Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Meteorol. Appl. (2013) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/met.1367 Climatological evaluation of Haines forest fire weather index over the Mediterranean Basin Hasan Tatli* and Murat Türkeş Department of Geography, Physical Geography Division, Climatology/Meteorology Group, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey ABSTRACT: Forest fires are the most crucial natural threat to forests and wooded areas. They destroy many more trees than all other natural catastrophes such as parasite attacks, insects, extreme weather events and others. Forest fires, especially in summer and dry autumn/spring periods, are frequent in the Mediterranean basin and represent growing environmental and ecological problems. The aim of this investigation is to determine a climatic pattern of fire-meteorology over the Mediterranean basin via the frequency analysis of the forest fires weather index (FFWI) of Haines. The FFWI values were obtained by using the hourly data derived from reanalysis fields available from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) for the period 1980–2010. High frequency values of FFWI, taken to be a sign of moderate-level risk of forest fires, were obtained on the forests, scrubs, succulents and wooded areas in several countries facing the sea including Greece, Italy, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Cyprus, Macedonia, Albania, Serbia, Slovenia, France, Portugal, Spain, Morocco and Tunisia, almost all of which are characterized by dry summer, subtropical Mediterranean climates. As expected, the highest-level risk values are found in the arid desert climate regions: the desert areas of the Sahara and Libya in North Africa and the semi-arid steppe climate regions of the Middle East, as well as the semi-arid environments near the Caspian Sea basin. Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society KEY WORDS fire meteorology; frequency; Haines Index; Mediterranean; dry summer; NCEP/NCAR-reanalysis Received 10 April 2012; Revised 3 September 2012; Accepted 10 October 2012 1. Introduction The Mediterranean basin is heavily affected by forest fires; every year more than 50 000 fires burn an estimated average of 600 000–900 000 ha, an area roughly equal to 1.3–1.7% of total Mediterranean forests (EEA, 2008). Forest fires have decreased in some regions of the world, for example in Canada (Gillett et al ., 2004); however in regions of the Mediterranean basin where data have been available since the 1950s, a large increase in the number of forest fires has been observed from the beginning of the 1970s (European Union, 1993, 1996; EEA, 2008). In a recently published study of Juli and Santiago (2012), the forest fires in the Western Mediterranean basin have been becoming larger and more frequent, but according to the European Forest Fire Information Systems (European Commission, 2010), the number of fires in the southern member states of European Union increased from 1980 to 2000, and has been slightly decreasing since that time. Current climate change trends are towards longer summer droughts and intensification of droughts in other seasons (Tatli et al ., 2004, 2005; Flannigan et al ., 2006; Moriondo et al ., 2006; IPCC, 2007; Tatli, 2007; Türkeş et al ., 2009; Türkeş and Tatli, 2009, 2011; Tatli and Türkeş, 2011). Furthermore, the occurrence of fires could be much higher recently due to economical, political and social activities of humans. For instance, the vast majority of fires in the tropics * Correspondence: H. Tatli, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, Department of Geography, Physical Geography Division, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Terzioglu Campus, 17020 Çanakkale, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society are set deliberately for land clearing and conversion, and as such are considered land use fires, not forest fires. In the past two decades, wide-ranging and frequent droughts, coupled with increased pressures on land and unsustainable forest use, have led to an increase in catastrophic fire events (SCBD, 2001). However, the appropriate meteorological conditions alone are not enough to start a forest fire. Fire establishes when oxygen, heat and fuel (a form of glucose (C6 H12 O6 )n ) combined together in the proper ratio lead to fuel ignition and combustion, frequently referred to as the fire triangle. Additionally, extreme weather events, such as periods of high temperatures, strong air dryness and very strong winds, as well as sudden storms with heavy rainfall in only few hours, are becoming frequent (Johnson and Miyanishi, 2001). One day of high temperatures combined with very low humidity and strong winds could be enough to activate an abandoned forest fire’s processes, which can lead to damage of thousands hectares of forest. Wildfires typically occur during periods of increased temperature and drought. Therefore, scientists