Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SATELLITE NETWORKS Ian F. Akyildiz Broadband & Wireless Networking Laboratory School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Tel: 404-894-5141; Fax: 404-894-7883 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/bwn Why Satellite Networks ? Wide geographical area coverage From kbps to Gbps communication everywhere Faster deployment than terrestrial infrastructures Bypass clogged terrestrial networks and are oblivious to terrestrial disasters Supporting both symmetrical and asymmetrical architectures Seamless integration capability with terrestrial networks Very flexible bandwidth-on-demand capabilities Flexible in terms of network configuration and capacity allocation Broadcast, Point-to-Point and Multicast capabilities Scalable IFA’2004 2 Orbits Defining the altitude where the satellite will operate. Determining the right orbit depends on proposed service characteristics such as coverage, applications, delay. IFA’2004 3 Orbits (cont.) GEO (33786 km) GEO: Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Outer Van Allen Belt (13000-20000 km) MEO: Medium Earth Orbit LEO: Low Earth Orbit MEO ( < 13K km) IFA’2004 LEO ( < 2K km) Inner Van Allen Belt (1500-5000 km) 4 Types of Satellites Geostationary/Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Satellites (GSOs) (Propagation Delay: 250-280 ms) GEO: 33786 km Medium Earth Orbit Satellites (MEOs) (Propagation Delay: 110-130 ms) Highly Elliptical Satellites (HEOs) (Propagation Delay: Variable) Low Earth Orbit Satellite (LEOs) (Propagation Delay: 20-25 ms) LEO: < 2K km (Globalstar, Iridium, Teledesic) MEO: < 13K km (Odyssey, Inmarsat-P) IFA’2004 5 Geostationary/Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Satellites (GSOs) 33786 km equatorial orbit Rotation speed equals Earth rotation speed (Satellite seems fixed in the horizon) Wide coverage area Applications (Broadcast/Fixed Satellites, Direct Broadcast, Mobile Services) IFA’2004 6 Advantages of GSOs Wide coverage High quality and Wideband communications Economic Efficiency Tracking process is easier because of its synchronization to Earth IFA’2004 7 Disadvantages of GSOs Long propagation delays (250-280 ms). (e.g., Typical Intern. Tel. Call 540 ms round-trip delay. Echo cancelers needed. Expensive!) (e.g., Delay may cause errors in data; Error correction /detection techniques are needed.) Large propagation loss. Requirement for high power level. (e.g., Future hand-held mobile terminals have limited power supply.) Currently: smallest terminal for a GSO is as large as an A4 paper and as heavy as 2.5 Kg. IFA’2004 8 Disadvantages of GSOs (cont.) Lack of coverage at Northern and Southern latitudes. High cost of launching a satellite. Enough spacing between the satellites to avoid collisions. Existence of hundreds of GSOs belonging to different countries. Available frequency spectrum assigned to GSOs is limited. IFA’2004 9 Medium Earth Orbit Satellites (MEOs) Positioned in 10-13K km range. Delay is 110-130 ms. Will orbit the Earth at less than 1 km/s. Applications – Mobile Services/Voice (Intermediate Circular Orbit (ICO) Project) – Fixed Multimedia (Expressway) IFA’2004 10 Highly Elliptical Orbit Satellites (HEOs) From a few hundreds of km to 10s of thousands allows to maximize the coverage of specific Earth regions. Variable field of view and delay. Examples: MOLNIYA, ARCHIMEDES (Direct Audio Broadcast), ELLIPSO. IFA’2004 11 Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOs) Usually less than 2000 km (780-1400 km are favored). Few ms of delay (20-25 ms). They must move quickly to avoid falling into Earth LEOs circle Earth in 100 minutes at 24K km/hour. (5-10 km per second). Examples: – Earth resource management (Landsat, Spot, Radarsat) – Paging (Orbcomm) – Mobile (Iridium) – Fixed broadband (Teledesic, Celestri, Skybridge) IFA’2004 12 Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOs) (cont.) Little LEOs: 800 MHz range Big LEOs: > 2 GHz Mega LEOs: 20-30 GHz IFA’2004 13 Comparison of Different Satellite Systems LEO MEO GEO Satellite Life 3-7 10-15 10-15 Hand-held Terminal Possible Possible Difficult Propagation Delay Short Medium Long Propagation Loss