Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal Executive Summary Revolutionizing the Future of Medicine: The Federal Investment in medical research through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) promises to revolutionize how we diagnose, treat, and prevent and cure disease. Congress and the Administration have accelerated the fulfillment of this potential by committing, in a bipartisan fashion, to double the NIH budget over the five-year period FY 1999 to FY 2003. Three primary reasons for doubling NIH’s budget include the many health challenges that still confront us, the burgeoning scientific opportunities that are now available, particularly as a result of the scientific achievement of sequencing the human genome, and the large economic benefits that accrue as we make progress against diseases. For these reasons, the Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding joins with the President and the Congress in supporting an appropriation of $27.3 billion for NIH in FY 2003, to achieve the bipartisan goal of doubling NIH by FY 2003. Extending Research from the Genome to the Patient: NIH’s support for basic research has resulted in unprecedented opportunities in genetics and an increased emphasis on the application of fundamental knowledge to specific diseases through clinical research. Providing the Infrastructure for Continued Discovery: Investigator-initiated research is the engine that drives scientific creativity and productivity. However, to realize fully the potential of our scientists’ creativity, additional support is also required for a variety of mechanisms that support a state-of-the-art research environment. A stable, well-maintained research infrastructure includes support for training, facilities, instrumentation, imaging, and information technology. Maintaining the Public’s Trust: NIH has a thorough merit-review system for deciding which research proposals to fund and which areas of science and health needs to pursue. It also has systems to monitor the research conducted by grantees to ensure it is carried out and reported ethically, accurately, and accountably. Sustaining the Momentum of Research to Confront Future Challenges: Recent NIH investments have helped create new diagnostic methods, new treatments, new vaccines, and new cures. Doubling the NIH budget will provide the additional resources needed to enable American scientists to address the burgeoning scientific opportunities and new health challenges that continue to confront us. When the doubling of the NIH budget is achieved, there will still be many disease burdens facing us, and NIH-supported scientists will remain our best hope for solving them. It is therefore essential to sustain the momentum of NIH-funded research so that it continues to be able to meet the ever-evolving responsibility of improving the health of all Americans. Introduction Imagine walking into the doctor’s office for your annual check-up. Instead of going through a battery of uncomfortable and expensive tests, a drop of your blood is placed on a microchip. Within minutes, you are told not only the state of your health today, but also whether you are at risk for any particular disease or illness in the future. And to ward off that threat, your doctor prescribes a drug or even a vaccine designed with your genetic make-up in mind. Science fiction? This could become science fact, especially when you consider the onceunimaginable gains that have been achieved our health. years. NIH research played a major role in lowering the death rates for heart disease by 48 percent and stroke by 61 percent during this same period. An estimated 80,000 more people with cancer are alive each year compared to four decades ago. NIH research has aided in the development of new medications that reduce or eliminate the symptoms of schizophrenia in 80 percent of patients, just as it has made possible vaccines against infectious diseases that once killed and disabled millions of children and adults. Most recently, medical researchers have been marshaled to help the nation respond to new menaces, including bioterrorism and drugresistant infectious diseases. Research supported and conducted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) - the world’s pre-eminent medical research organization may soon lead to the kind of personalized diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of disease envisioned above, if the recent past is any indication. Due in large part to an intensive medical research effort begun shortly after World War II, this country has built a remarkable health record. Life expectancy in 2000 reached an alltime high of 76.9 years; in 1970, it was 70.8 Presidents and Congresses have longrecognized the promise and value of investing in medical science. But that support took on even larger proportions when, in 1998, Congress made a bipartisan commitment to double the funding for the National Institutes of Health in five years (FYs 1999-2003). This bold and unprecedented action reflected both the health challenges facing our Nation, and the unparalleled opportunities science holds for meeting those challenges. The more than 300 organizations of the Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding, representing patients, volunteers, research institutions, scientists and medical professionals, wholeheartedly agree that research offers the best hope for saving lives, reducing human suffering, and lowering health costs. To those ends, the Ad Hoc Group strongly urges our nation’s leaders to provide an appropriation of $27.3 billion for NIH in fiscal year 2003. Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 2 The Rewards of Research The Challenges that Remain Research supported and conducted by NIH has had a profound and far-reaching impact on society in many important ways, serving as a catalyst for new products and technologies, creating skilled jobs, and contributing to the nation’s economic growth. But above all else, the central tenet of medical research is to safeguard and improve the lives of all our citizens. Despite these impressive achievements, much work remains to be done. There still is a formidable list of diseases for which there are no cures or effective treatments, and we are continually confronted with new challenges to good health: the emergence of new, lifethreatening diseases and infectious agents; the increased health risks associated with a rapidly aging population; racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence and severity of many diseases; and social, environmental and behavioral factors that undermine good health. In that regard, NIH research is paying enormous dividends. Americans are living longer, more productive lives; infant mortality rates have been reduced; and communicable diseases that once were thought incurable have been all but eliminated. And the quality of those added years of life also has improved, as evidenced by the steady decline, by 1 - 1.5 percent per year over the last two decades, in the number of elderly experiencing developmental, physical and mental disabilities. Chronic diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes continue to claim the lives of millions of Americans each year, wasting precious human resources and draining billions of dollars from the nation’s economy. Economic Burden of Illness Annual Cost Disease/Condition (in billions) Injury $338 Alcohol Abuse and Dependence $185 Heart Diseases $183 Disability $169 Mental Disorders $161 Smoking $138 Drug Abuse $110 Alzheimer’s Disease/Dementia $100 Obesity $99 Diabetes $98 Cancer $96 Chronic Pain $79 Arthritis $65 Digestive Diseases $56 Stroke $43 Source: “Disease-Specific Estimates of Direct and Indirect Costs of Illness and NIH Support,” NIH, February 2000. NIH research has produced safe, cost-effective vaccines against a number of diseases, including hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcus and pertussis, that have the potential to save millions of lives a year. In May 2001, the FDA approved Gleevac™ for use in treating a serious blood cancer known as chonic myelogenous leukemia. This drug – developed as a result of more than 40 years of NIH-funded research and a successful collaboration with industry – is the first of its kind to be approved: a drug that targets specific molecules in cancer cells, leaving healthy cells unharmed. Newly developed medications for schizophrenia have reduced psychiatric hospitalizations nearly 30 percent between 1996 and 1998. By reducing dangerous and unwanted side effects, these drugs have increased patient treatment compliance rates and resulted in estimated savings in hospitalization costs of $1.7 billion annually. The aging of our population is creating enormous challenges in health care. Nine years from now, “Baby Boomers” will begin to turn 65. By 2050 the number of Americans age 65 and over will have more than doubled and the number of Americans over age 85 will have increased five-fold. With increasing age comes increasing risk of disease and disability. Society must find ways to preserve the physical, cognitive, and social functioning of our older citizens, and when they do fall ill, we must work to ensure the availability of effective treatments Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 3 for conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, osteoporosis, arthritis, chronic pain, blinding eye diseases, depression, and other health problems prevalent in the elderly. Mental illness continues as a national concern, particularly among our younger citizens. In the United States, 1 in 10 children and adolescents suffer from mental illness severe enough to cause impairment. The Surgeon General released a report in January 2001, announcing a “national crisis” in children’s mental health. The report calls for the further development of scientifically proven prevention and treatment services. Infectious diseases, the second leading cause of death worldwide, present an ever-growing threat to millions of Americans with the emergence of infectious agents like hepatitis C, and the re-emergence of diseases like tuberculosis, malaria and cholera in more virulent and drug-resistant forms. Health conditions, often involving intricate biological factors, that are manifested in behaviors – often at an early age – such as obesity, drug and alcohol addiction, smoking, sexually-transmitted diseases, violence and teen pregnancy, take an enormous health, social and economic toll on the nation. Increased behavioral research has the potential to substantially reduce these and other health problems including heart disease, lung disease, cirrhosis, neurological disorders, developmental disabilities, and many others. Greater risks befall minorities and the poor who have not shared equitably in the progress in the nation’s overall health, and experience continuing disparities in the incidence of illness and death from cancer, hypertension, diabetes, infant mortality and AIDS. Responding to the Increased Threat of Bioterrorism Research has been underway for years to improve America’s capacity to respond to bioterrorism threats or attacks. For example, more than a year ago, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases began a study to determine the effectiveness of the smallpox vaccine at different levels of potency. In response to increasing concerns over potential bioterrorism threats or attacks, NIH recently announced several new, more intense research initiatives, and Congress has added additional bioterrorism funding. Many of these new programs will build on past studies and findings, applying the latest technology and methods in order to expedite research on high priority diseases such as smallpox and anthrax. The goals are to: Seek new medications and faster, more accurate diagnostics for other diseases that could pose a bioterrorism threat. Apply the latest technologies to map the gene sequences of particular infectious organisms. Establish multidisciplinary research units to investigate diseases that could be used by terrorists and rapidly disseminate their findings. Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 4 Economic Productivity and Job Creation The JEC found that of the 21 most important drugs introduced between 1965 and 1992, 15 were in part the result of federally-funded research, and seven were the direct result of NIH research. The success and prosperity of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry has long depended upon NIH-supported science for "enabling discoveries" and for training the skilled workers needed to develop cures and therapies. The revolutions in molecular biology and in genomics can only strengthen this reliance. The economic returns from medical research are an additional reason for supporting increased NIH funding. A May 2000 Ernst and Young study entitled The Economic Contributions of the Biotechnology Industry to the U.S. Economy found that the biotechnology industry employed 150,800 people in 1999. Adding the purchases from other related companies and the spending of their employees, the biotechnology sector generated an additional 287,000 jobs in 1999. Product sales for the biotechnology industry grew by 33 percent that same year for a total of $20.2 billion. Fundamental Science: The Foundation of Health Research According to the Congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC), high-tech and research-driven industries, including biotechnology and the pharmaceutical industry, have contributed directly to one-third of our nation’s economic growth over the past decade. New technologies, new methods of inquiry, new scientific perspectives - these are the building blocks of medical research in the 21st Century, and NIH is the major supporter of fundamental science. We often think of NIH as being responsible for producing what we know about specific diseases. But NIH also is a driving force for progress in science more generally – for advances in the conduct of research that allow us to better examine many specific diseases. Health Care Cost Savings Cardiovascular disease provides a dramatic example of the economic return possible from a disease prevented, ameliorated or cured. According the JEC, savings resulting from the reduction in cardiovascular mortality and ensuing longevity and economic productivity are estimated at $1.5 trillion a year. If one-third of this reduction in disease and resulting economic benefit can be attributed to medical research, the return on the research investment could be $500 billion annually, nearly 28 times the size of the FY 2002 NIH budget. To provide just a handful of examples, NIH has played a central role in developing advanced imaging technologies, animal models of disease and health, high-end computational facilities, state-of-the-art instrumentation, non-invasive diagnostic techniques, shared databases, sophisticated assessments of health disparities in ethnic minorities, improved prediction of risk factors for a variety of conditions, new ways of analyzing longitudinal data, and innumerable other accomplishments that have allowed our Nation’s scientists to pursue new research directions that even a short while ago were unimaginable. The May 2000 report commissioned by the Mary Woodward Lasker Charitable Trust, Exceptional Returns: The Economic Value of America’s Investment in Medical Research, states that medical research that reduced deaths from cancer by just one-fifth would be worth $10 trillion to Americans – double the national debt. In fact, the cancer death rate has dropped more dramatically for children than for any other age group. Up to 70 percent of all children with cancer can now be cured. As outlined on the following pages, two trends that have emerged as a result of NIH’s support for basic research are the increasing importance of genetics and of clinical research in the research agenda for all of the NIH institutes and centers. Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 5 GENETICS From Molecular Medicine to Human Health Less than 50 years after the landmark discovery of the structure of DNA, the Human Genome Project - an international collaboration led by NIH’s National Human Genome Research Institute - reported the initial sequence and analysis of the working draft of Finding the Genes that Contribute to Disease the DNA sequence of the human genome. Just as and Illness Watson and Crick’s discovery ushered in the era of molecular biology in research, the completion of the The National Institute of Environmental human genome heralds a revolution in the practice Health Sciences is conducting studies to of medicine. identify critical variations in genes that affect an individual’s response to toxins. Deciphering the human genetic code – what has been described as the “instruction book for human biology” – surely would not have been possible without a sustained commitment of federal funding. Consider that prior to launching this collaborative effort, it took scientists nine years to find the gene for cystic fibrosis; under the Human Genome Project, scientists precisely described a gene for Parkinson’s disease within nine months. Obtaining the complete sequence of the human genome is only the prelude for things to come. For the full impact of advances in genetics to be felt in the practice of medicine, major challenges must be addressed. Much work remains to understand how the human genome carries out its many functions. But the consequences