Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36 : 353-357, 2004 KISEP Clinical Article Microanatomical Study of the Extradural Middle Fossa Approach for Preventing Cochlear Damage Sang Myung Jung, M.D., Suk Jung Jang, M.D., Ph.D., Tae Hyoung Ahn, M.D. Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea Objective : The objective is to describe the relationship of anatomical landmark required for the middle fossa approach to preservation of hearing. Methods : Dissection of 16 fixed human cadaveric heads was performed. we identified a rhomboid-shaped middle fossa landmarks that serve as a guide to minimize cochlea injury. The points of this construct are as follows ; 1) the junction of the greater superficial petrosal nerve and the trigeminal nerve ; 2) the lateral edge of the porus trigemius ; 3) the intersection of the petrous ridge and arcuate eminence ; and 4) the intersection of the lines extended along the axes of the greater superficial petrosal nerve and arcuate eminence. Mean, minimum, and maximum measurements of all distances were determined. Results : The average cochlea-geniculate ganglion distance measured in the dissected specimens was 3.0mm± 0.8 with a range of 1.2 to 4.1mm. The average cochlea-petrous carotid genu distance was 2.9mm±0.9 with a range of 1.2 to 4.0mm. The average cochlea-internal acoustic meatus distance measured in the dissected specimens was 9.0mm±0.5 with a range of 7.8-10.9mm. The average cochlea-mandibular nerve distance measured was 9.4mm±0.4 with a range of 7.6-11.3mm. Conclusion : The middle fossa approach requires special knowledge of the anantomy to reduce the risk of damage to cochlea. It is important that the surgeon understand the surgical anantomy. The present study describes the simple geometric construct that proposes to assist in locating the cochlea. KEY WORDS : Middle fossa approach·Cochlea. Introduction M iddle fossa approach is indispensable in operating lesion on petrous apex and internal auditory meatus with preservation of hearing and recently it has been used for decompression of labyrinthine facial nerve for Bell's palsy patients1). But, this surgical approach has many difficulties because important structures are concentrated on operative region and exact anatomical index which can avoid cochlea damage for preservation of hearing was not reported. Therefore the authors performed microanatomical study of middle fossa structure using human cadaver for the preservation of cochlea during operation, set position of Received:April 22, 2004 Accepted:July 13, 2004 Address for reprints:Suk Jung Jang, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University, 588 Seosuk-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-717, Korea Tel : 062) 220-3120, 3126, Fax : 062) 227-4575 E-mail : [email protected] petrous bone and internal structure of important middle fossa as anatomical area of rhomboid shape, measured distance between each structures and examined anatomical index which can avoid damage of cochlea in operating middle fossa. Materials and Methods T he author performed morphometric analysis with both sides of 16 fixed human cadaver using operating microscope, electric drill with cutting and diamond burrs and microsurgical instruments for dissection. The authors set rhomboid structure to remove bone in approaching middle fossa without damage of structure for preservation of hearing, measured each distance using a small caliper(Fig. 1) and indicated all measured values with mean±standard deviation. Surgical approach The authors fixed cadaver head on 60 degree tilting position VOLUME 36 November, 2004 353 Extradural Middle Fossa Approach Fig. 1. A small caliper. on operating table using Mayfield three pin headrest and performed inversed question mark shaped scalp incision. Temporalis muscle was dissected from zygomatic bone and additional removal of zygomatic bone was not followed. The temporalis muscle and fascia are then elevated subperiosteally and reflected anteriorly and held in place by large fish hooks. An approximately 4×4cm rectangular bone flap was then cut, lying one-third behind and two-third in front of the external auditory canal. The inferior margin of the craniectomy was flush with the temporal fossa floor. The bony margin along the middle fossa floor was drilled flat to alleviate any obstruction to a flat angle of view along the petrous ridge. Dural elevation was performed along the petrous ridge, identifying the arcuate eminence(AE) as the primary landmark. Elevation was then carried out anteromedially to uncover Greater superficial petrosal nerve (GSPN) and Fig. 2. Illustration of the left side extradural middle fossa floor with the four landmarks(1 : AE at petrous ridge, 2 : porus trigeminus, 3 : GSPN intersection with V3, 4 : intersection line along the axes of the GSPN and AE) AE : arcuate eminence, GSPN : greater superficial petrosal nerve, MMA : middle meningeal artery, R : retractor, V3 : mandibular division of trigeminal nerve. 