* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Dr. Darouiche`s Powerpoint Presentation
Neglected tropical diseases wikipedia , lookup
Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup
Gastroenteritis wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Common cold wikipedia , lookup
Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Clostridium difficile infection wikipedia , lookup
Onchocerciasis wikipedia , lookup
Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae wikipedia , lookup
Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis C wikipedia , lookup
Sarcocystis wikipedia , lookup
Schistosomiasis wikipedia , lookup
Urinary tract infection wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Coccidioidomycosis wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
New Highlights in Central LineAssociated Bloodstream Infection and Surgical-Site Infection Prevention Rabih O. Darouiche, MD VA Distinguished Service Professor Director, Center of Prostheses Infection at Baylor College of Medicine Safe Practices Webinar February 18, 2010 23 Disclosure Statement • Co-invented antimicrobial-coated catheters that are licensed by Baylor College of Medicine to Cook Inc • Received educational and research grants from CareFusion • Do not plan to discuss off-label and investigational use of devices or drugs 24 Overview of Presentation • Address similarities and differences between CLABSI and SSI • Assess the impact of these two infections • Analyze potentially protective approaches 25 Similarities Between CLABSI and SSI • Both infections result primarily from breaking skin integrity • Both infections are caused mostly by skin organisms • Both infections occur at unacceptably high rates, can be difficult to manage, may require future intervention(s), and are expensive to treat 26 Differences Between CLABSI and SSI • CLABSI manifests while the catheter is still in place, whereas SSI can manifest at any time after surgery, usually by 30 days post-op • Microbiologic cause of CLABSI is almost always identified, whereas the microbiologic cause of SSI is unknown in many patients • Occurrence of CLABSI can be attributed to various healthcare providers, whereas SSI is typically linked to the surgeon 27 Clinical Manifestations of infected CVC • Exit site infection • Tunnel infection • Thrombophlebitis • BSI Impact of CLABSI • Incidence: of the 6 million CVC inserted annually in the U.S., 250,000 result in BSI • Management: cure often requires removal of the infected catheter and long antibiotic therapy • Medical sequelae: attributable mortality 5%25% • Economic burden: cost of treatment is $10K$56K; annual cost in U.S., $3 billion–$16.8 billion 29 Annual Death Rates in the U.S. for Selected Infectious Diseases 30,000 25,000 Deaths per Year 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 CRBSI MRSA AIDS Hep B Tbc Measles Nosocomial Infections in the ICU 95% Urinary Catheters 86% Mechanical Ventilation UTI 31% PNEU 27% 87% central lines < 55 = 33% 55 – 70 = 32% >70 = 35% BSI 19% GI 5% CVS 4% EENT 4% LRI 4% National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) (97 hospitals) OTHER 6% N= 14,177 31 Gram-Positive Bacteremia in Cancer Patients: Role of the CVC % of Bacteremia with CVC as the source 80% 70% 70% 56% 60% 50% 40% 44% 30% 30% 20% 10% 0% Non-CRBSI CRBSI Solid Tumor Malignancy Non-CRBSI CRBSI Hematologic Malignancy 32 Difference between Surveillance Definition (by National Healthcare Safety Network: NHSN) and Clinical/Microbiologic Definition of CLABSI • Surveillance definition: includes all cases of BSI in patients with CVC in whom other sites of infection are excluded (catheter-associated BSI varies from from 1.3/1000 cath-days in medical surgical wards to 5.6/1000 cath-days in burn ICU) • Clinical/microbiologic definition: includes only cases of BSI in patients with CVC in whom other sites of infection are excluded and microbiologic relationship of catheter to BSI 33 exists (catheter-related BSI) Relationship between Catheter Colonization and Bloodstream Infection • Principle: catheter colonization is a prelude to catheter-related bloodstream infection • Objective: to prevent infection by inhibiting catheter colonization 34 IA Recommendations in Upcoming CDC Guidelines for Prevention of CLABSI • • • • • • Staff education and training Insert CVC in subclavian catheters Place hemodialysis catheters in jugular or femoral veins Promptly remove CVC when no longer essential Hand wash with soap/water or alcohol-based hand rubs Utilize 2% chlorhexidine-based preparation for skin cleansing before inserting CVC, during dressing changes, and wiping access ports of needleless catheter systems • Use sterile gauze or transparent semi-permeable dressings • Use antimicrobial-impregnated CVC if expected duration of placement >5 days and CLABSI remains higher than goal set by institutions despite comprehensive strategy Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. [draft] 35 NQF CLABSI Prevention Safe Practice Specifications: 2010 Update Before insertion: • Educate healthcare personnel involved in the insertion, care, and maintenance of central venous catheters (CVCs). At insertion: • • • • • • Use a catheter checklist at the time of CVC insertion. Perform hand hygiene prior to catheter insertion or manipulation. Avoid using the femoral vein for central venous access in adult patients. Use a catheter cart or kit with components for aseptic catheter insertion. Use maximal sterile barrier precautions. Use chlorhexidine gluconate 2% and isopropyl alcohol solution as skin antiseptic preparation in patients over two months of age and allow appropriate drying time per product guidelines. After insertion: • Use a standardized protocol to disinfect catheter hubs, needleless connectors, and injection ports before accessing the ports. • Remove nonessential catheters. • Use a standardized protocol for non-tunneled CVCs in adults and adolescents for dressing care. • Perform surveillance for CLABSI and report the data on a regular basis. 