for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of disease will be profound. National Institute of Mental Health research has led to the discovery of a genetic vulnerability to schizophrenia. A recent study from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke indicates that a specific gene can dramatically improve the ability of adult neurons to regenerate. In collaboration with their European colleagues, scientists funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders have identified regions of four chromosomes that appear to be linked with autism. Much of the progress in understanding and treating human diseases has come from research using experimental animals, especially the mouse. Animal research will play an important role in helping scientists understand the biological functions of genes. Because mice and humans share virtually the same set of genes, the sequence of the mouse genome will provide a critical perspective to help scientists understand the human genome. Scientists will not only be able to find genes easily in the sequence of the mouse genome, they also will be able to test possible therapies for humans in mouse models of disease. Genomic medicine holds the ultimate promise of revolutionizing the diagnosis and treatment of many illnesses. Some scientists predict that using genetics to predict individual risks of disease and responsiveness to drugs will reach the medical mainstream in the next decade or so. The development of so-called “designer drugs,” based on a genome approach to targeting molecular pathways that are disrupted in disease, will become more common soon after. Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 6 CLINICAL RESEARCH From the Bench to the Bedside Medical research often is described as a continuum, from basic research to clinical research. But the journey from basic research to human health is not an automatic, linear evolution. Studies must be undertaken at several stages, beginning with translational research to explore whether there are possible health applications for basic research findings, and moving through clinical research – including clinical trials – to the actual use in clinical practice. Past investments in basic research supported by NIH have produced a wealth of knowledge about the fundamentals of human health and disease. But this accumulation of knowledge must be put to use to fulfill NIH’s health mission and to realize the full value of the nation’s research investments. An integral part of NIH’s mission is to move the unprecedented amount of information generated by basic research from the hands of the laboratory scientist to the practitioner. By supporting clinical research as well as basic research, NIH is ensuring that new knowledge can be put to use in preventing, diagnosing and treating disease and disability. Moving knowledge from the laboratory bench to the patient is neither easy nor inexpensive. The scope, size and pace of modern medical research is nowhere more apparent than in clinical research, particularly clinical trials, which requires setting up teams to design research protocols, recruit participants, conduct the trails, and analyze the data. The Ad Hoc Group supports increased funding for additional clinical research infrastructure, including general clinical research centers (GCRCs) - a national network of approximately 75 centers, usually located within teaching hospitals, with specialized resources and infrastructure to support clinical investigations - and community-based clinical research. Clinical Research Across the Nation: Translating Basic Research into Effective Therapies The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases is continuing studies to develop prevention strategies through its Type 1 Diabetes TRIALNET and has issued two requests for applications to develop clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. The National Institute on Drug Abuse has launched a Clinical Trials Network to test promising pharmacological and behavioral therapies across a wide range of community-based treatment centers and diverse patient populations. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke is supporting a network of acute stroke centers that will provide rapid treatment to patients and serve as a clinical laboratory for related studies, including the testing of new medicines The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases continues to support programs to build the infrastructure for clinical trials, including the Immune tolerance Network, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group, and the HIV Vaccine Trials and Prevention Trials Networks. The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skins Diseases and the National Institute on Aging are collaborating with other NIH institutes and centers and pharmaceutical companies on the Osteoarthritis Initiative, and public-private partnership to provide resource for clinical research. Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 7 Research Infrastructure Required To Produce Discoveries Setting Priorities, Ensuring Accountability Investigator-initiated research is the engine that drives scientific creativity and productivity. NIH fosters this creativity through its investment in research project grants. However, to realize fully the potential of our scientists’ creativity, additional support is also required for a variety of mechanisms that support a state-of-the-art research environment. A stable, well maintained research infrastructure includes not only innovative research tools and facilities, but also investments in people, education and technology. NIH is the largest and most comprehensive medical research enterprise in the world, supporting scientific study at more than 2,000 universities, medical schools, hospitals and research institutions