Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Nick Wytiaz University of Pittsburgh APPE – LifeCare Hospital June 13, 2011 [email protected] Monograph: TRADJENTA (linagliptin) I. Introduction Diabetes, a chronic disease of improper insulin production or use, affects over 25 million Americans, with 95% of these cases presenting as diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). Many oral and injectable medications are available to treat DM2, with the goals of controlling blood glucose levels and preventing micro- and macro-vascular complications. The American Diabetes Association recommends the following targets of DM2 patients: glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) <7.0%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 70-130 mg/dL, and post-prandial (PPG) <180 mg/dL. Tradjenta (linagliptin), a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, is the newest oral agent approved by the FDA in May 2011 for the management of diabetes. Linagliptin is indicated for adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2), along with diet and exercise, to improve blood glucose control. As with other DDP-4 inhibitors, linagliptin can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other DM2 therapies, including metformin, sulfonylurea, and pioglitazone. While linagliptin is the third agent to enter the DPP-4 class in the US, following sitagliptin (Januvia) and saxagliptin (Onglyza), the new agent presents with some unique features. II. Pharmacology DPP-4 inhibitors represent a relatively new approach to DM2 treatment with a unique mechanism of action compared to other classes of diabetes medications. Like other agents of this class, linagliptin is a potent, selective inhibitor of DPP-4, an enzyme that degrades the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). GLP-1 and GIP are naturally occurring hormones, which are released by endocrine cells in the epithelium of the small intestines at a low basal level throughout the day and spike immediately after meal intake. These hormones target the beta-cells of the pancreas by increasing insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon secretion in response to elevated blood glucose levels. In addition, GLP-1 also reduces glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha-cells, resulting in a reduction in hepatic glucose output. By binding to the DPP-4 enzyme, DPP-4 inhibitors increase the concentrations of GIP and GLP-1. This stimulates the release of insulin in a glucose-dependent manner and decreases levels of glucagon in circulation, which helps to control blood glucose levels in DM2 patients. Pharmacodynamics Linagliptin binds to DPP-4 in a reversible manner and thus increases the concentrations of incretin hormones. This, in turn, glucose-dependently increases insulin secretion and lowers glucagon secretion, resulting in a better regulation of the glucose homeostasis. Linagliptin binds selectively to DPP-4 and selectively inhibits DPP-4 but not DPP-8 or DPP-9 activity in vitro at concentrations approximating therapeutic exposures. Pharmacokinetics After a single 5mg dose in both healthy volunteers and DM2 patients: Tmax=1.5 hrs AUC=139 nmol*h/L Bioavail(po) = 30% Vd = 1110L Cmax=8.9 nmol/L Prot Binding = 70-80% (at high conc, DPP-4 fully saturated) Excretion = 80% (enterohepatic), 5% (urine) T1/2=12 hours III. Current Drug Classes for DM2 Class Specific Agents Mechanism of Action Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (AGI) Acarbose (Precose) Competitively blocks enzyme alphaglucosidase in brush borders of small intestine 3rd line due to lower or equivalent overall glucose lowering effect compared to other therapies and/or limited clinical data or relative expense 3rd line due to lower or equivalent overall glucose lowering effect compared to other therapies and/or limited clinical data or relative expense Tier-1, well-validated core therapy after lifestyle modification Miglitol Role in Therapy American Diabetes Association Amylin analog Pramlintide (Symlin) Slows gastric emptying leading to feeling of early satiety, decreases postprandial glucagon secretion Biguanide Metformin Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor Saxagliptin (Onglyza) Inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis, glycogenolysis, enhances insulin sensitivity Inhibits degradation of endogenous incretins which increase insulin secretion, decrease glucagon secretion Glucagon-like, peptide-1 (GLP1) or incretin mimetic Exenatide (Byetta) Insulin Sitagliptin (Januvia) Liraglutide (Victoza) Long-acting, rapid-acting, premixed combos Stimulates GLP-1 receptors