Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Detailed description of the problem Energy Crisis-Science says that energy never ends, it only changes its forms. But the source of energy can be well diminished. Now the time has arrived when energy crisis has became a cause of concern for the entire mankind. It is like an activated bomb threatening to explode any time. Fossil fuels, coal, petroleum etc. are considered as prime sources of energy. They are used as propellers in industries, automobiles, locomotives etc. For instance, coal is a conventional source of energy. Once coal is burnt it is gone forever and can never be reused. Once the population bag exploded, the ancient heritage made its way to extinction. Now it is advisable to use conventional energy sources, primary sources of energy in ancient days. Till 1980s transportation was possible only through trains run by coal and diesel. But now, even the automobiles use petrol (Mohanty,n.d.). The industries depend upon these sources of energy. And on the other hand, the country's economy depends upon the productivity of these industries. So basically, a country's economy is entirely dependent upon the availability of sources of energy. The statistics show that coal takes 1000 years for its formation while in thousand years population increases more than 1000 times of the coal produced. Energy crisis has engulfed most of the countries. Even the mightiest country, the United States is fighting against the Middle East for energy sources since decades and has also been in bitter terms with Iran, Iraq and other oil producing countries. These countries have been exercising their monopoly over oil in the international market. Within ten years oil prices has increased by about nine times or 900%. -Nonliving and living factors that contribute to or are affected by the problem Causes Although it is true that environmental regulations have caused some increased energy demand and have restricted supply to some extent, it is important to recognize that other factors have been considerably more significant. These include rapidly escalating demand for energy, energy pricing policies, oil import quotas, lack of incentives to invest in domestic energy facilities, and depletion of domestic oil and gas reserves. Demand for energy has surged in recent years at an average rate of 4.3 percent. Per capita demand is growing at 3.5%. Both rates are significantly higher than historical averages. In 197172, 69% of the total increase in demand for energy was supplied by oil. Consumption of oil has been increasing since 1970 at an annual rate of more than a million barrels per day each year. In contxt with US, Domestic production of oil and production by our traditional suppliers - Canada and Venezuela - has stabilized. The result is that not only has the incremental supply of oil come from imports, but it has also come from new sources in the Eastern Hemisphere. Demand Problems - • A shift in demand occurred toward electrical power because of convenience, despite the fact that electricity is generally the least efficient form of energy. • Use of energy by automobiles has increased rapidly (6.3% in 1972), yet automobiles and aircraft are the least efficient Supply Problems-Although demand for energy has been growing rapidly during the recent years, supply has not kept pace because of economics, facility siting difficulties, resource depletion of oil and gas, and environmental constraints.As was true on the demand side, economic factors have been at the root of the problems with supply. The energy industry has been stalled in its development of new facilities for economic, social and environmental reasons. Requirements for new energy facilities have been increasing exponentially and resistance to them has been increasing as well. OutcomeIt will certainly spread economic pain and hardship globally, especially to those who cannot afford higher transportation and heating-fuel costs. Some vectors, in particular, demand attention: • A slowing in the growth of energy supplies at a time of accelerating worldwide demand; • Rising political instability provoked by geopolitical competition for those supplies; • Mounting environmental woes produced by our continuing addiction to oil, natural gas and coal. According to U.S. department of energy, Energy experts have long warned that global oil and gas supplies are not likely to be sufficiently expandable to meet anticipated demand. As far back as the mid-1990s, peak-oil theorists like Kenneth Deffeyes of Princeton University and Colin Campbell of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) insisted that the world was heading for a peak-oil moment and would soon face declining petroleum output -Positive or negative human impacts Most scientists believe that recent global warming is largely the result of human energy consumption, which releases carbon dioxide, a powerful greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere. Massive, almost inconceivable amounts of energy are used to do everything these days, from building airplanes to running sewer systems and hospital equipment. Energy is the essence of modern civilization, and as