spread throughout the country; supporting training of over 15,000 investigators annually for careers in science; and conducting research in its own intramural laboratories. Through its extramural research program, NIH enlists the talents of approximately 50,000 scientists. The roster of individuals who have received NIH support in the past includes 97 Nobel Prize winners, five of whom made their prize-winning discoveries while working in NIH laboratories. Training - The next generation of researchers needs adequate stipend and tuition support. Current levels of support provide little incentive for young scientists to pursue careers in research. Efforts to increase the participation of minorities in research careers should be expanded and enhanced. Facilities - More cutting-edge research requires more state-of-the-art labs. For example, pioneering new research into viral pathogens requires very costly Level 4 laboratories, which have increased safety and security measures. Instruments - Increasingly sophisticated equipment is required for today's research. One time investments in large instrumentation such as mass spectrometers can be used by multiple researchers from a variety of disciplines. Imaging - New imaging methods have revolutionized diagnostics and treatment design. For example, new high powered magnetic resonance technology allows scientists to witness the real-time effects of drugs or behavior on patients’ brains. Information technology - increasingly powerful computing has become a mainstay of advanced medical research as research is producing more complex data. Bioinformatics is fusing medicine and information technology to help diagnose, monitor and treat disease. Entrusted with the nation’s largest investment in medical research, NIH is responsible for ensuring that the taxpayer’s dollars are allocated prudently, consistent with national priorities, and in a fashion that holds recipients accountable for meeting stringent legal and ethical standards for the protection of human subjects, the care and well-being of animals used in research experiments, and the handling of biohazards. To those ends, NIH has in place a carefully constructed system for setting research priorities, and a tiered review process to ensure that those grant applications of highest scientific merit are funded. NIH sets priorities through a complex series of evaluations and judgments among its more than two dozen research institutes and centers, each of which has a different research focus. The first level of priority-setting is guided in large part by the annual appropriation for each institute and center. The next occurs when applications for funding are initially reviewed for their scientific merit by a panel of outside experts. Applications that score sufficiently high are then assigned to the most appropriate institute or center, where they undergo a second evaluation by an advisory council composed of scientists and a crosssection of public representatives. Universities, medical schools, teaching hospitals, independent research institutions, and federal laboratories, take seriously their responsibilities to ensure that Federal research funds are used carefully to advance science. The recent strengthening of the oversight system involving protection of human subjects in research has Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 8 caused investigators and the institutions in which they work to re-focus their attention to ensuring that human beings who are the subject of research are treated ethically and responsibly. Institutions and investigators must also adhere to federal laws and regulations governing conflict of interest, scientific misconduct, care and treatment of animals, and the handling of hazardous materials. Sustaining the Momentum Of Discovery NIH funding has helped to create the new diagnostic methods, treatments, vaccines and other preventive measures and cures that we described above. But there still will be many challenges ahead. An ongoing commitment to sustaining the momentum of NIH-funded research will remain our best hope for solving them. One measure of whether the nation's medical research system is setting the right priorities and funding the best scientists to work on the most important scientific problems in a cost effective manner is to compare the frequency of medical breakthroughs generated by NIH-supported scientists to those generated by scientists supported by other nations. By this measure, NIH has been the world's leader in medical research, and America has the world's most highly acclaimed and emulated medical research system. Even with the additional funding provided by the current doubling effort, there still are two highquality unfunded research proposals for every one that gets funded — any of which could be the idea that leads to the cure for Alzheimer’s, cancer, or diabetes. Medical research is a long-term process. The scientific “breakthroughs” trumpeted by the newspapers and television are the result of years – sometimes decades – of basic and clinical research. Ensuring future breakthroughs requires sustained investments to attract and retain first-class researchers and to create and maintain state-of-the-art laboratories. If NIH research is to continue to meet the everevolving challenge of improving the health of all Americans, we as a nation must continue our commitment to medical research. The Ad Hoc Group urges Congress and the Administration to finish the job of doubling NIH by appropriating $27.3 billion in FY 2003. We look forward to working with the Executive and Legislative branches to increase support for this critically productive enterprise that enhances the quality of life for all Americans in the years to come. Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research Funding – FY 2003 Proposal 9