354 J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36 tegmen tympani and the middle meningeal artery was dissected as it joins the dura to allow a greater extent of dural elevation form the middle fossa floor. The anterior and medial border of dural elevation was done to mandibular division which is the third branch of trigeminal nerve the and the petrous ridge, and then middle fossa "rhomboid" complex was confirmed. Anatomical structures of "rhomboid" complex included 1) intersection of arcuate eminence and petrous ridge, 2) porus trigeminus, 3) intersection of trigeminal nerve and greater superficial petrosal nerve and4) intersection of extended line along axis of greater superficial petrosal nerve and arcuate eminence (Fig. 2). First internal auditory canal was unroofed with a Fig. 3. Extradural exposure of the posterior fossa, intracanalicular dura, inferior petrosal sinus. Co : cochlea, GG : geniculate gangliion, GSPN : greater superficial petrosal nerve, IAM : internal auditory meatus, ICA : internal carotid artery, R : retractor, V1 : ophthalmic nerve, V2 : maxillary nerve, V3 : mandibular nerve. Fig. 4. Intradural exposure of the posterior fossa with pontine surface (Trigeminal root has been removed) AICA : anterior inferior cerebellar artery, BA : basilar artery, Co : cochlea, ICA : internal carotid artery, V1 : ophthalmic nerve, V2 : maxillary nerve, V3 : mandibular nerve, GSPN : greater superficial petrosal nerve, VII + VIII : seventh and eighth cranial nerve. SM Jung, et al. the arcuate eminence measured along petrous ridge was 12.6± 2.6mm and the average distance from geniculate ganglion to the intersection of greater superfGeniculate ganglion to arcuate eminence at the petrous ridge 12.6 ± 2.6 7.5-16.6 icial petrosal nerve to mandibGeniculate ganglion to internal acoustic meatus 13.2 ± 1.9 9.3-16.0 ular nerve was 15.4±1.4mm. Internal auditory meatus to porus trigeminus 10.8 ± 1.5 7.5-13.2 In addition, the average distance GSPN : greater superficial petrosal nerve, V3 : mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve of exposed petrous ridge from Table 2. Morphometric analysis of the cochlea and the middle fossa rhomboid complex based on 32 cadaver arcuate eminence to porus trigedissection (All results are expressed with mean±standard deviation) minus was 25.4±1.7mm and Length (mm) Range (mm) the average distance of porus Cochlea to geniculate ganglion 3.0 ± 0.8 1.2-4.1 trigemius to intersection of Cochlea to petrous carotid genu 2.9 ± 0.9 1.2-4.0 greater superficial petrosal Cochlea to porus trigeminus 14.3 ± 0.6 17-12.3 nerve and mandibular nerve Cochlea to IAM 9.0 ± 0.5 7.8-10.9 measured along mandibular Cochlea to V3 at the GSPN 9.4 ± 0.4 7.6-11.3 GSPN : greater superficial petrosal nerve, IAM : internal auditory meatus, V3 : mandibular division of nerve (V3) was 15.8±1.3mm. trigeminal nerve Finally the average distance high-speed drill and drilling was started from center of angle from geniculate gang-lion to anterior lip of internal auditory extending greater superficial petrosal nerve and arcuate canal was 13.2±1.9mm and the average distance from internal eminence. The dura overlying the internal auditory canal was auditory canal to porus trigeminus was 10.8±1.5mm. identified after removing about 3 to 4mm of bone, posterior fossa dura was exposed by removing external parts of bone Morphometric analysis of the cochlea and the middle between internal auditory canal and superior semicircular fossa rhomboid complex based on 32 cadaver canal upward and internal auditory canal was exposed by dissection(Table 2) removing them backward. After gently unroofing the greater The average distance from cochlea to geniculate ganglion superficial petrosal nerve to facial hiatus and identifying was 3.0±0.8mm and that from cochlea apex to petrous geniculate ganglion as a further landmark defining the lateral carotid genu was 2.9±0.9mm. The average distance from extent of the internal auditory canal, anterior bone of internal cochlea to porus trigeminus was 14.3±0.6mm, that from auditory canal was removed to inferior petrosal sinus to cochlea to internal auditory meatus was 9.0±0.5mm and that expose posterior fossa dura (Fig. 3). And then undersurface of from cochlea to mandibular branch of trigeminal nerve was Meckel's cave and lateral margin of Dorello's canal were 9.4±0.4mm. exposed by careful drilling anteriorly the tip of the petrous apex. After securing operative field without cutting of greater Discussion superficial petrosal nerve, the bone overlying Glasscock's triangle was removed