societies and economies grow, so does their energy consumption. In the United States and most other developed countries, 85 percent of this energy comes from fossil fuels (mainly coal, oil, and natural gas). In developing countries, wood, charcoal, straw, and cow dung still meet a large portion of heating and cooking needs, but the shift to fossil fuels is happening fast. Global energy consumption is growing at roughly two percent per year and is projected to double by 2035 and triple by 2055. And global energy consumption is so great and rising so fast that humans are demonstrably changing the climate. Technologically advanced societies have become increasingly dependent on external energy sources for transportation, the production of many manufactured goods, and the delivery of energy services. This energy allows people, in general, to live under otherwise unfavorable climatic conditions through the use of heating, ventilation, and/or air conditioning. Level of use of external energy sources differs across societies, as do the climate, convenience, traffic congestion, pollution, production, and greenhouse gas emissions of each society. Increased levels of human comfort generally induce increased dependence on external energy sources, although the application of energy efficiency and conservation approaches allows a certain degree of mitigation of the dependence. Wise energy use therefore embodies the idea of balancing human comfort with reasonable energy consumption levels by researching and implementing effective and sustainable energy harvesting and utilization measures. -Evaluation of current sustainability strategies and solutions For too long, the world has focused on increase in energy supply, including, in particular, through electricity generation. However, there is now increasing realisation that most grid based power supply, transmission, and distribution systems are wasteful, and by saving energy, more of it can be delivered at lower cost to the user. Within the framework of energy laws, governments establish their policies, rules and regulations concerning ownership, exploitation, development and use of energy resources within the boundaries of their jurisdiction. Some countries have comprehensive energy laws which regulate resource exploration, development, production, transport, purchase and distribution of energy for one or more than one energy carrier. Other countries have issued separate laws for each type of fuel governing resource ownership, exploration rights, and trade regulations as well as supply and pricing rules. In most countries, energy supply systems, and electricity supply in particular, remain in the domain of the public sector. Due to the strategic and economic importance of energy private sector activity in this field also remains highly regulated. However, conventional energy laws typically focus on the development and management of the energy resource and supply side, and do not normally provide specific guidelines concerning energy use or demand management. All legislation concerning controls of human activity which cause emission of pollutants or has other environmental impacts may be categorized as environmental laws. During the past ten years many of the developing countries in Asia also announced such laws. Among the developing countries in Asia, national environmental protection laws were established in China (Environmental Protection Law; 1989), India (Environment Protection Act; 1986), Indonesia (Environmental Management Act, 1997), Malaysia (Environmental Quality Act, 1974, amended 1996), Sri Lanka (National Environmental Act; 1980 and 1988), Thailand (Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act, B.E. 2535, 1992) and Viet Nam (Law on Environment Protection; Presidential Order of 10 January 1994). National environmental laws provide a legal basis for prohibiting specific (economic) activities in certain geographical areas (for example, for purposes of preserving forest reserves, parks, wetlands, grasslands, coastal zones or marine parks). Energy conservation laws were first introduced by some oil import dependent countries as emergency measures in the mid 1970s and early 1980s when two subsequent global oil price shocks caused sudden and dramatic trade imbalances and economic recession. Energy conservation laws provide mandates for market intervention, energy price regulation (for purposes of energy price stabilization) and, in some countries, also include provisions for emergency-type rationing of energy consumption. In reaction to the oil crisis, several industrialized countries as well as some energy import dependent developing countries established (temporary) oil price stabilization funds. Related regulations foresee the (temporary) subsidization of energy import costs during expected future crisis periods. In most countries, regulations pertaining to oil price stabilization were repealed or suspended during the late 1980s and early 1990s as part of overall moves towards greater market and price liberalization. Laws and regulatory measures for energy efficiency promotion aim at achieving lower energy intensities in specific economic sectors or the economy as