Download REGBASE: A Distributed Information Infrastructure for Regulation

D. Bibliography
1.
ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities, The Access Board, 1998.
2.
Alchourron, C. A. and Makinson, “Hierarchies of Regulations and Their Logic,” in New Studies in
Deontic Logic, Hilpinen (ed.), Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, pp.125-148, 1981.
3.
Appalachain Power Co. v. E.P.A., 208 F.3d 1015 (D.C. Cir. 2000).
4.
Barwise, J and Seligman, J., Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed Systems, Cambridge University
Press, 1997.
5.
Beazer East, Inc. v. U.S. EPA, Region III, 963 F.2d 603 (3rd Cir. 1992).
6.
Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto. B., Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 1999.
7.
Bench-Capon, T. Knowledge Based Systems and Legal Applications, The APIC Series 36, Academic
Press, 1991.
8.
Bieder, P. and Cuppens, F., “Expression of Confidentiality Policies with Deontic Logic,” in Deontic Logic
in Computer Science, Meyer, J-J. Ch. and Wieringa, R. J. (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York. Pp. 103123, 1993.
9.
BNA Compliance Assistance Newsletter, http://www.bna.com, BNA's Environmental Compliance
Bulletin, Volume 09 Number 22, Page 351, October 28, 2002.
10. Botkin, A., “Wizards, Advisors and Websites, Oh My! Interactive Electronic Tools for Compliance
Assistance,” presented at the National Compliance Assistance Providers Forum, co-sponsored by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, San Antonio,
December, 2002,
11. Breuker, J.A.P.J., “On Legal Information Serving,” in Legal Knowledge Based System, Grutters, C. A. F.
M., et.. al. (ed.)., Koninklijke Vermande BV, Lelystad, pp. 93-102, 1992.
12. British Standard 8300, British Standards Institute, 2001
13. Brüninghaus, S., Ashley, K., “Finding Factors: Learning to Classify Case Opinions under Abstract Fact
Categories,” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp.
123-131, 1997.
14. Buck, S.J., Understanding Environmental Administration and Law, Island Press, 1991.
15. Business Compliance One Stop Workshop, Small Business Administration, Queenstown, MD, July 2426th, 2002.
16. Business & Legal Reports, Inc, David L. Galt (Legal Editor), http://www1.blr.com/
17. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (Social Security), Division 4.5, Chapter 12, Standards Applicable
to Generators of Hazardous Waste, Barclays (Publisher), 1997. (Other relevant titles include Title 14
Natural Resources, Title 27 Environmental Protection and others. See http://ccr.oal.ca.gov/ for latest
electronic version).
18. Code of Federal Regulation, Title 40: Protection of Environment, (Part 260-265: Hazardous Waste
Management System) 2003. (see http://www.access.gpo/ecfr/ for electronic version).
19. De Vey Mestdagh, C.N.J., et.al., “The Logic of Reasonable Inferences,” in Legal Knowledge Based
System, Breuker, J. A., et.al. (ed.), Koninklijke Vermande BV, pp. 60-76, 1991.
20. Deerwester, S., et al., “Indexing by latent semantic analysis,” Journal of the American Society of
Information Science, pp.391-407, 1990
21. Diane E. Oliver, Y. Shahar, E.H. Shortliffe, M.A. Musen: “Representation of Change on Controlled
Medical Terminologies,” Proc. AMIA Conference, Oct.1998.
1
22. Digital Consortium, NSF/EPA workshop, Washington D.C., October 18, 2001,
23. Dorre, J., Gerstl, P. and Seiffert, R., “Text mining: finding nuggets in mountains of textual data,” In
Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 398401, 1999.
24. Erdelez, S. and S. O’Hare, “Legal Informatics: Application of Information Technology in Law,” in Annual
Review of Information Science and Technology, M. E. Williams(ed.), ASIS, Vol. 32, 1997.
25. Fensel, D. and Van Harmelen, F., “A Comparison of Languages which Operationalize and Formalize
KADS Models of Expertise,” The Knowledge Engineering Review, 9(2):104-146, 1994.
26. Fenves, S.J., J.H. Garrett, H. Kilicote, K.H. Law and K.A. Reed, “Computer Representations of Design
Standards and Building Codes: US Perspective,” The International Journal of Construction Information
Technology, 3(1):13-34, 1994.
