Download CHF: Non-Pharmacologic Treatment

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Seven Countries Study wikipedia , lookup

List of medical mnemonics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CHF: Non-Pharmacologic Treatment
Reference # 218
CHF: Non-Pharmacologic Treatment
Key Highlights from the Recommended Guideline
•
•
•
Advise your heart failure patients to do moderate exercise, starting in a
supervised setting.
Advise your heart failure patients to limit their fluid and salt intake and
monitor their weight daily.
Immunize heart failure patients against influenza and pneumococcal
pneumonia.
Scope: Health professionals involved in the care of heart failure patients
What steps should I take to get my CHF patients to exercise?
Advise regular exercise for all heart failure patients with stable symptoms and impaired left ventricular
systolic function. [Level of Evidence: Class IIa, Level B]
Do a baseline graded exercise stress test to assess functional capacity, cardiac ischemia and obtain
the patient’s optimal target heart rate for training. [Level of Evidence: Class IIa, Level B]
For patients with stable NYHA Class II to III who have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%
recommend 30-45 minute sessions 3-5 times weekly (including warm-up and cool-down periods).
[Level of Evidence: Class IIa, Level B]
Have patients train for both resistance training and aerobic activity at moderate intensity (eg: 60-80% of
target heart rate). [Level of Evidence: Class IIa, Level B]
What advice can I give my patients to monitor and reduce fluid retention?
Advise all patients with symptomatic heart failure to limit their salt intake in to 2-3 g daily (“no added
salt”). [Level of Evidence: Class I, Level C]
Advise those with more advanced heart failure and fluid retention to limit their salt intake to 1-2 g daily
(“low-salt”). [Level of Evidence: Class I, Level C]
Ask patients with renal dysfunction or ongoing fluid retention to monitor their daily morning weights and
restrict fluid intake to 1.5-2 L daily. Patients with hyponatermia should restrict their fluid intake similarly.
[Level of Evidence: Class I, Level C]
What other interventions should I consider for heart failure patients?
Immunize eligible heart failure patients against pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza as respiratory
infections may worsen heart failure. [Level of Evidence: Class I, Level C]
Avoid use of the following therapies in heart failure patients:
o Vitamin and herbal remedies, coenzyme Q10 or chelation therapy. [Level of Evidence: Class III,
Level C]
o Continuous positive airway pressure for central sleep apnea. [Level of Evidence: Class III,
Level B]
o Enhanced external counterpulsation. [Level of Evidence: Class III, Level C]
www.gacguidelines.ca
-1-
CHF: Non-Pharmacologic Treatment
Reference # 218
What system considerations can have an impact on heart failure outcomes?
Consider referring heart failure patients to a specialist if they have:
o recently been diagnosed or hospitalized,
o complications of heart failure or comorbidities (e.g. ischemia, hypertension, valvular disease,
syncope, renal failure), or
o poor response to drug therapy. [Level of Evidence: Class I, Level C]
Consider using specialized hospital-based clinics or disease management programs staffed by
physicians, nurses, pharmacists and other health care professionals with expertise in heart failure
management for assessment and management of higher risk patients with heart failure. [Level of
Evidence: Class I, Level A]
Refer patients with recurrent heart failure hospitalizations to these clinics for follow-up within four weeks
of hospital discharge, or sooner when feasible. [Level of Evidence: Class I, Level A]
Multidisciplinary care should include close clinical follow-up, patient and caregiver education,
telemanagement or telemonitoring, and home visits by specialized heart failure health care
professionals where resources are available. [Level of Evidence: Class I, Level A]
Levels of Evidence
Class I
Class II
Class IIa
Class IIb
Class III
Level A
Level B
Level C
Evidence or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is beneficial, useful and
effective.
Conflicting evidence or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness or efficacy of the
procedure or treatment.
Weight of evidence is in favour of usefulness or efficacy.
Usefulness or efficacy is less well established by evidence or opinion.
Evidence or general agreement that the procedure or treatment is not useful or effective and
in some cases may be harmful.
Data derived from multiple randomized clinical trials or meta-analyses.
Data derived from a single randomized clinical trial or nonrandomized studies.
Consensus of opinion of experts and/or small studies.
The above recommendations were derived from the following GAC endorsed
guidelines:
Arnold, J.M.O., Liu, P., Demers, C. et al. and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. (2006, January). Canadian
Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006: Diagnosis and management.
Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 22(1), 23-45.
Arnold, J.M.O., Howlett, J.G., Dorian, P., Ducharme, A., Giannetti, N., Haddad, H. et al. (2007, January). Canadian
Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference recommendations on heart failure update 2007: Prevention,
management during intercurrent illness or acute decompensation, and use of biomarkers. Canadian Journal of
Cardiology, 23(1), 21-45.
Rating (out of 4):
Endorsed Date: May, 2007
Planned Review Date: July, 2009
Ontario Guidelines Advisory Committee
500 University Ave., Suite 650
Toronto, ON M5G 1V7
Telephone: 1-888-512-8173
Fax: 416-971-2462
Email: [email protected]
www.gacguidelines.ca
-2-