Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
SASKPIC Taking the Mystery out of Chemical Disinfection Nicole Kenny, BSc, Assoc Chem Director of Professional & Technical Services Virox Technologies Inc Phone: 1-800-387-7578 x118 Email: [email protected] Basic Facts ¾ Disinfectants are the backbone of Infection Control Products registered in the U.S. & Canada ¾ 50% of which are used for Healthcare Infection Control ¾ There are 300 different active chemistries ¾ >8000 z z 14 are in 95% of the disinfectant products 6 are the most common Effects of Germicides on Microorganisms ¾ HCWs take for granted the action of disinfectants without fully understanding mechanism of action ¾ Differences in the action of antimicrobial ingredients ¾ Differences depending on concentration of chemical used Infection Control Today Cleaning & Disinfecting: The Effects of Germicides on Microorganisms Microorganisms Feb 2004 Chicago Tribune (2000) ¾ 75% of an estimated 103 000 patient deaths linked to HAIs ¾ Due to unsanitary facilities, unwashed hands & dirty instruments ¾ Found that hospital cleaning staff were inadequately trained & cuts cleaning budgets Computer Keyboards May Harbor Harmful Bacteria ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Harmful bacteria can survive for prolonged periods on keyboards & keyboard covers (VRE & MRSA: 24 hrs, PSAE: 1hr) More contact with contaminated keyboard increase likelihood of transmitting bacteria to hands (MRSA: 42% - 92%, VRE: 22% to 50%, PSAE: 9% to 18%) Hand Hygiene important helps cut down on transmission Cleaning & Disinfection of keyboards & keyboard covers helps decrease contamination Infection Control Today Computer Keyboards May Harbor Harmful Bacteria; Experts Advise to Use Disinfectant and Wash Your Hands April 2005 On the Same Page Terminology, Definitions, Common Words Major Groups Of Microbes Most Susceptible ¾ Viruses (enveloped) ¾ Bacteria (Gram (Gram +ve +ve & Gram -ve) ve) ¾ Fungi ¾ Viruses (non(non-enveloped) ¾ Mycobacteria ¾ Protozoa ¾ Bacterial Spores Least Susceptible Typically, the more resistant the pathogen, the more toxic the disinfectant needs to be… be… BACTERIA WITH SPORES (Bacillus subtilis, Clostridiu, tetani, C. difficile C. botulinum) High Toxicity MYCOBACTERIA (Mycobacterium tuberculosis M. avium-intracellulare, M. chelonae Hard NON-ENVELOPED VIRUSES (coxsackieviruses, polio viruses, rhinoviruses, rotaviruses, Norwalk virus, hepatitis A virus Intermediate &High Level FUNGI (Candida species, cryptococcus species, Aspergillus species, Dermatophytes) Kill VEGETATIVE BACTERIA (Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, coliforms) Low Level Disinfection ENVELOPED VIRUSES (Herpes simplex, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, EpsteinBarr virus, Measles virus, Mumps virus, Rubella virus, Influenza virus, Respiratory syncytial virus, Hepatitis B and C viruses, Hantaviruses, and Human immunodeficiency virus) Easy •Glutaraldehyde •Ethylene oxide •Phenolics •Alcohol Blends •Iodine •Bleach/Chlorine •Quat/phenol Blends •Quat/Alcohol Blends •Quat as active •Peracids AHP Chemical Sterilant PROTOZOA WITH CYSTS (Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum) Low Toxicity Process for Choosing a Disinfectant Consider the Device/Surface Classification (According to Spaulding) Once the device has been defined determine the Disinfection Process Choose the CORRECT Product Process for Choosing a Disinfectant Critical Devices Semi-Critical Devices Sterilization High Level Disinfection Intermediate Level Disinfection Low Level Disinfection Sanitizing Non-Critical Devices Environmental Surfaces Cleaning ¾ ¾ ¾ The removal of adherent visible soil, blood, protein substances (tissue) and other debris from surfaces by mechanical or manual process Generally accomplished with water and detergents Removes or eliminates the reservoirs of potential pathogenic organisms Criteria for Sanitizing ¾ A process that reduces microorganisms on surfaces to a safe level z z ¾ Food Contact Surfaces: reduction of surrogate bacterial strains by more than 55-log10 in the presence of 5% bovine serum NonNon-Food Contact Surfaces: reduction of surrogate bacterial strains by more than 33-log10 Vegetative Bacteria such as E. coli, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas and other common food borne bacteria can be used Criteria for Low Level Disinfection ¾ Bactericidal: effective against Vegetative bacteria: > 6 Log10 reduction z ¾ ¾ ¾ Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella cholerasius General Virucide: effective against the Sabin strain of Polio virus Type 1 (Hydrophilic virus), criterion is > 3 Log10 reduction Virucidal: effective against targeted viruses (enveloped or nonnon-enveloped), criterion is > 3 Log10 reduction Fungicidal: effective against criterion is > 5 Log10 z Trichophyton mentagrophytes Criteria for Intermediate Level Disinfection ¾ Bactericidal: criterion is > 6 Log10 reduction ¾ General Virucide: criterion is > 3 Log10 reduction against Polio ¾ Virucidal: criterion is > 3 Log10 reduction against specific viruses ¾ Fungicidal: effective against Trichophyton mentagrophytes, mentagrophytes, criterion is > 5 Log10 ¾ Tuberculocidal: effective against Mycobacteria terrae, terrae, criterion is > 4 Log10 Criteria for High Level Disinfection & Sterilization ¾ Fungicidal: effective against Trichophyton mentagrophytes, mentagrophytes, criterion is > 5 Log10 ¾ Tuberculocidal: effective against Mycobacteria terrae, terrae, criterion is > 6 Log10 ¾ Sporicidal: effective against Bacillus subtilis & Clostridium sporogenes, sporogenes, criterion is > 6 Log10 Disinfectants: Desired Traits & Limiting Factors What’s in your bottle? Marketplace overview ¾ Existing Technologies “FAIL” FAIL” in one or more of the key decision making criteria when selecting a cleaner/disinfectant. z z z z Cleaning Efficacy Disinfection Capability Personal Health & Safety Environmental Responsibility Positive Changes ¾ “It is cheaper & more effective to prevent environmental & health damage than to attempt to manage or cure it. Prevention requires examining the entire life cycle of products. It encourages the exploration of safer alternatives and the development of cleaner products, technologies & workplaces.” workplaces.” - Preventing Occupational & Environmental Cancer - A strategy for Toronto Registration ¾ Government registered by Health Canada (DIN) ¾ Easy to Use with clear label instructions Microbiological ¾ BroadBroad-Spectrum Germicidal Activity ¾ Fast Acting ¾ Not Readily Neutralized in Organic or Inorganic Matter ¾ Microorganism Resistance will not develop Chemical ¾ ¾ Safe to Transport Long Shelf Life z ¾ Safe & Easy to Store z ¾ Improper or prolonged storage of disinfectants may lead to growth of bacteria in them Improper storage of disinfectants may lead to explosions or fires NonNon-Corrosive & Material Compatible z Using the wrong type or level of disinfectant may cause corrosion or other damage to expensive items such as flexible endoscopes Toxicological ¾ ¾ ¾ NonNon-Toxic to humans & animals NonNon-Allergenic & nonnon-sensitizing NonNon-Hormone disruption z ¾ Certain microbicidal chemicals or their breakdown products can disrupt hormone function in humans & animals Safe for the User and Patient z z Exposure to cleaner & disinfectant vapours may cause respiratory sensitization Improperly rinsed endoscopes or other devices may release residues of disinfectants into body cavity Environmental ¾ Environmentally sound (Biodegradable) z ¾ ¾ EnvironmentallyEnvironmentally-stable sanitizers & disinfectants can contaminate food or water (groundwater & surface water) No Active Residual Chemistry Good Air Quality z z z z Free of any pungent smell No Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Use of gaseous or volatile products may negatively affect indoor air quality Fragrance Free Purchasing & Training ¾ Cost Effective z z z ¾ Consider the ShelfShelf-life of product once diluted (i.e. 24hrs vs 30 days) Consider cost at Use Dilution ($/L of product) Decisions on purchasing disinfectants may be made entirely based on cost which can lead to choosing an inappropriate product Training Support z Personnel responsible for using disinfectants may not receive any training or inadequate instruction in the preparation, use, storage and disposal of the formulation in use Factors Affecting Disinfectants ¾ Prior cleaning of a surface or device z z z ¾ Cleaning MUST precede disinfection & sterilization procedures Cleaning residues can interfere with the activity of some disinfectants Chemical sterilants can be relied on to produce sterility only if adequate cleaning occurs Organic load on the surface or device z z Soil can provide a protection barrier for microbes Soil can neutralize many of the disinfectant