Download Redalyc.On a- t-disconnectedness and α- τ

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Surface (topology) wikipedia , lookup

Continuous function wikipedia , lookup

Sheaf (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup

Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup

Covering space wikipedia , lookup

3-manifold wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental group wikipedia , lookup

Grothendieck topology wikipedia , lookup

General topology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Acta Scientiarum. Technology
ISSN: 1806-2563
[email protected]
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Brasil
Mishra, Sanjay
On a- t-disconnectedness and - -connectedness in topological spaces
Acta Scientiarum. Technology, vol. 37, núm. 3, julio-septiembre, 2015, pp. 395-399
Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Maringá, Brasil
Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=303241163011
How to cite
Complete issue
More information about this article
Journal's homepage in redalyc.org
Scientific Information System
Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal
Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative
Acta Scientiarum
http://www.uem.br/acta
ISSN printed: 1806-2563
ISSN on-line: 1807-8664
Doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v37i3.17332
On α- τ-disconnectedness and α- τ-connectedness in topological
spaces
Sanjay Mishra
Department of Mathematics, School of Physical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India. E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT. The aims of this paper is to introduce new approach of separate sets, disconnected sets and
connected sets called α- τ-separate sets, α- τ-disconnected sets and α- τ-connected sets of topological spaces
with the help of α-open and α-closed sets. On the basis of new introduce approach, some relationship of ατ-disconnected and α- τ-connected set with α- τ-separate sets have been investigated thoroughly.
Keywords: α-open set, α-closed set, α-closure, α- τ-separate sets, α- τ-disconnected sets and α- τ-connected sets.
Sobre a α- τ-des-conectividade e a α- τ-conectividade em espaços topológicos
RESUMO. Introduz-se nesse ensaio uma nova abordagem de conjuntos separados, conjuntos
desconectados e conjuntos conectados chamados α- τ-conjuntos separados, α- τ-conjuntos desconectados e
α- τ-conjuntos conectados de espaços topológicos, com o auxílio de conjuntos α- τ-aberto e α- τ-fechado.
Baseados nessas abordagens, os relacionamentos de α- τ-conjunto desconectado e α- τ-conjunto conectado
com α- τ-conjuntos separados foram analisados.
Palavras-chave: α-conjunto aberto, α-conjunto fechado, α-fechamento, α- τ-conjuntos separados, α- τ-conjuntos
desconectados, α- τ-conjuntos conectados.
Introduction
There are several natural approaches that can
take to rigorously the concepts of connectedness
for a topological spaces. Two most common
approaches are connected and path connected and
these concepts are applicable Intermediate Mean
Value Theorem and use to help distinguish
topological spaces. These concepts play a
significant role in application in geographic
information system studied by Egenhofer and
Franzosa (1991), topological modelling studied by
Clementini et al. (1994) and motion planning in
robotics studied by Farber et al. (2003). The
generalization of open and closed set as like
  open and   closed sets was introduced by
Njastad (1965) which is nearly to open and closed
set respectively. These notion are plays significant
role in general topology. In this paper, the new
approaches of separate sets, disconnected sets and
connected sets called     separate set,
    disconnected sets and     connected
set with the help of   open and   closed set
are firstly introduced. Further, some relationship
    disconnected
concerning
and
    connected sets with     separate sets
are also investigated.
Acta Scientiarum. Technology
Throughout this paper ( X , ) and ( X ,  ) will
always be topological spaces. For a subset A of
topological space X, Int ( A), Cl ( A), Cl ( A) and
Int ( A) denote the interior, closure,   closure
and
  interior
of A respectively and G is the
  open set for topology   on X.
Preliminaries
We shall requires the following definitions and
results.
Definition 2.1. Levine (1963), defined a subset
A of ( X , ) is semi-open if A  Cl ( Int ( A)) and its
complement is called semi-closed set.
The family SO( X , ) of semi-open sets is not a
topology on X.
Definition 2.2. Mashhour et al. (1982), defined
a subset A of ( X , ) is called pre-open locally dense
or nearly open if A  Int (Cl ( A)) and its
complement is called pre-closed set.
Theorem 2.3. According to Mashhour et al.
(1982), the family PO( X , ) of pre-open sets is not
a topology on X.
Definition 2.4. Maheshwari and Jain (1982),
defined a subset A of ( X , ) is called   open if
Maringá, v. 37, n. 3, p. 395-399, July-Sept., 2015
396
Mishra
A  Int (Cl ( Int ( A))) . The family   of   open
sets of ( X , ) is a topology on X which is finer than
 and the complement of an   open set is called
an   closed set.
Theorem 2.5. According to Njastad (1965), for
a subset A of ( X , ) , thee following are equivalent:
A  G and A  H   .
( A  G )  ( A  H )   .
( A  G )  ( A  H )  A .
( X ,  ) is said to be     disconnected if
there exists non-empty G and H  in   such
that G  H    and G  H  X .
Definition 3.4. Let ( X , ) be a topological space
A   ;
A is semi open and pre-open;
A  B  SO( X , ) , for all B in So( X , ) ;
and A be non-empty subset of X. let G be
A  O / N , where O    and N is nowhere
arbitrary
dense;
There exists U contained in
   {G  A : G   } is a topology on A, called