a whole. All energy conservation legislation issued after 1990 focuses on measures for energy efficiency promotion. EPA has been taking positive steps to deal with energy problems during the last year and is now taking emergency action to reduce the severity of the shortage caused by the Arab oil embargo. The environmental movement shares some of the responsibility for the recent surge in energy demand. A number of EPA programs would reduce energy consumption. Obviously, reduction of energy use not only reduces the energy problem, but also limits environmental damages. Hence, there is agreement between environmental and energy interests on the need for conservation. Although environmental regulations are but a small factor in the current energy situation, EPA has acted recently to reduce the adverse impacts on energy of its programs. These actions are consistent with a long-run approach of balancing energy considerations against the need for environmental protection. A number of EPA decisions, some made explicitly in response to energy problems and some made for other reasons, have reduced or will reduce the impact of environmental regulations on energy. Examples of these actions include: • The "Clean Fuels Policy" on coal combustion- In the fall of 1972 EPA determined that imposition of State sulfur regulations under the Clean Air Act would jeopardize the production of more than 100 million tons of U.S. coal. By delaying or modifying regulations more stringent than those needed to meet primary (health-related) standards, this coal could be utilized. Accordingly, for the past year EPA has been encouraging the States to change those regulations to the level needed to meet health standards. This action would save domestic coal production and limit demand for imported low sulfur oil resulting from coal-to-oil switching. • The variance policy on oil combustion- EPA has enunciated a policy of granting temporary variances from sulfur regulations on oil combustion where low sulfur oil cannot be obtained. This ensures that adequate fuel is available, even though emissions standards and air quality standards may be violated. • Emergency switching from oil to coal- EPA has supported the emergency energy legislation proposed in the Congress this year which would allow the President to order power plants to switch from oil to coal combustion, even though it would result in increased sulfur emissions from those plants. Since coal production can only be increased by limited amounts in a short time, EPA has sought to insure that the limited amount of switching that can be done occurs where environmental damages are minimal. • Recommended change of the Nitrogen Oxides (Nox) auto emission standard- Using the revised technique to assess ambient concentrations of Nox and analyzing the impact of auto emissions on urban concentrations of Nox , EPA determined that the Congressionally mandated 90% reduction of Nox auto emissions was not needed to protect health. EPA requested that Congress increase the 1977 Nox auto emissions standard five-fold until 1982. This change has the added benefit of significantly improving fuel economy of cars meeting the standard. According to PSU (n.d.),National Energy Conservation Program- In late 1972, EPA prepared a major study on energy conservation. The most promising measures include: • Increase the population of small autos • Increase aircraft passenger load factor • Apply improved insulation and glass standards to new commercial buildings The EPA study estimates that about 20% of the predicted 1990 demand for energy could be saved if economic conservation policies are implemented as soon as practicable. The Agency is now actively supporting the Office of Energy Conservation (which will be part of the new Federal Energy Administration) in developing a program based on measures such as these. EPA is also participating in several efforts to determine whether alternative energy sources can be utilized in an environmentally acceptable manner. -Your plan to reach sustainability Opportunities for energy conservation are increasingly available in almost every application in any setting. Home, school, office, and industrial environments have all benefited from costsaving and energy-saving innovations. The advantages of energy conservation have been quantified on the local level as tons of air-pollutants avoided and dollars saved. Reduction in global green house gas emissions are also quantified with the benefit of reduced warming affect. • Development of an energy conservation program• Transportation control plans Transportation control plans for certain urban areas have been necessary to reduce pollution to levels needed to protect public health. Some of these plans require reductions in vehicle miles traveled, which also imply reductions in gasoline consumption. Additional fuel savings will be achieved through the inspection and maintenance programs and gasoline vapor recovery measures which are also required by the plans. • Mass transit- I would support construction of mass transit systems because they provide a lowpollution, energy-efficient alternative to automobile travel. Measures such as increased bus