chemistries Factors Affecting Disinfectants ¾ Type & level of microbial load on the surface or device z ¾ Water Quality z ¾ Mechanism of action differs for each chemistry (surface actives, cell components) Many chemistries can be neutralized when diluted with hard water Concentration of the chemical z Improper dilution can lead to a false sense of security Factors Affecting Disinfectants ¾ Exposure time of the surface or device to the chemical z z Contact time must be adhered to in order to achieve desired level of disinfection Surface or device must remain wet ¾ Physical configuration of the object (crevices, hinges etc) z Difficult to remove debris or ensure disinfectant comes in contact with all areas of a surface or device Factors Affecting Disinfectants ¾ Temperature z z ¾ pH z z ¾ Effectiveness is enhanced or hindered by various temperature levels Higher temperatures can accelerate the evaporation of volatiles which can reduce the concentration & effectiveness Some products need to be activated prior to use Changes to pH can decrease (neutralize) some chemistries Storage & ShelfShelf-life z z Must consider how products are stored (too cold or hot) Efficacy of product decreases once diluted The Chemistries NAME THAT CHEMISTRY!?! What Do the following chemicals have in common? ¾N-Alkyl (40% C12, 50% C14, 10% C16) dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride ¾3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyldimethyloctadecyl ammonium chloride ¾N-Alkyl (68% C12, 32% C14) dimethyl ethylbenzyl ammonium chloride ¾Benzalkonium chloride They are all QUATERNARY AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS! Next Slide Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Advantages: ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Bactericidal, Fungicidal, Virucidal (enveloped) with a minimum contact time of 10 minutes Generally non-irritating to hands & non-corrosive to surfaces Usually has detergent properties Low Toxicity profile Stable in concentrate and use dilution Newer generations are relatively stable in the presence of organic matter Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Disadvantages: ¾ Not sporicidal, generally not tuberculocidal or virucidal against non-enveloped viruses ¾ Not effective against Biofilms ¾ DO NOT use to disinfect Instruments ¾ Leaves Residual Active Chemistry on Environmental Surfaces Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Disadvantages: ¾ Repeated uses increase residue build up on surfaces which may lead to increase resistance to susceptibility to antimicrobials inside health settings ¾ Formulations may contain APEs or NPEs (hormone disrupting chemicals) ¾ Non-Biodegradable NAME THAT CHEMISTRY!?! What do the following chemicals have in common? ¾Ethanol ¾Isopropanol ¾Methanol ¾Alcohol Anhydrous They are all ALCOHOLS Next Slide Alcohols Advantages: ¾ Broad-spectrum effectiveness: bactericidal, tuberculocidal, fungicidal and virucidal ¾ Contact time for Ethanol is1 to 3 minutes ¾ Contact time for Isopropanol is 5 to 10 minutes (generally added to Quats) ¾ No Active Chemical Residue ¾ Non Staining Alcohols Disadvantages: ¾ Evaporation may diminish concentration therefore contact time is difficult to achieve unless items are immersed ¾ Inactivated by organic material ¾ Poor cleaners, not appropriate for use on Environmental Surfaces ¾ Not sporicidal Alcohols Disadvantages: ¾ Volatile, flammable and must be stored in well-ventilated area ¾ Use in the OR is contraindicated ¾ Prolonged exposure may cause dry skin & skin irritation ¾ Compatibility issues with glues & plastics ¾ May affect indoor air quality due to VOCs Quat-Alcohol Blends ¾ Surface products on the market that contain a combination of Quats & Alcohol (IPA) ¾ Addition of IPA allows for efficacy against Mycobacteria (TB Claim) ¾ These products have the same Advantages & Disadvantages for both Quats and Alcohols NAME THAT CHEMISTRY!?! What do the following chemicals have in common? ¾Chlorophene ¾Chloroxylenol ¾P-terttert-amylphenol Potassium salt ¾O-phenylphenol ¾O-benzylbenzyl-p-chlorophenol They are all PHENOLS / PHENOLICS Next Slide Phenols & Phenolics Advantages: ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Commercially available with added detergents to provide cleaning & disinfecting Broad-Spectrum antimicrobial (bactericidal, tuberculocidal, fungicidal & virucidal) with a 5 to 10 minute