and other users make use of similar indices for monitoring the forest fires and drought events. There are many tools for monitoring forest fires. Besides the remote sensing techniques which are widely used (e.g., Paltridge and Barber, 1988; Leblon, 2005), in some cases the forest fire weather indices are also affectively used. These indices are used in many parts of the world to integrate meteorological and fuel information into a single value. This value can then be applied to regions for the issuing of warnings. The most widely used indices are the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (CFWI) System (Van Wagner and Pickett, 1985; Van Wagner, 1987; Dimitrakopoulos et al ., 2011), the US National Fire Danger Ratings System (NFDRS) (Deeming et al ., 1977), Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI) (Keetch and H. Tatli and M. Türkeş Figure 1. The study area, and geographical distributions of climate types over the Mediterranean macroclimate region based on the first, second and third hand letters classification of the Köppen–Geiger climate system. It was re-drawn and arranged from the data by Peel et al . (2007). Byram, 1968) and the Haines Index (Haines, 1988). In fact, some of these techniques, such as KBDI, combine measures of antecedent precipitation and observations or forecasts of near-surface wind speed, air temperature and humidity data to estimate fire danger for fires that are primarily wind-driven, but the Haines Index does not use wind quantity, which indicates its disadvantage. Moreover, the formation of a fire, fire growth and the progression of fire usually depend on vertical humidity and stability of the atmosphere. Accordingly, the Haines Index (Haines, 1988) responds to these situations that measure the potential for rapid wild forest fire growth. Haines does not explicitly define the criteria for major fire, but one can find some suggestion of the size of major fire in the study of Potter (1996), where the criterion is 400 ha. The Haines Index is widely applied, and a number of studies for the wild forest fire-prone countries such as in the United States (e.g., Saltenberger and Barker, 1993; Werth and Werth, 1998; Potter and Goodrick, 2003) have shown significant positive correlation with the Haines Index. There are also several similar key studies performed in Australia. For example, the study of Bally (1995) shows that the Haines Index is influentially efficient to predict fire activity. Additionally, the studies of Long (2006), McCaw et al . (2007) and Mills and McCaw (2010) are relevant. The study by Mills and McCaw (2010) developed a climatology of the Haines Index for southern Australia, proposed an extension of the index to give it greater resolution in dry continental environments, and examined a number of case studies where the index appeared to provide useful information in identifying factors contributing to unexpected fire behaviour. 2. A brief outlook of the Mediterranean Basin Climate In order to evaluate the results of the present study, a brief outlook of the general features of the climate of the Mediterranean will be helpful. According to the Köppen–Geiger climate classification system, the mid-latitude warm temperate (mild) climates (C climates) are mostly located in parts of the latitude range between approximately 25 and 60◦ in either hemisphere, including the Mediterranean Basin (Peel et al ., 2007). Furthermore, the Cs climates of the Köppen classification are principally referred to as the temperate rainy climate with dry summer (humid meso-thermal), but the more widely used term Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society is the dry summer subtropical Mediterranean, which can be shortened to the Mediterranean climate. In C climates the coldest month has an average temperature below 18 ◦ C, but above 0 ◦ C (0 ◦ C < T cold < 18 ◦ C); at least 1 month has an average temperature above 10 ◦ C (T hot > 10 ◦ C). Temperate C climates hence have both an evident summer and winter. The Mediterranean Cs climates are found on the western side of continents centred at about latitudes 40 ◦ N and 40 ◦ S. With one exception, which can be called as the ‘true’ or ‘macro’ Mediterranean climate region, all the Mediterranean climate regions are small in terms of the dominated area. The Mediterranean Csa and Csb climates are also found, for example, in northern Iran, California, Chile, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, in addition to the ‘true’ Mediterranean regions of Portugal, Spain, Coastal Northwest Africa (Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria), France, Italy, Greece, Turkey, Lebanon and Israel (Figure 1). The Mediterranean macroclimate mainly results from the seasonal alternation between mid-latitude (frontal) cyclones, associated with polar air masses, during the winter, and subtropical high-pressure systems, from subsiding maritime and continental tropical air masses, during the summer. Continental tropical air-streams from the northern African and Middle East/Arabian regions generally dominate, particularly throughout summer by causing long-lasting warm and dry conditions over Turkey, except in the Black Sea region and the continental northeastern part of the Anatolian Peninsula (Türkeş, 1998, 2003; Türkeş et al ., 2009, 2011). In winter, a well-known combination of the northeastern Atlantic originated mid-latitude and the Mediterranean cyclones and subtropical anticyclones from the Azores control the weather and climate in the Mediterranean Basin. The Mediterranean Cs climates have the following distinctive characteristics. 