Download Steven Feldman_NCI

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Adoptive Cell Therapy for the Treatment
of Cancer: The CAR-T Cell Experience
Steven A. Feldman, Ph.D.
Surgery Branch, NCI
MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES FOR CAR-T
BIOMANUFACTURING
January 29, 2016
1
Disclosures
No financial disclosures
This work is supported, in part,
through a CRADA with KITE Pharma
2
Outline
•
•
•
•
Background
CD19 CAR-T process development
CD19 CAR-T clinical experience
CAR-T therapy for solid cancers
3
Three Main Approaches to Cancer Immunotherapy
1. Non-specific stimulation of immune reactions
• Stimulate effector cells (IL-2, IL-12)
• Inhibit regulatory factors (PD-1, CTLA-4)
2. Active immunizations to enhance anti-tumor reactions
• Cancer vaccines
3. Passively transfer activated immune cells with anti-tumor activity
• Adoptive cell transfer
4
Gene Therapy Approach for Adoptive Cell Transfer
Tumor-specific TCR/CAR
Clinical
retroviral vector
Morgan RA, et al. Science 2006; 314(5796): 68-9.
5
Advantages of Cell Transfer Therapy Using Genetically
Engineered Cells
1. High avidity anti-tumor T cell receptors (TCR) and/or chimeric
antigen receptors (CAR) can be identified and cloned using in
vitro assays.
2. Peripheral blood lymphocytes can be genetically modified to
express these high avidity TCRs/CARs.
3. Large numbers of tumor-specific lymphocytes can be grown in
vitro.
4. The host can be manipulated to provide a favorable tumor
microenvironment prior to administering the cells.
5. ACT can mediate tumor regressions.
6
A Critical Challenge Confronting the Development of
Human Cancer Immunotherapy is the Identification of
Antigens to Target
1. Differentiation antigens overexpressed on cancers compared
to normal tissue (MART-1, gp100, CEA, Her-2, Mesothelin)
2. Antigens expressed on cancers and on non-essential normal
tissues (CD19, thyroglobulin)
3. Shared antigens unique to cancer (cancer-testes antigens,
NY-ESO-1, MAGE-A)
4. Critical components of the tumor stroma (VEGFR2, FAP)
5. Mutations unique to each cancer (EGFRvIII)
7
Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs)
Step 2
Step 1
Step 3
Ig scFv
Linker/TM
T cell signaling
Antibody Producing Hybridoma
Ig Genes
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)
sd
Step 5

Step 4
sa
LTR
CD28
Anti-tumor Ag-scFv
CD3 zeta
LTR
Transduce PBL
sd
LTR

sa
Anti-tumor Ag-scFv
CD8
CD28
4-1BB
CD3 zeta
LTR
8
CAR-T Program for the Treatment of CD19+ Hematologic
Malignancies
• More than 20,000 people die of B-cell malignancies annually
in the U.S.
• CD19 is expressed by more than 90% of B-cell malignancies.
• CD19 is expressed by mature B cells, B-cell precursors and
plasma cells but not any other normal tissues.
• B cells are considered a “non-essential” tissue.
Anti-CD19 CAR
5’ LTR

FMC63 scFv
CD28
CD3-zeta
3’ LTR
9
A Rapid Cell Expansion Process for the Production of CD19
CAR-T Cells
Process Development Objectives:
• Develop a closed process
• Production time of 6 days
• Cryopreserved cell product
• GMP-compliant
Stimulation
Approx 1E9
Cell #
Days
0
<1E9
1
Transduction
2E8
2E8
2
3
Expansion
2.5E8
5E8
4
5
1E9
6
10
Development of a CAR-T Cell Closed Production Process
Current NCI Process
•
•
Manual Ficoll Separation
of PMBC
•
•
Stim in T175 Flask (open)
AIM V + 5% Hu serum
supplemented with anti-CD3 Ab
and rIL2
Wash cells after Stim (open)
Days
Transduction in 6 - well plates
by Spinoculation (open
process)
•
•
•
•
•
Expansion in T-175 flasks
(open process)
7 day expansion
Cell concentration and wash
(open process)
Administer fresh cells
Improved Process
Apheresis product
Enrich for lymphocytes
•
•
Ficoll Separation of PBMC by
Sepax 2 (closed process)
Stim in Culture bags (closed)
Serum-free medium with anti-CD3
Ab and rIL-2
Wash cells after Stim
(Sepax 2, closed process)
T Cell
Days
0-2
Activation
0-2
•
Days
Retroviral
Days
•
2-3
Transduction
2-3
Transduction in Culture bags
(closed process)
•
Expansion in bags (closed
process) without antibiotics
3 day expansion
Days
3-10
T Cell
Expansion
Days
3-6
•
•
Harvest
Cell concentration and wash
(closed process)
Cryopreserve product
11
Optimization Parameters
Process Steps:
• Cell culture medium
• Serum replacement
• Bag comparison
• Cell density at OKT3 stimulation
• Post-stimulation wash
• Transduction





