* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Design of a Low Noise Amplifier and Mixer in 0
Flip-flop (electronics) wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Power dividers and directional couplers wikipedia , lookup
Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup
Oscilloscope history wikipedia , lookup
Audio crossover wikipedia , lookup
Tektronix analog oscilloscopes wikipedia , lookup
Standing wave ratio wikipedia , lookup
Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup
Wilson current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Transistor–transistor logic wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Analog-to-digital converter wikipedia , lookup
Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup
Current mirror wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Wien bridge oscillator wikipedia , lookup
Operational amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Design of a Low Noise Amplifier and Mixer in 0.5um CMOS Process Dr. Yao RFIC Design EE 5390 Miguel Hernandez IV Rebecca Sullivan April 19, 2004 Abstract The performance of a single ended low noise amplifier (LNA) and a doubly balanced Gilbert mixer fabricated in a 0.5um CMOS process are presented. The LNA operates in the 940MHz to 980MHz frequency range, and has demonstrated a voltage gain of 21dB, a noise figure of 1.25dB, and an input impedance of 48.43 at 960 MHz. The P1dB was found to be –15.03dBm. The IIP3 was not measured due to a problem with convergence. The system used a total current of 3.68mA. The mixer is operated with an RF input of 960MHz and an LO input of 950MHz. The mixer has demonstrated a conversion gain of 20dB, a DC offset of 0.39mV, LO leakage at the IF output of 8.4x10-17V, and LO leakage at the RF input of 0.0V. Introduction Many communication systems require that small signals be amplified while preventing the addition of noise hence, preserving a signal-to-noise ratio at low power levels. The role of an LNA in a receiver design is to do precisely this task. LNA’s are also constructed to amplify large signals while avoiding distortion, thus eliminating channel interference. Often the first stage of a receiver is an LNA and its main function is to provide the gain needed to prevail over the noise of the stages that follow, such as the noise created by mixers. Communication systems also require baseband information signals to be shifted to a frequency suitable for electromagnetic propagation to the desired destination. At the destination, we reverse this process, shifting the received radiofrequency signal back to baseband to allow the recovery of the information it contains. This frequency- shifting function is known as mixing; the stages that perform it are mixers. Any device that exhibits amplitude-nonlinear behavior can serve as a mixer, as nonlinear distortion results in the production, from the signals present at the input of a device, of signals at new frequencies. The RF port senses the signal to be converted and the LO port senses the periodic waveform generated by the local oscillator. The IF port contains the frequency translated signal. Theory and Design LNA. When designing a low noise amplifier, considerations must be taken to the tradeoffs between specifications such as the desired gain, the noise figure, input impedance, and power consumption. All of the LNA parameters are important but they do not always work in each other’s favor. The tradeoffs include an increase in power consumption when the width of the design NMOS transistor increases or if the dc voltage increases. The noise figure increases if additional noise, such as thermal noise from resistors is added. The gain of the amplifier changes when the dc voltage changes or when the widths of the transistors are changed, unfortunately, the total current of the design increases as well. Also the capacitances and inductances at the input and output of the system affect the input impedance and the peak gain of the amplifier, respectively. Furthermore, two main design methods for low noise amplifiers are discussed. They are the wideband design method and the narrowband design method. An important difference between the two is their frequency response. For instance, wideband low noise amplifiers require a wideband matching network that is needed to provide a flat frequency response at the output, while narrowband low noise amplifiers require a matching network at the input and output. For this project, the narrowband LNA design method is chosen because it also differs from a wideband LNA in that it is able to reduce the DC power substantially in addition to providing good quality low-noise performance. The specifications for the LNA designed are shown in Table 1 and the design itself shown in Figure 1. Table 1: LNA Design Specifications Frequency range : Input Impedance, |Zin| 940 MHz ~ 980 MHz 50 Ohms ±10% Voltage gain, Av > 20 dB Noise Figure, NF < 3 dB P1dB > -20 dBm IIP3 > -10 dBm Total current < 5 mA Figure 1: Single-ended Low Noise Amplifier When simulating the s-parameters, the component values were adjusted in order to provide better results. The component values used for the design