1. The major characteristic of the Mediterranean climate is of high temporal variability varying from seasonal and interannual to centennial scales due to the following factors: a. it extends in a transition region between temperate and cold mid-latitudes and tropics (i.e. subtropical zone); b. it has been facing significant circulation (associated pressure and wind systems characterizing mid-latitude Meteorol. Appl. (2013) Evaluation of Haines forest fire weather index and tropical/monsoonal weather and climate, respectively) changes between winter and summer, and, c. it is closely associated with several atmospheric oscillation and/or teleconnection patterns, such as North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Arctic Oscillation (AO), Mediterranean Oscillation (MO), El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and North Sea – Caspian Pattern (NCP) during the course of year. 2. About half of the modest annual precipitation amount falls in winter, whereas summers are mostly rainless. 3. Winter temperatures are unusually mild for the middlelatitudes except in some eastern and inland regions: summer temperatures vary from hot to warm. 4. Cloudless skies and intensive sunshine (incoming short wave solar radiation) are typical, particularly in summer months. 5. Major influences arise from sea and land distribution and their interactions, in addition to the ocean–atmosphere interaction, during the year, particularly in the ‘true’ or ‘actual’ Mediterranean macro-climate region. The study area also includes the B arid and D cold climates (Figure 1). In the arid climates, no water supply occurs in the annual water balance. Consequently, generally no permanent streams develop in these climate regions. The B arid climate is divided into two types: S steppe and W desert climates. The letters S and W are applied only to the arid (dry) B climates, yielding two important combinations as BS and BW. BS steppe climate is semi-arid with about average annual precipitation varying from 350 to 700 mm, and the exact precipitation boundary is determined by a formula considering air temperature. The BS steppe climates are found mainly over the Iberian and Anatolian peninsulas, the large area surrounding the Caspian Sea, and the areas lying nearby the Csa climate zones in the north-western Africa and the western part of the Middle East region (Figure 1). BW desert climate is an arid climate mostly having annual rainfall amount less than 250 mm, exact boundary of desert climate is also determined by a formula. The BW desert climate regions dominate evidently over the northern Africa, the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula regions. The D cold (micro-thermal) climates are found in the northern regions of the Mediterranean Basin including southern Europe (excluding France mainly with Cf climates), Balkans, central and eastern mountainously regions of the Anatolian Peninsula and northern regions of the Caucasia (Figure 1). In this climate, the coldest month average temperature is under 0 ◦ C (T cold ≤ 0 ◦ C), and average temperature of the warmest month is above 10 ◦ C (T hot > 10 ◦ C); that isotherm also coincides approximately with pole-ward limit of forest growth (Türkeş, 2010). 3. Data and methodology The Haines index is derived from the stability (temperature difference between different levels of the atmosphere) and moisture content (dew point depression) of the lower atmosphere. These data may be obtained from radiosonde observations, but this is problematic because there is an insufficient amount of radiosonde data. In this study, the Haines Index values were obtained by using hourly temperature data measured at 1200 GMT derived from reanalysis fields available from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) (Kalnay et al ., 1996; Kistler et al ., 2001) for the period 1980–2010. The data sets have a resolution of 2.5◦ by 2.5◦ in a pane of 12.5◦ W to 55◦ E by 30–50◦ N. The study area in this window completely envelops the geography of the Mediterranean basin (Figure 1). The calculation steps of the Haines Index require temperature values at the 950, 850, 700 and 500 hPa pressure levels, and dew point temperatures at the 850 and 700 hPa levels (Table 1). Indeed, 950 hPa is not a standard pressure level, so the interpolation