contact time Stable in both concentrate and use dilutions Tolerance for organic load and hard water will depend on formulation Generally regarded as biodegradable Phenols & Phenolics Disadvantages: ¾ Poor cleaning efficacy ¾ Not Sporicidal ¾ Contraindicated for use around children ¾ Not recommended for use on Food Contact Surfaces ¾ Residual disinfectant may cause tissue irritation ¾ Pungent Odour (Volatile) Phenols & Phenolics Disadvantages: ¾ High Toxicity (listed on the Canadian Toxic Substance List & the EPA National Priority Lists) ¾ Phenols have limited use in Educational & Food Preparation settings because of their restrictions due to the toxicity ¾ Potential toxicity (skin, brain, kidneys, liver & lungs) from o-phenylphenol (listed as a carcinogen), o-benzyl-p-chlorophenol & ethylene glycol (anti-freeze, listed as a teratogen) NAME THAT CHEMISTRY!?! What do the following chemicals have in common? ¾Calcium Hypochlorite ¾Sodium Hypochlorite ¾Chlorine Dioxide ¾Sodium Chlorite They are all CHLORINE COMPOUNDS! Next Slide Chlorine & Chlorine Compounds Advantages: ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Low cost, readily available, Multi-purpose Relatively Fast Acting (average contact time of 10 minutes) Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial (bacteria, viruses, fungi, protozoa, spores) Effective in removing biofilms (does not kill) Readily available in liquid or solid Use for disinfection Environmental surfaces, toys, sports equipment Chlorine & Chlorine Compounds Disadvantages: ¾ Unstable, Corrosive & pH dependant ¾ Inactivated (neutralized) by Organic Matter ¾ No detergent properties ¾ Irritant to skin & mucous membranes ¾ Compatibility issue with metals, rubber & fabric materials Chlorine & Chlorine Compounds Disadvantages: ¾ Use in well-ventilated areas ¾ High Toxicity, especially on aquatic life ¾ Chlorine disinfection by-products cause adverse developmental & reproductive effects including spontaneous abortion NAME THAT CHEMISTRY!?! What do the following chemicals have in common? ¾Dihydrogen dioxide ¾Hydrogen dioxide ¾Dioxidane They are all synonymous for Hydrogen Peroxide! Next Slide Hydrogen Peroxide Advantages: ¾ Environmentally safe ¾ Broad-spectrum antimicrobial (bacteria, viruses, mycobacteria, fungi, spores) ¾ Effective against biofilms ¾ Stable in presence of organic matter ¾ Non-staining ¾ No Active Chemical Residue Hydrogen Peroxide Disadvantages: ¾ Can be corrosive to soft metals aluminum, copper, brass, zinc, mild & galvanized steel ¾ High concentration has strong pungent odour (>20%) ¾ High concentration may cause chemical burns (>20%) ¾ Can be explosive at high concentrations (>20%) Accelerated Hydrogen Peroxide Advantages: ¾ Fast acting broad-spectrum antimicrobial (bacteria, viruses, mycobacteria, fungi, spores) for environmental surfaces and instruments ¾ Contact times ranging from 30 seconds to 20 minutes depending on level of disinfection ¾ Effective against biofilms ¾ Excellent cleaning efficacy ¾ Excellent Health & Safety profile Accelerated Hydrogen Peroxide Advantages: ¾ Stable in presence of organic matter ¾ No active chemical residuals ¾ Low foam & non-staining ¾ Stable in concentrate form ¾ VOC free ¾ Environmentally friendly (EcoLogo and Green Seal Approved formulas) ¾ Not manufactured using APEs (ie NPEs) Accelerated Hydrogen Peroxide Disadvantages: ¾ Not recommended for use on soft metals aluminum, copper, brass, zinc, anodized aluminum and carbon steel ¾ Surface disinfectants do not contain solvents NAME THAT CHEMISTRY!?! What do the following chemicals have in common? ¾Glutaral ¾1,51,5-pentanedial ¾OrthoOrtho-phthalaldehyde ¾Formalin They are all ALDEHYDES! Next Slide Ortho-phthalaldehyde Advantages: ¾ High level disinfectant in 5 - 12 mins ¾ No activation required ¾ Non-corrosive to metals ¾ Non-flammable ¾ Excellent material compatibility, can be used on lensed instruments and flexible endoscopes Ortho-phthalaldehyde Disadvantages: ¾ Slow sporicidal activity ¾ Stains skin, mucous membranes, clothing and environmental surfaces ¾ Eye irritation with contact ¾ Not enough information on Toxicity ¾ Potential material incompatibility (anodize aluminum coating dulls) Ortho-phthalaldehyde Disadvantages: ¾ Restrictions to disposal (dependant on municipality) ¾ Instruments must be well rinsed to ensure removal of all chemical residues ¾ Contraindication for use on urological