect on memory consolidation of emotionally neutral information in humans36,38,39. Glucocorticoids enhance memory consolidation and synaptic plasticity by influencing various cellular functions, including intra- and inter-cell signalling, ion channel properties and cell structure40–42. It has long been recognized that glucocorticoids primarily exert their effects on neuronal function through their ability to affect gene transcription; glucocorticoid-bound GR homodimers can bind directly to glucocorticoid response-elements on DNA43. However, recent evidence indicates that glucocorticoids also have various nongenomic actions on neuroplasticity and memory, through their interactions with a membrane-associated variant (or variants) of the steroid receptor 44–48. Activation of these membrane steroid receptors results in effects such as rapid increases in glutamate-release probability from presynaptic sites49 and rapid insertion of AMPAreceptor subunits into postsynaptic membranes50,51. Glucocorticoids and noradrenaline signalling mecha nisms might act synergistically to rapidly enhance AMPA-receptor function52 and to influence several other molecular events — for example, such interactions may induce rapid activation of the transcription factor cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) and promote associated epigenetic mechanisms such as histone acetylation47,53. Recent findings indicate that the actions of glucocorticoids on memory also involve intriguing rapid signalling interactions with the endocannabinoid system54 that can enhance noradrenergic transmission in the amygdala and other brain regions (BOX 3). Retrieval. Memory retrieval is the process of recollecting previously stored information. In contrast to the enhancing effects of glucocorticoids on memory consolidation, several studies have indicated that stress exposure or glucocorticoid administration to rats or mice shortly before retention testing impairs the retrieval of inhibitory NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 9 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS avoidance memory, contextual fear-conditioned memory or spatial memory acquired 24 hours earlier7 (FIG. 1). Such rapid glucocorticoid effects on memory retrieval selectively depend on the membrane GR55 and are mediated via non-genomic actions56. These findings from animal models have now been translated to healthy humans: a single administration of cortisone (at a dose resulting in high physiological cortisol levels) 1 hour before retention testing impaired the recall of words learned 24 hours earlier 57. Further studies demonstrated that glucocorticoids impair the retrieval of hippocampus-dependent spatial or contextual memory in rodents and of declarative memory in humans (reviewed in REFS 4,9). Importantly, another study has shown that cortisone impairs the retrieval of emotionally arousing words but leaves the retrieval of neutral words unaffected58. Thus, similar to memory consolidation, the retrieval of emotionally arousing information is also particularly sensitive to impairment by glucocorticoids58,59. a dStr Shift in memory system Amy Stress Glucocorticoids Hipp ↑ Consolidation ↓ Retrieval b Cue Training dStr-dependent response Hipp-dependent response Target Figure 1 | Glucocorticoid effects on different memoryNature systems under| Neuroscience stress. Reviews a | Stress acts through the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis to stimulate the release of glucocorticoids. These in turn enhance memory consolidation and impair memory retrieval. In addition, stress promotes a shift from a hippocampus (Hipp)-dependent, ‘cognitive’ memory system to a dorsal striatum (dStr)-dependent, ‘habitual’ memory system. Such a shift, which is thought to be orchestrated by the amygdala (Amy), is often observed in stress- and fear-related disorders. b | The schematics show an example of a test of dStr- and Hipp-dependent memory retrieval. The animal is trained in a plus maze that contains spatial cues to turn right to the target (left panel). When tested from another part of the maze (middle and right panels), the animal can either use a dStr-dependent, habitual strategy (‘turn right’), or a Hipp-dependent, cognitive strategy (using the cues to navigate to the target). Moreover, as with the effects on memory consolidation, the effects of glucocorticoids on memory retrieval are also abolished by a β-adrenergic receptor antagonist 58,60. The influence of glucocorticoid–noradrenergic interactions on memory retrieval was further shown to also depend on the endocannabinoid system61 (BOX 3). Also comparable to memory consolidation, glucocorticoid effects on memory retrieval seem to be more prominent in men than in women who use oral contraceptives62, suggesting possible interactions with sex hormones. Extinction and reconsolidation. Extinction is a process in which conditioned responses to a stimulus that was previously paired with an aversive event diminish if the stimulus is presented repeatedly without the aversive event63. Like other forms of learning, extinction learning is followed by a consolidation phase. Whereas the consolidation of extinction memory and that of new memory show partially distinct molecular and neuroanatomical profiles64 (for example, the prefrontal cortex has a different role in these two types of memory), glucocorticoids seem to have a similar role in both. Specifically, animal models have shown that consolidation of extinction memory is facilitated by the administration of exogenous glucocorticoids65–68 but impaired by suppression of glucocorticoid signalling65,67–70. More specifically, glucocorticoids are involved in the extinction of several types of fear memory, including auditory fear conditioning65, contextual fear conditioning66,68 and fear-potentiated startle67, and in the predator stress paradigm70. Memories that are already consolidated may be targeted in two distinct ways: by enhancing extinction, which depends on the formation of a new memory trace that competes with the original fear memory, or by inhibiting reconsolidation of the original fear memory when it is rendered labile during reactivation in order to diminish or erase the memory 71. During reconsolidation, reactivated memories are again susceptible to various amnesic agents72. Thus, reconsolidation may provide a window of opportunity to alter established, unwanted memories retrospectively, with notable implications for fear-related disorders73. Although the mechanisms of initial memory consolidation and post-reactivation reconsolidation seem to be at least partly distinct 74, in particular with respect to the recruited brain circuits and the temporal profiles, several studies showed that stress hormones are also important in memory reconsolidation. How acute stress affects reconsolidation is debated; some studies show that stressful events after memory reactivation enhance reconsolidation, whereas other reports show the opposite effect 75–77. However, animal model studies of the effects of glucocorticoids have shown that systemic or intrahippocampal administration of a GR antagonist after reactivation interferes with the reconsolidation process78,79. Administration of a GR agonist after reactivation also impairs 24‑hour recall, but this effect is more likely to be due to increased memory extinction than to reduced reconsolidation66,80. Evidence for this comes from a study in rats that examined the persistence of the deleterious effect of post-retrieval glucocorticoids 10 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 18 www.nature.com/nrn . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS Box 3 | Glucocorticoid interactions with the endocannabinoid system GABAergic neuron Growing evidence indicates that the effects of glucocorticoids on both the consolidation and the Presynaptic neuron retrieval of memory depend on interactions with the endocannabinoid (eCB) system54: a fast-acting GABA retrograde messenger system in the brain. eCBs (mainly CB1R anandamide and 2‑arachidonoyl glycerol) are released from postsynaptic membranes and feed back in GABAR a retrograde manner onto either glutamatergic or GABAergic presynaptic terminals, thus suppressing both excitatory and inhibitory signalling within specific neuronal circuits182. Recently, the eCB system has emerged as a key modulator of the stress response183,184, eCB NA emotional regulation185 and memory functions54,186. CORT Emotionally arousing training conditions or systemic GR glucocorticoid (specifically, corticosterone; CORT in the β-AR figure) administration to rats induce rapid release of cAMP eCBs in limbic regions including the amygdala and hippocampus187,188. Blockade of cannabinoid type 1 PKA receptors (CB1Rs) in these brain regions prevents the enhancement of memory consolidation that is triggered Postsynaptic by administration of exogenous glucocorticoids54,188,189, pCREB neuron indicating that this stimulated eCB signalling is involved in mediating glucocorticoid effects on memory Nature Reviews | Neuroscience consolidation. Consistent with the view that glucocorticoid-induced release of eCBs is rapid, other recent findings indicate that glucocorticoid–eCB interactions depend on a membrane glucocorticoid receptor (GR)188. Glucocorticoid-induced recruitment of eCB signalling might then enhance memory consolidation by modulating GABAergic or glutamatergic signalling. In the amygdala, GABAergic interneurons are particularly enriched for CB1Rs190, and activation of these receptors inhibits GABA release190,191. These findings suggest that glucocorticoids might bind to a membrane GR and rapidly induce the release of eCBs, which then bind to CB1Rs on GABAergic interneurons to inhibit GABA release192, in turn possibly resulting in a disinhibited release of noradrenaline (NA) in the amygdala (see the figure). Other recent findings indicate that glucocorticoid–eCB interactions also play a part in other memory processes. For example, blockade of CB1Rs in the hippocampus prevented glucocorticoid-induced impairment of the retrieval of contextual fear memory61. Interestingly, two studies have suggested that a polymorphism (rs1049353) of