Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Radiofrequency Ablation 101 Neuroscience Summit September 10, 2016 Chris Pratt, DO Texas Health Care Pain Management 1651 West Rosedale Street, Suite #205 Fort Worth, Texas 71604 What’s in a name?     Radiofrequency Ablation RFA Rhizotomy Neurotomy Rhizotomy    Interventional pain modality designed to decrease the sensation of pain by denervating the source Provides partial relief Provides temporary relief/can be repeated Common Applications     Lumbar facet pain Cervical facet pain Thoracic facet pain Sacroiliac joint pain Less Common Applications  Regional neuropathic pain syndromes    Sympathectomy Ganglion lesion Nociceptive pain syndromes    Knee Hip Heel Facet Syndrome Diagnosis       Axial pain without a distinct radicular pattern (facet pain can have referred components ie. HA’s arm/shoulder buttock/leg) Pain may be relieved by standing, walking, rest or repetitive activity Tenderness over affected facet joints Pain is worse with extension Pain is relieved with flexion Imaging may show severe facet degenerative disease, or may be relatively normal Case Study        Patient LR is a 68 year old male 5 year history of intermittent low back pain Pain has become constant over the last 8 months Pain is bilateral but worse on the right (VAS 6/10) Has tried OTC NSAIDS, occasional narcotics with only short term relief PT, felt short term relief with each session but worse the next day MRI- degenerative disc L5-S1, minimal spondylolisthesis L45, facet arthopathy L3-S1 with subchondral cyst L5-S1, no central stenosis Conservative Treatment      Duration 6-8 weeks to give the pain a chance to go away Therapy, formal and home based Medications, steroids, NSAIDS, narcotics Ice/Heat avoidance of aggravating factors Imaging, rule out surgical indication, fracture, malignancy RF and Treatment Modality  Facet related pain must be meticulously established  At least 2 diagnostic procedures      Intra-articular facet injection Medial branch blocks Placebo injection Comparative blocks with short- and long-acting anesthetics Relief of the pain should be “significant” and consistent with the duration of the anesthetic used Case Study     Patient RL having failed conservative treatment underwent a lumbar facet injection B/L L3-S1 Reported 70% pain relief that lasted 4-6 weeks, but was only 30% improved at his 2 month follow up Lumbar medial branch block was performed L2,3,4,5 Reported 80% relief of his back pain the day of the injection with a precipitous return of the pain over the next 2-3 days Lets Cook     RL was offered RFA of the medial branch L2,3,4, dorsal ramus L5 Alterative treatments were discussed Risks: bleeding infection, unintentional damage to nerves, increased postoperative pain Expectations: increased pain for 2-5 days followed by a 60% reduction of the usual pain for 8-14 months Facet Denervation  Destruction of the nerve supply to the facets  Medial branches C3-L4 Third occipital nerve Posterior primary ramus of L5  C8 spinal nerve changes everything     Dual nerve supply Proper nomenclature Landmarks MB = medial branch TON = 3rd occipital nerve LB = lateral branch SAB = superior articular branch NR = nerve root TP = transverse process VA = vertebral artery IC = iliac crest DPR = dorsal primary ramus IAB = inferior articular branch RF and Patient Selection      Pain relief in the expected distribution of the injected facet joint/MBB Similar relief from at least 2 diagnostic injections Aggressive non-surgical therapy has failed Patient with realistic goals Psychosocial factors have been addressed Equipment    Radiofrequency generator (Thermal and/or Pulsed) Grounding pad and connecting cable Electrodes and disposable needles         5cm, 10cm, 15cm needles (5 or 10mm active tips) 18-22 gauge insulated needles Dependent on location and patient body habitus Straight vs. curved needles 22 gauge, 3.5” spinal needle for deep local Lead apron and thyroid shield Fluoroscopy (c-arm, image archiving) Sterile scrub Preparation for Procedure   Fluoroscopically assess anatomy Anatomy and nerve nomenclature     2 nerves, 1 facet joint T12-L4 MB-base of transverse process and SAP L5 medial branch-sacral ala groove and S1 SAP MB arises over transverse process above and below the joint Lumbar PA and Lumbar Oblique MB = medial branch IC = iliac crest IAB = inferior articular branch NR = nerve root LB = lateral branch TP = transverse process IBP = intermediate branch plexus DPR = dorsal primary ramus S = superior articular process FJ = facet joint SAB = superior articular branch I = inferior articular process Images from Fenton, DS, Czervionke LF. