Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Adoptive Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer: The CAR-T Cell Experience Steven A. Feldman, Ph.D. Surgery Branch, NCI MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES FOR CAR-T BIOMANUFACTURING January 29, 2016 1 Disclosures No financial disclosures This work is supported, in part, through a CRADA with KITE Pharma 2 Outline • • • • Background CD19 CAR-T process development CD19 CAR-T clinical experience CAR-T therapy for solid cancers 3 Three Main Approaches to Cancer Immunotherapy 1. Non-specific stimulation of immune reactions • Stimulate effector cells (IL-2, IL-12) • Inhibit regulatory factors (PD-1, CTLA-4) 2. Active immunizations to enhance anti-tumor reactions • Cancer vaccines 3. Passively transfer activated immune cells with anti-tumor activity • Adoptive cell transfer 4 Gene Therapy Approach for Adoptive Cell Transfer Tumor-specific TCR/CAR Clinical retroviral vector Morgan RA, et al. Science 2006; 314(5796): 68-9. 5 Advantages of Cell Transfer Therapy Using Genetically Engineered Cells 1. High avidity anti-tumor T cell receptors (TCR) and/or chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) can be identified and cloned using in vitro assays. 2. Peripheral blood lymphocytes can be genetically modified to express these high avidity TCRs/CARs. 3. Large numbers of tumor-specific lymphocytes can be grown in vitro. 4. The host can be manipulated to provide a favorable tumor microenvironment prior to administering the cells. 5. ACT can mediate tumor regressions. 6 A Critical Challenge Confronting the Development of Human Cancer Immunotherapy is the Identification of Antigens to Target 1. Differentiation antigens overexpressed on cancers compared to normal tissue (MART-1, gp100, CEA, Her-2, Mesothelin) 2. Antigens expressed on cancers and on non-essential normal tissues (CD19, thyroglobulin) 3. Shared antigens unique to cancer (cancer-testes antigens, NY-ESO-1, MAGE-A) 4. Critical components of the tumor stroma (VEGFR2, FAP) 5. Mutations unique to each cancer (EGFRvIII) 7 Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CARs) Step 2 Step 1 Step 3 Ig scFv Linker/TM T cell signaling Antibody Producing Hybridoma Ig Genes Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) sd Step 5 Step 4 sa LTR CD28 Anti-tumor Ag-scFv CD3 zeta LTR Transduce PBL sd LTR sa Anti-tumor Ag-scFv CD8 CD28 4-1BB CD3 zeta LTR 8 CAR-T Program for the Treatment of CD19+ Hematologic Malignancies • More than 20,000 people die of B-cell malignancies annually in the U.S. • CD19 is expressed by more than 90% of B-cell malignancies. • CD19 is expressed by mature B cells, B-cell precursors and plasma cells but not any other normal tissues. • B cells are considered a “non-essential” tissue. Anti-CD19 CAR 5’ LTR FMC63 scFv CD28 CD3-zeta 3’ LTR 9 A Rapid Cell Expansion Process for the Production of CD19 CAR-T Cells Process Development Objectives: • Develop a closed process • Production time of 6 days • Cryopreserved cell product • GMP-compliant Stimulation Approx 1E9 Cell # Days 0 <1E9 1 Transduction 2E8 2E8 2 3 Expansion 2.5E8 5E8 4 5 1E9 6 10 Development of a CAR-T Cell Closed Production Process Current NCI Process • • Manual Ficoll Separation of PMBC • • Stim in T175 Flask (open) AIM V + 5% Hu serum supplemented with anti-CD3 Ab and rIL2 Wash cells after Stim (open) Days Transduction in 6 - well plates by Spinoculation (open process) • • • • • Expansion in T-175 flasks (open process) 7 day expansion Cell concentration and wash (open process) Administer fresh cells Improved Process Apheresis product Enrich for lymphocytes • • Ficoll Separation of PBMC by Sepax 2 (closed process) Stim in Culture bags (closed) Serum-free medium with anti-CD3 Ab and rIL-2 Wash cells after Stim (Sepax 2, closed process) T Cell Days 0-2 Activation 0-2 • Days Retroviral Days • 2-3 Transduction 2-3 Transduction in Culture bags (closed process) • Expansion in bags (closed process) without antibiotics 3 day expansion Days 3-10 T Cell Expansion Days 3-6 • • Harvest Cell concentration and wash (closed process) Cryopreserve product 11 Optimization Parameters Process Steps: • Cell culture medium • Serum replacement • Bag comparison • Cell density at OKT3 stimulation • Post-stimulation wash • Transduction