which increases production of insulin in response to high blood glucose levels, inhibits postprandial glucagon release, slows gastric emptying Insulin replacement therapy 3rd line due to lower or equivalent overall glucose lowering effect compared to other therapies and/or limited clinical data or relative expense Tier-2 therapies. In selected clinical settings (when hypoglycemia or weight loss is major consideration), these can be considered only when in conjunction with lifestyle modification and metformin, when additional A1C lowering is desired Tier-1, well-validated core therapies to be used with lifestyle modification and metformin, when additional A1C lowering is desired -2- American Assoc of Endocrinologists / American College of Endocrinology One of several preferred agents, after metformin, for patients with impaired postprandial glucose as monotherapy or as add-on therapy to metformin in pts with A1C values 6.5-7.5% Possible adjunct to insulin in patients receiving prandial insulin Initial therapy after lifestyle modification One of several preferred agents, after metformin, for patients with impaired postprandial glucose / elevated fasting plasma glucose as monotherapy or add-on therapy in pts with A1C 6.5-7.5% or as add-on therapy to metformin in pts with A1C 7.6-9%. Can be considered as part of a multi-drug regimen with metformin, in drug-naïve, asymptomatic pts if A1C >9% One of several preferred agents, after metformin, for pts with impaired post prandial glucose / elevated fasting plasma glucose as monotherapy or add-on therapy in pts with A1C 6.5- 7.5% or as add-on therapy to metformin in pts with A1C 7.6-9% Prefer GLP-1 agonists over DPP-4 inhibitors because of better reductions in PPG & wt 3rd line agents in pts with A1C 6.5-9%, to be used after failure to meet goals on triple oral therapy with other agents. In patients with A1C >9%, insulin should be used in pts who fail other therapies or those with symptoms of hyperglycemia Meglitinide Nateglinide (Starlix) Stimulates pancreatic insulin secretion Repaglinide (Prandin) Sulfonylurea – 1st generation 3rd line due to lower or equivalent overall glucose lowering effect compared to other therapies and/or limited clinical data or relative expense Not preferred Add-on therapy to metformin in patients with impaired postprandial glucose and A1C 6.5% to 9% Chlorpropamide Tolazamide Tolbutamide Glyburide Glipizide Glimepiride Stimulates pancreatic insulin secretion Stimulates pancreatic insulin secretion Tier-1, well-validated core therapies when used with lifestyle modification and metformin, for additional A1C lowering Add-on to metformin in patients with elevated fasting plasma glucose and A1C 6.5% to 9% or as part of a multi-drug regimen with metformin, in drug-naïve, asymptomatic patients with A1C > 9% Thiazolidinedione (TZD) Pioglitazone (Actos) Enhances insulin sensitivity in muscle and fat by increasing glucose transporter expression Tier-2 therapy (when hypoglycemia is a concern) Clinicians should carefully consider whether to use these agents vs. insulin or sulfonylureas as 2nd line therapy Others-bile acid sequestrant Colesevelam (Welchol) May reduce hepatic insulin resistance leading to reduction in hepatic glucose production, have effect on molecular mediators of glucose metabolism, reduce intestinal glucose absorption Role not defined One of several preferred agents, after metformin, as monotherapy in patients with A1C 6.5-7.5% or as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with A1C 7.6-9%. Can also be considered as part of a multi-drug regimen with metformin, in drug-naïve, asymptomatic patients with A1C >9%. Also consider if metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease One of several preferred agents as add-on to metformin in patients with A1C 6.5-7.5% Sulfonylurea – 2nd generation Not preferred V. Dosing & Administration The recommended dose of linagliptin is 5 mg PO once daily. The medication can be taken without regards to meals. No dosage titration is recommended. Unlike other DPP-4 inhibitors, no dosing adjustment is necessary for patients with impaired renal or hepatic function. Both saxaglipin and sitagliptin require dose reductions in patients with renal dysfunction. Saxagliptin does not require dose adjustments for hepatic impairment. Sitagliptin can be dosed normally in mild-moderate hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class A or B). However, no information is available on its use in severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C). -3- VI. Adverse Drug Reactions ADR Additional Therapy Frequency* Nasopharyingitis 5.8% Hypoglycemia