Low Medium High Network Complexity Complex Medium Simple Hand-off Very Medium None Visibility of a Satellite Short Medium Mostly Always IFA’2004 14 Comparison of Satellite Systems According to their Altitudes (cont.) IFA’2004 15 Why Hybrids? GSO + LEO – GSO for broadcast and management information – LEO for real-time, interactive LEO or GSO + Terrestrial Infrastructure – Take advantage of the ground infrastructure IFA’2004 16 Frequency Bands NarrowBand Systems L-Band 1.535-1.56 GHz DL; 1.635-1.66 GHz UL S-Band 2.5-2.54 GHz DL; 2.65-2.69 GHz UL C-Band 3.7-4.2 GHz DL; 5.9-6.4 GHz UL X-Band 7.25-7.75 GHz DL; 7.9-8.4 GHz UL IFA’2004 17 Frequency Bands (cont.) WideBand/Broadband Systems Ku-Band 10-13 GHz DL; 14-17 GHz UL (36 MHz of channel bandwidth; enough for typical 50-60 Mbps applications) Ka-Band 18-20 GHz DL; 27-31 GHz UL (500 MHz of channel bandwidth; enough for Gigabit applications) IFA’2004 18 Next Generation Systems: Mostly Ka-band Ka band usage driven by: – Higher bit rates - 2Mbps to 155 Mbps – Lack of existing slots in the Ku band Features – Spot beams and smaller terminals – Switching capabilities on certain systems – Bandwidth-on-demand Drawbacks – Higher fading – Manufacturing and availability of Ka band devices – Little heritage from existing systems (except ACTS and Italsat) IFA’2004 19 Frequency Bands (cont.) New Open Bands (not licensed yet) GHz of bandwidth Q-Band in the 40 GHz V-Band 60 GHz DL; 50 GHz UL IFA’2004 20 Space Environment Issues Harsh hard on materials and electronics (faster aging) Radiation is high (Solar flares and other solar events; Van Allen Belts) Reduction of lifes of space systems (12-15 years maximum). IFA’2004 21 Space Environment Issues (cont.) Debris (specially for LEO systems) (At 7 Km/s impact damage can be important. Debris is going to be regulated). Atomic oxygen can be a threat to materials and electronics at LEO orbits. Gravitation pulls the satellite towards earth. Limited propulsion to maintain orbit (Limits the life of satellites; Drags an issue for LEOs). Thermal Environment again limits material and electronics life. IFA’2004 22 Basic Architecture LAN Ring Mobile Network Internet Ring Public Network Internet MAN Ethernet Wireless Terrestrial Network Ethernet SIU-- Satellite Unit Unit SIU Satellite Interface Interworking IFA’2004 23 Basic Architecture (cont.) SIU - Satellite Interworking Unit IFA’2004 24 Satellite Interworking Unit (SIU) IFA’2004 25 Payload Concepts Bent Pipe Processing Onboard Processing Onboard Switching IFA’2004 26 Bent-Pipe Protocol Stack (Internet) Satellite Applications Physical Applications TCP TCP IP IP Network Network Medium Access Control Medium Access Control Data Link Control Data Link Control Physical Physical User Terminal User Terminal IFA’2004 27 Onboard Processing Protocol Stack (Internet) Medium Access Control Satellite Data Link Control Physical Applications Applications TCP TCP IP IP Network Network Medium Access Control Medium Access Control Data Link Control Data Link Control Physical Physical User Terminal User Terminal IFA’2004 28 Onboard Switching Protocol Stack (Internet) Network Satellite Applications Medium Access Control Data Link Control Physical Applications TCP TCP IP IP Network Network Medium Access Control Medium Access Control Data Link Control Data Link Control Physical Physical User Terminal User Terminal IFA’2004 29 Routing Algorithms for Satellite Networks Satellites organized in planes User Data Links (UDL) Inter-Satellite Links (ISL) Short roundtrip delays Very dynamic yet predictable network topology – Satellite positions – Link availability Changing visibility from the Earth http://www.teledesic.com/tech/mGall.htm IFA’2004 30 LEO’s at Polar Orbits Seam – Border between counter-rotating satellite planes Polar Regions – Regions where the inter-plane ISLs are turned off E. Ekici, I. F. Akyildiz, M. Bender, “The Datagram Routing Algorithm for Satellite IP Networks” , IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, April 2001. E. Ekici, I. F. Akyildiz, M. Bender, “A New Multicast Routing Algorithm for Satellite IP Networks”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, April 2002. IFA’2004 31 Routing in Multi-Layered