Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
GG 101L SEDIMENTARY ROCKS SUPPLEMENTARY READING Sedimentary rocks are common in continental parts of the Earth, but not very common here in Hawai‘i. In this lab you will learn how to identify some of the more common sedimentary rocks, and also what these rocks can tell you about the conditions under which they formed. Unlike igneous rocks, which can form just about anywhere, sedimentary rocks form in particular environments and under particular conditions. They are therefore very useful for unraveling Earth’s history. I SEDIMENTARY ROCKS There are two main types of sedimentary rocks – those that are made up of pieces of other rocks (sometimes called detrital or clastic sedimentary rocks), and those that form by precipitating minerals out of water by either biological or non-biological processes (sometimes called chemical or biochemical sedimentary rocks). It can get a bit confusing because there are some sedimentary rocks that form from a combination of both clastic and precipitating processes. Importantly, however, all of these sedimentary rock types form under normal conditions of temperature and pressure with regard to the Earth’s surface. Detrital Sedimentary Rocks These are probably the most well-known types of sedimentary rocks, and include sandstones, shales, breccias, mudstones, conglomerates, and many others. Detrital sedimentary rocks are important because they contain a record of the starting rock type out of which the particles were eroded, the transport mechanism and distance that the particles moved under, and the conditions under which the particles were deposited, and finally the conditions under which the particles were sedimented together (lithified) to form the eventual rock. Detrital (or clastic) sedimentary rocks are classified by a number of characteristics, including the size of the particles, their shape, whether or not they’re all the same size and composition, etc. Your lab book discusses these characteristics in more detail. Chemical and Biochemical Sedimentary Rocks Chemical and biochemical sedimentary rocks either form by non-biological precipitation out of chemical-laden water, or by biological processes, or by some combination of these. The convention is to consider any rock that at some time had life involved in its formation to be a biochemical sedimentary rock. Thus, even if it is made up of a whole bunch of broken seashell pieces (and thus the animals were actually dead before the pieces became a rock), it is still considered to be a biochemical sedimentary rock rather than a detrital sedimentary rock. Characteristics of Sedimentary Rocks The following sections describe different properties of sedimentary rocks that are used in classifying them. Keep in mind that the ultimate goal in geology is not to come up with a rock name, it is to understand the circumstances under which the rock formed. The rock name is just a shortcut way to describe the rock so that other geologists will be able to readily understand the rock’s significance and where it fits into a geological story. Grain size Detrital sedimentary rocks are classified most generally by the size of the particles (usually called grains) making up the rock. Figure 4.1A in your lab book illustrates the size classifications of 2 sediment, and Table 4.4 compares grain size to the eventual sedimentary rocks that develop from these sediments. From finest to coarsest, the sediments (and corresponding sedimentary rock) are: clay (claystone, shale), silt (siltstone, shale), sand (sandstone), granules + pebbles + cobbles + boulders (conglomerate or breccia). Thus, merely by measuring the dominant size of the grains in a sedimentary rock, you can go a long way toward identifying the rock. Do geologists go around with straight-edges measuring individual grains in rocks? Not usually. Instead, there are some general rules that they follow. For example, it is pretty easy to tell if the grains are bigger than 2 mm across and therefore telling pebbles from sand is easy. Additionally, if the grains are too small to be seen individually, they are finer than sand and must therefore be silt or clay. How do you tell the difference between silt and clay? Your lab book suggests grinding a bit between your teeth. If it feels gritty, it is silt. If it feels smooth it is clay. However, in GG101 labs, it is pretty common for students to test every single rock with HCl, so perhaps you don’t want to go around biting all the fine-grained rock samples. Instead, try scraping the rock with your fingernail instead of your teeth. Particularly for water-borne sediments, grain size is often an indication of the distance that the sediment traveled. This is because if you followed any stream or river from its headwaters to where it enters an ocean or lake, you would notice that the flow velocity would decrease along the way. There is a direct relationship between the velocity of flowing water and the size of particles that it can carry, with faster water being able to carry larger particles. Thus a single stream may be characterized by swiftly flowing water at its head that is pushing boulders and cobbles down a relatively steep stream bed. Farther downstream, slower flow carries only pebbles. Even farther downstream there may be some sand, and eventually, when the stream has merged with other streams into a slow-flowing lazy river, only silt or clay will be transported. Of course the character of streams and rivers changes depending on whether it is flooding or not, so the size of the particles that can be transported may also change. Grain size is not as diagnostic for chemical and biochemical sedimentary rocks. However, there are some cases where grain size is part of the characteristic used to identify them. For example, coquina consists of a coarse-grained aggregate of shell fragments whereas micritic limestone consists of claysized particles of calcite and clay. Some chemical and biochemical sedimentary rocks don’t really have a sedimentary “grain size” at all