such that
U  A  scl (U )  Int (Cl ( A)).
Theorem 2.6. The intersection of semi-open
(resp. pre-open) set and an   open set is semiopen (resp. pre-open).
Theorem 2.7. According to Njastad (1965),
SO( X , )  SO( X ,  ) and PO( X , )  PO( X ,  ) .
Theorem 2.8. According to Njastad (1965), the
  open sets A and B are disjoint if and only if
Int(Cl ( Int ( A))) and Int (Cl ( Int ( B))) are disjoint.
Definition 2.9. A point x in X is called an
  interior point of a set A in X if there exists
A G   such that y  G with y  x , i.e. x
  interior point of a set A in X
if foe every G    with x  G and G  A .
Collection of all   interior points of A is called
  interior of A which is denoted by Int ( A) .
in X is called an
Alternatively, we can define as
Int ( A)
by
Int ( A)  {G    : G  A} .
Main Results
Definition 3.1. Let ( X , ) and ( X ,  ) be
topological spaces. Then the subsets A and B of
( X , ) are said to be     separate sets if and
only if
A and B are non-empty set.
A  Cl (B) and B  Cl ( A) are non-empty.
Remark 3.2 If A and B are     separate sets,
then both of them are also disjoint sets.
Definition 3.3. Let ( X , ) and ( X ,  ) be
topological spaces. Then the subsets A of X is said
    disconnected, if there exists G and H in

