Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contributors: Sarah Ezzell Abstract – This paper explores the past, present, and future of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The history of such technology is first described, followed by the basics of MRI and a description of how it works. Two main ideas discussed are the magnetic field and the radio frequency (RF) pulse. The advantages and disadvantages of using an MRI system to look inside a person’s body are explored. Finally, the future of MRI in medicine as well as industrial applications is explained. I. HISTORY Figure 1 Patent drawing2 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a means of looking inside the human body. This method is achievable without the use of surgery, harmful dyes, or x-rays. MRI makes use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), a physics phenomenon that was discovered in the 1930s1 by Isidor I. Rabi and his colleagues at Columbia University 2. This is a phenomenon in which tiny radio signals are given off by atoms due to magnetic fields and radio waves, which are both harmless. In the 1940s, research physicists learned more. They found that depending on the substance being examined, variations were evident in the length of time the response signals were emitted after the atom was stimulated by radio waves. Biological tissue is no exception to this phenomenon. The gap between researchers familiar with NMR and doctors anxious for better diagnostic methods was bridged by Dr. Raymond Damadian. Dr. Damadian studied mathematics, but then earned a medical degree and became a professor shortly after. He became interested in NMR and through testing normal mouse tissues against tumors removed from the animals, concluded that NMR signals in cancerous cells endured much longer than those in healthy cells. His paper, published in 1971, entitled “Tumor Detection by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance” described these results. He then filed his idea, using magnetic resonance for medical diagnosis, with the U.S. Patent Office less than two years later. His idea, entitled “Apparatus and Method for Detecting Cancer in Tissue”, was granted a patent in 1974 by the Patent Office and was the world’s first patent given in the field of MRI. A patent drawing from Dr. Damadian’s 1972 filing can be seen in Figure 1. By 1977, Dr. Damadian’s idea had become a physical reality. He constructed a whole-body MRI scanner, which he called “Indomitable.” The machine had been built despite those who believed it was impractical and foolish. Dr. Damadian and his associates produced the first whole-body magnetic resonance image on July 3, 1977 with Indomitable. This scan lasted four hours and 45 minutes. Today Indomitable can be found on permanent display in the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC. II. BASICS OF MRI The basic design used in most MRI machines is a large cube3. New models are shrinking in size, but the typical system is two meters by two meters by three meters. A horizontal tube known as the bore runs through the magnet. Newer models may also have some openness around the sides. A MRI scanner can be seen in Figure 2. Figure 2 MRI scanner4 The patient slides into the bore while on his or her back on a special table. The type of exam determines how far into the magnet the patient goes as well as whether the patient -1- goes in head first or feet first. The scan can begin once the patient is in the exact center, isocenter, of the magnetic field. Accompanied by radio-wave pulses of energy, the MRI scanner is able to select a point inside the patient’s body and ask the question, “What type of tissue are you?” This question is asked to the entire area, point by point, that is being examined and the information is integrated into a 2-D image or a 3-D model. Each point that is examined is approximately a cube that is half a millimeter on each side. III. ferromagnetic material: alloys of iron and cobalt (ALNICO) or rare earth alloys such as Neodymium Iron Boron (Ne-FeB) or Samarium Cobalt (Sm-Co)5. Rare earth alloys are more efficient; a 2.0 T magnet weighs 23 tons with ALNICO and only 4 tons with Ne-Fe-B. MAGNETIC FIELD The magnet is the largest and most important element of the MRI system. Magnets are rated using units of measure known as Tesla (T) or gauss. One Tesla is equal to 10,000 gauss. The earth’s magnetic field is 0.5 gauss. The magnets used in the MRI system are extremely powerful in comparison. They range from 0.5 Tesla to 2.0 Tesla, which is equivalent to 5,000 to 20,000 gauss. MRI scanners are frequently categorized as low-, mid-, or high-field. Lowfield is considered under 0.2-Tesla, mid-field from 0.2 to 0.6 Tesla, and high-field from 1.0 to 2.0 Tesla. Radiologists debated for years the diagnostic effectiveness of the different field strengths. An editorial by noted radiologist Dr. David Stark in Applied Radiology stated, “The great field strength debate lasted one decade…Increasing field strength was an obvious, and expensive, approach to improve image quality. Although it is unarguable that increasing field strength increases image quality by increasing image signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) achievable during a given scan time, over the past few years it has become apparent that increasing field yields only fractional gains in SNR, not the exponential bonanza touted in the 1980s1.” MRI systems use one of three basic types of magnets: resistive magnet, permanent magnet, or superconducting magnet. Resistive magnets are composed of many windings of wire looped around a bore through which