the gene encoding CB1R (CNR1) is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) risk193,194. Furthermore, stimulation of CB1Rs promotes memory extinction (reviewed in REF. 195), and initial clinical evidence suggests that cannabinoids might be useful in the treatment of PTSD196,197. Thus, there is independent evidence implicating the glucocorticoid and eCB systems in extinction and suggesting that targeting these systems may potentially be useful in the treatment of PTSD. Notably, the evidence discussed above indicates that considering both these interacting systems together might bear substantial clinical potential. Indeed, changes in both systems have been described in PTSD122,198. Most importantly, the combined analysis of eCB and glucocorticoid markers has a higher predictive value for classifying PTSD than does individual analysis198. Therefore, combined targeting of glucocorticoid and cannabinoid signalling might be promising and should be explored in animal and human models of fear learning and extinction to inform future clinical studies195. β-AR, β-adrenergic receptor; cAMP, cyclic AMP; GABAR, GABA receptor; pCREB, phosphorylated cAMP-responsive element-binding protein; PKA, protein kinase A. Retrograde messenger A chemical substance that is released from postsynaptic neurons and acts on presynaptic neurons to regulate neurotransmitter release. Anisomycin An antibiotic that prevents the synthesis of proteins. Spontaneous recovery The reappearance of a previously extinguished conditioned response after a delay. on recall, to determine whether there was a deficit in the underlying stability of the memory trace66. Whereas post-reactivation administration of either glucocorticoids or anisomycin impaired memory recall tested 24 hours later, only rats treated with anisomycin still showed an impairment when tested 72 hours later. Because memory impairment after successful blockage of reconsolidation is permanent, but spontaneous recovery is typically observed after extinction4, the relative transience of the effect of glucocorticoids suggests that they affect extinction rather than reconsolidation. It has been shown in humans that administration of cortisol immediately after reactivation enhances reconsolidation in men81 but not in women82. Because of potentially important clinical implications, further studies are needed to corroborate possible sex differences with regard to glucocorticoid effects on reconsolidation. Timing matters. The evidence indicating that the enhancement of memory consolidation of emotionally arousing information depends on the interaction between glucocorticoids and noradrenergic activation suggests that these events must occur in a precisely timed manner 22,83. Within seconds of the onset of a stressful encounter, acute increases in catecholamines in the brain recruit a so‑called salience network that facilitates vigilance and attention84. In humans, this network includes the amygdala, the anterior insula and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex 84. Noradrenaline is further known to facilitate synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus85 and thus contributes to enhanced memory for the stressful episode both in rodents and in humans86,87. With time after stressor onset, glucocorticoid levels increase and exert rapid, non-genomic actions. These fast glucocorticoid actions, in combination with catecholamines, help to NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 11 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS increase glutamate transmission50 and strengthen memories of the stressful experience26. As soon as glucocorticoid levels are elevated (typically within 15–30 minutes of stressor onset), retrieval processes are impaired7,88, possibly to avoid interference and protect the consolidation of the stressful event. At longer delays (longer than ~1 hour) after the onset of a stressful event, genomic glucocorticoid actions manifest that are thought to hamper the encoding of new experiences and memory retrieval processes89,90. In line with the view that glucocorticoids have biphasic timing-dependent effects on memory formation, glucocorticoids facilitate synaptic potentiation in the rodent hippocampus when administered immediately before tetanic stimulation91 but not when administered about 1 hour before stimulation92. Acute stress or glucocorticoids enhance memory consolidation only when synchronized with an increase of noradrenaline37,83; mistiming of glucocorticoid elevations with respect to noradrenaline release suppresses the effects of noradrenaline, preventing glucocorticoid–noradrenaline synergy 83. For instance, cortisol administered alone more than 1 hour before imaging human brain responses to neutral or negative stimuli reduced amygdala and hippocampal activity 93,94, possibly pointing to an increased threshold for information processing. In sum, acute stress or glucocorticoid exposure around the time of learning seems to facilitate memory consolidation processes, whereas such exposure out of the learning context impairs memory consolidation and the retrieval of previously encoded memories8,22. This information is crucial to consider when designing clinical drug trials: after defining which memory phase (or phases) should be targeted by glucocorticoid-based interventions, drug administration has to be well timed to get the desired effect and not the opposite. Stimulus–response (S–R) associations A type of learning that links single stimuli to responses. This type of learning is considered to be cognitively less demanding than, for example, spatial memory and relies on the dorsal striatum. Inhibitory avoidance task A learning and memory task in which animals learn to avoid the place in an apparatus where they received a single footshock during the training. Multiple memory systems: beyond the hippocampus. For decades, research on the impact of stress and stress hormones on memory focused mainly on the hippocampus, presumably because it expresses MRs and GRs at a high density and is thus thought to be highly stress sensitive. However, more recent research has demonstrated that stress and glucocorticoids may also affect memory processes in other brain regions — for example, in the insula (to affect object recognition47, taste aversion95 and inhibitory avoidance memory96) or in the dorsal striatum, which acquires habits or stimulus–response (S–R) associations97. Importantly, glucocorticoid actions in these brain regions were shown to depend on concurrent noradrenergic activity within the amygdala2, supporting the view that stress effects on learning and memory involve the recruitment of large-scale neural networks98. Learning and memory can be supported by anatomically and functionally distinct systems that operate in parallel99 and may be in competition with one another 100. Stress seems to induce a shift in the memory system that dominates learning and behaviour (reviewed in REFS 101–103). Specifically, converging lines of evidence from human and animal model studies using dualsolution navigation tasks that could be solved by either a hippocampus-dependent spatial system or a dorsal striatum-dependent S–R system showed that stress promotes a switch from hippocampal ‘cognitive’ to dorsal striatal ‘habitual’ (or S–R) learning 104,105 (FIG. 1). Importantly, this stress-induced shift was blocked by the administration of an MR antagonist in mice and humans106,107, thus demonstrating a crucial role of glucocorticoids108. Moreover, acute stress decreases functional connectivity between the amygdala and the hippocampus but increases functional connectivity between the amygdala and the dorsal striatum, suggesting that the amygdala orchestrates the shift from cognitive to habitual memory systems107,108. In line with the stress-induced bias towards S–R learning, stress promotes habitual responding at the expense of prefrontal cortex-dependent goal-directed instrumental actions both in humans and in rodents109,110. Interestingly, in humans, the impact of stress on the control of instrumental learning, like stress effects on consolidation and retrieval, depends on an interaction between glucocorticoids and noradrenergic activation111–113. The stress-induced shift from cognitive to habitual learning also has important implications for our understanding of fear-related disorders. Whereas the cognitive memory system has been shown to be involved in fear-related disorders, for example by reactivating contextual fear memories114, there is accumulating evidence that the habitual memory system also has an important role. In PTSD, experiences are encoded under extreme stress, and the basic findings referred to above suggest that this might lead to a preferential engagement of habitual systems101. Furthermore, dorsal striatal activity is often observed when patients with PTSD are asked to re‑imagine their trauma115. The strong response of patients with PTSD to single, trauma-related cues (such as odours or tones), and their difficulties to integrate the traumatic experience into their autobiographic memory (as reflected, for example, in a lack of episodic details), might be taken as indications of an aberrant recruitment of habitual S–R memory processes. Thus, an important question is whether glucocorticoids influence habitual memory systems as well. Indeed, similar to the effects on hippocampus-dependent memory, stress or glucocorticoids administered systemically in humans or directly into the rodent dorsal striatum shortly before or after training on an S–R or inhibitory avoidance task enhance subsequent memory 116–118. Further, stress or glucocorticoids before retention testing impair S–R memory retrieval both in humans and rodents118,119. In rodents, the stress-induced deficit in S–R memory retrieval, reflected in more errors, was blocked by the glucocorticoid-synthesis inhibitor metyrapone and could be mimicked by corticosterone injection119. Thus, glucocorticoids are implicated in the consolidation and retrieval of S‑R memory. Although individuals tend to switch from cognitive to habit memory processes when stressed108, these habitual memories can also be affected by stress and glucocorticoids. These findings have important clinical implications, as glucocorticoid-based interventions might also be effective in regulating habitual memory in stress- and fear-related disorders including obsessive–compulsive disorder, which comprises a strong S‑R component 120 (FIG. 1). 