Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence HS 12 Overview 1 Setting the Stage 2 Result 3 Proof 4 Remarks Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 2/13 Setting the Stage We present the argument for the existence of a Walrasian equilibrium in the context of an Exchange economy. This is a special case of the model from the previous lecture in which no production is possible: Y j = {0} for all j ∈ J . In effect: There are no firms, only consumers. In this case an allocation is given by x = (x1 , . . . , xI ). feasibility requires xi ∈ Rn+ and X xi = i∈I X ei . i∈I the incomes are given by mi (p) = p · ei . Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 3/13 Setting the Stage The condition for p∗ 0 to be a Walrasian equilibrium price vector can be written as z(p∗ ) = 0. Here z : Rn++ Rn is the aggregate excess demand function given by X X zk (p) = xki (p, p · ei ) − eki . i∈I i∈I Answering the question “Does a Walrasian equilibrium exist?” is thus the same as answering the question “Does there exists p∗ 0 such that z(p∗ ) = 0?” Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 4/13 Result Theorem 5.5: Consider an exchange economy in which the utility functions u i of all consumers are continuous, strongly increasing, and strictly quasiconcave. Assume, in addition, that the aggregate endowment of each good is strictly positive, that is X ei 0. i∈I Then a Walrasian equilibrium price vector p∗ 0 exists. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 5/13 Structure of the Proof 1 Derive properties of individual demand from assumptions on preferences. 2 Derive properties of excess demand from properties of individual demand. 3 Show that these properties of excess demand imply the existence of an equilibrium. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 6/13 Step 1 of the Proof We already know that under the assumptions, each consumer’s problem has a unique solution xi (p, y ) for given income y if p 0. We simply use p · ei as income (each individual sells its initial endowment at given prices). Furthermore, the theorem of the maximum assures that xi (p, p · ei ) is continuous in p for p 0. Thus we know: Individual demand xi (p, p · ei ) is well-defined and continuous in p whenever p 0. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 7/13 Step 2 of the Proof (I) This structure of individual demand has implications for aggregate excess demand. For p 0: Aggregate excess demand z(p) is continuous in p, homogeneous of degree zero in p (i.e., z(t p) = z(p), for all t > 0), for all p 0, we have p · z(p) = 0 (“Walras Law”). Continuity and homogeneity are rather obvious implications of the corresponding properties of individual demand functions; Walras Law needs a detailed proof . . . Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 8/13 Step 2 of the Proof (II) There is a further (technical) property of aggregate excess demand. Let {pm } be a sequence of price vectors with pm 0 that converges to some p̄ 6= 0 with p̄k = 0 for some good k . Then for some good k 0 with p̄k0 = 0, the associated sequence of excess demands for good k 0 is unbounded above. This property simply says that if the prices of some but not all goods come arbitrarily close to zero, then the excess demand for at least one of these goods goes to infinity. I am not going to prove this property here (see Theorem 5.4.); but note that this is where the assumption that the aggregate endowment is strictly positive is used. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 9/13 Step 3 of the Proof (I) For the final part of the proof, we need a fixed-point theorem. A vector x∗ is called a fixed point of the function f if f(x∗ ) = x∗ . Brouwer’s Fixed-Point Theorem: Let S ⊂ Rn be a non-empty, compact, and convex set. Let f : S → S be a continuous function. Then there exists a point x∗ ∈ S, so that f(x∗ ) = x∗ . Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 10/13 Step 3 of the Proof (II) Theorem 5.3 finishes the proof by combining the properties of the aggregate excess demand function established in Step II with Brouwer’s fixed point theorem to demonstrate that there exists p∗ 0 with z(p∗ ) = 0. The key idea is to construct a function f mapping price vectors into price vectors, such that p∗ is a fixed point of this mapping if and only if aggregate excess demand is equal to zero. Constructing such a function isn’t very difficult. Nevertheless, the proof is rather messy because there is no straightforward way to meet the compactness requirement in Brouwer’s fixed point theorem. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 11/13 Remarks: Uniqueness of Walrasian Equilibrium The above argument establishes fairly general conditions under which a Walrasian equilibrium in an exchange economy exists. From the homogeneity of aggregate excess demand, it is clear that there is no hope for the uniqueness of Walrasian equilibrium prices – the best we can hope for is that a Walrasian equilibrium allocation and “relative prices” are uniquely determined. Alas, it can be shown that unless much more stringent assumptions on preferences and/or endowments are imposed, Walrasian equilibrium allocations are, in general, not unique. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 12/13 Remarks: Existence in Production Economies Existence of Walrasian equilibrium in the model with production can be proven following the same logic as in the case of an exchange economy. 1 Continuity properties of individual demand and supply functions. This requires the assumptions on Y j introduced in the previous lecture. 2 Establish same properties of the aggregate excess demand function as above. Aggregate excess demand is now given by X X X X z(p) = xi (p, p · ei + θij Πj (p)) − ei − yj (p). i∈I j∈J i∈I j∈J Rather than assuming a strictly positive aggregate endowment, a weaker assumption will do. 3 Use Brouwer’s fixed point theorem in the same way as above. Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 6: General Equilibrium - Existence 13/13