MET + SU 22.9% Cough MET + SU 2.4% Hypertriglyceremia SU 2.4% Weight Gain PIO 2.3% Arthralgias MET 5.7% Back Pain MET 6.4% Headache MET 5.7% * Based on clinical trials LIN = linagliptin 5mg PIO = pioglitazone (> 15 mg/day) Comparator Placebo (5.5%) Placebo + MET + SU (14.8%) Placebo + MET + SU (1.1%) Placebo + SU (0.0%) Placebo + PIO (0.8%) Glimepiride + MET (3.5%) Glimepiride + MET (5.2%) Glimepiride + MET (4.2%) MET = metformin (> 1500 mg/day) SU = sulfonylurea The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar to placebo when linagliptin was administered as monotherapy or in combination with metformin alone or pioglitazone. Other adverse reactions reported included hypersensitivity (urticaria, angioedema, localized skin exfoliation, or bronchial hyperreactivity), and myalgia. Pancreatitis was reported in 8 of 4687 patients receiving linagliptin (1 per 538 patient-years) vs. 0 of 1183 patients treated with placebo (0 in 433 person-years). Post-marketing reports of acute pancreatitis in patients taking Januvia have prompted a change in the “Warnings and Precautions” section of the package, recommending the prompt discontinuation of Januvia if pancreatitis is suspected. While it is still too soon to tell if the rate of pancreatitis with linagliptin is similar to that of Januvia, it seems reasonable to discontinue linagliptin if a patient showed signs of pancreatitis. VII. Drug Interactions Nearly 90% of linagliptin is excreted from the body unchanged. Since only a small portion of the drug is metabolized, drug interactions are rare. Preclinical studies have shown linagliptin to be a weak CYP3A4 inhibitor and a P-glycoprotien substrate. However, it does not significantly affect other 3A4 or p-glycoprotein substrates when given at therapeutic levels. Rifampin, a strong P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inducer, has been shown to decrease linagliptin exposure. Though its clinical significance was not studied, the interaction suggests that the efficacy of linagliptin may be reduced when administered with rifampin or other strong P-glycoprotein or CYP3A4 inducers. Thus, use of linagliptin in combination with such medications should be avoided. VIII. Contraindications / Precautions Linagliptin is contraindicated in patients with a history of hypersensitivity reaction to the medication (e.g. urticaria, angioedema, or bronchial hyperreactivity), type 1 diabetes, or diabetic ketoacidosis. Use of linagliptin in combination with an insulin secretagogue, such as a sulfonylurea, was associated with a higher rate of hypoglycemia. Therefore, a lower dose of the insulin secretagogue may be required to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Pregnancy Category B – no adequate, well-controlled studies in pregnant women. In animal studies, linagliptin was not teratogenic in therapeutic dose, but was found to cross the placenta into the fetus and be secreted into the breast milk. Based on available information, linagliptin should only be used in pregnancy if clearly needed. -4- IX. Clinical Trial Review Lingliptin has been studied as monotherapy and in combination with metformin, glimepiride, and pioglitazone therapy in approximately 3800 patients with DM2, who were randomized in 8 doubleblind, placebo-controlled clinical safety and efficacy studies. Monotherapy Two double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, of 18-week and 24-week duration, were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linagliptin monotherapy. In both studies, patients currently on an antihyperglycemic agent discontinued the medication and underwent a diet, exercise, and drug washout period of 6 weeks. An open-label placebo run-in was conducted for all patients during the final 2 weeks of the washout period. Patients with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7-10%) after the washout period were randomized, while patients not currently on antihyperglycemic agents (off therapy for at least 8 weeks) with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7-10%) were randomized after completing the 2-week open-label placebo run-in period. In the 18-week study, 76 patients were randomized to placebo and 151 to linagliptin 5mg. Only patients ineligible for metformin were recruited for the 18-week study. Reasons a patient was considered unsuitable for metformin included GI adverse events (93%) or elevated serum creatinine levels (male >1.5 mg/dL, female >1.4 mg/dL; 7%). For the 24-week study, 167 patients were randomized to placebo and 336 to linagliptin 5 mg. Treatment with linagliptin 5mg daily provided statistically significant improvements