27. Fontane, J.E., “Prospects for Improving the Regulatory Process Using E-Rulemaking,” Communications
of the ACM, 46(1):63-64, 2003.
28. Genesereth, M., Knowledge Interchange Format, Technical Report Logic-92-1, Stanford University,
1992.
29. Giarratano, J. and G. Riley, Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, 2nd Edition, PWS. Publishing
Company, 1994.
30. Greiner, R., Darken, C., Santaso, N. I., “Efficient Reasoning”, ACM Computing Surveys, 33(1):1-30,
2001.
31. Gruber, T.R., “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition,
5(2):199-220, 1993.
32. Han, C.S., Disabled Access Code Compliance and Usability Design Assistance in An Integrated Modular
Computer Environment, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford
University, June 2000.
33. Heenan, C., Manual and Technology-Based Approaches to Using Classification for the Facilitation of
Access to Unstructured Text, (unpublished manuscript), Engineering Informatics Group, Department of
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, January, 2002.
available at
http://eil.stanford.edu/regnet,
34. Heenan, C., A Review of Academic Research on Information Retrieval, (unpublished manuscript),
Engineering Informatics Group, Department of Civil an Environmental Engineering, Stanford University,
August, 2002. available at http://eil.stanford.edu/regnet,
35. Heffron, F.A., McFeeley, N., The Administrative Regulatory Process, Longman, pg 293, 1983.
36. Hovy, E., “Using an Ontology to Simplify Data Access,” Communications of the ACM, 46(1):47-49, 2003.
37. International Building Code 2000, International Conference for Building Officials, 2000.
38. Jannink, J., Srinvasan, P. Verheijen, D. and Wiederhold, G., “Encapsulation and Composition of
Ontologies,” Proc. AAAI Summer Conference, Madison WI, AAAI, July 1998.
39. Kerrigan, S., An Internet-Enabled Software Framework For Regulation Compliance Assistance, Ph.D.
Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University (under preparation,
expected date of completion: June, 2003.)
40. Kerrigan, S., Lau, G., Zhou, L., Law, K.H., and Wiederhold, G. “Information Infrastructure for Regulation
Management and Compliance Checking,” National Conference on Digital Government Research, Los
Angeles, May 21-23, 2001, pp. 167-170., 2001.
2
41. Kerrigan, S., Heenan, C. and Law, K.H., “Regnet: An Infrastructure for Regulatory Information
Management and Compliance Assistance,” National Conference on Digital Government Research, Los
Angeles, CA, May 20-22, 2002.
42. Killicote, H. A Standard Processing Framework, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engr., Carnegie-Mellon
University, Pittsburgh, PA 1997.
43. Kowalski, R. “The Treatment of Negation in Logic Programs for Representing Legislation,” Second
International Conference on AI and Law, Vancover, Canada, pp. 11-15, 1989.
44. Lau, G.T., Law, K.H. and Kumar, B. , “A Regulatory Information Infrastructure with Application to
Accessibility Codes,” INCLUDE 2003, Royal College of Art, London, March 2003.
45. Lau, G.T., Law, K.H. and Wiederhold, G., “Similarity Analysis on Government Regulations,” (submitted
for consideration) the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mining, Washington, DC, August 2003.
46. Law, K.H and N. Yabuki, “An Integrated Approach to Design Standards Representation, Processing and
Documentation,” The International Journal of Construction Information Technology, 3(1):91-111, 1994.
47. Lesk, M. Discussion at Bellcore, 1990.
48. Liu, D., Law, K.H. and Wiederhold, G. “CHAOS: An Active Security Mediation System,” Advanced
Information Systems Engineering (CAISE 12), June 2000, Stockholm, Sweden, Springer LNCS., 2000.
49. Maluf, D. A., “Implementing Articulation Rules for Object Request Brokers as an Extension to Production
Systems,” IEEE Knowledge and Data Engineering Exchange Workshop, Newport Beach, California,
1997.
50. Maluf, D. A. and Wiederhold, G., “Abstraction of Representation for Interoperation,” Tenth International
Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer
Verlog, 1997.
51. Manning, D. and Schutze. H., Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press,
1999.
52. McCarthy, J., “Notes on Formalizing Context,” Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint
Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1993.
53. McCarty, T., “Reflections on Taxman: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning,”
Harvard Law Review, 1977.
54. McCune, W.W., “Otter 3.0 Reference Manual and Guide.” ANL-94/6, Mathematics and Computer
Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 1994.