electric current is delivered. The result is the generation of a magnetic field. However, the electricity is required to maintain the magnetic field. On account of the natural resistance in the wire, these magnets require large amounts of power, up to 50 kilowatts, to operate. Operation above the 0.3-Tesla level would be unreasonably expensive. A permanent magnet requires nothing additional to maintain the magnetic field. It is always there and is always on full strength. This means that there is no cost to maintain the field. However, these magnets are extremely heavy. At the 0.4-Tesla level, they weigh many tons. It would be challenging to construct a permanent magnet with a stronger field because of the tremendous weight. These magnets are consequently typically limited to low field strengths. Permanent magnets are constructed from magnetized Certainly the most commonly used magnets for this application are superconducting magnets. These have some similarity to resistive magnets in that the magnetic field is created by coils of wire in which a current is passed. The windings are composed of a Niobium-Titanium alloy (Nb-Ti) embedded in a copper core. The significant difference is that the wire is incessantly bathed in liquid helium that is at a temperature of 4 degrees Kelvin, or negative 452 degrees Fahrenheit. This ensures superconductivity of the Nb-Ti, which becomes superconductive at 10 degrees Kelvin. A vacuum insulates it though, so the patient is not exposed to that incredible cold. Because of the extremely cold temperature, the resistance in the wire drops to zero, making operation of the system much more economical. These magnets can generate high-fields and higher quality images, but they are still very expensive. In Figure 3, a superconducting MRI magnet without the outer housing can be seen. Figure 3 Superconducting MRI magnet4 High-quality imaging requires a uniform magnetic field of tremendous strength and stability. Such a field is possible with the magnets described above. Another type of magnet that is found in every MRI system is a gradient magnet. In comparison to the main magnetic field, these magnets are incredibly low-strength, ranging from 180 gauss to 270 gauss. The gradient magnets create a variable field as opposed to the stable field created by the main magnet. The gradient magnets are designed to alter the main field on a local level. This allows the image of any exact “slice” of any part in any direction to be generated. -2- IV. CREATING AN IMAGE The basics in creating an image include the understanding of atoms in the human body as well as their interaction with radio frequency pulses. Atoms, of which the human body is made up of billions, are the fundamental building blocks of matter. The nucleus of an atom spins on an axis, and billions of nuclei are randomly spinning in every direction in the body. Although there are many types of atoms in the body, MRI is concerned with the hydrogen atom. Hydrogen has a large magnetic moment, meaning that in the presence of a magnetic field, the atom has a strong inclination to line up with the direction of the field. This makes the hydrogen atom good for MRI. The magnetic field runs down the center of the tube, the bore, in which the patient is placed. Figure 4 shows the orientation of the main magnetic field, which is shown in red. The patient is surrounded by gradient coils, an RF shield, and the main magnet coils. Figure 5 Hydrogen protons align with magnetic field3 A radio frequency (RF) pulse that is specific to hydrogen is then applied by the MRI machine to the area of the body being examined. This pulse drives the protons that are not canceled out to spin at a certain frequency in a certain direction. The tissue being examined and the magnetic field strength determine the resonance frequency, called the Larmour frequency. Application of the RF pulses generally occurs through a coil. MRI machines are equipped with multiple coils, designed for different parts of the body. The coils either conform to the form of the body part or are located very close during the scan. Figure 4 Magnet placement and field orientation6 The hydrogen protons of a patient lying on his or her back will therefore line up either in the direction of the head or feet. Most of these protons will cancel each other out. When there is one in the direction of the head and one in the direction of the feet, they cancel each other out. Out of every million protons, there are only several that are not canceled out. Because of the huge number of hydrogen atoms in the body, this is enough to create fantastic images. Figure 5 shows how the hydrogen protons align with the magnetic field and most cancel each other out. Upon termination of the RF pulse, the hydrogen protons return to their natural alignment within the magnetic field, sometimes called relaxation. Their excess energy is thereby released and a signal is given off and picked up by the coil. From there it is sent to the computer system and the data is transformed by use of the Fourier transform into an image that can be put onto film. The magnetic resonance relaxation that occurs after RF stimulation in the presence of a strong magnetic field is measured both by values T1 and T2. Every tissue in the body has a unique T1 and T2 value. When constructing an image, the MRI machine can control the brightness of the image pixels with either the T1 or T2 value. The resulting image is accordingly either a T1 image or a T2 image. A T1 image displays tissues with low T1 values as bright elements and a T2 image displays tissues with high T2 values as bright elements. Therefore, what