are shown in Table 2. Table 2: Component Values Vdd 2.7 V R1 2 KΩ R2 15 KΩ Ld 7 nH Lg 7 nH Ls 1.5 nH Cb 10 pF CL 3.6 pF Zin 50 Ω Zout 1.5 kΩ M1 900 μm M2 700 μm M3 150 μm Mixer. Mixers can be divided into four categories: Passive, active, singlebalanced, and double-balanced. Passive mixers do not provide any gain, and typically achieve higher linearity. Active mixers, on the other hand, provide gain and help reduce the effect of noise contributed by subsequent stages. Single-balanced mixers accept a differential LO signal and a single-ended RF signal. A drawback of this topology is LOIF leakage. A double-balanced mixer accepts both differential LO and RF signals. It has an advantage over signal-balanced mixers in that LO-IF feedthrough is cancelled. Because of the advantages that active mixers and double-balanced topologies provide, an active mixer with a double-balanced topology, also known as a Gilbert mixer, was selected, and is shown in Figure 2. The proposed mixer was designed with the following design specifications shown in Table 2 in mind. Table 2. Mixer Design Specifications RF Input LO Input (positive node) LO Input (negative node) IF Output Frequency [MHz] 960 950 950 10 Amplitude [V] 0.001 0.2 0.2 n/a DC Level [V] 0 2 2 n/a One of the most important design parameters of a mixer is the conversion gain. The conversion gain of a mixer is defined as the ratio of the IF voltage amplitude and the RF voltage amplitude. The equation that describes the conversion gain for the proposed Gilbert mixer is shown below: Gc 4 g m1 xRL (1) where, gm1 = transconductance of transistor M1 RL = load resistance. With the design specifications and conversion gain in mind, the Gilbert mixer in Figure 2 was designed and simulated in Advanced Design System. Table 3 shows the values of all components used in the Gilbert Mixer. Figure 2. Gilbert Mixer Table 3: Component Values Component Value Unit R1 500 Ohms R2 500 Ohms Vdd 5 V Iss 10 mA W_M1 500 Um L_M1 0.5 Um W_M2 500 Um L_M2 0.5 Um W_M3 500 Um L_M3 0.5 Um W_M4 500 Um L_M4 0.5 Um W_M5 500 Um L_M5 0.5 Um Results LNA. The following results were all measured by using the Advanced Design System. Figure 3 shows a plot of the input impedance of the amplifier. Figure 4 shows the amplifier gain. Figure 5 shows the noise figure of the amplifier. Table 4 shows the results measured for the design at 940MHz, 960MHz, and 980MHz. Figure 3: Input impedance of LNA Figure 4: Voltage Gain of LNA m2 22 m1 freq= 960.0MHz S(1,1)=0.611 / -92.036 impedance = Z0 * (0.442 - j0.862) S(1,1) dB(S(2,1)) 21 20 m2 freq= 963.0MHz dB(S(2,1))=21.527 19 18 m1 17 940 945 950 freq (940.0MHz to 980.0MHz) Voltage Gain, Av (dB) Noise Figure, NF (dB) Input impedance (Ω) nf(2) 1.26 m3 1.25 m3 freq=960.0MHz nf(2)=1.250 1.23 945 950 955 960 965 freq, MHz 965 970 975 970 975 940 MHz 960 MHz 980 MHz 17.854 21.406 19.413 1.269 1.25 1.231 63.49 48.43 59.33 980 P1db (dBm) -15.03 Mixer. Figures 6 and 7 below show the IF voltage output at 10MHz and the RF voltage input at 960MHz respectively. The conversion gain, defined as the ratio of the IF voltage output to the RF voltage input, DC offset at IF, and LO leakage at IF and RF are shown in Table 5. 980 Table 4: Design Metrics 1.27 940 960 freq, MHz Figure 5: Noise Figure of LNA 1.24 955 Figure 6: IF Voltage Output Figure 7: RF Voltage Input Vif Vrf 0.0020 m1 0.012 0.0018 0.0016 mag(HB.VrfP) mag(HB.Vo) 0.010 0.008 m1 freq= 10.00MHz mag(HB.Vo)=0.010 0.006 0.004 0.0014 0.0010 0.0008 0.0006 0.0004 0.002 m2 0.0012 0.0002 m2 freq= 960.0MHz mag(HB.VrfP)=0.001 0.0000 0.000 -10 0 10 20 30 940 960 freq, MHz freq, MHz Table 5: Metrics Metric Conversion Gain Conversion Gain Amplitude of LO leakage at IF Output Amplitude of LO leakage at RF Input DC Offset at IF Output Unit [V] [dB] Value 10.4 20.4 [V] 8.40E-17 [mV] [V] 0 0.39 Conclusion The performance of a single ended low noise amplifier (LNA) and a doubly balanced Gilbert mixer fabricated in a 0.5um CMOS process were presented. The LNA demonstrated a voltage gain of 21 dB, a noise figure of 1.25 dB, and an input impedance of 48.43 at 960 MHz. The P1dB was found to be –15.03 dBm, the IIP3 was not measured due to a problem with convergence, and the system used a total current of 3.68 mA. The mixer demonstrated a conversion gain of 20dB, a DC offset of 980 0.39mV, LO leakage at the IF output of 8.4x10-17V, and LO leakage at the RF input of 0.0V. References T. Lee, “The Design of CMOS Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits,” pp. 272- 305, 1998 B. Leung, “VLSI for Wireless Communication”, pp.74- 114, 2002 J. Lucek and R. Damen, “Designing an LNA for a CDMA Front End”, www.rfdesign.com, February 1999 V. Geffroy, G. De Astis, E. Bergeault, “RF Mixers Using Standard Digital CMOS 0.35um Process,” IEEE MTT-S Digest, 2001 B. Leung, “VLSI for Wireless Communication,” pp. 118-216, 2002 T. Lee, “The Design of CMOS Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits,” pp. 134144, 178-216, 308-337, 1998 B. Razavi, “RF Microelectronics,” pp.180-204, 1998 P.J. Sullivan, B.A Xavier, W.H. Ku, “Low Voltage Performace of a Microwave CMOS Gilbert Cell Mixer,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 32, No. 7, July 1997