instruments due to anaphylaxis Glutaraldehydes Advantages: ¾ Chemical sterilants in 6 - 12 hrs ¾ High level disinfectant in 10 - 60 mins ¾ Non-corrosive to metals ¾ Non-flammable ¾ Active in presence of Organic Matter ¾ Excellent material compatibility, can be used on lensed instruments and flexible endoscopes Glutaraldehydes Disadvantages: ¾ Not suitable or safe for use as a surface disinfectant ¾ Pre-cleaning is essential (fixative) ¾ May corrode or stain high-carbon steel & leave residues on metals ¾ Germicidal activity is affected by pH & dilution ¾ Questionable ability to kill / remove Biofilms Glutaraldehydes Disadvantages: ¾ Extremely irritating to skin & mucous membranes (pungent odour) ¾ Special ventilation is required ¾ Liquid & vapour are recognized as toxic can cause dermatitis (skin), conjunctivitis (eyes), rhinitis & sinusitis (lungs) ¾ Gluteraldehyde is a suspected mutagen & carcinogen Conclusions Disinfectant Selection Consider: ¾ Efficacy ¾ Spectrum ¾ Versatility ¾ Ease of use ¾ Safety profile ¾ Cost What’s in your bottle? Disinfectant Selection pe Ty Iodine Alcohols Phenolics Chlorine Quats AHP Ac de ic i m er G S u m m a r y t Vo ive l R To ital esi xi e O du Su c / rg als b Ir a Po str rita nic o at n C E n r C e Im t o m po v le p Na ir o an ac un ds rr nm ing t O ow en rg - t S a Re ani pe l is s t c N c tr s u r ic e u e ti o u tr m s n s a li G e In z a t r m i Us ion cid e e Remember: ¾ Match Product with Protocol z Surfaces vs Instruments ¾ Cleaning = 1st step ¾ Disinfection = 2nd step ¾ Contact Time is MANDITORY! Ac V o ti ve R T o lita l e s x e id S u ic / O rg u a ls P o b str Irrit a n i c a a E n o r C te I n t C o m l m po N a v ir o ea n p a un n m in ct r r Or ow e g d ga -S nt a Re n p l s t ic N e c t is s ric e ru u e tio u tr m s n s a li G e In z a t rm U s io ici de e pe Ty de ic i rm Ge S u m m a r y Peracetic Acid OPA Glutaraldehyde AHP Virox Technologies Inc. Engineering Revolutionary Disinfectants for the War Against Microbes References ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Infection Control Guidelines: Hand Washing, Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care, Health Canada. Dec 1998, Vol 24S8 Routine Practices and Additional Precautions for Preventing the Transmission of Infection in Health Care, Health Canada. July 1999, Vol 25S4 Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Healthcare Facilities, CDC. MMWR June 2003, Vol 52, No RRRR-10 Best Practices for Cleaning, Disinfection and Sterilization in All Health Care Settings, PIDAC, March 2006 References ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Block S. Disinfection. Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th Ed. 2001 Mayhall CG. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, 3rd Ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:14732004:1473-1522 Cokendolpher JC & Haukos JF. The Practical Applications of Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care Facilities, Chicago. American Hospital Association, 1996: 4747-59 Rutala WA. APIC Guideline for Selection and Use of Disinfectants AJIC 1990:17(2) 9999-117 References ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Bessems E. The effect of practical conditions on the efficacy of disinfectants. Int Biodeter & Biodeg 1998:1771998:177-183 Crawford L et al. A Comparison of Commonly Used Surface Disinfectants: AlcoholAlcohol-, PhenolPhenol-, ChlorineChlorine- and Quat Disinfectants. www.infectioncontroltoday.com/articles/0b1feat2 .html Russel AD. Glutaraldehyde: Current Status and Uses. Inf Con & Hosp Epi 1994;15 (11) 724724-733 Rutala WA. Sporicidal Activity of Chemical Sterilants Used in Hospitals. Inf Con & Hosp Epi 1993; 14(12) 713713-718 References ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Rutala WA & Weber DJ. The benefits of surface disinfection. AJIC 2004;32(4) 226226-229 Woldkoff P et al. Risk in cleaning: chemical and physical exposure. Sci of Total Env 1995:215:1351995:215:135-156 Sattar SA. Current issues in testing, selection and use of microbicides in infection control: a critical review. AICJ 2004;9(3):842004;9(3):84-100 Health Canada. Therapeutic Products Programme Guidelines: Disinfectant Drugs. Fall 1999 References ¾ Degussa, Hydrogen Peroxide: Properties, Handling and Application ¾ Hugo, Inhibition and destruction of the microbial cell ¾ Ascenzi, Handbook of disinfectants and antiseptics