may be white in a T1 image could be gray in a T2 image. T1 images demonstrate anatomic detail while T2 images show good contrast between normal and abnormal tissues. Figure 6 shows a T1 and T2 image of the brain. -3- Figure 6 T1 and T2 MRI of the brain4 V. ADVANTAGES OF MRI There are many advantages to performing a MRI scan. Both the fantastic image produced and also the harmlessness of the procedure contribute to the excellence of the idea. MRI is a great way to see inside the human body. There are many situations in which performing an MRI scan is ideal. Some of them are the following: Diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS) Diagnosing tumors of the pituitary gland and brain Diagnosing infections in the brain, spine, or joints Visualizing torn ligaments in the wrist, knee, and ankle Visualizing shoulder injuries Diagnosing tendonitis Evaluating masses in the soft tissues of the body Evaluating bone tumors, cysts, and bulging or herniated discs in the spine Diagnosing strokes in their earliest stages3 The ability of MRI to image in any plane is of great significance. This is one advantage of MRI over computed tomography (CT) imaging, which is limited to one plane. Moreover, the imaging in various planes is produced without the patient moving through use of the gradient magnets. There are three standard views that are typically used: transverse (axial), coronal, and sagittal. The orientation of these slices can be seen in Figure 7. Figure 7 Axial, coronal, and sagittal planes3 To perform the procedure, the emission of ionizing radiation, used for X-ray and CT scans, is not necessary. This is comforting to many people. The biological effects resulting from exposure to magnetic fields and RF electromagnetic pulses, which are necessary for magnetic resonance imaging, have been studied multiple times; no significant biological hazards have been found. Certain types of MRI scans do require the injection of intravenous contrast, as do other imaging methods7. The most commonly used dye is gadolinium. MRI contrast alters the local magnetic field in the tissue being examined, resulting in differing signals from normal and abnormal tissue as they respond differently to the alteration. The CT dye rarely produces complication, but even rarer are complications from gadolinium. VI. DISADVANTAGES OF MRI MRI does have drawbacks though. The most significant is the extreme care that must be taken due to the extreme power of the magnet. Strict precautions must be observed in order to maintain a safe environment. Metal objects of any kind cannot be brought into the scan room. Objects such as paperclips, pens, keys, scissors, and stethoscopes can be drawn out of the pockets or off the body and pulled toward the opening of the magnet at high speeds. -4- The magnetic force that an object experiences is exponentially proportionate to the distance from the magnet. A much stronger force attracts an object with more mass. Examples of objects that have been pulled into the magnetic fields of MRI machines are mop buckets, vacuum cleaners, oxygen tanks, patient stretchers, and heart monitors. In Figure 8, a fully loaded pallet jack that has been sucked into the bore of an MRI system can be seen. The removal of large objects may require a winch or the magnetic field to be shut down. implants are also generally acceptable because they are securely embedded in the bone. Although there are no adverse biological affects known from exposure to magnetic fields of the strength used in imaging today, most facilities choose not to scan pregnant women. The reasoning behind such a preference is the lack of research that has been done in the area of biological effects on a developing fetus. The decision whether to scan a pregnant woman or not is made on a case-to-case basis. The risk to the fetus and mother must be enormously outweighed by the benefit of the MRI scan. Generally, doctors use other imaging methods such as ultrasound on pregnant women9. Several other aspects of the MRI scan can make it uncomfortable for the patient. Obese patients may have trouble fitting well or even at all into the bore. For claustrophobic people, the scan can be difficult in typical, enclosed constructions. Another discomfort is the noise, which sounds like a continual hammering, present during the scan. The rising electrical current in the gradient magnet wires is the source of this noise. Earplugs or stereo headphones often mitigate the noise. A requirement of the MRI scan is that patient hold very still. Distorted images can be the result of slight movements. Figure 8 Pallet jack sucked into bore of magnet 3 One recent tragic incident of a metal object being pulled into the magnetic field left a child having a MRI scan dead8. The six-year-old boy was in the MRI machine at Westchester Medical Center in New York when, according to the hospital, a metal oxygen tank was accidentally “introduced into the exam room8.” In a news release, the center said that the tank was “immediately magnetized and drawn to the center of the machine, causing head trauma to the child 8.” Besides external objects, patients may have objects inside themselves, which make the presence of a magnetic field dangerous. There is no danger associated with an MRI scan for the vast majority of people, but for some it could cause serious injury or even death. People with pacemakers or other mechanically, electrically, or magnetically activated implanted devices cannot be scanned. In the case of the pacemaker, the magnet could cause malfunction. Another dangerous object is an aneurysm clip in the brain, while the magnet can move it