Retronectin concentration
Vector dilution
1 vs 2 transductions
Bag flip
Cell density
Analytical Assays:
• FACS
– CAR+ cells
– Phenotype
• Co-culture
• ELISA
• qPCR
– Copy number
– Persistence
• Sepax
 Apheresis
 OKT3 wash
 Final product wash
• Cryopreservation
12
Sepax 2 can Efficiently Process Apheresis Products
Sepax Technologies, Inc.
13
Optimizer-TCSR Medium can Support T Cell Growth
Cell Number
1.5×108
OpTmizer CTS
1.0×108
AIM V medium
X-VIVO 20 Medium
5.0×107
TexMACS GMP medium
AIM V 5%
0.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 .5  1 0
8
1 .0  1 0
8
5 .0  1 0
7
p = 0 .7 7 8 1
iz
e
IM
r
V
C
T
5
S
%
0
O
p
T
m
A
C e ll N u m b e r
Day
14
Optimization of Cell Concentration During Transduction
6 well (9.5 cm2):
• 2e6 cell/well
• 10 ng/ml RN
• 4ml (1:1 vector)
• 0.5e6 cell/ml
• 1e5 cell/cm2
PL240 (540 cm2):
2e8 cell/bag
10 ng/ml RN
400ml (1:1 vector)
0.5e6 cell/ml
3.7e5 cell/cm2
100
% T r a n s d u c t io n
80
60
40
20
c
u
h
s
d
8
t
ra
n
a
p
T
li
2
n
d
F
g
0
.5
e
6
/m
l
B
a
o
ti
u
o
6
e
.5
0
.2
0
n
U
n
rs
l
/m
/m
6
e
5
e
.1
0
tr
a
n
s
d
u
6
c
e
/m
d
l
l
0
15
6 Day Closed Production Process – Engineering Runs
• 5 engineering runs at scale and compared to standard open
process
• Evaluated
•
•
•
•
Transduction efficiency
Function (IFNg secretion)
Cell expansion
Phenotype
16
A Comparison of the Standard Open and 6 Day Closed
Production Process
50000
Bag
PL240 Bag
P la te
40000
IF N g ( p g /m L )
***
80
60
40
30000
20000
10000
20
M
-N
C
E
R
F
G
L
A
2
6
5
K
* * * p < 0 .0 0 1
M
o
d
T
o
le
o
C e ll P r o d u c t io n P r o c e s s
N
P la t e
e
B ag
n
UT
6
0
0
N
% T r a n s d u c t io n
100
C e ll L in e
17
A Comparison of the Standard Open and 6 Day Closed
Production Process
Bag
P la te
80
60
40
20
ra
m
T
e
T
e
m
m
c
T
a
iv
e
0
N
P e r c e n t a g e o f T o t a l C e lls
100
C e ll P h e n o t y p e
Naïve:
Tcm:
Tem:
Temra:
CD45RA+/CCR7+
CD45RA-/CCR7+
CD45RA-/CCR7CD45RA+/CCR7-
18
Development of a CAR-T Cell Closed Production Process
Current NCI Process
•
•
Manual Ficoll Separation
of PMBC
•
•
Stim in T175 Flask (open)
AIM V + 5% Hu serum
supplemented with anti-CD3 Ab
and rIL2
Wash cells after Stim (open)
Days
Transduction in 6 - well plates
by Spinoculation (open
process)
•
•
•
•
•
Expansion in T-175 flasks
(open process)
7 day expansion
Cell concentration and wash
(open process)
Administer fresh cells
Improved Process
Apheresis product
Enrich for lymphocytes
•
•
FicollSeparation of PBMC by
Sepax 2 (closed process)
Stim in Culture bags (closed)
Serum-free medium with anti-CD3
Ab and rIL-2
Wash cells after Stim
(Sepax 2, closed process)
T Cell
Days
0-2
Activation
0-2
•
Days
Retroviral
Days
•
2-3
Transduction
2-3
Transduction in Culture bags
(closed process)
•
Expansion in bags (closed
process) without antibiotics
3 day expansion
Days
3-10
T Cell
Expansion
Days
3-6
•
•
Harvest
Cell concentration and wash
(closed process)
Cryopreserve product
19
Efficacy of CD19 CAR-T Cells in CLL
Before treatment
3 months after treatment
CD19
CD19
CD20
CD20
20
Kochenderfer et al. Blood 2012
CD19 CAR-T cells can Mediate Tumor regression
21
CD19 CAR-T Cells Eliminate normal B cells and Show
Minimal Persistence in Vivo
22
CAR-T Cell Production Process for Solid Cancers
REP:
6000 IU/ml IL-2
200:1 irradiated feeder cells
OKT3
Gene
Modification
23
CAR-T Program for the Treatment of Solid Cancers
Receptor
Generation
Cancers
Status
ERBB2 (Her2/neu)
3rd
All Her2+ Cancers
Closed
VEGFR2
3rd
All cancers
Closed
EGFRvIII
3rd
Glioblastoma
Accruing
Mesothelin
2nd
Pancreatic/Mesothelioma/Ovarian
Accruing
Receptor
Patients
Treated
Cells Infused
ORR
ERBB2 (Her2/neu)
1
1e10
0/1
VEGFR2
23
1e6 – 3e10
1/23 (4%)
EGFRvIII
16
1e7 – 3e10
0/16
Mesothelin
14
1e6 – 1e8
0/13
PR (2 months)
(Pt. 14, too early)
24
Summary
• CD19 CAR-T cell therapy effectively treats a variety of B cell malignancies
• We have developed a closed cell production process sufficient for current
CD19 CAR-T cell demands
–
–
–
–
Closed system
Serum-free
6 days
Cryopreserved cell product
• Currently no effective CAR-T therapies for the treatment of solid cancers
• Considerations
–
–
–
–
–
–
How to handle increased cell numbers
Increase transduction efficiency
RCR testing beyond 6 days
Direct detection of CD19 CAR+ T cells (other CARs ???)
Patient variability
How to extend CAR T therapies to solid cancers
25