method suggested by Potter et al . (2008) has been used to obtain the required temperature data. Additionally, there is no derived data set for dew point temperatures in the public data sets of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis over the Mediterranean basin. For that reason, the following algorithm is preferred with other available data values of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis in order to derive a data set of gridded dew point temperatures (T d ). The dew point is the air temperature to which air must be cooled to produce a saturated condition without changes in air pressure and moisture content of the air, that is, the temperature for which the actual vapour pressure is equal to the saturated vapour pressure as defined in the following: Td = 237.3 × ln e e / 17.27 − ln 6.1078 6.1078 (1) where e is the actual vapour pressure at the grid point in question. However, there are also no vapour pressure values in the public data sets of NCEP/NCAR. Thus, the required vapour pressure values were obtained by using the public data values of relative humidity (RH) and temperature (T ) available in the data sets. The first step requires estimating saturated vapour Table 1. Calculating steps of the Haines Index (HI). Elevation Low T A = T 950 − T 850 Mid T A = T 850 − T 700 High T A = T 700 − T 500 Stability (A) component category Humidity (B) component category A = 1 if T A < 4 ◦ C A = 2 if 4 ◦ C ≤ T A ≤ 7 ◦ C A = 3 if T A < 7 ◦ C A = 1 if T A < 6 ◦ C A = 2 if 6 ◦ C ≤ T A ≤ 10 ◦ C A = 3 if T A > 10 ◦ C A = 1 if T A < 18 ◦ C A = 2 if 18◦ C ≤ T A ≤ 21 ◦ C A = 3 if T A > 21 ◦ C B = 1 if T B < 6 ◦ C B = 2 if 6 ◦ C ≤ T B ≤ 9 ◦ C B = 3 if T B > 9 ◦ C B = 1 if T B < 6 ◦ C B = 2 if 6 ◦ C ≤ T B ≤ 12 ◦ C B = 3 if T B > 12 ◦ C B = 1 if T B < 15 ◦ C B = 2 if 15 ◦ C ≤ T B ≤ 20 ◦ C B = 3 if T B > 20 ◦ C T B = T 850 − T d850 T B = T 850 − T d850 T B = T 700 − T d700 T and T d indicate the temperature and dew point temperature values at the pressure level in question respectively. HI = A + B : this is ranging from 2 to 6. Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society Meteorol. Appl. (2013) H. Tatli and M. Türkeş pressure (e s ) of the air as: 273.15 T 273.15 exp 24.846 1 − T es = 6.1078 exp 5.0065 ln (2) The actual vapour pressure (e) values are then calculated using the saturated vapour pressure (e s ) and relative humidity (RH) values (in percent) as in the following: e= RH es 100 Information Systems (GIS) was used to obtain elevation values of the grids. The calculation steps of the Haines Index are given in Table 1 according to Haines (1988) and Potter et al . (2008). Haines (1988) originally developed the Index for the 0000 GMT weather conditions in the northwest of the United States, which is not constructed to identify the extreme conditions in the Mediterranean basin due to the different temperature lapse-rate and humidity climatology of the two continents. The FFWI of Haines at 1200 GMT has been obtained, since the heating and instability for the Mediterranean basin reaches its maximum level at about 1200 GMT. (3) The dew point temperatures are then obtained by inserting e into Equation (1). The Haines index is calculated over three geopotential height ranges: low elevation (950 to 850 hPa), mid elevation (850 to 700 hPa) and high elevation (700 to 500 hPa). A Haines index equal to 6 means a high potential for large fire growth, 5 means medium potential, 4 low potential, and anything less than 4 means very low potential. The thresholds used to transform the differences to values depend on the elevation (represented by z ) of the areas of interest. In the study, values of the low (z ≤ 304.8 m (1000 feet)), mid (304.8 m < z ≤ 914.4 m (3000 feet)) and high (z > 914.4 m) elevations as suggested by Haines (1988) were used. Indeed, there is no elevation information for the grids in the NCEP/NCAR data sets. Hence, a digital elevation model (DEM) used in Geographic 4. Results In order to obtain particular climatic information, the relative frequencies of FFWI of Haines represented by categorical values of ‘2, 3, 4, 5, 6’, and as well as the merged values of ‘2 + 3’, ‘4 + 5 + 6’ and ‘5 + 6’ were calculated. The geographical distribution map of relative frequencies of Haines Index for the value equal to 6 is given in Figure 2. This figure shows the distribution map of relative frequency of where forest fires have high-level risk for large fire growth. It can also be phrased as the map of long-term (climatological) probabilities. As seen in this figure, the probability values greater than 0.2 (or 20%) are only seen over the Syrian and An Nafud deserts of the Middle East, and the desert areas of the Sahara and Libya in north Africa. Nevertheless, these areas depict the poorest Figure 2. The geographical distribution of the probabilities of Haines Index value equal to 6. These are areas with high potential for large fire growth. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/met Figure 3. The geographical distribution of the probabilities of Haines Index value of 5. These are areas with medium-risk potential for large fire growth. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/met Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society Meteorol. Appl. (2013) Evaluation of Haines forest fire weather index Figure 4. The geographical distribution of the probabilities of the merged index category obtained by summation of the Haines Index values equal to 4, 5 and 6. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/met (a) (b) (c) Figure 5. Probability distribution of the humidity (B) component of the Haines Index: (a) B = 1; (b) B = 2; and (c) B = 3. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/met Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society Meteorol. Appl. (2013) H. Tatli and M. Türkeş (a) (b) (c) Figure 6. Probability distribution of the stability (A) component of the Haines Index: (a) A = 1; (b) A = 2; and (c) A = 3. This figure is available in colour online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/met regions in terms of forest cover as well. Likewise, remarkable areas are also observed near eastern and northeastern regions around the Caspian Sea, where the risk of forest fires is greater than 0.2. From the point of view of climatology, one reason for high-level risk of forest fire seen over these regions could be originated from the effects of the cold winter deserts including the Garagum (or Karakum), Qyzylqum and Gobi to the eastern and northern regions near the Caspian Sea basin. Figure 3 shows the geographical distribution of mid-level risk of Haines Index equal to 5. According to this figure, the risk values of greater than 0.2 are seen in the south of Europe and northwestern Africa, where summer forest fires often occur. In addition, regions of the Aegean Sea (i.e., Greece and the southern and western parts of Turkey), Albania, Macedonia, Southern France, Italy, Slovenia, Morocco and Tunisia could be identified Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society as the areas having moderate-level risk. These regions are also relatively rich in forest cover with the Mediterranean climate. Figure 4 depicts the distribution of relative-frequencies obtained by summation of the Haines Index values equal to 4, 5 and 6. As shown in this figure, high-level risks greater than 0.3 are seen in almost all areas except the high mountains and plateaus of Turkey’s interior, northern parts of Europe, and the Middle East region with high mountainous sections. In addition, high-level risks greater than 0.5 are concentrated in the western part of Turkey, Greece, the southern parts of the Balkans, Italy, Slovenia, Spain, Morocco and Tunisia, all of which are mostly characterized with the dry summer subtropical Mediterranean climate (Figure 1). The probability distributions of humidity and the stability components of the Haines index are given in Figures 5(a) Meteorol. Appl. (2013) Evaluation of Haines forest fire weather index and 6(a). According to these figures, the stable atmospheric conditions with low humidity create similar patterns as obtained for the Haines index value equal to 1. This result reveals a parallel with the results in the recent study carried out for Turkey by Tatli and Türkeş (2011): the principal components of Palmer Drought Severity Index show similar patterns with the patterns extracted for soil moisture. The physical geographical controllers (climate, soil, geomorphology) and atmospheric features have strong inter-relationships. As a result, the spatial patterns for the Haines Index values have a clear similarity between the areas covered with forest and wooded areas (Figures 5 and 6). However, high-level risk values seen near the Caspian Sea basin could be evaluated, as these areas are semi-arid steppe climate zones (Figures 3–6). The probability patterns seen over middle and eastern parts of north Africa (the desert areas of the Sahara and Libya) can be assessed by a similar point of view. That is, the reasons for high-level probabilities seen over these regions could be due to the fact of these areas being desert, one of the reasons being that the forest fire weather and drought indices are already obtained by using the same physical background, since both indices are the highest when the air reaches high temperature and low humidity. 