12 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 18 www.nature.com/nrn . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS Clinical implications There are several theoretical time points at which glucocorticoid-based interventions might be useful for reducing aversive memory. First, GR blockade could attenuate the initial consolidation of an aversive experience. This intervention would be referred to as a secondary prevention of a fear-related disorder. Second, glucocorticoids could be administered to reduce the retrieval of aversive memories and thus to curtail the expression of fear, such as of flashbacks in PTSD (see also BOX 1). Third, glucocorticoids could be used to enhance memory extinction in patients who undergo extinction-based psychotherapy. Last, GR blockade could help to reduce reconsolidation after memory reactivation. These glucocorticoid signalling-based intervention strategies are illustrated in FIG. 2. Below, we review the clinical studies that used glucocorticoid signalling-based interventions to prevent or treat fear-related disorders (TABLE 1). PTSD. Interestingly, and perhaps unexpectedly, PTSD is not characterized by elevated glucocorticoid levels121 but rather by enhanced HPA-axis feedback122,123, which can sometimes result in lower circulating cortisol levels in individuals with PTSD than in healthy people121. Furthermore, altered HPA-axis regulation and a high number of GRs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells can represent a pre-trauma risk factor for the disorder 124–126. Approximately 30% of the variance in PTSD risk can be attributed to genetic factors, and a number of risk-related polymorphisms in glucocorticoid signalling-related genes have been identified127. Genetic and epigenetic risk and resistance factors for PTSD are discussed in BOX 4. Aversive event Consolidation GR antagonists Aversive memory Reconsolidation Retrieval Expression of fear Glucocorticoids Extinction Extinction memory Figure 2 | Glucocorticoid signalling-based intervention strategies. Nature ReviewsGlucocorticoids | Neuroscience have been tested for their potential to reduce the retrieval of aversive memory or to enhance memory-extinction processes (for clinical trials, see TABLE 1). Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists or very high doses of glucocorticoids resulting in a response beyond the peak of the inverted U of the glucocorticoid dose–response curve could be used to block initial consolidation of aversive memory or to block memory reconsolidation. For these approaches targeting consolidation or reconsolidation processes, there are only a few studies available, with mixed results (see the main text). There are currently no clinical data available on the effects of inhibiting the initial consolidation of a traumatic memory by blocking glucocorticoid signalling (FIG. 2). However, a preliminary study showed that a single high dose (100–140 mg) of cortisol within 6 hours of the traumatic event (mostly motor vehicle accidents) reduced the risk of developing PTSD128. This treatment may have resulted in cortisol levels corresponding to a response beyond the peak of the inverted-U-shaped dose–response curve and therefore impaired consolidation32. Another study in which a high dose of dexamethasone was intraoperatively administered to cardiac patients did not find a preventive effect on PTSD risk 18 months later in the entire sample, but a sex-specific analysis revealed a significant reduction in PTSD risk in females129. Two other studies aimed to reduce retrieval of aversive memories to curtail symptoms of PTSD. The first — a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in three patients — found that low-dose cortisol treatment (10 mg per day for 1 month) reduced re‑experiencing symptoms and nightmares130. The second study, which used a similar design but in a larger group of patients who were receiving various psychotropic medications (including serotonin- or noradrenaline-reuptake inhibitors), failed to show beneficial effects of cortisol (10 mg or 30 mg per day for 1 week) treatment on PTSD symptoms131. Clinical studies testing the effects of glucocorticoids on extinction memory have consistently shown that such treatment enhances extinction130,132–134. In particular, a recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 24 veterans with PTSD showed that cortisol (30 mg) combined with exposure treatment improved treatment retention and outcome134. Only one clinical trial has examined the ability of the GR antagonist mifepristone to reduce reconsolidation after reactivation, but it did not find evidence for such an effect 135. There have been several studies using high-dose glucocorticoid administration for a longer time period (for example, several days) after a traumatic event, potentially affecting several memory processes (FIG. 2; TABLE 1). These studies indicate that prolonged treatment with high doses of cortisol starting within 12 hours of the trauma reduces the risk of later PTSD136–139. This may be attributable to an initial shift in the glucocorticoid response to the right of the peak of the inverted U-shaped dose– response curve and, consequently, in an impairment of consolidation32, and/or to a later reduction in the retrieval of traumatic memories, thereby interrupting the vicious cycle of retrieving, re‑experiencing and reconsolidating aversive memories4. The preventive effect of exogenous glucocorticoid administration is consistent with studies that suggest that PTSD risk after a traumatic event is decreased by higher excretion of endogenous cortisol in the first hours after the event140–142. Two systematic reviews indicate that prolonged administration of glucocorticoids after a traumatic event is the most effective pharmacological intervention that is currently available for preventing PTSD143,144. One review included seven randomized controlled trials NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 13 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS Table 1 | Clinical trials with glucocorticoid-based interventions in fear-related disorders Drug Design Timing and duration Memory phase exposed Outcome Refs Daily for 30 days Retrieval ↓ Intrusions while under treatment 130 Daily for 7 days Retrieval No change in intrusions while under treatment 131 Single dose after exposure Extinction ↓ PTSD symptoms at 1 week 132 20 min before exposure therapy, which was administered on 8 days Retrieval and extinction ↓ PTSD symptoms at 6 weeks 134 Starting <12 h after trauma, for 10 days Consolidation and retrieval ↓ PTSD symptoms at 3 months 139 Starting <6 h after trauma, for 6 days Consolidation and retrieval ↓ PTSD incidence at 31 months 137 Starting <6 h after trauma, for 4 days Consolidation and retrieval ↓ Stress scores at 6 months Single dose <6 h after trauma Consolidation ↓ PTSD incidence at 3 months 128 Single intraoperative dose Consolidation No difference in PTSD incidence at 18 months 129 Retrieval ↓ Fear while under treatment 149 1 h before phobic stimulus, which was administered on 4 days Retrieval and extinction ↓ Fear while under treatment 149 1 h before exposure therapy, which was administered on 2 days Retrieval and extinction ↓ Fear at 1 month 151 Retrieval and extinction ↓ Fear at 1 month 150 Treatment of PTSD Cort DB, PC, CO RCT Prevention of PTSD Cort Dex RCT RCT 136, 138 Treatment of social phobia Cort RCT Single dose 1 h before phobic stimulus Treatment of spider phobia Cort RCT Treatment of phobia of heights Cort RCT 1 h before exposure therapy, which was administered on 3 days Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) or double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled (PC), cross-over (CO) trials are included. Cort, cortisol; Dex, dexamethasone; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder. of different pharmacological treatments (four with cortisol, three with the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol, one with the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor escitalopram and one with the benzodiazepine temazepam) and reported that cortisol, but not the other drugs, showed efficacy in preventing PTSD development in adults144. The other review included five placebo-controlled studies with cortisol and showed a large effect of cortisol in reducing the risk of PTSD143. Currently, there are several ongoing studies investigating the effects of cortisol administration on the prevention of PTSD145,146 and on fear extinction in veterans with PTSD147. Trier Social Stress Test A test that is designed to trigger social stress; participants must prepare and give a presentation and perform an arithmetic task in front of an audience. Phobias. There have been several clinical studies investigating the beneficial effects of glucocorticoids for the treatment of phobias. However, not all memory phases (FIG. 2) are well accessible to pharmacological interventions in phobias, as the pathogenic events in phobias are generally not known, and preventive strategies are therefore not feasible. There are also no studies available that have tested the effects of glucocorticoid blockade during reconsolidation of fear memory (after reactivation), although this approach would be feasible. In addition, unlike in PTSD, there is not much evidence for alterations of the glucocorticoid system in phobias; specifically, there are no clear alterations in the HPA axis148, and no genetic or epigenetic studies on glucocorticoid-related genes in phobias have been performed. Nevertheless, because the administration of glucocorticoids might exert beneficial effects in phobias by reducing retrieval of fear memories and by enhancing extinction processes, there are several studies investigating these effects in phobic patients. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 40 patients with social phobia, a single oral dose of cortisone (25 mg) was administered 1 hour before a socio-evaluative stressor (the Trier Social Stress Test ). This treatment significantly reduced subjectively reported fear during the anticipation, exposure and recovery phases of the test 149. Moreover, the stress-induced release of cortisol in the placebo-treated participants correlated negatively with the change in fear ratings, suggesting that endogenously released cortisol in the context of a phobic situation may counteract fear symptoms in patients with social phobia149. In another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 20 patients with spider phobia, 10 mg oral cortisol administered 1 hour before the presentation of a spider photograph resulted in a gradual reduction of stimulus-induced fear 149. The cortisol-induced reduction of fear was still observed 2 days after the last dose, suggesting that cortisol might have facilitated the extinction of phobic fear and have impaired retrieval. 14 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 18 www.nature.com/nrn . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS Box 4 | Genetic and epigenetic changes in the glucocorticoid system in PTSD Studies in humans have identified several genetic and epigenetic alterations in the glucocorticoid system that are associated with increased or decreased risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). NR3C1 alterations A well-known single nucleotide polymorphism of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1 (NR3C1) is the common BclI polymorphism, a C-to-G nucleotide change that is associated with receptor hypersensitivity to glucocorticoids199. In humans, GG carriers (as compared with GC and CC carriers) of the BclI polymorphism show enhanced emotional memory in healthy individuals200 and lower cortisol levels and an increased incidence of traumatic memories and PTSD symptoms in patients after intensive care therapy201. Increased NR3C1 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been shown to be associated with higher PTSD risk, in line with the enhanced GR feedback that is reported in individuals with PTSD125. Moreover, there is evidence that these changes are in part epigenetically controlled. Two recent studies indicated that methylation of the NR3C1 promoter is inversely correlated with lifetime PTSD risk202,203. A study of survivors of genocide indicated that increased methylation at the nerve growth factor-induced protein A (NGFIA; also known as EGR1)-binding site of the NR3C1 promoter was associated with reduced PTSD risk and fewer intrusive traumatic memories204. In support of the idea that methylation might regulate memory processes, increased methylation at this same site — which was accompanied by lower GR expression — was also associated with reduced picture recognition and recognition-related brain activity in healthy participants. These studies suggest an epigenetic and genetic link between the predisposition to form strong aversive memories and the risk of PTSD. FKBP5 alterations FK506‑binding protein 5 (FKPB5) acts as a co‑chaperone that modulates GR activity205, and risk alleles of FKPB5 have been associated with differences in GR sensitivity, higher risk of PTSD and increased incidence of intrusive memories of aversive photographs in a laboratory experiment206,207. Moreover, allele-specific demethylation of FKBP5 has been found to mediate gene–childhood-trauma interactions; specifically, this demethylation was associated with increased stress-dependent gene transcription, followed by a long-term dysregulation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis208. Furthermore, FKBP5 alleles may influence the effectiveness of exposure-based psychotherapy for PTSD209, and FKBP5 allele-specific changes in methylation are associated with treatment response to psychological treatments for anxiety disorders210. Implications Taken together, the evidence that genetic and epigenetic variations in the glucocorticoid system are related to traumatic memory and to PTSD risk and treatment adds to the understanding of individual risk and resilience factors for PTSD. Although common genetic polymorphisms typically have small effect sizes, more research is needed to evaluate whether rare genetic variants or specific methylation events might be suited for diagnostic and/or personalized treatment purposes. Behavioural approach test A test that is used to measure approach behaviour in the context of a feared stimulus. One randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with phobia for heights tested whether glucocorticoids might enhance extinction processes induced by exposure therapy 150. One hour before each of three virtual-reality exposure sessions, cortisol (20 mg) or placebo was administered orally. Compared with the placebo group, the cortisol-treated group showed significantly lower fear levels at post-treatment and at the 1‑month follow‑up. Furthermore, administration of cortisol to people with spider phobia during therapy in which they were exposed (in groups) to live spiders also enhanced treatment outcome151. Another study investigated whether differences in endogenous glucocorticoid levels (which fluctuate with time of day) might also affect the outcome of exposure therapy 152. Women with spider phobia who were treated with a single exposure session at 8:00 (when cortisol levels are high) exhibited significantly less fear of spiders in the behavioural approach test at post-treatment and at the 3‑month follow‑up than did women who were treated at 18:00 (when cortisol levels are low). In conclusion, cortisol may reduce symptoms of phobic fear — presumably by reducing aversive-memory retrieval and enhancing memory extinction — in particular if combined with exposure therapy. These synergistic actions may be important in the successful treatment of phobias. Addiction and other psychiatric disorders. Gluco corticoids probably have also beneficial effects in other psychiatric disorders in which memory has an important role. In drug addiction, for example, memory encodes and stores the associations that provide the powerful incentives for drug taking and that produce cravings153–156. A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with heroin addiction found that, 90 minutes after a single administration of cortisol (20 mg), low-dose heroin addicts showed reduced craving before and 15 min after heroin administration157. Thus, cortisol might reduce craving by reducing retrieval of addiction memory. Glucocorticoids could also be tested for their potential to enhance the extinction of addiction memory. Furthermore, glucocorticoid-based interventions might have therapeutic value in other psychiatric disorders in which aversive memory plays an important part, such as obsessive–compulsive disorder. In patients with this disorder, impaired fear extinction and neurobiological changes in the fear circuit have been reported158. Conclusions Over the past decades, compelling evidence has accumulated for a crucial role of glucocorticoids in memory consolidation, retrieval, extinction and reconsolidation — all processes that are highly relevant in the NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 15 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS pathogenesis, maintenance and treatment of fear-related disorders. These effects are not limited to hippocampus-dependent memories but can also be found in other memory systems, such as habitual memory, which relies on the dorsal striatum and also plays an important part in fear-related disorders. Novel treatment approaches that are based on basic studies have been developed that use the memory-modulating properties of glucocorticoids to weaken dysfunctional memories and to strengthen treatment-related memories of safety. Many of the clinical studies reviewed above suggest that the strategy to enhance extinction processes by combining exposure-based psychotherapy with timed glucocorticoid administration is a particularly promising approach to treat fear-related disorders. Furthermore, there is evidence that the use of glucocorticoids in the aftermath of a traumatic event may help to prevent development of PTSD. However, the existing evidence for the usefulness of glucocorticoids in treatment and prevention of fear-related disorders comes from rather small proof‑of‑concept studies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for large randomized controlled clinical trials. Joels, M. & Baram, T. Z. The neuro-symphony of stress. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 459–466 (2009). This review explains why stress requires activation of many different stress mediators and how the effects of individual mediators on neuronal function and plasticity are integrated. 2. Roozendaal, B. & McGaugh, J. L. Memory modulation. Behav. Neurosci. 125, 797–824 (2011). 3.McGaugh, J. L. Memory and Emotion. The Making of Lasting Memories (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2003). 4. de Quervain, D. J., Aerni, A., Schelling, G. & Roozendaal, B. Glucocorticoids and the regulation of memory in health and disease. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 30, 358–370 (2009). 5. Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S. & Chattarji, S. Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 423–433 (2009). 6. Quirarte, G. L., Roozendaal, B. & McGaugh, J. L. Glucocorticoid enhancement of memory storage involves noradrenergic activation in the basolateral amygdala. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14048–14053 (1997). 7. de Quervain, D. J., Roozendaal, B. & McGaugh, J. L. Stress and glucocorticoids impair retrieval of longterm spatial memory. Nature 394, 787–790 (1998). This study provided the first evidence that stress, via release of glucocorticoids, has a specific impairing effect on the retrieval of previously stored information. 8. Schwabe, L., Joels, M., Roozendaal, B., Wolf, O. T. & Oitzl, M. S. Stress effects on memory: an update and integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1740–1749 (2012). 9. Wolf, O. T. Stress and memory in humans: twelve years of progress? Brain Res. 1293, 142–154 (2009). 