because they precipitated directly from water. Instead of being fragments of previous rocks they are a crystalline aggregate, sometimes having a texture that looks more like an igneous rock. Sorting Sorting refers to the variety of grain sizes in a rock. A well-sorted sedimentary rock is one in which all the grains have the same size. A poorly-sorted sedimentary rock contains grains of many different sizes. Interestingly (some might say confusingly), engineers use the term “well sorted” to refer to just the opposite - materials where there is a big range of grain sizes. This is because such materials are much better for mixing with cement and other construction-oriented uses. But we’re geologists… Sorting is important because it is closely tied to the environment under which the sediment was deposited, to the mechanism that carried the sediment to its final resting place, and to the distance that the sediment traveled before becoming lithified. Wind, for example, is very good at moving sand-sized grains, tends to blow silt and clay particles away, and doesn’t often move pebbles. Wind-deposited sandstones therefore tend to be very well sorted. Meanwhile, the silt and clay that is blown away eventually lands somewhere to form a different (but also well sorted) rock called loess. 3 Certain transport environments are not very good at sorting particles by size. Rapidly flowing streams, mudflows, landslides, and glaciers are capable of transporting everything from boulders to clay particles. If all the particles are deposited directly from one of these high-energy environments, the resulting sedimentary rock will be very poorly-sorted. Grain Shape If the grains are big enough, their shapes hold important clues to the amount of energy in the environment that the sediments were deposited in and also to the amount of time and/or distance over which the sediments were transported. High-energy streams crash boulders and pebbles together so they often have broken, angular shapes. On high-energy ocean and lake beaches, pebbles and boulders are constantly ground and smashed against each other so they end up with well-rounded shapes. Sand grains hit against each other while being blown by the wind, and whether or how they break depends on what they consist of. Quartz sand grains, being very hard, rarely fracture all the way through. Instead, tiny chips are broken off when they crash together and the eventual result is a frosted surface much like beach glass. Feldspar sand grains are much more likely to break apart when they collide (usually along cleavage planes), so they become smaller and smaller while blowing in the wind. Eventually, all the feldspar will be broken into tiny pieces that get blown away completely, leaving behind a sandstone consisting only of round, frosted quartz grains. Composition The composition of the particles in detrital or chemical/biochemical sedimentary rocks is an important clue to their origin, and therefore important for classifying them. Calcite, for example, is produced almost exclusively by biochemical processes, so any sedimentary rock consisting of calcite is classified as chemical or biochemical (even if it may happen to look like a sandstone). As we noted above, depending on the distance over which wind-blown sand is carried, the overall composition can change from a mixture of quartz and feldspar eventually to pure quartz. Thus, looking at the composition can tell you something about the distance that detrital sediments were carried, which is important if your goal is to reconstruct ancient environments. Fossils Fossils, evidence of organisms, are almost exclusive to sedimentary rock (as opposed to igneous and metamorphic rocks), and indeed some sedimentary rocks consist wholly of fossils. Sometimes a detrital sedimentary rock will contain fossils of some sort, and it will therefore be considered “fossiliferous.” Many chemical and biochemical sedimentary rocks are also fossiliferous, but some are not. There are chemical and biochemical sedimentary rocks that owe their existence to fossils that once existed but which have been completely dissolved away. Limestone is a common biochemical sedimentary rock that is derived mostly from ancient reefs. Some limestones look basically like a live reef today, with shells, worm casings, coral fragments, sand grains, etc. Other limestones, however, have been completely recrystallized, meaning that all the calcite that once made up the shells, worm casings, coral fragments, and sand grains has been dissolved and then re-precipitated; no fossils remain. And of course there is every gradation in between these extremes. Fissile/Layered Some sedimentary rocks are layered. This can be layering inherited from the initial deposition process, and includes bedding in sandstones and siltstones. Fine layering, particularly if it is uniform in 4 thickness, is called lamination. Other layering, particular to the finest-grained sedimentary rocks, derives from the parallel orientation of mica minerals. This parallel orientation is partly due to the deposition processes that took place, but mostly due to the development of clay minerals that occurs after deposition takes place. This type of layering imparts a characteristic weakness in the rock that is manifested by thin, platy layers that may flake off. Such rocks are said to be “fissile,” and the best example is shale. Shales can be mostly silt-sized or clay-sized so there are silty shales and clay shales. Sedimentary rocks that are neither layered nor fissile are “massive.” Identifying the Characteristics of Sedimentary Rocks 1. Table 1 lists a number of characteristics of common sedimentary rocks. Figures 4 and 5 of your lab manual give more details. Use Table 1, the choices listed below, the grainsize charts, and the lab manual figures to identify the characteristics of the sedimentary samples supplied by your TA, and fill in the blanks in Table 2. Grain size choices >2 mm (pebbles, cobbles, or boulders) visible to 2 mm (sand - note that there are subdivisions of sand) gritty (silt) really fine (clay) looks crystalline (interlocking grains of various or very small sizes) Sorting choices well-sorted moderately sorted poorly sorted Grain shape choices rounded sub-rounded sub-angular angular Composition choices (can be more than one) quartz feldspar calcite can’t tell mix Fossil choices no fossils few fossils lots of fossils Fissile/layered choices fissile layered (or laminated) massive 5 Table 1: Characteristics of Common Sedimentary Rocks Rock Grain size Sorting >2 mm Poorly sorted Breccia >2 mm Poorly sorted Conglomerate Grain Shape angular rounded Composition Can be lots of things Can be lots of things Fossils? Usually no sometimes Fissile/Layered? massive massive Quartz Sandstone Arkose Sandstone Greywacke/ Wackystone Siltstone Vis-2 mm Well sorted rounded quartz no Massive or layered Vis-2 mm Rounded to subrounded Sub-rounded to sub-angular Can’t tell Massive or layered Usually no massive sometimes massive Silty shale Fine (gritty) Well sorted Can’t tell sometimes fissile Claystone/ Mudstone Very fine Well sorted Can’t tell Quartz + K-feldspar Quartz, feldspar, lithics, clay Can’t really tell, but mostly clay minerals Can’t really tell, but mostly clay minerals Can’t really tell, but mostly clay minerals no Fine (gritty) Well sorted to moderately sorted Moderately sorted to poorly sorted Well sorted sometimes massive Clay shale Very fine Well sorted Can’t tell Coquina >2 mm Moderately sorted variable Crystalline Limestone Micritic Limestone Chalk Crystalline, can see n.a. crystals Crystalline, can’t n.a. see crystals Very fine Well sorted Fossiliferous Limestone Oolitic Limestone Chert Variable crystalline Coal crystalline Vis-2 mm, ± fines sometimes fissile n.a. Can’t really tell, but mostly clay minerals Calcite (shell fragments) calcite Essentially all fossils sometimes Massive, maybe layered massive n.a. Calcite sometimes Usually massive Can’t tell Soft calcite Usually massive variable Fossil fragments Essentially all fossils lots rounded Calcite (oolites) sometimes n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. Silica (microcrystalline sometimes quartz) Carbon (black) sometimes variable 1-2 mm Massive, maybe layered Massive, maybe layered Usually massive Usually massive, conchoidal fracture, low density 6 II Determining Sediment Size In this portion of the lab, you will see how sedimentologists quantify the parameters of grain size and sorting. The way this is done is to pour a dry sediment through a stack of sieves. The sieves with the coarse spaces are on the top and those with ever-finer spaces are on the bottom. That way the fine grains can settle through until they reach a level that they cannot get through. The set of sieves we will use have mesh spacings of 2, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.063 mm (it’s written on the sides of the sieves). These sieves are kind of fragile and definitely are expensive to replace, so please treat them with care. After you determine what percentage of the overall mass of the sample got caught in each sieve, plot these, and you have a graphical illustration of both the sediment size and its sorting. Figure 1 shows how this is done. Note that the graph is kind of strange and the axes are kind of strange. The xaxis is in units of φ size (φ is the lower-case Greek letter f, by the way). Notice from Table 4 that each physical mesh size (in mm) has a corresponding φ size. For extra credit, explain how you get φ size from mesh size. Table 4: φ size relationship Mesh size φ size 4 mm -2 2 mm -1 0.5 mm 1 0.25 mm 2 0.125 mm 3 0.063 mm 4 < 0.63 mm 5* *not really, but we’ll plot it this way The two numbers that you really want to get are called Mdφ (the median diameter) and σφ (the graphic standard deviation). How do you do this? First, plot your cumulative wt% and φ size data on the probability paper. Next, fit a smooth, curved line to your data. Mdφ is easy - just drop a vertical line down from the intersection of your curve and the 50% cumulative wt% line, and read off the φ value. That will be Mdφ. Figure 1: Method for calculating Mdφ and σφ from sieve data plotted on probability paper To get σφ you drop vertical lines down from the intersections of your line and the 84% and 16% cumulative weight % lines. 7 These values are φ84 and φ16, respectively. σφ = (φ φ84 - φ16)/2. What are these Mdφ and σφ numbers and why would anyone care? The median grain size diameter, Mdφ, is the grain size for which half the sample is finer and half the sample is coarser. If Mdφ is small or negative, then the sample overall is coarse. If Mdφ is large and positive, then the sample overall is fine. You hear the term “median” used a lot with house prices: “The median house price on Kaua‘i in October was $680,000” means that of the houses sold on Kaua‘i in October, half of them were cheaper than $680,000 and half of them were more expensive than $680,000 - a sad state of affairs if you’re looking for a house there! The other number, σφ is a measure of how much variability there is in the grain size. If σφ is big, it means that the sample has a wide range of grain sizes, and a geologist would say that it is poorly sorted. If σφ is small, then there is only a narrow range of grain sizes, and a geologist would say that the sample is well sorted. Figure 2 illustrates how these two parameters vary. Figure 2: diagram showing how Mdφ and σφ vary for different sieve samples. In the left-hand diagram of Figure 2, there are three samples that have the same value of σφ, but you see that each one intersects the 50 wt% line at a different place. This indicates that they have different median grain sizes. The Mdφ values of samples A, B, and C would be about -2.4, -0.5, and 0.8 φ, respectively. In the diagram to the right, samples A, B, and C all have the same value of Mdφ 8 (about 0.4 φ), but you can see that the ranges of φ16 and φ84 are quite different, so σφ would be different. Specifically, σφ would increase from A to B to C, meaning that A, B, and C would be best-, medium-, and poorest-sorted, respectively.