Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Department of Geography, SUNY Bufallo, February 2007 From Pixels to Processes: Detecting the Evolution of Agents in a Landscape Gilberto Câmara Director National Institute for Space Research Brazil Knowledge gap for spatial data source: John McDonald (MDA) The way remote sensing data is used Exctracting information from remote sensing imagery Recipe analogy Most applications use the “snapshot” paradigm Take 1 image (“raw”) “Cook” the image (correction + interpretation) All “salt” (i.e., ancillary data) Serve while hot (on a “GIS plate”) But we have lots of images! Immense data archives (Terabytes of historical images) The challenge of remote sensing data mining How many cutting-edge applications exist for extracting information in large image databases? How much R&D is being invested in spatial data mining in large repositories of EO data? How do we put our image databases to more effective use? Land remote sensing data mining: A GIScience view A large remote sensing image database is a collection of snapshots of landscapes, which provide us with a unique opportunity for understanding how, when, and where changes take place in our world. We should search for changes, not search for content Research challenge: How do model land change for data extracted from a land remote sensing database? MSS – Landsat 2 – Manaus(1977) TM – Landsat 5 – Manaus (1987) Can we avoid that this…. Source: Carlos Nobre (INPE) Fire... ….becomes this? Source: Carlos Nobre (INPE) Dynamic areas (current and future) New Frontiers INPE 2003/2004: Intense Pressure Future expansion Deforestation Forest Non-forest Clouds/no data Modelling Land Change in Amazonia How much deforestation is caused by: Soybeans? Cattle ranching? Small-scale setllers? Wood loggers? Land speculators? A mixture of the above? Agent-based models Recent emphasis on agent-based modeling for simulation of social processes. Simulations can generate patterns similar to real-life situations How about real-life modelling? We need to be able to describe the types of agents that operate in a given landscape. Extracting Land Change Agents from Images Land change agents can be inferred from land change segments extracted from remote sensing imagery. Different agents can be distinguished by their different spatial patterns of land use. This presentation Description of methodology Case studies in Amazonia Research Questions What are the different land use agents present in the database? When did a certain land use agent emerge? What are the dominant land use agents for each region? How do agents emerge and change in time? Challenge: How do people use space? Soybeans Loggers Competition for Space Small-scale Farming Source: Dan Nepstad (Woods Hole) Ranchers What Drives Tropical Deforestation? % of the cases 5% 10% 50% Underlying Factors driving proximate causes Causative interlinkages at proximate/underlying levels Internal drivers *If less than 5%of cases, not depicted here. source:Geist &Lambin Different agents, different motivations Intensive agriculture (soybeans) export-based responsive to commodity prices, productivity and transportation logistics Extensive cattle-ranching local + export responsive to land prices, sanitary controls and commodity prices photo source: Edson Sano (EMBRAPA) Large-Scale Agriculture Agricultural Areas (ha) 1970 Legal Amazonia Brazil 1995/1996 % 5,375,165 32,932,158 513 33,038,027 99,485,580 203 Source: IBGE - Agrarian Census photo source: Edson Sano (EMBRAPA) Cattle in Amazonia and Brazil Unidade Amazônia Legal Brasil Fonte: PAM - IBGE 1992 29915799 154,229,303 2001 51689061 176,388,726 % 72,78% 14,36% Cattle in Amazonia and Brazil Unidade Amazônia Legal Brasil 1992 2001 % 29,915,799 51,689,061 72,78% 154,229,303 176,388,726 14,36% Different agents, different motivations Small-scale settlers Wood loggers Associated to social movements Responsive to capital availability, land ownership, and land productivity Can small-scale economy be sustainable? Primarily local market Responsive to prime wood availability, official permits, transportation logistics Land speculators Appropriation of public lands Responsive to land registry controls, law enforcement Landscape Analysis: Land units associated to agents Space Partitions in Rondônia …linking human activities to the landscape Agent Typology: A simple example Is it enough to describe Amazonian land use patterns? Tropical Deforestation Spatial Patterns: Corridor, Diffuse, Fishbone, Geometric (Lambin, 1997) Landscape Ecology Metrics Patterns and differences are immediately recognized by the eye + brain Landscape Ecology Metrics allow these patterns in space to be described quantitatively Source: Phil Hurvitz 23 Fragstats (patch metrics) (image from Fragstats manual) 24 Some patch metrics PARA = perimeter/area ratio SHAPE = perimeter/ (perimeter for a compact region) FRAC = fractal dimension index CIRCLE = circle index (0 for circular, 1 for elongated) CONTIG = average contiguity value GYRATE = radius of gyration 25 1975 1986 Increased fragmentation 1992 on Rondonia, Brazil Region-growing segmentation Remote sensing image mining Patterns of tropical deforestation (example 1) Patch metrics for example 1 Decision tree classifier C4.5 decision tree classifier (Quinlan 1993). Each node matches a non-categorical attribute and each arc to a possible value of that attribute. Each node is associated the numerical attribute which is most informative among the attributes not yet considered in the path from the root. Decision tree for patterns metrics are: perimeter/area ratio (PARA) and fractal dimension (FRAC) Validation set for decision tree (ex 1) Validation showed 81% correctness Incra settlement projects Small, medium and large farms Started in the 70’s Case Study 1:Rondônia Different spatial and temporal patterns Lots size of 25 ha to 100 ha – Farms from 500 ha. Cattle ranching Objective: To capture patterns and to characterize and model land use change processes Escada, 2003. Prodes (INPE, 2000) TM/Landsat, 5, 4, 3 (2000) Spatial patterns in the Vale do Anari irregular, linear, regular Land use patterns Spatial distrib ution Clearing size Actors Main land use Description Settlement parcels less than 50 ha. Deforestation uses linear patterns following government planning. Linear (LIN) Roadside Variable Small households Subsistence agriculture Irregular (IRR) Near main Settlement main roads Small (< 50 ha) Small farmers Cattle ranching Settlement parcels less and than 50 ha. Irregular subsistence clearings near roads agriculture following settlement parcels. Regular (REG) Near main Settlement main roads Mediumlarge (> 50 ha) Midsized and large farms Cattle ranching Patterns produced by land concentration. Decision tree for Vale do Anari Changes in Incra parcels configuration by (Coy, 1987; Pedlowski e Dale, 1992; Escada 2003): • Fragmentation • Transference • Land concentration Vale do Anari – 1982 -1985 REG Patterns/Typology IRR: Irregular – Colonist parcels LIN: Linear – roadside parcels REG: Regular agregation parcels Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Vale do Anari – 1985 - 1988 REG Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Vale do Anari – 1988 - 1991 REG Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Vale do Anari – 1991 - 1994 Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Vale do Anari – 1994 - 1997 REG Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Vale do Anari – 1997 - 2000 REG Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Vale do Anari – 1985 - 2000 REG REG Confirmed by field work Pereira et al, 2005 Escada, 2003 Marked land concentration Government plan for settling many colonists in the area has failed. Large farmers have bought the parcels in an illicit way Case study 2: Xingi-Iriri watershed in the state of Pará Spatial patterns in the Xingu-Iriri region linear, small irregular, irregular, medium regular, large regular Land use patterns Spatial distribution Clearing size Variable Actors Main land use Small Subsistence household agriculture s Description Linear (LIN) Roadside Small irregular (SMALL) Near main Small settlements (< 35 ha) and main roads Irregular (IRR) Near main Small Small settlements (35 – 190 farmers and main ha) roads Cattle ranching Associated to small family households Medium Regular (MED) Isolated or 190 – 900 Medium near ha farmers secondary roads Cattle ranching Associated medium to farms Large Regular (LARGE) Isolated or Large at the end of (> 900 ha) secondary roads Cattle ranching Isolated, may have airstrips Small farmers Large farmers Roadside clearings, following main roads Family Near main roads labour and and settlements up cattle to 10 Km. ranching to large Decision tree for Terra do Meio spatial patterns Trend towards land concentration where large farms dominate over small settlements. Conclusions Pattern classification in maps extracted from images of distinct dates enables associating land change objects to causative agent Pattern classification techniques associated to remote sensing image interpretation are a step forward in understanding and modelling land use change. Next step: develop agent-based models for deforestation in Amazonia References Mining Patterns of Change in Remote Sensing Image Databases. Marcelino Silva, Gilberto Camara, Ricardo Souza, Dalton Valeriano, Isabel Escada. Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Houston,TX, USA, November 2005. "Remote Sensing Image Mining: Detecting Agents of Land Use Change in Tropical Forest Areas“ Marcelino Silva, Gilberto Câmara, Ricardo Souza, Dalton Valeriano, Isabel Escada. International Journal of Remote Sensing, under review (manuscript available from the author).