fleets, bus/carpool lanes, and commuter-carpool programs will immediately reduce energy consumption and will encourage development of total transportation systems for the future. By reducing our reliance on low-occupancy automobile use the transportation control program will result in significant long-run energy savings. • Resource recovery programs- For many materials, the energy required to mine the ore, refine it, and produce a finished product is much larger than that needed to reclaim the materials from wastes. In one case, recycling aluminum rather than extracting it from raw ore saved about 97% of the energy involved. The energy savings of recycling steel and paper are about 52% and 70% respectively. The potential savings from recycling steel, aluminum, and paper is equivalent to about 190,000 barrels of oil per day. Beside reducing energy demand for manufacturing, resource recovery also provides a benefit for energy supply, since residential and commercial refuse can be used as fuels. The total potential of resource recovery programs equals the equivalent of about 550 thousand barrels of oil per day, or about 1 percent of forecasted national demand for energy in 1980. • Fuel economy labeling progra- We should educate consumers as to the importance of fuel economy differences in lifetime costs of cars and to provide them with data with which to make fuel-saving decisions. Knowledge of this information is expected to have an immediate effect in accelerating the current trend to smaller, more efficient cars. • Land use programs- Land use can effect substantial transportation fuel savings through design of systems where less automotive transport is necessary and where mass transit is convenient. Energy savings in transportation of up to 30% can be accomplished with comprehensive planning. Another energy benefit of land use planning is the ability to reuse waste heat from various sources if communities are designed appropriately. Use of central heating for apartment structures and siting of construction according to meteorological conditions and solar exposure can also provide substantial savings. • Development of more efficient auto propulsion systems- Through the Advanced Automotive Power Systems program, direct financial support should be given to development of new propulsion systems through research funding. Development of alternative technologies by industry could be stimulated by the mobile source standards. These requirements have certainly hastened development of the stratified-charge engine for U.S. cars. National campaigns for energy efficiency promotion can include mandatory energy auditing for large-scale energy consuming industries or other establishments. Regulatory measures for energy efficiency promotion can also include the setting of minimum energy efficiency standards for automobiles or electrical appliances, and the introduction of voluntary or mandatory energy labelling schemes for consumer information. -Benefits and challenges of your plan Benefits- Energy has always been a vital resource in the development of any nation. The prosperity of a nation is measured in terms of per capita energy consumption besides GDP, GNP, etc. While the world has seen hectic industrial activity in the past century it has also come face to face with serious problems arising out of haphazard utilization of the energy resources. It can promise an immediate, long term and multi-faced solution to the problems immerging from increased energy demands against short supplies. Efficiency of energy utilization needs to be a continuous activity as there is lots unproductive energy utilization. Energy conservation can: Save money- Besides saving money on monthly energy bills, energy conservation will reduce the uncollected costs due to environmental damages due to acquisition, transportation and conversion of the fossil fuels, as well as, the future costs of replacing an irreplaceable commodity. Make for a more comfortable home- Proper energy usage will make ones home more comfortable. Proper insulation will reduce or eliminate drafts that suck the heat/coolness out of the house. It reduces the amount of time required for hot water or hot air to reach where we want it. Proper moisture management will provide for less static electricity, fewer allergies, nosebleeds, colds, etc. during the winter, and less condensation, mold and mildew in the summer. Protect the environment -The earth's non-renewable resources are being consumed without being replaced. By the middle of this century, petroleum sources may be significantly depleted. Negative environmental impacts due to energy creation include air pollution, and the release of heavy metals and other contaminants into the air, water, or on the land. Power lines require land and generate electromagnetic fields that are suspected to have a negative impact on human health. Other problems include the generation of spent radioactive wastes from nuclear plants. Any reduction in the demand for energy, particularly electricity and vehicle fuels, will reduce the impacts on the environment. Reduce smog- When coal, wood and petroleum products are burned, pollutants rise into the sky. These