Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
What was Shown by Rutherford’s Gold Foil Experiment Posted By Jim J Jones On October 7, 2013 @ 6:40 am In Chemistry Ernest Rutherford’s 1911 experiments with gold foil discovered that the atom’s positive charge is concentrated in one place – a nucleus, as we now know it. Although Rutherford did not personally conduct the experiment (his assistants, Ernest Marsden and Hans Geiger, of “Geiger Counter” fame, actually carried it out), he did design and direct it. The groundbreaking results ensured that the “Rutherford model”, as it was then known, gained quick, widespread acceptance in the scientific community. Rutherford’s goal had not been to revolutionize chemistry. He was one of the greatest experimentalists of his time, but this experiment was merely intended to study the distribution of charge in the atom. The logic was that if an alpha particle with a charge of 2+ is fired at a super-thin gold foil (on the order of micrometers), the degree to which it is thrown off course allows you to reverse-engineer the structure of the atom that it passed through. Rutherford was in for a big surprise when he found that the vast majority of his alpha particles went undisturbed, but that a select few came zooming straight back at the alpha emitter. He would later describe this as being like firing a cannon at tissue paper, and having the cannon ball fly back in your face. His reverse engineering told him that there was only one possible explanation: the atom’s positive charge was all at one location. And so the nucleus was discovered. Rutherford’s results flew in the face of contemporary science. The “plum pudding” model of the atom, which dictated that protons and electrons are spread out evenly throughout the atom (like fruit n a plum pudding), was in complete contradiction to Rutherford’s findings. It was not long before the new way prevailed, and Rutherford had the brand-new “nuclear model” of the atom named after himself. Of course, the great Danish theorist Niels Bohr would unseat him barely a decade later – but that’s another story. Rutherford’s model treats the atom as a solar system, of sorts. It argued (incorrectly, as Bohr and Louis de Broglie would later show) that the nucleus acted as a sun, located at the center. Instead of using gravity to attract the electrons, it relied on the electric force. The electrons orbited the nucleus, zipping around at speeds where the inward pull of the electric force equaled the outward pull of the centripetal force. Even to this day, some of the fundamental ideas of Rutherford’s model are still used. Modern knowledge of the nucleus is not all that much better than it was at Rutherford’s time, though neutrons have been added to the modern model. Also, the idea that the electrons move in “orbitals” is, to some limited extent, still relevant, and is an especially useful mental tool for those who cannot visualize URL to article: http://www.sciences360.com/index.php/what-was-shown-by-rutherfords-gold-foilexperiment-2-12404/ Who? Name the scientists involved, and how they were related. What? Explain the results of the experiment. When & Where? When and where was the experiment conducted? Why? Why was the experiment conducted? How? How did the results of the experiment change existing Atomic Theory? What Did Rutherford's Gold Foil Experiment Tell Scientists About Atomic Structure? By Eric Moll, eHow Contributor Rutherford's experiment, also known as the gold foil experiment or the Geiger-Marsden experiment, involved firing positively charged alpha particles, which are basically helium nuclei, at a very thin sheet of gold foil surrounded by a detector. The experiment, devised by Ernest Rutherford and performed by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden in 1911, yielded surprising results which disproved the prevailing model of atomic structure, generally known as the plum pudding model. 1. Experimental Setup o The experiment setup of the gold foil experiment consisted of an alpha particle emitter, a sheet of super-thin gold foil, and a circular zinc-sulfide detector sheet which surrounded the gold foil. The alpha particles were produced by the radioactive decay of radium. The zinc-sulfide sheet would light up when struck by an alpha particle. Because the initial angle of the alpha particles was controlled by a narrow slit in front of the emitter, the angle of deflection could be calculated based on where they hit the detector. Expected Results o The plum pudding model of atomic structure claimed that an atom consisted of negatively charged electrons dispersed relatively evenly throughout a soup or cloud of diffuse positive charge. If this model were true, the alpha particles would pass through the gold foil without much hindrance. There would be no electrical forces strong enough to change their path by more than a few degrees. Actual Results o Rather than seeing only minor changes to the paths of the alpha particles, the detector sheet showed that most of the particles went straight through without any interference but some were deflected at large angles or even deflected backwards. This was surprising because under the diffuse plum pudding model, there wouldn't be any localized electrical charges strong enough to deflect a heavy, fast-moving alpha particle. Rutherford Model o The results of the gold foil experiment allowed Rutherford to develop a new theory of atomic structure in which nearly all of the mass and all of the positive charge of an atom is contained in a very small "nucleus" at the center of the atom, roughly 1/4000 the diameter of the whole atom. The negative charges, or electrons, orbit around this nucleus. Most of the atom is empty space. The Rutherford Model of atomic structure has since been revised due to advances in quantum mechanics but its basic premise of a tiny, central, positively charged nucleus remains unchanged to this day. Rutherford’s gold foil experiment Purpose: Expected results: (explain why) Actual Results: (explain why) What did the results of this experiment add to the existing atomic theory?