10. Bandelow, B., Seidler-Brandler, U., Becker, A., Wedekind, D. & Ruther, E. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled comparisons of psychopharmacological and psychological treatments for anxiety disorders. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 8, 175–187 (2007). 11.Bandelow, B. et al. Guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract. 16, 77–84 (2012). 12. Barton, S., Karner, C., Salih, F., Baldwin, D. S. & Edwards, S. J. Clinical effectiveness of interventions for treatment-resistant anxiety in older people: a systematic review. Health Technol. Assess. 18, 1–59 (2014). 13. Ipser, J., Seedat, S. & Stein, D. J. Pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder — a systematic review and meta-analysis. S. Afr. Med. J. 96, 1088–1096 (2006). 1. Moreover, from the most recent advances regarding timing, glucocorticoid–endocannabinoid interactions (BOX 3), multiple memory systems, and genetics and epigenetics (BOX 4), several open questions prompt further basic and clinical studies. For example, the optimal dosage, time point and duration of treatment with glucocorticoids need to be elucidated, and the usefulness and safety of such treatments for fear-related disorders must be tested in large randomized controlled trials. It would also be interesting to test the effects of glucocorticoids in other neuropsychiatric disorders in which memory has an important role, such as obsessive–compulsive disorder, and to search for epigenetic and genetic markers for diagnostic and/or personalized treatment purposes. Further basic research should explore novel approaches to modulating glucocorticoid signalling — for example, combining glucocorticoids with cannabinoids — to further investigate the signalling cascades that are involved and to identify safer more-specific glucocorticoid-related drugs. The field of stress and memory represents one of the very few areas in neuroscience in which insights from basic science studies have translated into direct clinical interventions and will hopefully continue to do so in the future. 14. Lin, C. C., Tung, C. S. & Liu, Y. P. Escitalopram reversed the traumatic stress-induced depressed and anxietylike symptoms but not the deficits of fear memory. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 233, 1135–1146 (2016). 15. Parsons, R. G. & Ressler, K. J. Implications of memory modulation for post-traumatic stress and fear disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 146–153 (2013). 16. Holbrook, T. L., Galarneau, M. R., Dye, J. L., Quinn, K. & Dougherty, A. L. Morphine use after combat injury in Iraq and post-traumatic stress disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 110–117 (2010). 17.Pitman, R. K. et al. Pilot study of secondary prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder with propranolol. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 189–192 (2002). 18. Wessa, M. & Flor, H. Failure of extinction of fear responses in posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence from second-order conditioning. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1684–1692 (2007). 19.Ressler, K. J. et al. Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy. Use of D‑cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 1136–1144 (2004). 20. Soeter, M. & Kindt, M. An abrupt transformation of phobic behavior after a post-retrieval amnesic agent. Biol. Psychiatry 78, 880–886 (2015). 21. McEwen, B. S., Gray, J. D. & Nasca, C. 60 years of neuroendocrinology: redefining neuroendocrinology: stress, sex and cognitive and emotional regulation. J. Endocrinol. 226, T67–T83 (2015). 22. Joels, M., Pu, Z., Wiegert, O., Oitzl, M. S. & Krugers, H. J. Learning under stress: how does it work? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 152–158 (2006). This influential opinion paper laid the theoretical basis for a number of studies on timing-dependent stress effects in the past 10 years. 23. de Kloet, E. R., Karst, H. & Joels, M. Corticosteroid hormones in the central stress response: quick-andslow. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 29, 268–272 (2008). 24. de Kloet, E. R., Joels, M. & Holsboer, F. Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 463–475 (2005). 25.Coluccia, D. et al. Glucocorticoid therapy-induced memory deficits: acute versus chronic effects. J. Neurosci. 28, 3474–3478 (2008). 26. McGaugh, J. L. Memory — a century of consolidation. Science 287, 248–251 (2000). This comprehensive review of memory consolidation research focuses on the role of the amygdala and of the noradrenergic system in the basolateral amygdala in modulating long-term memory consolidation in other brain regions. 27. McGaugh, J. L. & Roozendaal, B. Role of adrenal stress hormones in forming lasting memories in the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 205–210 (2002). 28. Roozendaal, B., Bohus, B. & McGaugh, J. L. Dosedependent suppression of adrenocortical activity with metyrapone: effects on emotion and memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology 21, 681–693 (1996). 29. Maheu, F. S., Joober, R., Beaulieu, S. & Lupien, S. J. Differential effects of adrenergic and corticosteroid hormonal systems on human shortand long-term declarative memory for emotionally arousing material. Behav. Neurosci. 118, 420–428 (2004). 30. Oitzl, M. S. & De Kloet, E. R. Selective corticosteroid antagonists modulate specific aspects of spatial orientation learning. Behav. Neurosci. 106, 62–71 (1992). 31. Roozendaal, B. & McGaugh, J. L. Glucocorticoid receptor agonist and antagonist administration into the basolateral but not central amygdala modulates memory storage. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 67, 176–179 (1997). 32. Roozendaal, B., Williams, C. L. & McGaugh, J. L. Glucocorticoid receptor activation in the rat nucleus of the solitary tract facilitates memory consolidation: involvement of the basolateral amygdala. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 1317–1323 (1999). 33. Andreano, J. M. & Cahill, L. Glucocorticoid release and memory consolidation in men and women. Psychol. Sci. 17, 466–470 (2006). 34. Preuss, D. & Wolf, O. T. Post-learning psychosocial stress enhances consolidation of neutral stimuli. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 92, 318–326 (2009). 35. Cornelisse, S., van Stegeren, A. H. & Joels, M. Implications of psychosocial stress on memory formation in a typical male versus female student sample. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36, 569–578 (2011). 36. Buchanan, T. W. & Lovallo, W. R. Enhanced memory for emotional material following stress-level cortisol treatment in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26, 307–317 (2001). 37. Roozendaal, B., Okuda, S., van der Zee, E. A. & McGaugh, J. L. Glucocorticoid enhancement of memory requires arousal-induced noradrenergic activation in the basolateral amygdala. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6741–6746 (2006). This study shows that glucocorticoids require emotional arousal-induced noradrenergic activation in the basolateral amygdala to influence memory consolidation. 16 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 18 www.nature.com/nrn . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS 38.Segal, S. K. et al. Glucocorticoids interact with noradrenergic activation at encoding to enhance longterm memory for emotional material in women. Neuroscience 277, 267–272 (2014). 39. Kuhlmann, S. & Wolf, O. T. Arousal and cortisol interact in modulating memory consolidation in healthy young men. Behav. Neurosci. 120, 217–223 (2006). 40.Karst, H. et al. Glucocorticoids alter calcium conductances and calcium channel subunit expression in basolateral amygdala neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 1083–1089 (2002). 41.Revest, J. M. et al. The MAPK pathway and Egr‑1 mediate stress-related behavioral effects of glucocorticoids. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 664–672 (2005). 42. Bisaz, R., Conboy, L. & Sandi, C. Learning under stress: a role for the neural cell adhesion molecule NCAM. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 91, 333–342 (2009). 43. Datson, N. A., van der Perk, J., De Kloet, E. R. & Vreugdenhil, E. Identification of corticosteroidresponsive genes in rat hippocampus using serial analysis of gene expression. Eur. J. Neurosci. 14, 675–689 (2001). 44. Riedemann, T., Patchev, A. V., Cho, K. & Almeida, O. F. Corticosteroids: way upstream. Mol. Brain 3, 2 (2010). 45. Johnson, L. R., Farb, C., Morrison, J. H., McEwen, B. S. & LeDoux, J. E. Localization of glucocorticoid receptors at postsynaptic membranes in the lateral amygdala. Neuroscience 136, 289–299 (2005). 46. Barsegyan, A., Mackenzie, S. M., Kurose, B. D., McGaugh, J. L. & Roozendaal, B. Glucocorticoids in the prefrontal cortex enhance memory consolidation and impair working memory by a common neural mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16655–16660 (2010). 47.Roozendaal, B. et al. Membrane-associated glucocorticoid activity is necessary for modulation of long-term memory via chromatin modification. J. Neurosci. 30, 5037–5046 (2010). 48.Lee, E. J. et al. Impairment of fear memory consolidation in maternally stressed male mouse offspring: evidence for nongenomic glucocorticoid action on the amygdala. J. Neurosci. 31, 7131–7140 (2011). 49.Karst, H. et al. Mineralocorticoid receptors are indispensable for nongenomic modulation of hippocampal glutamate transmission by corticosterone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 19204–19207 (2005). 50. Krugers, H. J., Hoogenraad, C. C. & Groc, L. Stress hormones and AMPA receptor trafficking in synaptic plasticity and memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 675–681 (2010). 51. Conboy, L. & Sandi, C. Stress at learning facilitates memory formation by regulating AMPA receptor trafficking through a glucocorticoid action. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 674–685 (2010). 52. Zhou, M., Hoogenraad, C. C., Joels, M. & Krugers, H. J. Combined β-adrenergic and corticosteroid receptor activation regulates AMPA receptor function in hippocampal neurons. J. Psychopharmacol. 