and medial and inferior bones of iddle fossa approach was indispensable operative internal carotid artery were removed without damaging any technique to many neurosurgeons who are to preserve neural or vascular structures. hearing at the operative lesion of petrous apex and internal After incision of the tentorium, pontomedullary junction, auditory meatus. But, this approach has surgical difficulties the fifth cranial nerve, middle part of basilar artery, the sixth because major structures including internal auditory meatus, cranial nerve and anterior inferior cerebellar artery could be facial nerve, cochlea, semicircular canal and internal carotid artery are very adjacent to one another11). Therefore, in operobserved (Fig. 4). ation with middle fossa approach, understanding of exact Results anatomical structures of temporal bone is indispensable. In 1986, Fukushima3) divided middle fossa when he divided Morphometric analysis of the middle fossa rhomboid structures around cavernous sinus and each compartment is complex based on 32 cadaver dissection(Table 1) composed of posterolateral, posteromedial, premeatal and The average distance from geniculate ganglion to the end of postmeatal triangle. Table 1. Morphometric analysis of the middle fossa rhomboid complex based on 32 cadaver dissection(All results are expressed with mean±standard deviation) Length (mm) Range (mm) Arcuate eminence to porus trigemius 25.4 ± 1.7 22.0-28.0 Porus trigeminus to GSPN-V3 junction 15.8 ± 1.3 13.6-17.5 GSPN-V3 junction to the geniculate ganglion 15.4 ± 1.4 12.9-17.5 M VOLUME 36 November, 2004 355 Extradural Middle Fossa Approach First, posterolateral triangle is bony surface composed of foramen spinosum, cochlea and mandibular nerve near its intersection with the greater superficial petrosal nerve. This area is an important landmark in exposing horizontal intrapetrous internal carotid artery. Second, posteromedial triangle is the part bounded by cochlea, trigeminal groove and horizontal intrapetrous carotid artery. This is thin petrous apex which is removed to approach the upper petroclival area, inferior limit of internal auditory canal and internal carotid artery. Third, premeatal triangle is bounded by the medial lip of internal auditory meatus, carotid genu and geniculate ganglion. This triangle identifies the exact location of cochlea when drilling the petrous apex or exposing the intrapetrous carotid artery though the middle fossa approach. The cochlea is located in the base of this triangle6). Fourth, postmeatal triangle is defined as bone between superior semicircular canal and internal auditory canal. The geniculate ganglion, lateral lip of the internal auditory canal and intersection of arcuate eminence with petrous ridge are located at the boundaries of this postmeatal triangle4). Such as a compartmentalization of the middle fossa can minimize damages of major nerves and vascular structures during operation, but it may cause loss of hearing due to cochlear damage because it is very difficult for operator to know the exact position of cochlea at live operative field. Although superior bone of internal auditory canal contains a lot of air cell anatomically, labyrinthine bone around cochlea is composed of yellow cortical bone and the base of cochlea is located vertically to medial part of the petrous internal carotid artery. In addition, cochlea is located inferiorly to geniculate ganglion8). However, since cochlear damage cannot be prevented at operative field only with the above anatomical features, a lot of researches on anatomical structures around cochlea have been developed. Dew et al.2) investigated anatomical relationship between posterior genu of petrous internal carotid artery and the base of cochlea with cadaver dissection. The average distance from internal carotid artery to cochlea was 4.3±0.8mm, (3.2~5.8mm) and Naguib et al.7) measured the distance from cochlea to trigeminal ganglion. Rhoton8) reported that cochlea is separated from the petous carotid artery by about 2.1mm thickness bone. In this study, the others also confirmed that average distance from cochlea to posterior genu of petrous carotid artery was 2.9±0.9mm. Petrous anatomy of the middle fossa apporach, Sennaroglu et al.9) published that medial temporal bone could be removed about 8mm from petrous ridge to lateral direction and removal of bone more than 8mm might cause cochlear damages. 