Retronectin concentration Vector dilution 1 vs 2 transductions Bag flip Cell density Analytical Assays: • FACS – CAR+ cells – Phenotype • Co-culture • ELISA • qPCR – Copy number – Persistence • Sepax Apheresis OKT3 wash Final product wash • Cryopreservation 12 Sepax 2 can Efficiently Process Apheresis Products Sepax Technologies, Inc. 13 Optimizer-TCSR Medium can Support T Cell Growth Cell Number 1.5×108 OpTmizer CTS 1.0×108 AIM V medium X-VIVO 20 Medium 5.0×107 TexMACS GMP medium AIM V 5% 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 1 .5 1 0 8 1 .0 1 0 8 5 .0 1 0 7 p = 0 .7 7 8 1 iz e IM r V C T 5 S % 0 O p T m A C e ll N u m b e r Day 14 Optimization of Cell Concentration During Transduction 6 well (9.5 cm2): • 2e6 cell/well • 10 ng/ml RN • 4ml (1:1 vector) • 0.5e6 cell/ml • 1e5 cell/cm2 PL240 (540 cm2): 2e8 cell/bag 10 ng/ml RN 400ml (1:1 vector) 0.5e6 cell/ml 3.7e5 cell/cm2 100 % T r a n s d u c t io n 80 60 40 20 c u h s d 8 t ra n a p T li 2 n d F g 0 .5 e 6 /m l B a o ti u o 6 e .5 0 .2 0 n U n rs l /m /m 6 e 5 e .1 0 tr a n s d u 6 c e /m d l l 0 15 6 Day Closed Production Process – Engineering Runs • 5 engineering runs at scale and compared to standard open process • Evaluated • • • • Transduction efficiency Function (IFNg secretion) Cell expansion Phenotype 16 A Comparison of the Standard Open and 6 Day Closed Production Process 50000 Bag PL240 Bag P la te 40000 IF N g ( p g /m L ) *** 80 60 40 30000 20000 10000 20 M -N C E R F G L A 2 6 5 K * * * p < 0 .0 0 1 M o d T o le o C e ll P r o d u c t io n P r o c e s s N P la t e e B ag n UT 6 0 0 N % T r a n s d u c t io n 100 C e ll L in e 17 A Comparison of the Standard Open and 6 Day Closed Production Process Bag P la te 80 60 40 20 ra m T e T e m m c T a iv e 0 N P e r c e n t a g e o f T o t a l C e lls 100 C e ll P h e n o t y p e Naïve: Tcm: Tem: Temra: CD45RA+/CCR7+ CD45RA-/CCR7+ CD45RA-/CCR7CD45RA+/CCR7- 18 Development of a CAR-T Cell Closed Production Process Current NCI Process • • Manual Ficoll Separation of PMBC • • Stim in T175 Flask (open) AIM V + 5% Hu serum supplemented with anti-CD3 Ab and rIL2 Wash cells after Stim (open) Days Transduction in 6 - well plates by Spinoculation (open process) • • • • • Expansion in T-175 flasks (open process) 7 day expansion Cell concentration and wash (open process) Administer fresh cells Improved Process Apheresis product Enrich for lymphocytes • • FicollSeparation of PBMC by Sepax 2 (closed process) Stim in Culture bags (closed) Serum-free medium with anti-CD3 Ab and rIL-2 Wash cells after Stim (Sepax 2, closed process) T Cell Days 0-2 Activation 0-2 • Days Retroviral Days • 2-3 Transduction 2-3 Transduction in Culture bags (closed process) • Expansion in bags (closed process) without antibiotics 3 day expansion Days 3-10 T Cell Expansion Days 3-6 • • Harvest Cell concentration and wash (closed process) Cryopreserve product 19 Efficacy of CD19 CAR-T Cells in CLL Before treatment 3 months after treatment CD19 CD19 CD20 CD20 20 Kochenderfer et al. Blood 2012 CD19 CAR-T cells can Mediate Tumor regression 21 CD19 CAR-T Cells Eliminate normal B cells and Show Minimal Persistence in Vivo 22 CAR-T Cell Production Process for Solid Cancers REP: 6000 IU/ml IL-2 200:1 irradiated feeder cells OKT3 Gene Modification 23 CAR-T Program for the Treatment of Solid Cancers Receptor Generation Cancers Status ERBB2 (Her2/neu) 3rd All Her2+ Cancers Closed VEGFR2 3rd All cancers Closed EGFRvIII 3rd Glioblastoma Accruing Mesothelin 2nd Pancreatic/Mesothelioma/Ovarian Accruing Receptor Patients Treated Cells Infused ORR ERBB2 (Her2/neu) 1 1e10 0/1 VEGFR2 23 1e6 – 3e10 1/23 (4%) EGFRvIII 16 1e7 – 3e10 0/16 Mesothelin 14 1e6 – 1e8 0/13 PR (2 months) (Pt. 14, too early) 24 Summary • CD19 CAR-T cell therapy effectively treats a variety of B cell malignancies • We have developed a closed cell production process sufficient for current CD19 CAR-T cell demands – – – – Closed system Serum-free 6 days Cryopreserved cell product • Currently no effective CAR-T therapies for the treatment of solid cancers • Considerations – – – – – – How to handle increased cell numbers Increase transduction efficiency RCR testing beyond 6 days Direct detection of CD19 CAR+ T cells (other CARs ???) Patient variability How to extend CAR T therapies to solid cancers 25