such that
Acta Scientiarum. Technology
in
 ,
then
collection
A
the subspace or relative topology of topology
 .
Theorem 3.5. If ( X , ) a disconnected space
and ( X ,  ) is a topological space, then ( X ,  ) is
    disconnected.
Proof. As ( X , ) disconnected and   is finer
than, hence by Theorem 3.1 ( X , ) is disconnected.
Theorem 3.6. Let ( X , ) and ( X ,  ) are
spaces, then ( X , ) is
    disconnected
if and
only if there exists non-empty proper subset of X
which is both   open and   closed.
Proof. Necessity: Let ( X ,  ) be    disconnected. Then, by Definition 3.3 there exist
non-empty sets G and H in   such that
G  H is non-empty and G  H  X . Since
H  is open in   show
that G  X  H  , but it is  -closed. Hence G is
non-empty proper subset of X which is  -closed
G  H  
and
as well  -open.
Sufficiency: Suppose A is non-empty proper
subset of X such that it is  -open as well  closed. Now A is nonempty  -closed show that
X  A is non-empty and  -open. Suppose
B  X  A , then A  B  X and A  B   . Thus
A and B are non-empty disjoint  -open as well
as  -closed subset of X such that A  B  X .
Consequently X is    -disconnected.
Theorem 3.7. Every ( X ,  ) discrete space is
   -disconnected if the space contains
more than
one element.
Proof. Let ( X ,  ) be discrete space such that
X  {a, b} contains more than one element. But  is
discrete topology so   { , X ,{a},{b}} and family
of all  -open sets is    { , X , {a}, {b}} .
Maringá, v. 37, n. 3, p. 395-399, July-Sept., 2015
On α- τ-disconnectedness and α- τ-connectedness in topological spaces
 -closed sets are  , X ,{a},{b} . Since {a}
is non-empty proper subset of X which is both
 -open and  -closed in X . Finally, we can
All
say
that
( X ,  )
is
   -disconnected by
Theorem 3.6.
Theorem 3.8. A topological space ( X ,  ) is
   -connected
397
Sufficiency:
disconnected
Suppose
and
that
M A  NA
   A    A -
A is
is
a
disconnection on A . By definition, we can say that
M A , NA   ;
M A , NA  A ;
if and only if one non-empty
subset which is both  -open and  -closed in
X is X itself.
Proof. Necessity: Assume that ( X ,  ) is    -
( A  M A )  ( A  NA )   ;
connected topological space. So, our assumption
show that ( X ,  ) is not  -disconnected i.e. there
M A  A  M 1 , NA  A  N1 . But by (1) we can
does not exist a pair of non-empty disjoin  -open
and  -closed A and B such that, A  B = X .
This shows that there exist non-empty subsets
(other than X ) which are both and  -open and  closed in X .
Sufficiency: Suppose that ( X ,  ) is topological
space such that the only non-empty subsets of X
which is  -open as well as  -closed in X is X
itself. By hypothesis, there does not exist a partition
of the space X . Hence X is not
  disconnected i.e.    connected.
Theorem 3.9. Let A be a non-empty subset of
 A be the relative
   -disconnected if
topological space ( X , ) . Let
topology on A , then A is
A is    A -disconnected.
Proof. Necessity: Let A be a    -disconnected
and let G  H  be a    -disconnection on A .
By Definition 3.3, there exists non-empty G and
H  in   such that
A  G , A  H   ;
( A  G )  ( A  H )   ;
( A  G )  ( A  H  )  A.
and only if
Now by the definition of relative topology, if
G and H  in   ,then there exist G1 and H 1
in   such that G  A  G and H   A  H  .
A
Now by (1)
1
1
G1 and H 1 are non-empty. Hence
A  G1 and A  H 1 are non-empty.
Similarly by (2) and (3), we can say that
( A  G1 )  ( A  H1 )   and ( A  G1 )  ( A  H 1 )  A
respectively.
Consequently
disconnected.
Acta Scientiarum. Technology
A
is
   A -
( A  M A )  ( A  NA )  A .
Now (2)  there exists M 1 , N1   such that
say
A  M 1 , A  N1   .
that
Now
( A  M  )  A  ( A  M  )  ( A  A)  M   A  M 1 .
A
1
1
Similarly we can say that A  NA  A  N1 .
Now (3)  ( A  M 1 )  ( A  N1 )   .
 ( A  M 1 )  ( A  N1 )  A .
Finally, we can say that A is     disconnected.
Similarly (4)
Theorem 3.10. The union of two non-empty
   -separate subsets of topological space
( X ,  ) is    -disconnected.
Proof. Let A and B be     separate subsets
of ( X ,  ) . Then by definition 3.1, we can say that
A and B non-empty.
A  Cl ( B), B  Cl ( A)   ;
A  B  .
Let X  Cl ( A)  G and X  Cl ( B)  H . Then
Cl (A) and Cl (B) are non-empty  -closed subsets
of X which shows that G and H  are non-empty
 -open subsets of X .
Since,
G  H   ( X  Cl ( A))  ( X  Cl ( B ))  X  Cl ( A)  Cl ( B )
we have
( A  B)  G  ( A  B)  ( X  Cl ( B))
 [ A  ( X  Cl ( B))]  [ B  ( X  Cl ( B))]
 B
( A  B)  G  B .
Similarly, ( A  B)  H  A. Now (1) shows
that
( A  B)  G , ( A  B)  H    .
Additionally, (3) shows that
Maringá, v. 37, n. 3, p. 395-399, July-Sept., 2015
398
Mishra
[( A  B)  H ]  [( A  B)  G ]   and
Theorem 3.12. A subset Y of a topological space
X is    -disconnected if and only if it is union
of two    -separate sets.
[( A  B)  H ]  [( A  B)  G ]  A  B