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. WB Saunders, 2003. Oblique Lumbar Spine Target for Needle Placement Images from Fenton, DS, Czervionke LF. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. WB Saunders, 2003. Scotty Dog SAP = superior articular process IAP = inferior articular process FJ = facet joint Images from Fenton, DS, Czervionke LF. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. WB Saunders, 2003. Oblique Lumbar Spine Target for Needle Placement P = pedicle S = superior articular process T=transverse process Arrow = target Oblique Lumbar Spine Needle Placement Cephalad Approach Lateral Lumbar Spine Needle Placement Cephalad Approach Superior Articular Process AP Lumbar Spine Needle Placement RF Procedure RF Stim Sensory 50 Hz; < 1 volt Stim Motor 2 Hz; < 10 volts RF Lesion 80C; 1:30 Pulsed RF 42C; 2 minutes RF Procedure: Sensory Testing     Remove stylet Insert electrode Impedance (between 250-500 ohms) Sensory testing (50 Hz, 0-1V)     Pain similar to usual pain in part or in total Referred proximal extremity pain No true radicular pain If no pain, shut off and reposition needle RF Procedure: Motor Testing  Motor testing (2 Hz, 1-10V)  Ramped to at least double the sensory stimulation value with a minimum of 3V  Rhythmic thumping in back or neck  Multifidus muscles  Lateral branch of posterior primary ramus  Proceed to RF lesioning  Any contractions of gluteal or extremity musculature is incorrect placement  Needle must be repositioned, start with sensory RF Procedure  Once patient has passed impedance, sensory and motor testing, lesioning can proceed   No further manipulations of the needle Deep local anesthetic (1% lidocaine) through spinal needle for thermal lesioning (not needed for pulsed)    Take care not to move needle at all Use a non-luer lock connecting tube to connect local syringe to cannula Obtain lateral spot image prior to moving stylet and compare to spot image taken after injecting local and placing electrode into cannula RF Lesion Mode (Or Standard RF)  Lesioning protocol        80° Celsius for 60° seconds Temperature slowly ramped up (manual or auto) Evaluate for signs of improper needle position Remain at maximum temperature for 60 seconds Remove electrode, instill steroid (optional) Remove needle Perform other level(s) Pulsed RF Mode        50 Hz stimulation Correct impedance if > 450 Ohms Frequency 2 Hz Pulse Duration 20 msec 45 Volts 2-4 minutes Decrease voltage or pulse frequency if temperature > 42°C Complications Bleeding  Infection  Thecal sac puncture and headache  Allergic reactions to the medications  Pneumothorax in thoracic procedures  Vasovagal reactions and ataxia especially in cervical procedures  Fenton DS, Czervionke LF. In Image-Guided Spine Intervention. WB Saunders, 2003. Waldman SD. In Interventional Pain Management, 2nd edition. WB Saunders, 2001. Complications continued…  Post-denervation neuritis  Distributional sunburn-like feeling  More annoying than painful  Resolves spontaneously in 6-8 weeks  Membrane stabilizing agents to treat  Gabapentin (Neurontin)  Steroids  Deafferentation syndrome  Permanent damage to the nerve root  Hyperexcitability of primary sensory neurons Fenton DS, Czervionke LF. In Image-Guided Spine Intervention. WB Saunders, 2003. Waldman SD. In Interventional Pain Management, 2nd edition. WB Saunders, 2001. Case Study       RL follow up 6 weeks post RFA Neurologic exam intact Reports 60-70% overall improvement Still has morning pain when he gets out of bed, but significantly better Started on home based PT exercises Follow up based on recurrence of pain Questions? Thank you!