356 J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36 For the prevention of cochlear damages, its correlation with important anatomical structures and direction of drilling should be considered. Velut and Jan et al.12) emphasized that for the prevention of cochlea, medial part of vertical surface adjacent to medial wall of internal carotid artery should be drilled. In particular, since cochlea is located at the lateral middle of premeatal triangle which is made by genu of internal carotid artery, geniculate ganglion and medial part of internal auditory canal, it should be careful to remove anteromedial and inferior bone of geniculate ganglion for the prevention of cochlear damages. Arcuate eminence has been recognized as an important anatomical landmark which can identify the position of anterior semicircular canal and Kartush et al.5) published that arcuate eminence at temporal bone was proper landmark in 85%. Villavicencio et al.13) reported that the average distance from middle of anterior semicircular canal to anterior border of petrous ridge on the same sagittal plane was 5.2mm and the average bone thickness of anterior part of lateral semicircular canal was 8.9mm. This research found that the average distance from geniculate ganglion to anterior semicircular canal was 14.1±0.8mm and that from internal auditory canal to anterior semicircular canal was 13.0± 0.3mm. The middle meningeal artery which is one of the important anatomical landmark in middle fossa approach entered cranial cavity through foramen spinosum of the sphenoid bone and Tedeschi et al.10) reported that the average distance from foramen spinosum to anterolateral part of petrous internal carotid artery was 4.5mm and to anterolateral part of geniculate ganglion was 14mm. This research found that the average distance from foramen spinosum to mandibular nerve was 11.1±0.6mm. Conclusion T he authors drilled bone covering greater superficial petrosal nerve and from facial nerves of internal auditory meatus to geniculate ganglion then exposed nerves, performed morphometric analysis of anatomical relationship of middle fossa rhomboid complex and measured distance from cochlea to structures around it. Consequently, it was found that the average distance from the base of cochlea to geniculate ganglion was 3.0±0.8mm, that from the apex of cochlea to genu of internal carotid artery was 2.9±0.9mm and that from cochlea to internal auditory meatus was 9.0± 0.5mm. Then it is considered that recognition of morphometric structure, distance and understanding of cochlea SM Jung, et al. position surrounded by cortical bone in middle fossa approach will be very helpful to preserve hearing during operation. Acknowledgement This study was supported by research funds from Chosun University Hospital, 2003. References 1. Cho J, Park SH, Kim JY : Facial nerve decompression via middle fossa approach : Report of three cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 30 : 479-485, 2001 2. Dew LA, Shelton C, Harnsberger HR, Thompson BG Jr : Surgical exposure of the petrous internal carotid artery: practical application for skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 107 : 967-976, 1997 3. Fukushima T : Direct operative approach to the vascular lesion in the cavernous sinus : Summary of 27 cases. Mt Fuji Workshop cerebrovasc Dis 169-189, 1988 4. Glasscock ME, Hays JW, Josey AF, Jackson CG, Whitaker SR : Middle fossa approach for acoustic tumor removal and preservation of hearing in Brackman DE(ed) : Neurological surgery of the skull base. New York : Raven Press, 1985, pp223-226 5. Kartush JM, Kemink JL, GrahamMD : The arcuate eminence. Topographic orientation in middle cranial fossa surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 94 : 25-28, 1985 6. Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T : Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 63 : 857-861, 1985 7. Naguib MB, Aristegui M, Saleh E, Cokkeser Y, Landolfi M, Taibah A, et al : Surgical anatomy of the petrous apex as it relates to the enlarged middle cranial fossa approaches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111 : 488-493, 1994 8. Rhoton AL Jr : The temporal bone and transtemporal approaches. Neurosurgery 47 : S211-S265, 2000 9. Sennaroglu L, Slattery WH 3rd : Petrous anatomy for middle fossa approach. Laryngoscope 113 : 332-342, 2003 10. Tedeschi H, Rhoton AL Jr : Lateral approaches to the petroclival region. Surg Neurol 41 : 180-216, 1994 11. Tsunoda A, Komatsuzaki A, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y : Threedimensional image for the middle fossa approach and its anatomical considerations. Laryngoscope 111 : 1048-1052, 2001 12. Velut S, Jan M : Petrectomy of the point during approach to the clivus : technic, values and limitations. Apropos of a case of meningioma. Neurochirurgie 34 : 17-25, 1988 13. Villavicencio AT, Gray L, Leveque JC, Fukushima T, Kureshi S, Friedman AH : Utility of three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography for assessment of relationships between the vertebrobasilar system and the cranial base. Neurosurgery 48 : 318-326, 2001 VOLUME 36 November, 2004 357