26, 516–524 (2012). 53. Chen, D. Y., Bambah-Mukku, D., Pollonini, G. & Alberini, C. M. Glucocorticoid receptors recruit the CaMKIIα–BDNF–CREB pathways to mediate memory consolidation. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1707–1714 (2012). 54.Campolongo, P. et al. Endocannabinoids in the rat basolateral amygdala enhance memory consolidation and enable glucocorticoid modulation of memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4888–4893 (2009). This article shows that activation of cannabinoid type 1 receptors in the basolateral amygdala enhances memory consolidation and provides the first in vivo demonstration in mammals that endocannabinoid activity is required to enable the memory-enhancing effects of glucocorticoids. 55.Chauveau, F. et al. Rapid stress-induced corticosterone rise in the hippocampus reverses serial memory retrieval pattern. Hippocampus 20, 196–207 (2010). 56. Roozendaal, B., Hahn, E. L., Nathan, S. V., de Quervain, D. J. & McGaugh, J. L. Glucocorticoid effects on memory retrieval require concurrent noradrenergic activity in the hippocampus and basolateral amygdala. J. Neurosci. 24, 8161–8169 (2004). 57. de Quervain, D. J., Roozendaal, B., Nitsch, R. M., McGaugh, J. L. & Hock, C. Acute cortisone administration impairs retrieval of long-term declarative memory in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 313–314 (2000). 58. de Quervain, D. J., Aerni, A. & Roozendaal, B. Preventive effect of β-adrenoceptor blockade on glucocorticoid-induced memory retrieval deficits. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 967–969 (2007). 59. Kuhlmann, S., Piel, M. & Wolf, O. T. Impaired memory retrieval after psychosocial stress in healthy young men. J. Neurosci. 25, 2977–2982 (2005). 60.Schwabe, L. et al. Stress effects on declarative memory retrieval are blocked by a β-adrenoceptor antagonist in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 446–454 (2009). 61.Atsak, P. et al. Glucocorticoids interact with the hippocampal endocannabinoid system in impairing retrieval of contextual fear memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3504–3509 (2012). 62. Kuhlmann, S. & Wolf, O. T. Cortisol and memory retrieval in women: influence of menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 183, 65–71 (2005). 63. Quirk, G. J. & Mueller, D. Neural mechanisms of extinction learning and retrieval. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 56–72 (2008). 64. Milad, M. R. & Quirk, G. J. Fear extinction as a model for translational neuroscience: ten years of progress. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 129–151 (2012). 65. Barrett, D. & Gonzalez-Lima, F. Behavioral effects of metyrapone on Pavlovian extinction. Neurosci. Lett. 371, 91–96 (2004). 66. Cai, W. H., Blundell, J., Han, J., Greene, R. W. & Powell, C. M. Postreactivation glucocorticoids impair recall of established fear memory. J. Neurosci. 26, 9560–9566 (2006). 67. Yang, Y. L., Chao, P. K. & Lu, K. T. Systemic and intraamygdala administration of glucocorticoid agonist and antagonist modulate extinction of conditioned fear. Neuropsychopharmacology 31, 912–924 (2006). 68. Blundell, J., Blaiss, C. A., Lagace, D. C., Eisch, A. J. & Powell, C. M. Block of glucocorticoid synthesis during re‑activation inhibits extinction of an established fear memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 95, 453–460 (2011). 69. Bohus, B. & Lissak, K. Adrenocortical hormones and avoidance behaviour of rats. Int. J. Neuropharmacol. 7, 301–306 (1968). 70.Clay, R. et al. Glucocorticoids are required for extinction of predator stress-induced hyperarousal. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 96, 367–377 (2011). 71. Nader, K. & Hardt, O. A single standard for memory: the case for reconsolidation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 224–234 (2009). 72. Nader, K., Schafe, G. E. & LeDoux, J. E. Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval. Nature 406, 722–726 (2000). 73. Schwabe, L., Nader, K. & Pruessner, J. C. Reconsolidation of human memory: brain mechanisms and clinical relevance. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 274–280 (2014). 74. Alberini, C. M. Mechanisms of memory stabilization: are consolidation and reconsolidation similar or distinct processes? Trends Neurosci. 28, 51–56 (2005). 75. Schwabe, L. & Wolf, O. T. Stress impairs the reconsolidation of autobiographical memories. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 94, 153–157 (2010). 76. Coccoz, V., Maldonado, H. & Delorenzi, A. The enhancement of reconsolidation with a naturalistic mild stressor improves the expression of a declarative memory in humans. Neuroscience 185, 61–72 (2011). 77. Bos, M. G., Schuijer, J., Lodestijn, F., Beckers, T. & Kindt, M. Stress enhances reconsolidation of declarative memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology 46, 102–113 (2014). 78. Nikzad, S., Vafaei, A. A., Rashidy-Pour, A. & Haghighi, S. Systemic and intrahippocampal administrations of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist RU38486 impairs fear memory reconsolidation in rats. Stress 14, 459–464 (2011). 79.Pitman, R. K. et al. Systemic mifepristone blocks reconsolidation of cue-conditioned fear; propranolol prevents this effect. Behav. Neurosci. 125, 632–638 (2011). 80. Abrari, K., Rashidy-Pour, A., Semnanian, S. & Fathollahi, Y. Administration of corticosterone after memory reactivation disrupts subsequent retrieval of a contextual conditioned fear memory: dependence upon training intensity. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 89, 178–184 (2008). 81. Drexler, S. M., Merz, C. J., Hamacher-Dang, T. C., Tegenthoff, M. & Wolf, O. T. Effects of cortisol on reconsolidation of reactivated fear memories. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 3036–3043 (2015). 82. Meir Drexler, S., Merz, C. J., Hamacher-Dang, T. C. & Wolf, O. T. Cortisol effects on fear memory reconsolidation in women. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 233, 2687–2697 (2016). 83. Joels, M., Fernandez, G. & Roozendaal, B. Stress and emotional memory: a matter of timing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 280–288 (2011). 84.Hermans, E. J. et al. Stress-related noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration. Science 334, 1151–1153 (2011). 85. Katsuki, H., Izumi, Y. & Zorumski, C. F. Noradrenergic regulation of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampal CA1 region. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 3013–3020 (1997). 86. Vogel, S. & Schwabe, L. Stress in the zoo: tracking the impact of stress on memory formation over time. Psychoneuroendocrinology 71, 64–72 (2016). 87. Sandi, C., Loscertales, M. & Guaza, C. Experiencedependent facilitating effect of corticosterone on spatial memory formation in the water maze. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9, 637–642 (1997). 88. Schönfeld, P., Ackermann, K. & Schwabe, L. Remembering under stress: different roles of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids in memory retrieval. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39, 249–256 (2014). 89.Zoladz, P. R. et al. Pre-learning stress differentially affects long-term memory for emotional words, depending on temporal proximity to the learning experience. Physiol. Behav. 103, 467–476 (2011). 90. Schwabe, L. & Wolf, O. T. Timing matters: temporal dynamics of stress effects on memory retrieval. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 1041–1048 (2014). 91. Wiegert, O., Joels, M. & Krugers, H. J. Timing is essential for rapid effects of corticosterone on synaptic potentiation in the mouse hippocampus. Learn. Mem. 13, 110–113 (2006). 92. Kim, J. J. & Diamond, D. M. The stressed hippocampus, synaptic plasticity and lost memories. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 453–462 (2002). 93.Henckens, M. J. A. G. et al. Dynamically changing effects of corticosteroids on human hippocampal and prefrontal processing. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 2885–2897 (2012). 94. Henckens, M. J. A. G., van Wingen, G. A., Joels, M. & Fernandez, G. Time-dependent effects of corticosteroids on human amygdala processing. J. Neurosci. 30, 12725–12732 (2010). 95. Miranda, M. I., Quirarte, G. L., Rodriguez-Garcia, G., McGaugh, J. L. & Roozendaal, B. Glucocorticoids enhance taste aversion memory via actions in the insular cortex and basolateral amygdala. Learn. Mem. 15, 468–476 (2008). 96.Fornari, R. V. et al. Involvement of the insular cortex in regulating glucocorticoid effects on memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance training. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 10 (2012). 97. Packard, M. G. & Knowlton, B. J. Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 563–593 (2002). 98.Hermans, E. J. et al. How the amygdala affects emotional memory by altering brain network properties. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 112, 2–16 (2014). 99. McDonald, R. & White, N. Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus. Behav. Neural Biol. 61, 260–270 (1994). 100.Poldrack, R. A. & Packard, M. Competition among multiple memory systems: converging evidence from animal and human brain studies. Neuropsychologia 41, 245–251 (2003). 101. Goodman, J., Leong, K. C. & Packard, M. G. Emotional modulation of multiple memory systems: implications for the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 627–643 (2012). 102.Schwabe, L. Stress and the engagement of multiple memory systems: integration of animal and human studies. Hippocampus 23, 1035–1043 (2013). 103.Schwabe, L., Wolf, O. T. & Oitzl, M. S. Memory formation under stress: quantity and quality. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 584–591 (2010). 104.Kim, J., Lee, H., Han, J. & Packard, M. Amygdala is critical for stress-induced modulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation and learning. J. Neurosci. 