Proof. Necessity: Suppose Y  A  B,
Finally, we can say that there exists G and
H  in   such that
( A  B)  G , ( A  B)  H  
[( A  B)  H ]  [( A  B)  G ]   and
[( A  B)  H ]  [( A  B)  G ]  A  B .
 H  is a    -disconnection of
A  B. Hence A  B is    -disconnected.
Theorem 3.11. Let ( X , ) and ( X ,  ) be
topological spaces and A be a subset of X and let
G  H  be a    -disconnection of A. Then
A  G and A  H  are    -separate subsets
So, G
of topological space ( X ,  ) .
G  H  be a given    disconnection of subset A of ( X ,  ) . To prove
A  G and A  H  are    -separate subsets,
Proof.
Let
we must show that
A  G and A  H are non-empty;
[Cl ( A  G )]  ( A  H )  
and
[Cl ( A  H )]  ( A  G )   ;
( A  G ) and ( A  H ) is non-empty;
( A  G )  ( A  H  )   ;
( A  G )  ( A  H )  A.
To prove (2) suppose it is not possible i.e.
x  Cl ( A  G )
and
x  A, x  H  , that is
( A  G )  H   .
Therefore ( A  G )  ( A  H )   . But it is
contrary to (5). Finally our assumption that is
wrong.
Acta Scientiarum. Technology
(Y  G )  (Y  H )  Y .
Since (Y  G ) and (Y  H  ) are separated sets,
if we write A  (Y  G ) and B  (Y  H  ), then
by (3) Y  A  B . Finally, we can say that there
exist two    -separate sets A and B in X such
that Y  A  B.
Theorem 3.13. If Y is an    -connected
subset of topological space X such that Y  A  B,
where
A and
B is
   -connected,
then
Proof. Since the inclusion Y  A  B holds by
the hypothesis we have ( A  B)  Y  Y which
yields that Y  (Y  A)  (Y  B). Now we want
to prove that (Y  A), (Y  B)  . Suppose,
Now,
(Y  A), (Y  B)  .
(Y  A)  Cl (Y  B))   .
Then, there exists x  Cl ( A  G )  ( A  H  )
that
(Y  G )  (Y  H  )   ;
(Y  Cl (Y ))  ( A  Cl ( B))  (Y  ( A  Cl ( B))  Y    
Cl ( A  G )  ( A  H )   .
implies
Y  G and Y  H are non-empty;
(Y  A)  Cl (Y  B)  (Y  A)  (Cl (Y )  Cl ( B)) 
Evidently, (4)  (1).
which
A and B are    -separate sets of X .
A  B is    By
theorem
3.10,
disconnected. Hence, Y is    -disconnected.
Sufficiency: Let Y is    -disconnected. To
prove that there exists two    -separate subsets
of A, B in X such that Y  A  B. By assumption,
Y is    -disconnected show that there exists a
   -disconnection G  H  of Y . Therefore
by Definition 3.3, we can say that there exists G
H  in   such that
Y  A and Y  B.
Now by our assumption and definition, we can
say that there exist G , H   such that
where
i.e.,
Similarly,
we
can
prove
that
Cl (Y  A)  (Y  B)  . Hence, from the above
result we can say that Y is a union of two    separate sets (Y  A) and (Y  B) . Consequently,
Y is    -disconnected. But this contradicts the
fact that Y is    -connected. Hence we can say
that
Now
if
(Y  A) ,
(Y  B)   .
Maringá, v. 37, n. 3, p. 395-399, July-Sept., 2015
On α- τ-disconnectedness and α- τ-connectedness in topological spaces
(Y  A)   , then
Y    (Y  B)  (Y  B)
which gives that Y  B. Similarly, we can prove that
Y  A if (Y  A)   .
Conclusion
We have introduced new approach of separate
sets, disconnected sets and connected sets called
    separate sets,     disconnected sets
and     connected sets of topological spaces
with the help of   open and   closed sets and
investigated their properties. The results of this
paper will help to study various weak and strong
form of connectedness and disconnectedness in
topological spaces and it can be also applied for the
study of topology in robotics, topological modeling
and geographical information system.
Acknowledgements
I am very thankful to referee and my colleague Dr.
A. K. Srivastva for providing useful commnets for
improvement of the paper.
399
EGENHOFER, M. J.; FRANZOSA, R. D. Point-Set
Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of
Geographical Information System, v. 5, n. 2, p. 161174, 1991.
FARBER, M.; TABACHNIKOV, S.; YUZVINSKY, S.
Topological robotics: Motion planning in projective
spaces.
International
Mathematical
Research
Notices, v. 34, p. 1853-1870, 2003.
LEVINE, N. Semi-open sets and Semi-continuity in
Topological Spaces. The American Mathematical
Monthly, v. 70, n. 1, p. 63-41, 1963.
MASHHOUR, A. S.; MONSEF, A. E.; DEEB, S. N. E.
On Precontinuous and Weak Precontinuous Mapping.
Proceedings of the Mathematical and Physical
Society of Egypt, v. 53, p. 47-53, 1982.
MAHESHWARI, S. N.; JAIN, P. C. Some New
Mappings. Mathematica, v. 24, n. 1-2, p. 53-55, 1982.
NJASTAD, O. On Some Classes of Nearly Open Sets.
Pacific Journal of Mathematics, v. 15, n. 3, p. 961-970,
1965.
Reference
Received on May 23, 2012.
Accepted on September 28, 2012.
CLEMENTINI, E.; SHARMA, J.; EGENHOFER, M. J.
Modelling topological spatial relations Strategies for query
processing. Computers and Graphics, v. 18, n. 6,
p. 815-822, 1994.
License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Acta Scientiarum. Technology
Maringá, v. 37, n. 3, p. 395-399, July-Sept., 2015