Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Workstream 1: Project Management – System Configuration and Business as normal Andrew Heed Kathy Wallis 17 June 2013 Agenda • Some background to us – Trust and ePrescribing Project • Workshop structure – Pre-Go Live planning – Roll-out considerations – Maintenance and Support • Any questions?? University Hospital Southampton • 1100 beds • Provides services for 1.3M people in Southampton and south Hampshire • specialist services such as neurosciences, cardiac services and children's intensive care to more than 3 million people in central southern England and the Channel Islands • major centre for teaching and research in association with the University of Southampton and partners including the Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust • treat around 140,000 inpatients and day patients, including about 50,000 emergency admissions Project timeline Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals • Freeman Hospital • Transplantation, Cancer Centre, Cardiothoracic Surgery, ENT, Vascular…… • Royal Victoria Infirmary • Neurosciences, Emergency care, Children’s Services, Plastic Surgery, Ophthalmology, Dermatology, Maternity • Beds – 1792 (Inpatient) & 205 (Day case) • Activity – – – – – Inpatients – 192,000 Outpatients – 870,000 Lab/ Rad requests – 3 million ePrescriptions – 1.7 million eAdministration – 7.2 million ePx Project • Cerner Millennium system – ePx, electronic orders, A+E, Theatre scheduling, PAS, documentation. • Project timelines: – – – – – – – Work started April 2008 Go-live November 2009 Adult In-patient rollout completed March 2011 Paediatric ward Feb 2013 (ongoing) Starting 2nd system upgrade. Documentation ongoing. Never-ending story Workshop Session 1 Pre-Go Live Planning • • • • • • Design Considerations Testing Hardware Roll-out plan Training …. Workshop Session 1 Feedback / Discussion Design Considerations • The drug catalogue – VTM, AMP, AMPP • Terminology – Routes, forms, frequencies. • Decision support. – Dosing sentences. – Alerts (interaction / dose checking / allergy others) – Order sets • Future -proofing Scope • What can you actually do? – System limitations – Do you need documentation • Where can you do it? – Other systems? • What can you afford / support. Hardware • • • • • Can you ever have enough? What kind? Dispensing trolley? Security / cleanliness / durability. People will have better hardware at home – Or even in their pocket. – But what can an App actually do? Training • Who to train? • When to train? • What to train on? • How many people? • How to get bums on seats? • What about the night shift? • Who will do this in the long term? • Should we even bother? Workshop Session 2 Roll-Out Considerations • • • • • Support Mixed Media Prescribing Bank and Agency Staff Real time PAS / ADT issues …. Workshop Session 2 Feedback / Discussion 29 M ay - 31 July 11 - 16 September 18 - 23 September 25 - 30 September Division B Wards (18 wards) Cancer Care:MAOS (Bay on C3); C3 (Bay B), C4, C7, D3, Cancer Care CMH Cancer Care: C6 Neuro: F8 27 November 2 December 5 - 12 December 11 - 16 December 15 - 27 Jan 05 - 24 February March - August 10 - 30 September 2013 July - December 2013 01 December 2013 ?Autumn 2013 Surgery E5, E7, E8, SDU(Surgery) Cardiothoracic: D4 (Vascular) Theatre 10 Woman's Surgical Unit Bramshaw Woman's Unit, Day Surgical Unit Theatres x 3 and Recovery: PAH SHDU Neurosciences: NICU CNU, DNU, ENU, F8, Neuro-Radiology Theatres: Neuro 1,2,3. Recovery: Neuro Cardiac D2, E3, E4, CHDU, CCU, CSS Theatres: A,B,C,3,4, Complete Paediatric Build. V5.02 - test and install Child Health E1, G4N, G4S, PD / PDM, Neuro Paeds (G2), Piam Brown, PAU, PMU, PHD / LTV, Bursledon House Theatres and Recovery: S,T Outpatients Maternity: Burley, Lyndhurst, Labour Ward, Broadlands, NFBC Obstetric Theatre x 1: PAH To be confirmed: receive and test V5.1 Winter 2013 / 14 Process needs agreeing To be confirmed: Transitional Baby Unit, SCBU NNU To be confirmed: CDU / ?ED Winter 2013 / 14 20 - 25 November Surgery ASU, F5, F6, F7 Theatres: 5,6,7,(11),13,14. Recovery: E Level 2012 To be confirmed: Critical Care: GICU, CICU Child health: PICU 618 November Trauma and Orthopaedics: SDU (T&O), F1, F2, F3, F4 Theatres: Neuro Barn4 & 5,,8,9,11, 12, h,j. Recovery: F level, Neuro • • • October Period Ward Roll Out planning Start upstream or downstream? Time between wards go lives – transfer of patients and outliers Dual systems – paper and electronic 2013 Roll Out planning • Big Bang vs staggered rollout. – What can you support? • Staggered: – Arranged by directorate, patient flow – How does geography affect things – What is your transfer mechanism – Is it realistic – Too fast or too slow. Dedicated ePrescribing support 24/7 • • • • • • ePrescribing team manager (Pharmacist) plus 5 full-time team members (Nurses or Pharmacy Technicians) On-site 