21, 5222–5228 (2001). This study provided the first evidence that stress may lead to a shift from hippocampus-dependent to dorsal striatum-dependent spatial memory. NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 17 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS 105.Schwabe, L. et al. Stress modulates the use of spatial and stimulus-response learning strategies in humans. Learn. Mem. 14, 109–116 (2007). This study showed for the first time in humans that stress may promote simple S–R learning at the expense of cognitively more-demanding spatial learning. 106.Schwabe, L., Schächinger, H., de Kloet, E. R. & Oitzl, M. S. Corticosteroids operate as switch between memory systems. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 1362–1372 (2010). 107. Schwabe, L., Tegenthoff, M., Höffken, O. & Wolf, O. T. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade prevents stressinduced modulation of multiple memory systems in the human brain. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 801–808 (2013). 108.Vogel, S., Fernandez, G., Joëls, M. & Schwabe, L. Cognitive adaptation under stress: a case for the mineralocorticoid receptor. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 192–203 (2016). This paper provides a state‑of‑the-art review of how stress biases the engagement of multiple memory systems and of the neuroendocrine mechanisms that are involved in these effects. 109.Schwabe, L. & Wolf, O. T. Stress prompts habit behavior in humans. J. Neurosci. 29, 7191–7198 (2009). 110. Braun, S. & Hauber, W. Acute stressor effects on goaldirected action in rats. Learn. Mem. 20, 700–709 (2013). 111. Schwabe, L., Tegenthoff, M., Höffken, O. & Wolf, O. T. Concurrent glucocorticoid and noradrenergic activity shifts instrumental behavior from goal-directed to habitual control. J. Neurosci. 30, 8190–8196 (2010). 112. Schwabe, L., Höffken, O., Tegenthoff, M. & Wolf, O. T. Preventing the stress-induced shift from goal-directed to habit action with a β-adrenergic antagonist. J. Neurosci. 31, 17317–17325 (2011). 113. Schwabe, L., Tegenthoff, M., Höffken, O. & Wolf, O. T. Simultaneous glucocorticoid and noradrenergic activity disrupts the neural basis of goal-directed action in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 32, 10146–10155 (2012). 114.Paquette, V. et al. “Change the mind and you change the brain”: effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on the neural correlates of spider phobia. Neuroimage 18, 401–409 (2003). 115.Mickleborough, M. J. et al. Effects of trauma-related cues on pain processing in posttraumatic stress disorder: an fMRI investigation. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 36, 6–14 (2011). 116.Quirarte, G. L. et al. Corticosterone infused into the dorsal striatum selectively enhances memory consolidation of cued water-maze training. Learn. Mem. 16, 586–589 (2009). 117.Medina, A. C. et al. Glucocorticoid administration into the dorsal striatum facilitates memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance training but not of the context or footshock components. Learn. Mem. 14, 673–677 (2007). 118. Guenzel, F. M., Wolf, O. T. & Schwabe, L. Glucocorticoids boost stimulus–response memory formation in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology 45, 21–30 (2014). 119.Atsak, P. et al. Glucocorticoids mediate stress-induced impairment of retrieval of stimulus–response memory. Psychoneuroendocrinology 67, 207–215 (2016). 120.Burguiere, E., Monteiro, P., Mallet, L., Feng, G. & Graybiel, A. M. Striatal circuits, habits, and implications for obsessive–compulsive disorder. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 30, 59–65 (2015). 121.Meewisse, M. L., Reitsma, J. B., de Vries, G. J., Gersons, B. P. & Olff, M. Cortisol and post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 191, 387–392 (2007). 122.Yehuda, R. Post-traumatic stress disorder. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 108–114 (2002). 123.Pitman, R. K. et al. Biological studies of posttraumatic stress disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 769–787 (2012). This is a comprehensive review about the neurobiology of PTSD. 124.Yehuda, R. Status of glucocorticoid alterations in posttraumatic stress disorder. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1179, 56–69 (2009). 125.van Zuiden, M. et al. Pre-existing high glucocorticoid receptor number predicting development of posttraumatic stress symptoms after military deployment. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 89–96 (2011). 126.van Zuiden, M., Kavelaars, A., Geuze, E., Olff, M. & Heijnen, C. J. Predicting PTSD: pre-existing vulnerabilities in glucocorticoid-signaling and implications for preventive interventions. Brain Behav. Immun. 30, 12–21 (2013). 127.Castro-Vale, I., van Rossum, E. F., Machado, J. C., Mota-Cardoso, R. & Carvalho, D. Genetics of glucocorticoid regulation and posttraumatic stress disorder — what do we know? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 63, 143–157 (2016). 128.Zohar, J. et al. High dose hydrocortisone immediately after trauma may alter the trajectory of PTSD: interplay between clinical and animal studies. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 21, 796–809 (2011). 129.Kok, L. et al. The effect of dexamethasone on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression after cardiac surgery and intensive care admission: longitudinal follow‑up of a randomized controlled trial. Crit. Care Med. 44, 512–520 (2016). 130.Aerni, A. et al. Low-dose cortisol for symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 161, 1488–1490 (2004). 131.Ludascher, P. et al. No evidence for differential dose effects of hydrocortisone on intrusive memories in female patients with complex post-traumatic stress disorder — a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled, crossover study. J. Psychopharmacol. 29, 1077–1084 (2015). 132.Suris, A., North, C., Adinoff, B., Powell, C. M. & Greene, R. Effects of exogenous glucocorticoid on combat-related PTSD symptoms. Ann. Clin. Psychiatry 22, 274–279 (2010). 133.Yehuda, R., Bierer, L. M., Pratchett, L. & Malowney, M. Glucocorticoid augmentation of prolonged exposure therapy: rationale and case report. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3402/ejpt.v1i0.5643 (2010). 134.Yehuda, R. et al. Cortisol augmentation of a psychological treatment for warfighters with posttraumatic stress disorder: randomized trial showing improved treatment retention and outcome. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51, 589–597 (2015). 135.Wood, N. E. et al. Pharmacological blockade of memory reconsolidation in posttraumatic stress disorder: three negative psychophysiological studies. Psychiatry Res. 225, 31–39 (2015). 136.Schelling, G. et al. Stress doses of hydrocortisone, traumatic memories, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized study. Biol. Psychiatry 55, 627–633 (2004). 137.Schelling, G. et al. The effect of stress doses of hydrocortisone during septic shock on posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors. Biol. Psychiatry 50, 978–985 (2001). 138.Weis, F. et al. Stress doses of hydrocortisone reduce chronic stress symptoms and improve health-related quality of life in high-risk patients after cardiac surgery: a randomized study. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 131, 277–282 (2006). 139.Delahanty, D. L. et al. The efficacy of initial hydrocortisone administration at preventing posttraumatic distress in adult trauma patients: a randomized trial. CNS Spectr. 18, 103–111 (2013). 140.Delahanty, D. L., Raimonde, A. J. & Spoonster, E. Initial posttraumatic urinary cortisol levels predict subsequent PTSD symptoms in motor vehicle accident victims. Biol. Psychiatry 48, 940–947 (2000). 141.McFarlane, A. C., Atchison, M. & Yehuda, R. The acute stress response following motor vehicle accidents and its relation to PTSD. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 821, 437–441 (1997). 142.Yehuda, R., McFarlane, A. C. & Shalev, A. Y. Predicting the development of posttraumatic stress disorder from the acute response to a traumatic event. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 1305–1313 (1998). 143.Sijbrandij, M., Kleiboer, A., Bisson, J. I., Barbui, C. & Cuijpers, P. Pharmacological prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2, 413–421 (2015). 144.Amos, T., Stein, D. J. & Ipser, J. C. Pharmacological interventions for preventing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7, CD006239 (2014). 145.US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT00855270?term=NCT00855270&rank=1 (2016). 146.US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT02402114?term=NCT02402114&rank=1 (2015). 147.US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT00674570?term=NCT00674570&rank=1 (2016). 148.Elnazer, H. Y. & Baldwin, D. S. Investigation of cortisol levels in patients with anxiety disorders: a structured review. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 18, 191–216 (2014). 149.Soravia, L. M. et al. Glucocorticoids reduce phobic fear in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5585–5590 (2006). 150.de Quervain, D. J. et al. Glucocorticoids enhance extinction-based psychotherapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6621–6625 (2011). This study provided the first evidence that glucocorticoid effects on memory can be used to enhance the outcome of extinction-based psychotherapy. 151.Soravia, L. M. et al. Glucocorticoids enhance in vivo exposure-based therapy of spider phobia. Depress. Anxiety 31, 429–435 (2014). 152.Lass-Hennemann, J. & Michael, T. Endogenous cortisol levels influence exposure therapy in spider phobia. Behav. Res. Ther. 60, 39–45 (2014). 153.Tiffany, S. T. & Wray, J. M. The clinical significance of drug craving. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1248, 1–17 (2012). 154.Preller, K. H. et al. Sustained incentive value of heroinrelated cues in short- and long-term abstinent heroin users. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 23, 1270–1279 (2013). 155.Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive–sensitization view. Addiction 95 (Suppl. 2), 91–117 (2000). 156.Kelley, A. E. Memory and addiction: shared neural circuitry and molecular mechanisms. Neuron 44, 161–179 (2004). 157.Walter, M. et al. Effects of cortisol administration on craving in heroin addicts. Transl Psychiatry 5, e610 (2015). 