and cause tearing of the artery that it was meant to repair. Eye damage or blindness could result in a patient with metallic fragments in his or her eye. Unlike the rest of the human body, the eyes do not form scar tissue, so a fragment of metal that has been there 25 years is just as dangerous today. Metal staples in the body are usually acceptable since enough scar tissue has formed after approximately six weeks to hold them in place. Orthopedic One last disadvantage is the cost of these systems. A superconducting magnet is extremely expensive, costing approximately $500,00010. This brings the total cost of the system with imaging and controls to about $1 million. VII. FUTURE OF MRI The future of magnetic resonance imaging is very exciting. The medical industry is beginning to see MRI scanners that are much more compact, less expensive, and more patient-friendly11. The magnets are not as strong, so some images still should be taken with the traditional scanner like the one seen in Figure 2. The scanner in Figure 9 is a Siemens Medical Systems Magnetom Open, 0.2 T MRI, and is based on a permanent magnet. Shown positioned over the patient is the RF coil. -5- Technische Hochschule in Germany, a cost of about $50,000 per unit would be economically sensible in industry. Blümich and colleagues developed a hand-held MRI probe called the NMR Mouse, which stands for nuclear magnetic resonance mobile universal surface explorer. The probe is effectively a sensor that is placed over the surface of the material being tested. Seen in Figure 11, the probe utilizes a permanent magnet and can sense a volume restricted to 3 mm across the gap between poles, 8 mm along the gap, and 1 mm deep into the material. The device is more than adequate for its intended use, and Blümich noted “there are companies in the elastomer [rubber] business that have acquired these devices for quality control9.” Figure 9 Unenclosed, permanent-magnet-based MRI11 The scanner in Figure 10 allows for most of the patient’s body to remain outside the magnetic field during the exam. This Lunar Corp. 0.2 T Artoscan extremity magnetic resonance imager takes up a floor space of only nine square meters. Figure 11 MRI probe to monitor rubber tire hardness10 Figure 10 Extremity MRI scanner11 Not only does magnetic resonance imaging have a future in the medical industry, but it may also be moving onto the factory floor. Researchers are investigating its use in the analysis of fluid content. Another possible use is the analysis of molecular mobility, which measures the hardness of a material. One applicable material is the elastomer; rubber products such as automobile tires are an example of this type. Other applicable materials are fiber products like carpet in addition to ceramic and polycarbonate materials. Industry cannot tolerate the enormous costs incurred in the medical arena for magnetic resonance technology. According to Bernhard Blümich, professor and specialist in macromolecular chemistry with Rheinisch-Westfälische Besides the rubber industry, another possible application area for industrial MRI is carpet manufacturing. Researchers at Georgia Institute of Technology with the School of Textile and Fiber Engineering have been employing MRI off-line to examine the water content of carpet in the course of the drying process. Unlike the permanent magnet used in the NMR Mouse, this system uses a cryogenically cooled superconducting magnet, generating a flux density of 9.4 T for increased sensitivity. Receptivity to the research results may determine the outlook of an on-line system analogous to the probe for the rubber industry, according to Haskell Beckham, a leading researcher and associate professor at the Georgia institute. VIII. CONCLUSION The discovery of nuclear magnetic resonance in the 1930s has impacted society in a way never imagined before the work of Dr. Damadian. His years of work have changed the landscape of modern medicine. It now appears as though the idea is branching out into other arenas besides the -6- medical one. The future impact of this technology will be exciting to follow. IX. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] REFERENCES MRI FAQ’s. FONAR Corporation. 13 April 2002 <http://www.fonar.com/faqs_content.htm>. Schneider, David. “Raymond V. Damadian: Scanning the Horizon.” Scientific American. June 1997. 13 April 2002 <http://www.sciam.com/ 0697issue/0697profile.html>. Gould, Todd. How Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Works. Marshall Brain’s HowStuffWorks. 6 April 2002 <http://howstuffworks.com/mri. htm/printable>. MRI: How It Works. GCM Radiologists. 13 April 2002 <http://www.gcmradiology.com/mrworks. html>. Brown, Greg. Introduction to MRI Hardware. 25 April 2002 <http://www.users.on.net/vision/ papers/hardware/hardware.htm>. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Yale University School of Medicine. 13 April 2002 <http://www. med.yale.edu/intmed/cardio/imaging/techniques/mri_ diagram/>. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Healthcommunities.com. 13 April 2002 <http:// www.radiologychannel.net/magneticresonance/>. Fitzgerald, Jim. “Child Having MRI Killed in Machine.” The Detroit News. 24 April 2002 <http://detnews.com/2001/health/0108/01/258469.htm>. MR Imaging (MRI) – Body. American College of Radiology (ACR). Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). 13 April 2002 <http:// radiologyinfo.org/content/mr_of_the_body.htm>. Kaplan, Gadi. “Industrial Electonics.” IEEE Spectrum (2000): 104-09. Magin, Richard, Andrew Webb, and Timothy Peck, “Miniature Magnetic Resonance Machines.” IEEE Spectrum (1997): 51-61. -7-