chemicals combine with other materials in the atmosphere and physically cook and react among themselves, particularly during the heat of the summer. Weather and geography play a pivotal role in whether and how much of the smog is formed and where it moves. The smog can affect humans, plants and animals, buildings, etc. Physical effects include eye irritation, asthma, stuffy noses, lung aging, reduced lung function, breathing problems, and reduced resistance to colds, etc. Rubber, fabric, and vehicle exteriors can also be negatively impacted. Prevent Global Warming- Inefficient energy use releases atmospheric compounds that may raise the temperature of the Earth over time. These contaminants include carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxides, and are released from the combustion of fossil fuels. The result could be reduction of forests, increasing water levels near the ocean and reduced water levels in the rivers, changes in crop productivity, weather changes, and many other unanticipated changes. Challenges- The process of energy generation, transport and utilization leads to environmental pollution. In-efficient use of energy has stretched the global environment to its limits as can be seen from the unprecedented and unpleasant responses of the nature in the past few years. Green house effect, global warming, acid rain, smog, deforestation, shift in climatic conditions, etc., are some of the indications. Access to cheap energy has become essential to the functioning of modern economies. However, the uneven distribution of energy supplies among countries, and the critical need to widely access energy resources, has lead to significant vulnerabilities. Threats to global energy security include political instability of energy producing countries, manipulation of energy supplies, competition over energy sources, attacks on supply infrastructure, as well as accidents and natural disasters. One of the leading threats to energy security is significant increases in energy prices, either on the world markets - as has occurred in a number of energy crises over the years - or by the imposition of price increases by an oligopoly or monopoly supplier, cartel or country. In some cases the threat might come from a single energy superpower - those states able to significantly influence world markets by their action alone (Klare,n.d.). Rather than just manipulating prices, such suppliers might go beyond this by suspending or terminating supplies. This has been done to apply pressure during economic negotiations - such as during the Russia-Belarus energy dispute - or to apply political pressure, for example by OPEC in response to Western support for Israel in the Yom Kippur War. Suspension of supplies may also come about as a result of worldwide international sanctions against a country. Increased competition over energy resources may also lead to the formation of security compacts to enable an equitable distribution of oil and gas between major powers. However, this may happen at the expense of less developed economies. -Required government, societal, and global support Energy conservation is achieved when growth of energy consumption is reduced, measured in physical terms. Energy conservation can, therefore, be the result of several processes or developments, such as productivity increases or technological progress (Britannica,n.d.). Another way to conserve energy is to consume less, possibly sacrificing output, consumption or comfort. Energy efficiency is achieved when energy intensity in a specific product, process or area of production or consumption is reduced. By definition, energy efficiency does not involve sacrifices or reduction of output, consumption or comfort. Promotion of energy efficiency will contribute to energy conservation and is therefore regularly an integral part of energy conservation promotion policies. Moving towards energy sustainability will require changes not only in the way energy is supplied, but in the way it is used, and reducing the amount of energy required to deliver various goods or services is essential. Opportunities for improvement on the demand side of the energy equation are as rich and diverse as those on the supply side, and often offer significant economic benefits At the same time, concerns over the negative environmental impacts of inefficient uses of energy are growing, both globally and regionally. Such concerns require greater national efforts and greater international cooperation to promote energy efficiency and energy conservation. -Include at least four outside sources. ReferencesPSU. (n.d.)Why conserve energy? Retrieved from http://energy.opp.psu.edu/awarenessconservation/why-conserve-energy Mohanty, Swaraj, n.d., Energy crisis, Retrieved from http://www.bolokids.com/2006/0177.htm U.S. Environmental protection agency, n.d., Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/energy/01.htm Klare, Michael T., n.d., Permanent Energy Crisis, Retrieved from http://www.alternet.org/story/32077/ http://www.britannica.com/eb/topic-1262847/energy-crisis U.S. Department of Energy. (2010). U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from http://www.energy.gov/