158.Milad, M. R. et al. Deficits in conditioned fear extinction in obsessive-compulsive disorder and neurobiological changes in the fear circuit. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 608–618 (2013). 159.Mineka, S. & Oehlberg, K. The relevance of recent developments in classical conditioning to understanding the etiology and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 127, 567–580 (2008). 160.Pitman, R. K. Post-traumatic stress disorder, hormones, and memory. Biol. Psychiatry 26, 221–223 (1989). 161.LeDoux, J. The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 23, 727–738 (2003). 162.Phelps, E. A. & LeDoux, J. E. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron 48, 175–187 (2005). 163.Yehuda, R. & LeDoux, J. Response variation following trauma: a translational neuroscience approach to understanding PTSD. Neuron 56, 19–32 (2007). 164.Brewin, C. R. & Holmes, E. A. Psychological theories of posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 23, 339–376 (2003). 165.Cahill, L., Babinsky, R., Markowitsch, H. J. & McGaugh, J. L. The amygdala and emotional memory. Nature 377, 295–296 (1995). 166.Francati, V., Vermetten, E. & Bremner, J. D. Functional neuroimaging studies in posttraumatic stress disorder: review of current methods and findings. Depress. Anxiety 24, 202–218 (2007). 167.Armony, J. L., Corbo, V., Clement, M. H. & Brunet, A. Amygdala response in patients with acute PTSD to masked and unmasked emotional facial expressions. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 1961–1963 (2005). 168.Dickie, E. W., Brunet, A., Akerib, V. & Armony, J. L. An fMRI investigation of memory encoding in PTSD: influence of symptom severity. Neuropsychologia 46, 1522–1531 (2008). 169.Shin, L. M. et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to overtly presented fearful faces in posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 273–281 (2005). 170.Heim, C. & Nemeroff, C. B. Neurobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. CNS Spectr. 14, 13–24 (2009). 18 | JANUARY 2017 | VOLUME 18 www.nature.com/nrn . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 © REVIEWS 171.Ipser, J. C., Singh, L. & Stein, D. J. Meta-analysis of functional brain imaging in specific phobia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 67, 311–322 (2013). 172.Barlow, D. H. & Liebowitz, M. R. in Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry/VI 6th edn (eds Kaplan, H. I. & Sadock, B. J.) 1204–1218 (Williams and Wilkins, 1995). 173.Marks, I. Fears, Phobias and Rituals: Panic, Anxiety, and their Disorders (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987). 174.Bentz, D., Michael, T., de Quervain, D. J. & Wilhelm, F. H. Enhancing exposure therapy for anxiety disorders with glucocorticoids: from basic mechanisms of emotional learning to clinical applications. J. Anxiety Disord. 24, 223–230 (2010). 175.McNally, R. J. Mechanisms of exposure therapy: how neuroscience can improve psychological treatments for anxiety disorders. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 27, 750–759 (2007). 176.Hermans, D., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S. & Lovibond, P. F. Extinction in human fear conditioning. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 361–368 (2006). 177.Hamm, A. O. Specific phobias. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 32, 577–591 (2009). 178.Nader, K. Reconsolidation and the dynamic nature of memory. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a021782 (2015). 179.Kandel, E. R. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294, 1030–1038 (2001). 180.Schwabe, L. & Wolf, O. T. Stress and multiple memory systems: from ‘thinking’ to ‘doing’. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 60–68 (2013). 181.Bouton, M. E. Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biol. Psychiatry 52, 976–986 (2002). 182.Ohno-Shosaku, T. & Kano, M. Endocannabinoidmediated retrograde modulation of synaptic transmission. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 29, 1–8 (2014). 183.Di, S., Malcher-Lopes, R., Marcheselli, V. L., Bazan, N. G. & Tasker, J. G. Rapid glucocorticoidmediated endocannabinoid release and opposing regulation of glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid inputs to hypothalamic magnocellular neurons. Endocrinology 146, 4292–4301 (2005). 184.Evanson, N. K., Tasker, J. G., Hill, M. N., Hillard, C. J. & Herman, J. P. Fast feedback inhibition of the HPA axis by glucocorticoids is mediated by endocannabinoid signaling. Endocrinology 151, 4811–4819 (2010). 185.Marco, E. M. & Laviola, G. The endocannabinoid system in the regulation of emotions throughout lifespan: a discussion on therapeutic perspectives. J. Psychopharmacol. 26, 150–163 (2012). 186.Marsicano, G. et al. The endogenous cannabinoid system controls extinction of aversive memories. Nature 418, 530–534 (2002). 187.Hill, M. N., Karatsoreos, I. N., Hillard, C. J. & McEwen, B. S. Rapid elevations in limbic endocannabinoid content by glucocorticoid hormones in vivo. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 1333–1338 (2010). 188.Atsak, P. et al. Endocannabinoid signaling within the basolateral amygdala integrates multiple stress hormone effects on memory consolidation. Neuropsychopharmacology 40, 1485–1494 (2015). 189.de Oliveira Alvares, L. et al. Stress response recruits the hippocampal endocannabinoid system for the modulation of fear memory. Learn. Mem. 17, 202–209 (2010). 190.Katona, I. et al. Distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the amygdala and their role in the control of GABAergic transmission. J. Neurosci. 21, 9506–9518 (2001). 191.Ohno-Shosaku, T., Maejima, T. & Kano, M. Endogenous cannabinoids mediate retrograde signals from depolarized postsynaptic neurons to presynaptic terminals. Neuron 29, 729–738 (2001). 192.Di, S. et al. Acute stress suppresses synaptic inhibition and increases anxiety via endocannabinoid release in the basolateral amygdala. J. Neurosci. 36, 8461–8470 (2016). 193.Lu, A. T. et al. Association of the cannabinoid receptor gene (CNR1) with ADHD and post-traumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 147B, 1488–1494 (2008). 194.Mota, N. et al. The rs1049353 polymorphism in the CNR1 gene interacts with childhood abuse to predict posttraumatic threat symptoms. J. Clin. Psychiatry 76, e1622–e1623 (2015). 195.de Bitencourt, R. M., Pamplona, F. A. & Takahashi, R. N. A current overview of cannabinoids and glucocorticoids in facilitating extinction of aversive memories: potential extinction enhancers. Neuropharmacology 64, 389–395 (2013). 196.Jetly, R., Heber, A., Fraser, G. & Boisvert, D. The efficacy of nabilone, a synthetic cannabinoid, in the treatment of PTSD-associated nightmares: a preliminary randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled cross-over design study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51, 585–588 (2015). 197.Roitman, P., Mechoulam, R., Cooper-Kazaz, R. & Shalev, A. Preliminary, open-label, pilot study of add‑on oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Clin. Drug Investig. 34, 587–591 (2014). 198.Neumeister, A. et al. Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: a positron emission tomography study. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 1034–1040 (2013). 199.van Rossum, E. F. et al. Identification of the BclI polymorphism in the glucocorticoid receptor gene: association with sensitivity to glucocorticoids in vivo and body mass index. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 59, 585–592 (2003). 200.Ackermann, S., Heck, A., Rasch, B., Papassotiropoulos, A. & de Quervain, D. J. The BclI polymorphism of the glucocorticoid receptor gene is associated with emotional memory performance in healthy individuals. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38, 1203–1207 (2013). 201.Hauer, D. et al. Relationship of a common polymorphism of the glucocorticoid receptor gene to traumatic memories and posttraumatic stress disorder in patients after intensive care therapy. Crit. Care Med. 39, 643–650 (2011). 202.Labonte, B., Azoulay, N., Yerko, V., Turecki, G. & Brunet, A. Epigenetic modulation of glucocorticoid receptors in posttraumatic stress disorder. Transl Psychiatry 4, e368 (2014). 203.Yehuda, R. et al. Lower methylation of glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter 1F in peripheral blood of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 77, 356–364 (2015). 204.Vukojevic, V. et al. Epigenetic modification of the glucocorticoid receptor gene is linked to traumatic memory and post-traumatic stress disorder risk in genocide survivors. J. Neurosci. 34, 10274–10284 (2014). 205.Zannas, A. S., Wiechmann, T., Gassen, N. C. & Binder, E. B. Gene–stress–epigenetic regulation of FKBP5: clinical and translational implications. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 261–274 (2016). 206.Cheung, J. & Bryant, R. A. FKBP5 risk alleles and the development of intrusive memories. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 125, 258–264 (2015). 207.Mehta, D. et al. Using polymorphisms in FKBP5 to define biologically distinct subtypes of posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence from endocrine and gene expression studies. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 901–910 (2011). 208.Klengel, T. et al. Allele-specific FKBP5 DNA demethylation mediates gene–childhood trauma interactions. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 33–41 (2013). 209.Wilker, S. et al. The role of FKBP5 genotype in moderating long-term effectiveness of exposure-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Transl Psychiatry 4, e403 (2014). 210.Roberts, S. et al. HPA axis related genes and response to psychological therapies: genetics and epigenetics. Depress. Anxiety 32, 861–870 (2015). Competing interests statement The authors declare no competing interests. NATURE REVIEWS | NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 18 | JANUARY 2017 | 19 . d e v r e s e r s t h g i r l l A . e r u t a N r e g n i r p S f o t r a p , d e t i m i L s r e h s i l b u P n a l l i m c a M 7 1 0 2 ©