5. Conclusions In this study, the forest fire weather index developed by Haines (1988) was applied over the Mediterranean basin and Turkey. It is an important weather index used for monitoring largescale wild forest fires. The Haines index values were obtained at 1200 GMT, because the temperature and instability reach their maximum values at this time over the Mediterranean basin. To calculate index values, temperature and dew point temperature values are required at various standard pressure levels. However, there is no public gridded data set of dew point temperatures in the data sets of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis over the Mediterranean basin. For that reason, the dew point temperature values were obtained using the relative humidity and air temperature values available in the public data sets. After obtaining index values, the maps of relative-frequencies were analysed by viewing the large-scale climatic aspects. The results show that the highest-level risks of Haines Index values were found in semi-arid steppe (BS) and arid desert (BW) climate regions according to the Köppen–Geiger climate classification system. On the other hand, considerable risk values of medium-level for forest fires were found in the forests and wooded areas of the Mediterranean basin, generally with the mid-latitude warm temperate (C) climates but mainly pronounced by the dry summer subtropical Mediterranean climates (Csa and Csb). Moreover, the IPCC (2007) suggests that with global warming, forest fire frequency will increase all over the world. Accordingly, several studies point to the fact that global warming is likely to increase fire frequency and severity (Flannigan et al ., 2006; Moriondo et al ., 2006). Thus, due to high temperatures and droughts, an increase in the number of forest fires in future will also be evident. Therefore, the climatic features of forest fires are evident in the large-scale patterns of fire meteorology. The inability to obtain the records of real forest fires in some areas has a negative impact on scientific studies of this issue, because the results could not be compared with the statistics Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society of real forest fires. This should be viewed as an important open point of this study. Although the spatial properties of the Haines index were examined in this study, it is suggested that researchers examine its dynamics as well. For example, the persistence and trend in the index values need to be studied by means of its autoregressive features. On the other hand, the assessments of growing environmental problems from forest fires, such as emissions from biomass burning, are very important issues that should be revisited. Finally, it is hoped that the large-scale spatial distribution patterns for the risk of forest fires obtained in this study will provide significant climatic information to end users, such as for forest fire managers and officers of the regional and national forestry services and ministries, and researchers and scientists dealing with the climate change adaptation and modelling. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Dr Matthew Jones (School of Geography, University of Nottingham, UK) for improving the English quality of our manuscript. References Bally J. 1995. The Haines index as a predictor of fire activity in Tasmania. Proceedings of Australian Bushfire Conference, Hobart. Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD. 1977. The National fire-danger rating system, 1978. General Technical Report INT- 39, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: Ogden, UT. Dimitrakopoulos AP, Bemmerzouk AM, Mitsopoulos ID. 2011. Evaluation of the Canadian fire weather index system in an eastern Mediterranean environment. Meteorol. Appl. 18: 83–93, DOI: 10.1002/met.214. EEA. 2008. European forests — ecosystem conditions and sustainable use. European Environment Agency (EEA) Report No 3/2008, European Environment Agency (EEA): Copenhagen. European Commission. 2010. Forest Fires in Europe 2009 . EUR 24502 EN. Publication Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. European Union. 1993. Pan-European Conference on Forest Protection in Europe. Strasbourg 1990 (Resolution No. 3). Report of the twelve member states (DG-VI FII 2 Ed.). European Union: Brussels. European Union. 1996. Forest Fires in the South of the European Union-Pilot Project in Preparation for Setting up the Community Forest-Fire Information System(DG-VI FII 2 Ed.). European Union: Brussels. Flannigan MD, Amiro BD, Logan KA, Stocks BJ, Wotton BM. 2006. Forest fires and climate change in the 21st century. Mitigat. Adapt. Strategy Glob. Change 11: 847–859. Gillett NP, Weaver AJ, Zwiers FW, Flannigan MD. 2004. Detecting the effect of climate change on Canadian forest fires. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31: L18211, DOI: 10.1029/2004GL020876. Haines DA. 1988. A lower atmosphere severity index for wildland fires. Natl. Weather Dig. 13: 23–27. IPCC. 2007. IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). 996 pp. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY. Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (eds). 2001. Forest Fires: Behavior and Ecological Effects. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. Juli GP, Santiago FM. 2012. Fire regime changes in the Western Mediterranean Basin: from fuel-limited to drought-driven fire regime. Clim. Chang. 110: 215–226, DOI: 10.1007 /s10584-0110060-6. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa Meteorol. Appl. (2013) H. Tatli and M. Türkeş A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D. 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77: 437–471. Keetch JJ, Byram GM. 1968. A Drought Index for Forest Fire Control. Research Paper SE-38, Asheville, NC. USDA Forest Service. Kistler R, Kalnay E, Collins W, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Kanamitsu M, Kousky V, Van Den Dool H, Jenne R, Fiorino M. 2001. The NCEP/NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 82: 247–268. Leblon B. 2005. Monitoring forest fire danger with remote sensing. Nat. Hazards 35: 343–359. Long M. 2006. A climatology of extreme fire weather days in Victoria. Aust. Meteor. Mag. 55: 3–18. McCaw L, Marchetti P, Elliott G, Reader G. 2007. Bushfire weather climatology of the Haines Index in south-west WA. Aust. Meteor. Mag. 56: 75–80. Mills GA, McCaw L. 2010. Atmospheric stability environments and fire weather in Australia – extending the Haines Index. CAWCR Technical Report No 20, CAWCR. www.cawcr.gov.au (accessed 9 April 2012). Moriondo M, Good P, Durao R, Bindi M, Giannakopoulos C, CorteReal J. 2006. Potential impact of climate change on fire risk in the Mediterranean area. Clim. Res. 31: 85–95. Paltridge GW, Barber J. 1988. Monitoring grassland dryness and fire potential in Australia with NOAA-AVHRR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 25: 381–394. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11: 1633–1644. Potter BE. 1996. Atmospheric properties associated with large wildfires. Int. J. Wildland Fires 6: 71–76. Potter BE, Goodrick S. 2003. Performance of the Haines Index during August 2000 for Montana. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology, 13–15 November 2001, Reno, NV . American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA; 233–236. Potter BE, Winkler JA, Dwight FW, Ryan PS, Xindi B. 2008. Computing the low-elevation variant of the Haines Index for fire weather forecasts. Weather Forecast. 23: 159–167. Saltenberger J, Barker T. 1993. Weather related unusual fire behavior in the Awbrey Hall. Fire. Natl. Wea. Dig. 19: 20–28. SCBD. 2001. Impacts of Human-Caused Fires on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning, and Their Causes in Tropical, Temperate and Boreal Forest Biomes, CBD Technical Series No. 5. Secretariat of Copyright 2013 Royal Meteorological Society the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD): Montreal. Tatli H. 2007. Synchronization between the North Sea-Caspian pattern (NCP) and surface air temperatures in NCEP. Int. J. Climatol. 27: 1171–1187. Tatli H, Dalfes HN, Menteş ŞS. 2004. A statistical downscaling method for monthly total precipitation over Turkey. Int. J. Climatol. 24: 161–180. Tatli H, Dalfes HN, Menteş ŞS. 2005. Surface air temperature variability over Turkey and its connection to large-scale upper air circulation via multivariate techniques. Int. J. Climatol. 25: 331–350. Tatli H, Türkeş M. 2011. Empirical orthogonal function analysis of the Palmer Drought Indices. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151: 981–991. Türkeş M. 1998. Influence of geopotential heights, cyclone frequency and Southern Oscillation on rainfall variations in Turkey. Int. J. Climatol. 18: 649–680. Türkeş M. 2003. Spatial and temporal variations in precipitation and aridity index series of Turkey. In Mediterranean Climate – Variability and Trends, Regional Climate Studies, Bolle HJ (ed)(ed.). Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg; 181–213. Türkeş M. 2010. Climatology and Meteorology, Physical Geography Series No. 1, 1stPublication No. 63 edn. Kriter Publisher: Istanbul (in Turkish) ISBN: 978-605-5863-39-6. Türkeş M, Koç T, Sarış F. 2009. Spatiotemporal variability of precipitation total series over Turkey. Int. J. Climatol. 29: 1056–1074. Türkeş M, Kurnaz ML, Öztürk T, Altınsoy H. 2011. Climate changes versus ‘security and peace’ in the Mediterranean macroclimate region: are they correlated? Proceedings of International Human Security Conference on Human Security: New Challenges, New Perspectives, 27–28 October 2011, CPRS Istanbul, Turkey. Türkeş M, Tatli H. 2009. Use of the standardized precipitation index (SPI) and a modified SPI for shaping the drought probabilities over Turkey. Int. J. Climatol. 29: 2270–2282. Türkeş M, Tatli H. 2011. Use of the spectral clustering to determine coherent precipitation regions in Turkey for the period 1929-2007. Int. J. Climatol. 31: 2055–2067. Van Wagner CE. 1987. Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire weather index system. Technical Report 35, Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa. Van Wagner CE, Pickett TL. 1985. Equations and FORTRAN Program for the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System. Canadian Forestry Service: Ottawa. Werth J, Werth P. 1998. Haines Index climatology for the western United States. Fire Manage. Notes 58: 8–17. Meteorol. Appl. (2013)