55. McGregor, R. and R. Bates, “The LOOM Knowledge Representation Language,” in Proceedings of the
Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, April, 1987.
56. Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G. and Kersten, M. “A Graph-Oriented Model for Articulation of Ontology
Interdependencies"; Proc. Extending DataBase Technologies (EDBT), Konstanz, Germany, Springer
Verlag LNCS, March 2000.
57. Mitra, P., Wiederhold, G. and Decker, S., “A Scalable Framework for Interoperation of Information
Sources.” Proceedings of the 1st International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS `01), Stanford
University, Stanford, CA, July 29-Aug 1, 2001,
58. Mitra, P. and Wiederhold, G. “An Algebra for Semantic Interoperability of Information Sources,”
Proceedings of 2nd. IEEE Symp. on BioInformatics and Bioengineering, BIBE 2001, Bethesda, MD, Nov.
2001.
3
59. Mitra, P. and Wiederhold, G., “Resolving Terminological Heterogeneity in Ontologies,”
Proceedings of Workshop on Ontologies and Semantic Interoperability at the 15th European Conference
on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 2002. Lyon, France, July 2002.
60. National Compliance Assistance Providers Forum, co-sponsored by U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. San Antonio, December, 2002,
61. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Pollution Prevention Unit, Environmental
Compliance And Pollution Prevention Guide for Vehicle Maintenance Shops, April 2002. (PDF document
available online at: http://www.dec.state.ny.us/website/ppu/ecppvms.pdf)
62. Occupational Safety & Health Administration. (see http://www.OSHA.gov/)
63. Panchapagesan, Priya, Joshua Hui, Gio Wiederhold, Stephan Erickson, Lynn Dean, and Antoinette
Hempstead: "The INEEL (Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory) Data Integration
Mediation System"; Proc. International ICSC Symposium on Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis
(AIDA'99), Rochester, NY, June 1999.
64. Percival, R.V., Miller, A.S., Schroeder, C.H., and Leape, J.P., Environmental Regulation: Law Science,
and Policy, third edition, Aspen Law & Business, 2000.
65. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press, Oslo,
Norway, June, 1999.
66. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ACM Press, St. Louis,
May 2001
67. Rechtschaffen, C., “Competing Visions: EPA And The States Battle For The Future Of Environmental
Enforcement,” Environmental Law Reporter, 30 Envtl. L. Rep. 10803, September 2000.
68. Regulatory Flexibility Act / Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (RFA/SBREFA), Pub
Law No. 104-121, March 29, 1996. (available at http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/statute.htm)
69. Romine, M., “Politics, The Environment, And Regulatory Reform At The Environmental Protection
Agency,” Environmental Lawyer, September 1999.
70. Royles, C. A., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., “Dynamic Tailoring of Law Related Documents To User Needs,”
DEXA Workshop, 609-613, 1998.
71. Royles, C.A., Intelligent Presentation and Tailoring of Online Legal Information, Ph.D. Thesis,
University of Liverpool, 2000.
72. Salton, G., The smart retrieval system - experiments in automatic document processing. Prentice Hall Inc.,
1971.
73. Salton, G. and Buckley, C., “Term-weighting approaches in automatic retrieval,” Information Processing
and Management, 24(5):513-523, 1988.
74. Salzman, J., Ruhl, J.B. and Song, K.-S., “Regulatory Traffic Jams,” 2 Wyo. L. Rev. 253, 2002.
75. Sergot, M., “The Representation of Law in Computer Programs,” in Bench-Capon, T. (ed.) Knowledge
Based Systems and Legal Applications, The APIC Series 36, Academic Press, pp. 3-67, 1991.
76. Shanahan, M., Solving the Frame Problem: A Mathematical Investigation of the Common Sense Law of
Inertia, MIT Press, 1997.
77. SKC project: Description of Scalable Knowledge Composition project; Stanford Computer Science
department, http://www-db.stanford.edu/SKC/, 1999
78. Sowa, J.F., Knowledge Representation, Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations, PWS
Publishing Company, 1998.
4
79. Stasiak, D, M., et.al., “A broker for Tracking, Delivering and Using Regulations over the World Wide
Web,” IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 293-297, 1996
80. Stoll, R.G., Coping with the RCRA Hazardous Waste System: A Few Practical Points for Fun and Profit,
American Law Institute – American Bar Association Continuing Legal Education, 1990.