Satellite Networks IFA’2004 32 Iridium Network IFA’2004 33 Iridium Network (cont.) IFA’2004 34 Iridium Network (cont.) 6 orbits 11 satellites/orbit 48 spotbeams/satellite Spotbeam diameter = 700 km Footprint diameter = 4021km 59 beams to cover United States Satellite speed = 26,000 km/h = 7 km/s Satellite visibility = 9 - 10 min Spotbeam visibility < 1 minute System period = 100 minutes IFA’2004 35 Iridium Network (cont.) 4.8 kbps voice, 2.4 Kbps data TDMA 80 channels /beam 3168 beams globally (2150 active beams) Dual mode user handset User-Satellite Link = L-Band Gateway-Satellite Link = Ka-Band Inter-Satellite Link = Ka-Band IFA’2004 36 Operational Systems Reference Type Orbit Investors Prime Services Frequencies Antennas (cm) U/L Rates (Mbps) Number of Satellites Primary Access Multibeam ISLs Transport Protocol IFA’2004 EUTELSAT INTELSAT Bent Pipe GSO Eutelsat Various Multimedia Ku 120+ 0.016-2 1 FDMA/TDMA No No IP/ATM Bent Pipe GSO Intelsat Various Voice, Data, Video Conf. Ku 120+ 0.016-2 26 FDMA/TDMA No No IP 37 Operational Systems (cont.) Little LEOs Reference ORBCOMM VITASAT STARNET Type Bent Pipe Bent Pipe Bent Pipe Altitude (km) 775 1000 1000 Coverage Below 1 GHz Below 1 GHz Below 1 GHz Number of Satellites Mass of Satellites (kg) 36 24 24 40 150 150 IFA’2004 38 Proposed and Operational Systems 1. ICO Global Communications (New ICO) Number of Satellites: Planes: Satellites/Plane: Altitude: Orbital Inclination: Remarks: 10 2 5 10,350 km 45° Service: Voice @ 4.8 kbps, data @ 2.4 kbps and higher Operation anticipated in 2003 System taken over by private investors due to financial difficulties Estimated cost: $4,000,000,000 163 spot beams/satellite, 950,000 km2 coverage area/beam, 28 channels/beam Service link: 1.98-2.01 GHz (downlink), 2.17-2.2 GHz (uplink); (TDMA) Feeder link: 3.6 GHz band (downlink), 6.5 GHz band (uplink) IFA’2004 39 Proposed and Operational Systems (cont.) 2. Globalstar Number of Satellites: Planes: Satellites/Plane: Altitude: Orbital Inclination: Remarks: 48 8 6 1,414 km 52° Service: Voice @ 4.8 kbps, data @ 7.2 kbps Operation started in 1999 Early financial difficulties Estimated cost: $2,600,000,000 16 spot beams/satellite, 2,900,000 km2 coverage area/beam, 175 channels/beam Service link: 1.61-1.63 GHz (downlink), 2.48-2.5 GHz (uplink); (CDMA) Feeder link: 6.7-7.08 GHz (downlink), 5.09-5.25 GHz (uplink) IFA’2004 40 Proposed and Operational Systems (cont.) 3. ORBCOM Number of Satellites: Planes: Satellites/Plane: Altitude: Orbital Inclination: Remarks: 36 4 2 775 km 45° 2 2 775 km 70° Near real-time service Operation started in 1998 (first in market) Cost: $350,000,000 Service link: 137-138 MHz (downlink), 148-149 MHz (uplink) Spacecraft mass: 40 kg IFA’2004 41 Proposed and Operational Systems (cont.) 4. Starsys Number of Satellites: Planes: Satellites/Plane: Altitude: Orbital Inclination: Remarks: 24 6 4 1,000 km 53° Service: Messaging and positioning Global coverage Service link: 137-138 MHz (downlink), 148-149 MHz (uplink) Spacecraft mass: 150 kg IFA’2004 42 Proposed and Operational Systems (cont.) 5. Teledesic (original proposal) Number of Satellites: Planes: Satellites/Plane: Altitude: Orbital Inclination: Remarks: 840 (original) 21 40 700 km 98.2° Service: FSS, provision for mobile service (16 kbps – 2.048 Mbps, including video) for 2,000,000 users Sun-synchronous orbit, earth-fixed cells System cost: $9,000,000,000 ($2000 for terminals) Service link: 18.8-19.3 GHz (downlink), 28.6-29.1 GHz (uplink) (Ka band) ISL: 60 GHz Spacecraft mass: 795 kg IFA’2004 43 Proposed and Operational Systems (cont.) 6. Teledesic (final proposal) Number of Satellites: Planes: Satellites/Plane: Altitude: Remarks: 288 (scaled down) 12 24 700 km Service: FSS, provision for mobile service (16 kbps – 2.048 Mbps, including video) for 2,000,000 users Sun-synchronous orbit, earth-fixed cells System cost: $9,000,000,000 ($2000 for terminals) Service link: 18.8-19.3 GHz (downlink), 28.6-29.1 GHz (uplink) (Ka band) ISL: 60 GHz Spacecraft mass: 795 kg IFA’2004 44 References Survey Paper • Akyildiz, I.F. and Jeong, S., "Satellite ATM Networks: A Survey," IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp.30-44, July 1997. IFA’2004 45