in A1C, FPG, and 2-hour PPG compared with placebo (Table 1). Improvement in A1C compared with placebo was not affected by gender, age, race, prior anti-hyperglycemic therapy, baseline BMI, or a standard index of insulin resistance. Change in body weight did not differ significantly between groups. Table 1. Monotherapy Studies 18-Week Study 24-Week Study Linagliptin 5mg Placebo Linagliptin 5mg Placebo A1C Number of Patients 147 Mean baseline 8.1 Change from baseline -0.4* % achieving A1C <7% 28%* FPG (mg/dL) Number of Patients 138 Mean baseline 178.4 Change from baseline -13.3* 2-hr PPG (mg/dL) Number of Patients NA Mean baseline NA Change from baseline NA * Statistically significant (p<0.001) 73 8.1 0.1 15% 333 8.0 -0.4* 25%* 163 8.0 0.3 12% 66 175.6 7.2 318 164 -8.5* 149 166 14.8 NA NA NA 67 258 -33.5* 24 244 24.9 Combination Therapy A total of 701 patients with inadequately controlled DM2 (A1C 7-10%) participated in a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of linagliptin in combination with metformin. Patients already on metformin (n = 491) at a dose of at least 1500 mg per day were randomized after completing a 2-week open-label placebo run-in period. Patients on metformin and another antihyperglycemic agent (n = 207) were randomized after a run-in period of ~6 weeks on metformin (min 1500mg/day) monotherapy. Patients were randomized to the -5- addition of either once daily linagliptin 5mg or placebo. Patients who failed to meet specific glycemic goals during the studies were treated converted to glimepiride as “rescue therapy”. In combination with metformin, linagliptin provided statistically significant improvements in A1C, FPG, and 2-hour PPG compared with placebo (Table 2). A similar decrease in body weight was observed for both treatment groups. An 18-week study evaluated the efficacy of linagliptin in patients not achieving adequate glycemic control (A1C <7%) on sulfonylurea monotherapy. 245 received linagliptin 5mg once daily (n=161) or placebo (n=84). All oral antidiabetic agents other than sulfonyureas were withdrawn at the beginning of the study. Patients then underwent a 4-week washout prior to a 2-week run in. Sulfonylurea dosing remained consistent for each patient throughout the study duration. At the end of 18 weeks, patients in the linagliptin/sulfonylurea group experienced a mean A1C change from baseline of -0.47% compared to the placebo / sulfonylurea group (p<0.0001). A similar study evaluated the efficacy of linagliptin 5mg once daily in patients inadequately controlled (A1C 7% to 10%) with a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea. Patients were randomized to adjunctive linagliptin (n=793) or placebo (n=265) for the 24-week study. Patient characteristics were similar at baseline, with the majority (73.3%) having had DM2 for at least 5 years prior to study enrollment. The difference in mean change from baseline A1C was -0.62% in the linagliptin group compared with placebo (p<0.0001). Patients with a baseline A1C >7% were more likely to acheive goal A1C (<7%) when treated with linagliptin (29.2%) compared with placebo (8.1%, p<0.0001). In another study, linagliptin plus pioglitazone was compared with pioglitazone monotherapy. Linagliptin / pioglitazone therapy resulted in an adjusted mean reduction in A1C of 0.5% compared with pioglitazone alone. Patients in the pioglitazone / linagliptin group experienced a mean A1C change from baseline of -1.1% compared to a change of -0.6% in patients taking pioglitazone alone (p<0.0001). Reductions in fasting plasma glucose were also significantly greater for the combination group (p<0.0001) and were more likely to achieve a target A1C <7% compared with those on placebo / pioglitazone. Table 2. Combination Therapy Studies LIN + Placebo LIN + MET + MET PIO Placebo + PIO LIN + SU Placebo + SU A1C # Patients 513 175 252 128 158 82 Mean baseline 8.1 8.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 Change from -0.5* 0.15 -1.1* -0.6 -0.5* -0.1 baseline % achieving 28.3%* 11.4% 42.9%* 30.5% 15.2%* 3.7% A1C <7% FPG (mg/dL) # Patients 495 159 243 122 155 78 Mean baseline 169.0 163.8 188.4 186.4 180 171 Change from -10.7* 10.5 -32.6* -18.4 -8.2* -1.8 baseline LIN = linagliptin 5mg MET = metformin (> 1500 mg/day) PIO = pioglitazone (> 15 mg/day) SU = sulfonylurea * Statistically significant (p<0.005) -6- LIN+ MET+ SU Placebo + MET + SU 778 8.2 -0.7* 262 8.1 -0.1 31.2% 9.2% 739 159.2 -4.6* 248 162.6 8.1 X. Cost Comparison Class DPP-4 Inhibitors Drug / Strength Price* / Quantity Januvia 25, 50, 100mg $247.66 x30 Onglyza 2.5, 5mg $247.64 x30 Tradjenta 5mg $247.66 x30 Biguanides Metformin 500mg $70.40 x100 850mg $119.70 x100 1000mg $144.01 x100 Sulfonylureas Glimepiride 1mg $40.18 x100 2mg $65.20 x100 4mg $122.97 x100 Glyburide 1.25mg $30.30 x100 2.5mg $30.58 x100 5mg $52.60 x100 TZDs Actos 15mg $183.06 x30 30mg $279.76 x30 45mg $303.45 x30 Incretin Mimetics Byetta 5mcg/1.2mL $339.28 x1 10mcg/2.4mL $356.12 x1 Victoza 18mg/3mL $475.91 x3 *All prices derived from Cardinal Health website (www.cardinal.com) Price per Dose $8.26 $8.25 $8.26 $0.70 $1.20 $1.44 $0.40 $0.65 $1.23 $0.30 $0.31 $0.53 $6.10 $9.33 $10.12 $5.65 $5.94 $10.58 XI. Place in Therapy The American Diabetes Association (ADA), in conjunction with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, released an updated consensus statement in 2009 on the treatment of DM2. The statement segregated treatment options into two tiers. Tier 1 was defined as “well-validated treatments” while Tier 2 was defined as “less well validated treatments.” The distinctions were made based on evidence from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and on-going studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of current diabetic treatment options. The initial treatment recommendations in tier 1 include lifestyle modifications plus metformin. If additional therapies are needed, insulin and a sulfonylurea are recommended. In tier 2, pioglitazone or a GLP-1 agonist (incretin mimetic) is recommended. According to the ADA statement, DPP-4 inhibitors are not listed as a tier 1 or 2 agent. ADA stated that DPP-4 inhibitors lower A1C levels by 0.6% to 0.9%, are weight neutral, and are relatively well tolerated. The DPP-4 inhibitors are listed as “other therapies” in the current treatment algorithm because these agents are expensive and long-term safety has not been established. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) also released updated guidelines for the management of diabetes. The 2009 AACE/ACE Diabetes Algorithm for Glycemic Control listed DPP-4 inhibitors, given as monotherapy or in combination with other oral agents, as one of the preferred therapies for patients with DM2. Based on these two sets of recommendations and the favorable aspects of metformin as an initial treatment option, linagliptin seems to be most appropriate as an add-on therapy for certain patients who need additional glycemic control. Such examples of its use could include patients who are close to their A1C goal, yet continue to experience postprandial hyperglycemia; patients for whom hypoglycemia is a major concern, such as the elderly or those with high fall risk; and patients on metformin, sulfonylurea, or pioglitazone who can not tolerate other diabetic agents. While linagliptin provides another option for the management of DM2, immediate uptake and use will be limited due to high cost, limited A1C reduction, and lack of long-term safety / efficacy data. -7- XI. References 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed on: June 15, 2011. 2. Tradjenta [package insert]. Ridgefield, CT: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2011. 3. Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA, et al. Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(6): 540-59. 4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(Suppl. 1): S11–S61. 5. Drug classes for type 2 diabetes. Pharmacist’s Letter/Prescriber’s Letter. 2010;26(5): 260504. 6. Barnett AH. Linagliptin: a novel dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor with a unique place in therapy. Adv Ther. 2011;28(7). 7. Forst T, Uhilg-Laske A, Ring U, et al. Linagliptin (BI 1356), a potent and selective DPP-4 inhibitor, is safe and efficacious in combination with metformin in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010;27:1409-1419. 8. Thomas L, Tadayyon M, Mark M. Chronic treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor BI 1356 [(R)-8-(3-amino-piperidin-1-yl)-7-but-2-ynyl-3-methyl-1-(4-methyl-quinazol in-2-ylmethyl)3,7-dihydro-purine-2,6-dione] increases basal glucagon-like peptide-1 and improves glycemic control in diabetic rodent models. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Feb;328(2):556-63. 9. Pratley R. Inhibition of DPP-4: a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(4):919–31 10. Blech S, Ludwig-Schwellinger E, Grafe-Mody EU, Withopf B, Wagner K. The metabolism and disposition of the oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, linagliptin, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010 Apr;38(4):667-78. 11. Januvia [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc; 2011. 12. Onglyza [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristo Myers Squibb; 2011. -8-