Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
E PIPES and ABLIN D I T O R I A L Cancer stem cells revisited B.L. Pipes MS* and R.J. Ablin PhD*,† Stem cell research is currently at the frontier of medical science. Embryonic stem cells, therapeutic cloning, tissue regeneration—research into the vast therapeutic possibilities inherent in understanding and manipulating stem cells is exploding. Amid all this activity, understanding of the role that stem cells play in carcinogenesis has also been increasing. Stem cells have an extended replicative lifespan, which makes them excellent candidates for the cell of origin of cancer. The standard multi-step somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis requires that a cell acquire several critical mutations in the cell cycle or proliferation pathways, or both 1. The extended replicative lifespan of stem cells, or of primitive progenitor cells, would provide the opportunity over the lifespan of an individual for these rare, random mutations to accumulate in a cell. As reasonable as this argument seems, stem cells as the cell origin of cancer is not currently a favoured model. Although a stem-cell origin of cancer was initially proposed more than thirty years ago 2, research in this area has been overshadowed by massive amounts of work focussed on elucidating the genetic mechanisms of the underlying somatic mutation theory. The reasons for this focus, as addressed by Sonnenschein and Soto 3, are complicated and controversial. Until very recently, a stem- or progenitor-cell origin in carcinogenesis found support only in leukemia research. There, it was first accepted that both hematopoetic stem and progenitor cells could acquire genetic abnormalities that would lead to the uncontrolled replication and dysregulated differentiation that are characteristic of the spectrum of leukemic cancers 4,5. The possibility that a similar stem-cell origin of carcinogenesis might apply to solid malignant tumours was not vigorously pursued and has only recently been experimentally addressed. In 2003, Al-Hajj et al. 6 provided the first evidence for the existence of breast cancer stem cells. They identified a subpopulation of tumour cells that was 10 – 50 times more tumorigenic in xenografts than were cells from the bulk of the tumour. The cells in this subpopulation were also able to give rise to further tumorigenic cells—and to partially differentiated, non-tumorigenic cells. Continued experimental investigations of these breast cancer stem cells 7,8 have lent considerable support to the theory of a stemcell origin in carcinogenesis in solid malignant tumours. Currently, intriguing evidence is also coming from other investigators for the existence of stemcell involvement in several other solid malignancies, including those of prostate, ovary, lung, and brain 9,10. An unexpected twist to the model of stem-cell carcinogenesis was revealed in a study of gastric cancer 11, wherein the cell of origin of the cancer was found to be not only a stem cell, but a stem cell derived from bone marrow, not from gastric epithelium! The foregoing findings, together with data from earlier studies by one of the present authors (RJA), have been incorporated into a revised theory of the stem-cell origin of cancer, in which circulating bone marrow–derived stem cells may become tumorigenic in a variety of chronically inflamed tissue compartments 12. Future work will reveal if bone marrow– derived stem cells or local-tissue stem cells are indeed the origin for many, or perhaps most, human epithelial cancers. As the current explosion of interest in stem cells and their therapeutic possibilities continues, the knowledge gained should stimulate further interest in developing the stem-cell theory of carcinogenesis. Whatever the exact involvement of stem cells in the origin of cancers is ultimately found to be, the great hope is that new therapeutic approaches targeting the cancer stem cells within tumours will, in conjunction with current therapies that target the bulk of the tumour, provide oncologists with improved armaments in the war against cancer. REFERENCES 1. Rangarajan A, Hong SJ, Gifford A, Weinberg RA. Speciesand cell type–specific requirements for cellular transformation. Cancer Cell 2004;6:171–83. 2. Pardal R, Clarke MF, Morrison SJ. Applying the principles of CURRENT ONCOLOGY—VOLUME 12, NUMBER 4 1 EDITORIAL: CANCER STEM CELLS REVISITED stem-cell biology to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:895–902. 3. Sonnenschein C, Soto AM. Somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: why it should be dropped and replaced. Mol Carcinogen 2000;29:205–11. 4. Gilliland DG, Jordan CT, Felix CA. The molecular basis of leukemia. Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2004; :80–97. 5. Copland M, Jorgensen HG, Holyoake TL. Evolving molecular therapy for chronic myeloid leukaemia-are we on target? Hematology 2005;10:349–59. 6. Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito–Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:3983–8. [Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:6890] 7. Liu S, Dontu G, Wicha MS. Mammary stem cells, self-renewal pathways, and carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7: 86–95. 8. Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, et al. Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res 2005;65:5506–11. 9. Glinsky GV, Berezovska O, Glinskii AB. Microarray analysis identifies a death-from-cancer signature predicting therapy failure in patients with multiple types of cancer. J Clin Invest 2005;115:1503–21. 2 10. Fomchenko EI, Holland EC. Stem cells and brain cancer. Exp Cell Res 2005;306:323–9. 11. Houghton J, Stoicov C, Nomura S, et al. Gastric cancer originating from bone marrow–derived cells. Science 2004;306: 1568–71. 12. He X, Tsang TC, Pipes BL, Ablin RJ, Harris DT. A stem cell fusion model of carcinogenesis. J Exp Ther Oncol 2005; 5:101–9. Corresponding author: Brian L. Pipes, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona 85724-5049 U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] * † Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. Arizona Cancer Center and Center for Injury Mechanisms and Related Responses, University of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson, Arizona, U.S.A. CURRENT ONCOLOGY—VOLUME 12, NUMBER 4