24 hour support for 7 days post go live; otherwise 0730 – 2300 on site and on-call over night Used extra support for Theatres when surgical wards first went live (anaesthetists and recovery staff) Bank staff to support staff shortages Moving to be able to provide less on-site support over weekends Key success area for the project: awarded ‘Hospital Heroes’ team prize of Education and Support Agency nurses and locum doctor access • • • • Use NHS professionals and multiple other agencies High agency usage – wards could not operate if agency staff not able to use the system Agreed process where agency nurses (and locum doctors) access and complete training before starting their first shift Agencies responsible for completing System Access Forms Built into the performance metrics for the agencies • Difficult for first few wards, but easier as more wards are live • Real-time ADT • • Was an on-going issue for the Trust to have a accurate electronic bed-state – not a clinical task With ePrescribing: – – – • • • Patient must be admitted to be able to administer medications (can prescribe if pre-admitted) If patient not admitted or transferred to the correct ward, they do not appear on the list of patients due medication If patient not discharged, they will continue to appear on list of patients due medications – each ward needs to clear all non-administered medications overnight to be able to administer medications the next day Nursing staff now complete ADT when ward clerk not on duty (also have a central ADT team to support) ADT available on the drug trolleys – therefore can complete transfers etc ‘on the fly’ Also supports the use of other systems (e.g. Doctors Worklist; Bed Management tools Workshop Session 3 Maintenance and Support • • • • • • • • • Responding to incidents Handling prescription errors On-going maintenance of the system Training Managing Expectations Reporting Data for audit Upgrades Downtime Workshop Session 3 Feedback / Discussion Responding to Incidents • We now have something to blame! • Who does this now? Who does this after go-live? • System fault? or user fault? • But what is the system? – software, user, computer, Wi-Fi, power cable, the workmen digging the road up 3 miles away? • Trend monitoring. • Feedback to users / training central team or department. Consultant review of the drug chart / Drug Chart Viewer • surgical consultant ward rounds • anaesthetist review pre procedure (Demo) On-going modification of build • Link to stock control system limits naming of prescribable items: – Inclusion of strength and formulation • • Modification of existing protocols – general prescribing practice is more open Increasing list of protocols – standardise care and ease of prescribing On-going maintenance • Everything goes through the system – – – – New policies Clinical trials Who designs or build this Can the system / team become a bottleneck? • How do we handle changes to the system? – En masse change vs drip feed. – How does the system handle change? – Change control • Do we need a down-time. Future Proofing • Try to plan for every area you will be going to….. Or you potentially have a large rebuild / renaming process • Try to take the long view and avoid short cuts. • ??? Benefits: Error rates Error Type 70.00% Wrong Route 60.00% Missed Dose Wrong Freq 50.00% Wrong Drug 40.00% Wrong Form Wrong Dose 30.00% No Duration 20.00% No Indication 10.00% Duplicate Illegible 0.00% 1 2 3 Wrong Instructions Administration Error Type Pre and Post EPMA on C5 and G9 12 10 8 Period 1 (Pre) 6 Period 2 (Post) 4 Period 3 (Post) 2 0 Wrong Dose Missed Dose Prep Error Rate Error Wrong Form Wrong Time Benefits: Drug Round times Avg time / patient (Mins) Drug Round am lunch Eve Night pre / post eprescribing Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3 Ward 4 Ward 5 Ward 6 Ward 7 Avg difference (mins / patient Ward 8 pre 11.49 7 7.95 6.45 6.91 7.31 8.6 8.15 post 6.47 6.17 7.57 6.18 7.07 6.88 6.7 9.47 pre 8.68 3.75 4.71 3.43 3.82 4.08 10 4.12 post 3.15 2.73 4.11 3.11 4.47 4.19 3.72 3.7 pre 9.21 5 6.05 4.53 3.96 6.63 post 5.21 4.53 3.45 4.36 5.5 3.25 3.37 4 pre 10.47 5 4.26 4.81 4.5 5.47 12.65 8.71 post 5.78 6.42 4.9 5.43 5.39 6.45 9.38 10.57 0.92 1.67 5.85 1.68 0.19 EN_LOC_NURSE_UNIT_DISP (All) Prescribing of Ceuroxime Whole Trust Count of Month 800 700 500 Age range 65+ 400 UNDER 65 (blank) 300 200 100 2009 2010 2011 Month (blank) 01 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 12 0 11 No. of orders 600 2012 (blank) EN_LOC_NURSE_UNIT_DISP A+E Prescribing of Ceuroxime in A+E Count of Month 60 50 No. of orders 40 Age range 30 65+ UNDER 65 20 10 0 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 2009 2010 2011 Month 2012 Nov-11 Sep-11 Jul-11 May-11 Mar-11 Jan-11 Nov-10 Sep-10 Jul-10 May-10 Mar-10 Jan-10 Nov-09 Sep-09 Jul-09 May-09 Mar-09 Jan-09 Graph of C Diff incidence Questions?