36 Comprehensive Protective Strategy Infection Control Bundle • Hand washing • Maximal barrier precautions • 2% chlorhexidine-based skin antisepsis • Avoiding femoral site if possible • Removing unnecessary catheters 37 Potential Limitations of Traditional Infection Control Measures Although very essential, they: • Are not easily enforceable • Are not very durable • Do not completely prevent infection • Save some, but not enough, lives Reasons to Optimize Prevention of SSI • Unacceptably high incidence: the 30 million annual surgical procedures in the U.S. result in 300,000-500,000 cases of SSI • Difficult management: may require repeated surgical interventions • Serious medical consequences: tremendous morbidity and occasional mortality • Soaring economic burden: annual cost of treatment in the U.S. is >$7 billion 39 Perioperative Approaches for Preventing SSI • Non-antimicrobial approaches • Normothermia • Adequate oxygenation • Tight glucose control • Antimicrobial approaches • Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis • Nasal application of mupirocin • Skin antisepsis 40 Impact of Timing of Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis on SSI 41 A Prospective Randomized Trial of Nasal Mupirocin Plus Chlorhexidine Wash Rapid identification of nasal carriage by S. aureus followed by a 5-day course of nasal mupirocin plus chlorhexidine wash: • Reduces S. aureus infection (3.4% vs. 7.7%) • Decreases S. aureus SSI by almost 60% Bode, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:9-17 42 Importance of the Skin • Largest bodily organ • Protective barrier • Skin flora most common cause of SSI (and CLABSI) • 80% of bacteria reside in epidermis Factors that Support the Need for Optimal Skin Antisepsis • Most pathogens that cause SSI are skin flora • At least 2/3 of cases of SSI are incisional • Most SSI are considered preventable • Other preventive measures reduce but do not eliminate SSI 44 Commonly used Preoperative Antiseptics • Povidone-iodine (Iodophor) • Chlorhexidine gluconate • Alcohol • Combination products: >2 active agents 45 Comparison of Antimicrobial Activity of Antiseptic Preparations Chlorhexidine-based preparations are better than alcohol or iodine-based products in: • Reducing colonization of vascular catheters • Preventing contamination of blood cultures • Decreasing contamination of surgical tissues 46 Pressing Need to Compare Clinical Efficacy of Antiseptic Preparations in Preventing SSI • CDC guidelines for prevention of infections related to vascular catheters recommend antiseptic cleansing of the skin with 2% chlorhexidine-containing products O’Grady, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51(RR-10):1-29 • CDC has not previously issued a preference as to type of preoperative skin antiseptics 47 Prospective, Randomized, 6-Center Clinical Trial of 849 Patients • Population: adult patients scheduled for abdominal or non-abdominal clean-contaminated surgery • Randomization: hospital-stratified • Intervention: preoperative skin cleansing with: • ChloraPrep® (2% chlorhexidine gluconate-70% isopropyl alcohol = CA) 26-ml applicators; OR • 10% povidone-iodine (PI) scrub and paint • Evaluation: SSI was assessed by blinded evaluators Darouiche, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:18-26 48 Proportion of Patients with Surgical-Site Infection, According to Type of Infection (Intention-to-Treat Population). ChlorhexidineAlcohol (N=409) no. (%) PovidoneIodine (N=440) no. (%) Any surgical-site infection 39 (9.5) 71 (16.1) 0.59 (0.41-0.85) 0.004 Superficial incisional infection 17 (4.2) 38 (8.6) 0.48 (0.28-0.84) 0.008 Deep incisional infection 4 (1.0) 13 (3.0) 0.33 (0.11-1.01) 0.05 Organ-space infection 18 (4.4) 20 (4.6) 0.97 (0.52-1.80) >0.99 Sepsis from surgical-site infection 11 (2.7) 19 (4.3) 0.62 (0.30-1.29) 0.26 Type of Infection Relative Risk (95% CI) P-Value 49 Kaplan-Meier Curves for Freedom from Surgical-Site Infection (Intention-to-Treat Population) Proportion of Patients with Surgical-Site Infection, According to Type of Surgery (Intention-to-Treat Population). Chlorhexidine-Alcohol N no. Infected (%) Infected Abdominal 297 37 Colorectal 186 Biliary Povidone-Iodine N no. Infected (%) Infected (12.5) 308 63 (20.5) 28 (15.1) 191 42 (22.0) 44 2 (4.6) 54 5 (9.3) Small intestinal 41 4 (9.8) 34 10 (29.4) Gastroesophageal 26 3 (11.5) 29 6 (20.7) 112 2 (1.8) 132 8 (6.1) Thoracic 44 2 (4.5) 57 4 (7.0) Gynecologic 42 0 (0.0) 40 1 (2.5) Urologic 26 0 (0.0) 35 3 (8.6) Type of Surgery Non-abdominal 51 Chlorhexidine-Alcohol (CA) vs. PovidoneIodine (PI) for Prevention of SSI • CA significantly reduces SSI • Number of patients needed to receive CA instead of PI to prevent one case of SSI: 17 • Delays onset of SSI • CA and PI have similar rates of adverse events (including events related to study medication in 0.7% in each group) and serious adverse events 52 New CMS Regulations (effective 10/08) Changes to Inpatient Prospective Payment System 10 non-reimbursable conditions met these criteria: • High cost • High volume • Triggers a high-paying MS-DRG • May be considered reasonably preventable through application of evidence-based guidelines Federal Register, Volume 73, No. 161; 08/19/08 53 Non-reimbursable Infectious Conditions • Catheter-associated urinary tract infection • Vascular catheter-associated infection • Surgical-site infection-mediastinitis after CABG • Surgery on various joints, including shoulder, elbow, and spine 54 Perspective Optimal prevention of CLABSI and SSI can: • Improve patient care • Incur cost-savings • Enhance infection control measures 55