81. Stoll, R.G., “Court Forces EPA to Comply with Due Process Standards,” Andrews Hazardous Waste Litig.
21, No. 4 Rep. 10, 2001.
82. Stranierim, A., Zeleznikow, J., “The evaluation of legal knowledge based systems,” Proceedings of the
Seventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 18-24, 1999.
83. TIHI/SAW
projects:
Security
Mediators
for
Access
Wrapping
http://wwwdb.stanford.edu/pub/gio/TIHI/TIHI.html; Stanford University Computer Science department, 1999.
84. Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards, The Access Board, 1986.
85. Visser, P. R. S. and van Kralingen, R. W., “Reasoning about Definitions in Statutes,” in Legal Knowledge
Based System, Breuker, J. A., et.al. (ed.)., Koninklijke Vermande BV, pp. 113-122, 1991.
86. Wahlgren, P., Automation of Legal Reasoning, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1992.
87. Wang, J., Distributed Information Organization and Management for Hazardous Waste Regulation
Compliance Checking, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford
University, to be submitted, March, 2003.
88. Wiederhold, G., “Interoperation, Mediation, and Ontology’s,” Proceedings International Symposium of
Fifth Generation Computer System, Workshop on Heterogeneous Cooperative Knowledge-Bases, Vol.
W3, 33-48, ICOT, Tokyo, Japan, 1994.
89. Wiederhold, G., “An Algebra for Ontology Composition,” Proceedings of 1994 Monterey Workshop on
Formal Methods, US. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA pp. 56-61, 1994.
90. Wiederhold, G. and Genesereth, M, “The Basis for Mediation,” COOPIS, Vienna, 1995.
91. Wiederhold, G., Bilello, M., Sarathy, V. and Qian, X.L., “Protecting Collaboration,” Proceedings of the
National Information Systems Security Conference (NISSC'96), Baltimore MD, pp.561-569, 1996.
92. Wiederhold, G., Bilello, M., Sarathy, V. and Qian, X.L., “A security mediator for health care
information,” In Proceedings of the 1996 AMIA Conference, pages 120-124, Oct. 1996.
93. Wiederhold, G. and Genesereth:, M., “The Conceptual Basis for Mediation Services,” IEEE Expert,
Vol.12 No.5, pages 38-47, Sep.-Oct. 1997.
94. Wiederhold, G., Bilello, M. and Donahue, C., “Web Implementation of a Security Mediator for Medical
Databases.” Database Security XI, Status and Prospects, IFIP / Chapman & Hall, pp.60-72, 1998.
95. Wiederhold, Gio and Michel Bilello: "Protecting Inappropriate Release of Data from Realistic Databases";
Proc. of Data and Expert Systems (DEXA) Security Workshop, IEEE, August 1998, pp.330-339.
96. Wiederhold, G., “Collaboration Requirements: A Point of Failure in Protecting Information,” IEEE
Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol.31 No.4, pages 336-342, July 2001,
97. Wiederhold, G. “Obtaining Precision when Integrating Information,” in J.Filipe, Sharp, B. and Miranda,
P. (Eds.), Enterprise Information Systems III, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands,
2002
98. Wildemast, C. A. M. and Mulder, R. V., “Some Designs Considerations for a Conceptual Legal
Information Retrieval System,” in Legal Knowledge Based Systems, Grutters C. and Breuker, J (ed.) ,
Koninklijke Vermande BV, Lelystad., pp. 81-90, 1992.
5
99. Workshop on E-Rulemaking, organized by Cary Coglianese and Jennifer Nash, Regulatory Policy
Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (sponsored by the National Science
Foundation), Washington, D.C., March, 2002,
100. Workshop on E-Rulemaking: New Directions for Technology and Regulation, organized by Cary
Coglianese and Jennifer Nash, Regulatory Policy Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard
University, (sponsored by the National Science Foundation) Cambridge, MA, January, 2003,
101. Workshop on Performance Based Regulation, Prospects and Limitations in Health, Safety, and
Environmental Protection, organized by Cary Coglianese, Jennifer Nash and Todd Olmstead, Regulatory
Policy Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University,, Washington, D.C., May, 2002,
102. Yabuki, N. An Integrated Framework for Design Standards Processing, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of
Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1992.
103. Zeleznikow, J., Hunter, D., Building Intelligent Legal Information Systems: Representation and Reasoning
in Law, Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1994.
6